×




Jones Lang LaSalle (2012): Integrated Services and the Architecture of Complexity (D) Net Present Value (NPV) / MBA Resources

Introduction to Net Present Value (NPV) - What is Net Present Value (NPV) ? How it impacts financial decisions regarding project management?

NPV solution for Jones Lang LaSalle (2012): Integrated Services and the Architecture of Complexity (D) case study


At Oak Spring University, we provide corporate level professional Net Present Value (NPV) case study solution. Jones Lang LaSalle (2012): Integrated Services and the Architecture of Complexity (D) case study is a Harvard Business School (HBR) case study written by Ranjay Gulati, Luciana Silvestri. The Jones Lang LaSalle (2012): Integrated Services and the Architecture of Complexity (D) (referred as “Jll Brokers” from here on) case study provides evaluation & decision scenario in field of Strategy & Execution. It also touches upon business topics such as - Value proposition, Marketing, Mergers & acquisitions, Organizational structure, Strategy execution.

The net present value (NPV) of an investment proposal is the present value of the proposal’s net cash flows less the proposal’s initial cash outflow. If a project’s NPV is greater than or equal to zero, the project should be accepted.

NPV = Present Value of Future Cash Flows LESS Project’s Initial Investment






Case Description of Jones Lang LaSalle (2012): Integrated Services and the Architecture of Complexity (D) Case Study


This case describes the strategic and organizational challenges that Jones Lang LaSalle (JLL) faced between 2008 and 2012. In 2008, in order to strengthen the firm's brokerage team, JLL merged with The Staubach Company, a real estate services provider with a first-rate brokerage team and great cultural fit with JLL. Staubach paid its brokers with a commission model, which accelerated JLL's decision to let go of its long-standing salary and bonus approach. The merger also surfaced two interesting business opportunities. First, local brokers were now empowered and motivated to open up their client relationships to the rest of the company, growing their business from just local transactions to the full array of services JLL provided. Second, local brokers became aware of a great number of mid-sized clients whose real estate needs were not as sophisticated as those of large corporate accounts but who required multi-service solutions in selected geographies. JLL thus created a group called Markets Corporate Solutions, which specifically targeted mid-sized clients. Toward 2012, with its organizational structure expanding to tackle opportunities for multiple types of clients in a myriad of geographies, JLL was facing challenges associated with managing internal and external complexity. America's CEO Peter Roberts outlines the opportunities and challenges that lied ahead for JLL. This is the final case in a series that also comprises cases A, B, and C, and collectively covers JLL's evolution between the years 1999 and 2012.


Case Authors : Ranjay Gulati, Luciana Silvestri

Topic : Strategy & Execution

Related Areas : Marketing, Mergers & acquisitions, Organizational structure, Strategy execution




Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 6% for Jones Lang LaSalle (2012): Integrated Services and the Architecture of Complexity (D) Case Study


Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 6 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10010504) -10010504 - -
Year 1 3461557 -6548947 3461557 0.9434 3265620
Year 2 3963493 -2585454 7425050 0.89 3527495
Year 3 3943900 1358446 11368950 0.8396 3311374
Year 4 3233191 4591637 14602141 0.7921 2560990
TOTAL 14602141 12665479




The Net Present Value at 6% discount rate is 2654975

In isolation the NPV number doesn't mean much but put in right context then it is one of the best method to evaluate project returns. In this article we will cover -

Different methods of capital budgeting


What is NPV & Formula of NPV,
How it is calculated,
How to use NPV number for project evaluation, and
Scenario Planning given risks and management priorities.




Capital Budgeting Approaches

Methods of Capital Budgeting


There are four types of capital budgeting techniques that are widely used in the corporate world –

1. Profitability Index
2. Net Present Value
3. Payback Period
4. Internal Rate of Return

Apart from the Payback period method which is an additive method, rest of the methods are based on Discounted Cash Flow technique. Even though cash flow can be calculated based on the nature of the project, for the simplicity of the article we are assuming that all the expected cash flows are realized at the end of the year.

Discounted Cash Flow approaches provide a more objective basis for evaluating and selecting investment projects. They take into consideration both –

1. Magnitude of both incoming and outgoing cash flows – Projects can be capital intensive, time intensive, or both. Jll Brokers shareholders have preference for diversified projects investment rather than prospective high income from a single capital intensive project.
2. Timing of the expected cash flows – stockholders of Jll Brokers have higher preference for cash returns over 4-5 years rather than 10-15 years given the nature of the volatility in the industry.






