×




Go Red For Women: Raising Heart Health Awareness Net Present Value (NPV) / MBA Resources

Introduction to Net Present Value (NPV) - What is Net Present Value (NPV) ? How it impacts financial decisions regarding project management?

NPV solution for Go Red For Women: Raising Heart Health Awareness case study


At Oak Spring University, we provide corporate level professional Net Present Value (NPV) case study solution. Go Red For Women: Raising Heart Health Awareness case study is a Harvard Business School (HBR) case study written by V. Kasturi Rangan. The Go Red For Women: Raising Heart Health Awareness (referred as “Aha Red” from here on) case study provides evaluation & decision scenario in field of Sales & Marketing. It also touches upon business topics such as - Value proposition, Managing organizations, Marketing, Social enterprise.

The net present value (NPV) of an investment proposal is the present value of the proposal’s net cash flows less the proposal’s initial cash outflow. If a project’s NPV is greater than or equal to zero, the project should be accepted.

NPV = Present Value of Future Cash Flows LESS Project’s Initial Investment






Case Description of Go Red For Women: Raising Heart Health Awareness Case Study


To maximize their effectiveness, color cases should be printed in color.In 2003, the $654 million American Heart Association (AHA) approached Cone, Inc. (a brand and communications agency) to develop a corporate sponsorship strategy that would raise $75 million over three years. Within 12 months, the AHA launched the highly successful Go Red For Women campaign to help women understand their risk for heart disease. But Go Red became more than a fundraising vehicle. It energized the AHA and its 22 million volunteers, and potentially sparked a long-term movement focused on women and their prevention of heart disease. Traces the development of the relationship between Cone and the AHA and the development of the Go Red For Women campaign. Challenges students to assess the success of Go Red and its impact on the AHA and its goals. Concludes by summarizing three of the AHA's other health initiatives and questions the appropriate role for the AHA and cause marketing.


Case Authors : V. Kasturi Rangan

Topic : Sales & Marketing

Related Areas : Managing organizations, Marketing, Social enterprise




Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 6% for Go Red For Women: Raising Heart Health Awareness Case Study


Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 6 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10013109) -10013109 - -
Year 1 3444312 -6568797 3444312 0.9434 3249351
Year 2 3974753 -2594044 7419065 0.89 3537516
Year 3 3943153 1349109 11362218 0.8396 3310747
Year 4 3238222 4587331 14600440 0.7921 2564975
TOTAL 14600440 12662589




The Net Present Value at 6% discount rate is 2649480

In isolation the NPV number doesn't mean much but put in right context then it is one of the best method to evaluate project returns. In this article we will cover -

Different methods of capital budgeting


What is NPV & Formula of NPV,
How it is calculated,
How to use NPV number for project evaluation, and
Scenario Planning given risks and management priorities.




Capital Budgeting Approaches

Methods of Capital Budgeting


There are four types of capital budgeting techniques that are widely used in the corporate world –

1. Net Present Value
2. Profitability Index
3. Payback Period
4. Internal Rate of Return

Apart from the Payback period method which is an additive method, rest of the methods are based on Discounted Cash Flow technique. Even though cash flow can be calculated based on the nature of the project, for the simplicity of the article we are assuming that all the expected cash flows are realized at the end of the year.

Discounted Cash Flow approaches provide a more objective basis for evaluating and selecting investment projects. They take into consideration both –

1. Magnitude of both incoming and outgoing cash flows – Projects can be capital intensive, time intensive, or both. Aha Red shareholders have preference for diversified projects investment rather than prospective high income from a single capital intensive project.
2. Timing of the expected cash flows – stockholders of Aha Red have higher preference for cash returns over 4-5 years rather than 10-15 years given the nature of the volatility in the industry.






Formula and Steps to Calculate Net Present Value (NPV) of Go Red For Women: Raising Heart Health Awareness

NPV = Net Cash In Flowt1 / (1+r)t1 + Net Cash In Flowt2 / (1+r)t2 + … Net Cash In Flowtn / (1+r)tn
Less Net Cash Out Flowt0 / (1+r)t0

Where t = time period, in this case year 1, year 2 and so on.
r = discount rate or return that could be earned using other safe proposition such as fixed deposit or treasury bond rate. Net Cash In Flow – What the firm will get each year.
Net Cash Out Flow – What the firm needs to invest initially in the project.

