SC Johnson and the Greenlist Backlash Net Present Value (NPV) / MBA Resources

Introduction to Net Present Value (NPV) - What is Net Present Value (NPV) ? How it impacts financial decisions regarding project management?

NPV solution for SC Johnson and the Greenlist Backlash case study

At Oak Spring University, we provide corporate level professional Net Present Value (NPV) case study solution. SC Johnson and the Greenlist Backlash case study is a Harvard Business School (HBR) case study written by Andrew Hoffman. The SC Johnson and the Greenlist Backlash (referred as “Greenlista Sc” from here on) case study provides evaluation & decision scenario in field of Sales & Marketing. It also touches upon business topics such as - Value proposition, Public relations, Social responsibility.

The net present value (NPV) of an investment proposal is the present value of the proposal’s net cash flows less the proposal’s initial cash outflow. If a project’s NPV is greater than or equal to zero, the project should be accepted.

NPV = Present Value of Future Cash Flows LESS Project’s Initial Investment

---

Case Description of SC Johnson and the Greenlist Backlash Case Study

This case centers on SC Johnson's CEO, H. Fisk Johnson, and his decision on how to move forward with Greenlista?? after the settlement of two lawsuits. SC Johnson developed the ingredient improvement process Greenlista?? to reduce the negative environmental impacts of its products by substituting less harmful ingredients wherever possible. Significant environmental improvements were made in many of the company's products, such as WindexA?, and the company developed a Greenlista?? label to demonstrate to consumers that a product had been improved by the process. In 2008 and 2009, two lawsuits were filed accusing SC Johnson of deceptively marketing its products as "green", as the Greenlista?? label led consumers to believe the products had been certified by an objective third party. The lawsuits were settled and the company was forced to remove the label. The case raises a discussion about green labeling, the nature of environmental certification, and the value of internal sustainability initiatives.

Case Authors : Andrew Hoffman

Topic : Sales & Marketing

Related Areas : Public relations, Social responsibility

---

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 6% for SC Johnson and the Greenlist Backlash Case Study

Years	Cash Flow	Net Cash Flow	Cumulative     Cash Flow	Discount Rate @ 6 %	Discounted Cash Flows
Year 0	(10029404)	-10029404	-	-
Year 1	3456933	-6572471	3456933	0.9434	3261258
Year 2	3954368	-2618103	7411301	0.89	3519373
Year 3	3971506	1353403	11382807	0.8396	3334553
Year 4	3243182	4596585	14625989	0.7921	2568904
TOTAL			14625989		12684088

The Net Present Value at 6% discount rate is 2654684

In isolation the NPV number doesn't mean much but put in right context then it is one of the best method to evaluate project returns. In this article we will cover -

Different methods of capital budgeting

What is NPV & Formula of NPV,
How it is calculated,
How to use NPV number for project evaluation, and
Scenario Planning given risks and management priorities.

---

Capital Budgeting Approaches

Methods of Capital Budgeting

There are four types of capital budgeting techniques that are widely used in the corporate world –

1. Internal Rate of Return
2. Profitability Index
3. Net Present Value
4. Payback Period

Apart from the Payback period method which is an additive method, rest of the methods are based on Discounted Cash Flow technique. Even though cash flow can be calculated based on the nature of the project, for the simplicity of the article we are assuming that all the expected cash flows are realized at the end of the year.

Discounted Cash Flow approaches provide a more objective basis for evaluating and selecting investment projects. They take into consideration both –

1. Magnitude of both incoming and outgoing cash flows – Projects can be capital intensive, time intensive, or both. Greenlista Sc shareholders have preference for diversified projects investment rather than prospective high income from a single capital intensive project.
2. Timing of the expected cash flows – stockholders of Greenlista Sc have higher preference for cash returns over 4-5 years rather than 10-15 years given the nature of the volatility in the industry.

---

Formula and Steps to Calculate Net Present Value (NPV) of SC Johnson and the Greenlist Backlash

NPV = Net Cash In Flowt1 / (1+r)t1 + Net Cash In Flowt2 / (1+r)t2 + … Net Cash In Flowtn / (1+r)tn
Less Net Cash Out Flowt0 / (1+r)t0

Where t = time period, in this case year 1, year 2 and so on.
r = discount rate or return that could be earned using other safe proposition such as fixed deposit or treasury bond rate. Net Cash In Flow – What the firm will get each year.
Net Cash Out Flow – What the firm needs to invest initially in the project.

