Ginzel et al vs. Kolcraft Enterprises et al (A), Portuguese Version Net Present Value (NPV) / MBA Resources

Introduction to Net Present Value (NPV) - What is Net Present Value (NPV) ? How it impacts financial decisions regarding project management?

NPV solution for Ginzel et al vs. Kolcraft Enterprises et al (A), Portuguese Version case study

At Oak Spring University, we provide corporate level professional Net Present Value (NPV) case study solution. Ginzel et al vs. Kolcraft Enterprises et al (A), Portuguese Version case study is a Harvard Business School (HBR) case study written by Michael A. Wheeler. The Ginzel et al vs. Kolcraft Enterprises et al (A), Portuguese Version (referred as “Kolcraft Wrongful” from here on) case study provides evaluation & decision scenario in field of Strategy & Execution. It also touches upon business topics such as - Value proposition, Crisis management, Negotiations, Product development, Regulation, Social responsibility.

The net present value (NPV) of an investment proposal is the present value of the proposal’s net cash flows less the proposal’s initial cash outflow. If a project’s NPV is greater than or equal to zero, the project should be accepted.

NPV = Present Value of Future Cash Flows LESS Project’s Initial Investment

---

Case Description of Ginzel et al vs. Kolcraft Enterprises et al (A), Portuguese Version Case Study

Examines the wrongful death lawsuit brought by the family of an infant who died after a portable crib collapsed. The manufacturer, Kolcraft, licensed the Playskool brand name from the co-defendant, Hasbro Industries. Raises difficult questions about what the two companies should do now, after a series of tragic deaths--and after apparently complying with regulatory requirements governing product recall. Also raises provocative questions about the appropriateness of settlements in wrongful-death suits, corporate responsibility to ensure product safety, and pressures of national media attention on corporate actions. Though the circumstances here are particularly heart-breaking, managers often have to deal with lawsuits that are value-laden and have high emotional content, such as employment discrimination or sexual harassment claims, for example, or environmental and regulatory disputes. The kinds of decisions and tensions that a manager faces in such instances surely have much in common with the issues raised.

Case Authors : Michael A. Wheeler

Topic : Strategy & Execution

Related Areas : Crisis management, Negotiations, Product development, Regulation, Social responsibility

---

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 6% for Ginzel et al vs. Kolcraft Enterprises et al (A), Portuguese Version Case Study

Years	Cash Flow	Net Cash Flow	Cumulative     Cash Flow	Discount Rate @ 6 %	Discounted Cash Flows
Year 0	(10024527)	-10024527	-	-
Year 1	3444727	-6579800	3444727	0.9434	3249742
Year 2	3982906	-2596894	7427633	0.89	3544772
Year 3	3945450	1348556	11373083	0.8396	3312676
Year 4	3238587	4587143	14611670	0.7921	2565264
TOTAL			14611670		12672455

The Net Present Value at 6% discount rate is 2647928

In isolation the NPV number doesn't mean much but put in right context then it is one of the best method to evaluate project returns. In this article we will cover -

Different methods of capital budgeting

What is NPV & Formula of NPV,
How it is calculated,
How to use NPV number for project evaluation, and
Scenario Planning given risks and management priorities.

---

Capital Budgeting Approaches

Methods of Capital Budgeting

There are four types of capital budgeting techniques that are widely used in the corporate world –

1. Payback Period
2. Net Present Value
3. Profitability Index
4. Internal Rate of Return

Apart from the Payback period method which is an additive method, rest of the methods are based on Discounted Cash Flow technique. Even though cash flow can be calculated based on the nature of the project, for the simplicity of the article we are assuming that all the expected cash flows are realized at the end of the year.

Discounted Cash Flow approaches provide a more objective basis for evaluating and selecting investment projects. They take into consideration both –

1. Timing of the expected cash flows – stockholders of Kolcraft Wrongful have higher preference for cash returns over 4-5 years rather than 10-15 years given the nature of the volatility in the industry.
2. Magnitude of both incoming and outgoing cash flows – Projects can be capital intensive, time intensive, or both. Kolcraft Wrongful shareholders have preference for diversified projects investment rather than prospective high income from a single capital intensive project.

---

Formula and Steps to Calculate Net Present Value (NPV) of Ginzel et al vs. Kolcraft Enterprises et al (A), Portuguese Version

NPV = Net Cash In Flowt1 / (1+r)t1 + Net Cash In Flowt2 / (1+r)t2 + … Net Cash In Flowtn / (1+r)tn
Less Net Cash Out Flowt0 / (1+r)t0

Where t = time period, in this case year 1, year 2 and so on.
r = discount rate or return that could be earned using other safe proposition such as fixed deposit or treasury bond rate. Net Cash In Flow – What the firm will get each year.
Net Cash Out Flow – What the firm needs to invest initially in the project.