Step 1 – Understand the nature of the project and calculate cash flow for each year.
Step 2 – Discount those cash flow based on the discount rate.
Step 3 – Add all the discounted cash flow.
Step 4 – Selection of the project

Why Sales & Marketing Managers need to know Financial Tools such as Net Present Value (NPV)?

In our daily workplace we often come across people and colleagues who are just focused on their core competency and targets they have to deliver. For example marketing managers at Aha Red often design programs whose objective is to drive brand awareness and customer reach. But how that 30 point increase in brand awareness or 10 point increase in customer touch points will result into shareholders’ value is not specified.

To overcome such scenarios managers at Aha Red needs to not only know the financial aspect of project management but also needs to have tools to integrate them into part of the project development and monitoring plan.

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 15%

After working through various assumptions we reached a conclusion that risk is far higher than 6%. In a reasonably stable industry with weak competition - 15% discount rate can be a good benchmark.



Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 15 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10013109) -10013109 - -
Year 1 3444312 -6568797 3444312 0.8696 2995054
Year 2 3974753 -2594044 7419065 0.7561 3005484
Year 3 3943153 1349109 11362218 0.6575 2592687
Year 4 3238222 4587331 14600440 0.5718 1851464
TOTAL 10444689


The Net NPV after 4 years is 431580

(10444689 - 10013109 )








Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 20%


If the risk component is high in the industry then we should go for a higher hurdle rate / discount rate of 20%.

Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 20 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10013109) -10013109 - -
Year 1 3444312 -6568797 3444312 0.8333 2870260
Year 2 3974753 -2594044 7419065 0.6944 2760245
Year 3 3943153 1349109 11362218 0.5787 2281917
Year 4 3238222 4587331 14600440 0.4823 1561643
TOTAL 9474065


The Net NPV after 4 years is -539044

At 20% discount rate the NPV is negative (9474065 - 10013109 ) so ideally we can't select the project if macro and micro factors don't allow financial managers of Aha Red to discount cash flow at lower discount rates such as 15%.





Acceptance Criteria of a Project based on NPV

Simplest Approach – If the investment project of Aha Red has a NPV value higher than Zero then finance managers at Aha Red can ACCEPT the project, otherwise they can reject the project. This means that project will deliver higher returns over the period of time than any alternate investment strategy.

In theory if the required rate of return or discount rate is chosen correctly by finance managers at Aha Red, then the stock price of the Aha Red should change by same amount of the NPV. In real world we know that share price also reflects various other factors that can be related to both macro and micro environment.

In the same vein – accepting the project with zero NPV should result in stagnant share price. Finance managers use discount rates as a measure of risk components in the project execution process.

Sensitivity Analysis

Project selection is often a far more complex decision than just choosing it based on the NPV number. Finance managers at Aha Red should conduct a sensitivity analysis to better understand not only the inherent risk of the projects but also how those risks can be either factored in or mitigated during the project execution. Sensitivity analysis helps in –

What will be a multi year spillover effect of various taxation regulations.

What can impact the cash flow of the project.

What are the key aspects of the projects that need to be monitored, refined, and retuned for continuous delivery of projected cash flows.

What are the uncertainties surrounding the project Initial Cash Outlay (ICO’s). ICO’s often have several different components such as land, machinery, building, and other equipment.

Understanding of risks involved in the project.

Some of the assumptions while using the Discounted Cash Flow Methods –

Projects are assumed to be Mutually Exclusive – This is seldom the came in modern day giant organizations where projects are often inter-related and rejecting a project solely based on NPV can result in sunk cost from a related project.

Independent projects have independent cash flows – As explained in the marketing project – though the project may look independent but in reality it is not as the brand awareness project can be closely associated with the spending on sales promotions and product specific advertising.






Negotiation Strategy of Go Red For Women: Raising Heart Health Awareness

References & Further Readings

V. Kasturi Rangan (2018), "Go Red For Women: Raising Heart Health Awareness Harvard Business Review Case Study. Published by HBR Publications.


Beijing Sanyuan Foods SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer/Non-Cyclical , Food Processing


Santos Brasil Participacoes SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Transportation , Misc. Transportation


Takizawa Ham SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer/Non-Cyclical , Food Processing


Finatis SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Services , Retail (Grocery)


Malaysia Airport SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Transportation , Misc. Transportation


K N Kenanga SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Financial , Investment Services


Hornbeck SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Transportation , Water Transportation


Ratio L SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Energy , Oil & Gas - Integrated