Step 1 – Understand the nature of the project and calculate cash flow for each year.
Step 2 – Discount those cash flow based on the discount rate.
Step 3 – Add all the discounted cash flow.
Step 4 – Selection of the project

Why Sales & Marketing Managers need to know Financial Tools such as Net Present Value (NPV)?

In our daily workplace we often come across people and colleagues who are just focused on their core competency and targets they have to deliver. For example marketing managers at Greenlista Sc often design programs whose objective is to drive brand awareness and customer reach. But how that 30 point increase in brand awareness or 10 point increase in customer touch points will result into shareholders’ value is not specified.

To overcome such scenarios managers at Greenlista Sc needs to not only know the financial aspect of project management but also needs to have tools to integrate them into part of the project development and monitoring plan.

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 15%

After working through various assumptions we reached a conclusion that risk is far higher than 6%. In a reasonably stable industry with weak competition - 15% discount rate can be a good benchmark.

Years	Cash Flow	Net Cash Flow	Cumulative     Cash Flow	Discount Rate @ 15 %	Discounted Cash Flows
Year 0	(10029404)	-10029404	-	-
Year 1	3456933	-6572471	3456933	0.8696	3006029
Year 2	3954368	-2618103	7411301	0.7561	2990070
Year 3	3971506	1353403	11382807	0.6575	2611330
Year 4	3243182	4596585	14625989	0.5718	1854300
TOTAL					10461729

The Net NPV after 4 years is 432325

(10461729 - 10029404 )

---

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 20%

If the risk component is high in the industry then we should go for a higher hurdle rate / discount rate of 20%.

Years	Cash Flow	Net Cash Flow	Cumulative     Cash Flow	Discount Rate @ 20 %	Discounted Cash Flows
Year 0	(10029404)	-10029404	-	-
Year 1	3456933	-6572471	3456933	0.8333	2880778
Year 2	3954368	-2618103	7411301	0.6944	2746089
Year 3	3971506	1353403	11382807	0.5787	2298325
Year 4	3243182	4596585	14625989	0.4823	1564035
TOTAL					9489226

The Net NPV after 4 years is -540178

At 20% discount rate the NPV is negative (9489226 - 10029404 ) so ideally we can't select the project if macro and micro factors don't allow financial managers of Greenlista Sc to discount cash flow at lower discount rates such as 15%.

Acceptance Criteria of a Project based on NPV

Simplest Approach – If the investment project of Greenlista Sc has a NPV value higher than Zero then finance managers at Greenlista Sc can ACCEPT the project, otherwise they can reject the project. This means that project will deliver higher returns over the period of time than any alternate investment strategy.

In theory if the required rate of return or discount rate is chosen correctly by finance managers at Greenlista Sc, then the stock price of the Greenlista Sc should change by same amount of the NPV. In real world we know that share price also reflects various other factors that can be related to both macro and micro environment.

In the same vein – accepting the project with zero NPV should result in stagnant share price. Finance managers use discount rates as a measure of risk components in the project execution process.

Sensitivity Analysis

Project selection is often a far more complex decision than just choosing it based on the NPV number. Finance managers at Greenlista Sc should conduct a sensitivity analysis to better understand not only the inherent risk of the projects but also how those risks can be either factored in or mitigated during the project execution. Sensitivity analysis helps in –

What will be a multi year spillover effect of various taxation regulations.

What can impact the cash flow of the project.

What are the key aspects of the projects that need to be monitored, refined, and retuned for continuous delivery of projected cash flows.

What are the uncertainties surrounding the project Initial Cash Outlay (ICO’s). ICO’s often have several different components such as land, machinery, building, and other equipment.

Understanding of risks involved in the project.

Some of the assumptions while using the Discounted Cash Flow Methods –

Projects are assumed to be Mutually Exclusive – This is seldom the came in modern day giant organizations where projects are often inter-related and rejecting a project solely based on NPV can result in sunk cost from a related project.

Independent projects have independent cash flows – As explained in the marketing project – though the project may look independent but in reality it is not as the brand awareness project can be closely associated with the spending on sales promotions and product specific advertising.

---

Negotiation Strategy of SC Johnson and the Greenlist Backlash

References & Further Readings

Andrew Hoffman (2018), "SC Johnson and the Greenlist Backlash Harvard Business Review Case Study. Published by HBR Publications.