×




La Fageda Net Present Value (NPV) / MBA Resources

Introduction to Net Present Value (NPV) - What is Net Present Value (NPV) ? How it impacts financial decisions regarding project management?

NPV solution for La Fageda case study


At Oak Spring University, we provide corporate level professional Net Present Value (NPV) case study solution. La Fageda case study is a Harvard Business School (HBR) case study written by Ramon Casadesus-Masanell, Joan Enric Ricart Costa, Jordan Mitchell. The La Fageda (referred as “Fageda La” from here on) case study provides evaluation & decision scenario in field of Strategy & Execution. It also touches upon business topics such as - Value proposition, Marketing, Social enterprise, Sustainability.

The net present value (NPV) of an investment proposal is the present value of the proposal’s net cash flows less the proposal’s initial cash outflow. If a project’s NPV is greater than or equal to zero, the project should be accepted.

NPV = Present Value of Future Cash Flows LESS Project’s Initial Investment






Case Description of La Fageda Case Study


La Fageda is a manufacturer of high-quality, naturally-made yogurts in northern Catalonia, Spain. La Fageda is substantially different from its main competitors such as multinational Danone in that it is a 270-person workers' cooperative with 60 percent of its membership made up of mentally disabled individuals. Since its establishment in 1982, the organization has aimed to integrate the mentally disabled by providing meaningful jobs and dignified salaries. As of March 2010, La Fageda has opened up a new production facility to make ice cream in an urban area outside of its well-known agricultural farm. Students are faced with understanding La Fageda's business model and how it competes against multinationals.


Case Authors : Ramon Casadesus-Masanell, Joan Enric Ricart Costa, Jordan Mitchell

Topic : Strategy & Execution

Related Areas : Marketing, Social enterprise, Sustainability




Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 6% for La Fageda Case Study


Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 6 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10005332) -10005332 - -
Year 1 3448100 -6557232 3448100 0.9434 3252925
Year 2 3973770 -2583462 7421870 0.89 3536641
Year 3 3967708 1384246 11389578 0.8396 3331364
Year 4 3248399 4632645 14637977 0.7921 2573036
TOTAL 14637977 12693966




The Net Present Value at 6% discount rate is 2688634

In isolation the NPV number doesn't mean much but put in right context then it is one of the best method to evaluate project returns. In this article we will cover -

Different methods of capital budgeting


What is NPV & Formula of NPV,
How it is calculated,
How to use NPV number for project evaluation, and
Scenario Planning given risks and management priorities.




Capital Budgeting Approaches

Methods of Capital Budgeting


There are four types of capital budgeting techniques that are widely used in the corporate world –

1. Net Present Value
2. Internal Rate of Return
3. Profitability Index
4. Payback Period

Apart from the Payback period method which is an additive method, rest of the methods are based on Discounted Cash Flow technique. Even though cash flow can be calculated based on the nature of the project, for the simplicity of the article we are assuming that all the expected cash flows are realized at the end of the year.

Discounted Cash Flow approaches provide a more objective basis for evaluating and selecting investment projects. They take into consideration both –

1. Magnitude of both incoming and outgoing cash flows – Projects can be capital intensive, time intensive, or both. Fageda La shareholders have preference for diversified projects investment rather than prospective high income from a single capital intensive project.
2. Timing of the expected cash flows – stockholders of Fageda La have higher preference for cash returns over 4-5 years rather than 10-15 years given the nature of the volatility in the industry.






Formula and Steps to Calculate Net Present Value (NPV) of La Fageda

NPV = Net Cash In Flowt1 / (1+r)t1 + Net Cash In Flowt2 / (1+r)t2 + … Net Cash In Flowtn / (1+r)tn
Less Net Cash Out Flowt0 / (1+r)t0

Where t = time period, in this case year 1, year 2 and so on.
r = discount rate or return that could be earned using other safe proposition such as fixed deposit or treasury bond rate. Net Cash In Flow – What the firm will get each year.
Net Cash Out Flow – What the firm needs to invest initially in the project.

Step 1 – Understand the nature of the project and calculate cash flow for each year.
Step 2 – Discount those cash flow based on the discount rate.
Step 3 – Add all the discounted cash flow.
Step 4 – Selection of the project

Why Strategy & Execution Managers need to know Financial Tools such as Net Present Value (NPV)?