Step 1 – Understand the nature of the project and calculate cash flow for each year.
Step 2 – Discount those cash flow based on the discount rate.
Step 3 – Add all the discounted cash flow.
Step 4 – Selection of the project

Why Strategy & Execution Managers need to know Financial Tools such as Net Present Value (NPV)?

In our daily workplace we often come across people and colleagues who are just focused on their core competency and targets they have to deliver. For example marketing managers at Kolcraft Wrongful often design programs whose objective is to drive brand awareness and customer reach. But how that 30 point increase in brand awareness or 10 point increase in customer touch points will result into shareholders’ value is not specified.

To overcome such scenarios managers at Kolcraft Wrongful needs to not only know the financial aspect of project management but also needs to have tools to integrate them into part of the project development and monitoring plan.

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 15%

After working through various assumptions we reached a conclusion that risk is far higher than 6%. In a reasonably stable industry with weak competition - 15% discount rate can be a good benchmark.

Years	Cash Flow	Net Cash Flow	Cumulative     Cash Flow	Discount Rate @ 15 %	Discounted Cash Flows
Year 0	(10024527)	-10024527	-	-
Year 1	3444727	-6579800	3444727	0.8696	2995415
Year 2	3982906	-2596894	7427633	0.7561	3011649
Year 3	3945450	1348556	11373083	0.6575	2594197
Year 4	3238587	4587143	14611670	0.5718	1851673
TOTAL					10452934

The Net NPV after 4 years is 428407

(10452934 - 10024527 )

---

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 20%

If the risk component is high in the industry then we should go for a higher hurdle rate / discount rate of 20%.

Years	Cash Flow	Net Cash Flow	Cumulative     Cash Flow	Discount Rate @ 20 %	Discounted Cash Flows
Year 0	(10024527)	-10024527	-	-
Year 1	3444727	-6579800	3444727	0.8333	2870606
Year 2	3982906	-2596894	7427633	0.6944	2765907
Year 3	3945450	1348556	11373083	0.5787	2283247
Year 4	3238587	4587143	14611670	0.4823	1561819
TOTAL					9481578

The Net NPV after 4 years is -542949

At 20% discount rate the NPV is negative (9481578 - 10024527 ) so ideally we can't select the project if macro and micro factors don't allow financial managers of Kolcraft Wrongful to discount cash flow at lower discount rates such as 15%.

Acceptance Criteria of a Project based on NPV

Simplest Approach – If the investment project of Kolcraft Wrongful has a NPV value higher than Zero then finance managers at Kolcraft Wrongful can ACCEPT the project, otherwise they can reject the project. This means that project will deliver higher returns over the period of time than any alternate investment strategy.

In theory if the required rate of return or discount rate is chosen correctly by finance managers at Kolcraft Wrongful, then the stock price of the Kolcraft Wrongful should change by same amount of the NPV. In real world we know that share price also reflects various other factors that can be related to both macro and micro environment.

In the same vein – accepting the project with zero NPV should result in stagnant share price. Finance managers use discount rates as a measure of risk components in the project execution process.

Sensitivity Analysis

Project selection is often a far more complex decision than just choosing it based on the NPV number. Finance managers at Kolcraft Wrongful should conduct a sensitivity analysis to better understand not only the inherent risk of the projects but also how those risks can be either factored in or mitigated during the project execution. Sensitivity analysis helps in –

What will be a multi year spillover effect of various taxation regulations.

Understanding of risks involved in the project.

What are the key aspects of the projects that need to be monitored, refined, and retuned for continuous delivery of projected cash flows.

What are the uncertainties surrounding the project Initial Cash Outlay (ICO’s). ICO’s often have several different components such as land, machinery, building, and other equipment.

What can impact the cash flow of the project.

Some of the assumptions while using the Discounted Cash Flow Methods –

Projects are assumed to be Mutually Exclusive – This is seldom the came in modern day giant organizations where projects are often inter-related and rejecting a project solely based on NPV can result in sunk cost from a related project.

Independent projects have independent cash flows – As explained in the marketing project – though the project may look independent but in reality it is not as the brand awareness project can be closely associated with the spending on sales promotions and product specific advertising.

---

Negotiation Strategy of Ginzel et al vs. Kolcraft Enterprises et al (A), Portuguese Version

References & Further Readings

Michael A. Wheeler (2018), "Ginzel et al vs. Kolcraft Enterprises et al (A), Portuguese Version Harvard Business Review Case Study. Published by HBR Publications.