In our daily workplace we often come across people and colleagues who are just focused on their core competency and targets they have to deliver. For example marketing managers at Fageda La often design programs whose objective is to drive brand awareness and customer reach. But how that 30 point increase in brand awareness or 10 point increase in customer touch points will result into shareholders’ value is not specified.

To overcome such scenarios managers at Fageda La needs to not only know the financial aspect of project management but also needs to have tools to integrate them into part of the project development and monitoring plan.

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 15%

After working through various assumptions we reached a conclusion that risk is far higher than 6%. In a reasonably stable industry with weak competition - 15% discount rate can be a good benchmark.



Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 15 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10005332) -10005332 - -
Year 1 3448100 -6557232 3448100 0.8696 2998348
Year 2 3973770 -2583462 7421870 0.7561 3004741
Year 3 3967708 1384246 11389578 0.6575 2608832
Year 4 3248399 4632645 14637977 0.5718 1857283
TOTAL 10469204


The Net NPV after 4 years is 463872

(10469204 - 10005332 )








Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 20%


If the risk component is high in the industry then we should go for a higher hurdle rate / discount rate of 20%.

Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 20 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10005332) -10005332 - -
Year 1 3448100 -6557232 3448100 0.8333 2873417
Year 2 3973770 -2583462 7421870 0.6944 2759563
Year 3 3967708 1384246 11389578 0.5787 2296127
Year 4 3248399 4632645 14637977 0.4823 1566550
TOTAL 9495657


The Net NPV after 4 years is -509675

At 20% discount rate the NPV is negative (9495657 - 10005332 ) so ideally we can't select the project if macro and micro factors don't allow financial managers of Fageda La to discount cash flow at lower discount rates such as 15%.





Acceptance Criteria of a Project based on NPV

Simplest Approach – If the investment project of Fageda La has a NPV value higher than Zero then finance managers at Fageda La can ACCEPT the project, otherwise they can reject the project. This means that project will deliver higher returns over the period of time than any alternate investment strategy.

In theory if the required rate of return or discount rate is chosen correctly by finance managers at Fageda La, then the stock price of the Fageda La should change by same amount of the NPV. In real world we know that share price also reflects various other factors that can be related to both macro and micro environment.

In the same vein – accepting the project with zero NPV should result in stagnant share price. Finance managers use discount rates as a measure of risk components in the project execution process.

Sensitivity Analysis

Project selection is often a far more complex decision than just choosing it based on the NPV number. Finance managers at Fageda La should conduct a sensitivity analysis to better understand not only the inherent risk of the projects but also how those risks can be either factored in or mitigated during the project execution. Sensitivity analysis helps in –

Understanding of risks involved in the project.

What are the key aspects of the projects that need to be monitored, refined, and retuned for continuous delivery of projected cash flows.

What can impact the cash flow of the project.

What will be a multi year spillover effect of various taxation regulations.

What are the uncertainties surrounding the project Initial Cash Outlay (ICO’s). ICO’s often have several different components such as land, machinery, building, and other equipment.

Some of the assumptions while using the Discounted Cash Flow Methods –

Projects are assumed to be Mutually Exclusive – This is seldom the came in modern day giant organizations where projects are often inter-related and rejecting a project solely based on NPV can result in sunk cost from a related project.

Independent projects have independent cash flows – As explained in the marketing project – though the project may look independent but in reality it is not as the brand awareness project can be closely associated with the spending on sales promotions and product specific advertising.






Negotiation Strategy of La Fageda

References & Further Readings

Ramon Casadesus-Masanell, Joan Enric Ricart Costa, Jordan Mitchell (2018), "La Fageda Harvard Business Review Case Study. Published by HBR Publications.


Meiji Holdings SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer/Non-Cyclical , Food Processing


Liberty Media Braves C SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Services , Broadcasting & Cable TV


Linkgenesis SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Software & Programming


World Financial Split SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Financial , Misc. Financial Services


GuangZhou Baiyun Electric SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Electronic Instr. & Controls


FSA Group SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Financial , Consumer Financial Services


Barclays SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Financial , Regional Banks


Daihatsu Diesel Mfg SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Capital Goods , Misc. Capital Goods


Toami SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Capital Goods , Constr. - Supplies & Fixtures


Japara Healthcare SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Healthcare , Healthcare Facilities


A&A Material Corp SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Capital Goods , Constr. - Supplies & Fixtures