Formula and Steps to Calculate Net Present Value (NPV) of Jones Lang LaSalle (2012): Integrated Services and the Architecture of Complexity (D)

NPV = Net Cash In Flowt1 / (1+r)t1 + Net Cash In Flowt2 / (1+r)t2 + … Net Cash In Flowtn / (1+r)tn
Less Net Cash Out Flowt0 / (1+r)t0

Where t = time period, in this case year 1, year 2 and so on.
r = discount rate or return that could be earned using other safe proposition such as fixed deposit or treasury bond rate. Net Cash In Flow – What the firm will get each year.
Net Cash Out Flow – What the firm needs to invest initially in the project.

Step 1 – Understand the nature of the project and calculate cash flow for each year.
Step 2 – Discount those cash flow based on the discount rate.
Step 3 – Add all the discounted cash flow.
Step 4 – Selection of the project

Why Strategy & Execution Managers need to know Financial Tools such as Net Present Value (NPV)?

In our daily workplace we often come across people and colleagues who are just focused on their core competency and targets they have to deliver. For example marketing managers at Jll Brokers often design programs whose objective is to drive brand awareness and customer reach. But how that 30 point increase in brand awareness or 10 point increase in customer touch points will result into shareholders’ value is not specified.

To overcome such scenarios managers at Jll Brokers needs to not only know the financial aspect of project management but also needs to have tools to integrate them into part of the project development and monitoring plan.

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 15%

After working through various assumptions we reached a conclusion that risk is far higher than 6%. In a reasonably stable industry with weak competition - 15% discount rate can be a good benchmark.



Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 15 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10010504) -10010504 - -
Year 1 3461557 -6548947 3461557 0.8696 3010050
Year 2 3963493 -2585454 7425050 0.7561 2996970
Year 3 3943900 1358446 11368950 0.6575 2593178
Year 4 3233191 4591637 14602141 0.5718 1848587
TOTAL 10448785


The Net NPV after 4 years is 438281

(10448785 - 10010504 )








Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 20%


If the risk component is high in the industry then we should go for a higher hurdle rate / discount rate of 20%.

Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 20 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10010504) -10010504 - -
Year 1 3461557 -6548947 3461557 0.8333 2884631
Year 2 3963493 -2585454 7425050 0.6944 2752426
Year 3 3943900 1358446 11368950 0.5787 2282350
Year 4 3233191 4591637 14602141 0.4823 1559216
TOTAL 9478622


The Net NPV after 4 years is -531882

At 20% discount rate the NPV is negative (9478622 - 10010504 ) so ideally we can't select the project if macro and micro factors don't allow financial managers of Jll Brokers to discount cash flow at lower discount rates such as 15%.





Acceptance Criteria of a Project based on NPV

Simplest Approach – If the investment project of Jll Brokers has a NPV value higher than Zero then finance managers at Jll Brokers can ACCEPT the project, otherwise they can reject the project. This means that project will deliver higher returns over the period of time than any alternate investment strategy.

In theory if the required rate of return or discount rate is chosen correctly by finance managers at Jll Brokers, then the stock price of the Jll Brokers should change by same amount of the NPV. In real world we know that share price also reflects various other factors that can be related to both macro and micro environment.

In the same vein – accepting the project with zero NPV should result in stagnant share price. Finance managers use discount rates as a measure of risk components in the project execution process.

Sensitivity Analysis

Project selection is often a far more complex decision than just choosing it based on the NPV number. Finance managers at Jll Brokers should conduct a sensitivity analysis to better understand not only the inherent risk of the projects but also how those risks can be either factored in or mitigated during the project execution. Sensitivity analysis helps in –

What are the uncertainties surrounding the project Initial Cash Outlay (ICO’s). ICO’s often have several different components such as land, machinery, building, and other equipment.

What can impact the cash flow of the project.

Understanding of risks involved in the project.

What will be a multi year spillover effect of various taxation regulations.

What are the key aspects of the projects that need to be monitored, refined, and retuned for continuous delivery of projected cash flows.

Some of the assumptions while using the Discounted Cash Flow Methods –

Projects are assumed to be Mutually Exclusive – This is seldom the came in modern day giant organizations where projects are often inter-related and rejecting a project solely based on NPV can result in sunk cost from a related project.

Independent projects have independent cash flows – As explained in the marketing project – though the project may look independent but in reality it is not as the brand awareness project can be closely associated with the spending on sales promotions and product specific advertising.






Negotiation Strategy of Jones Lang LaSalle (2012): Integrated Services and the Architecture of Complexity (D)

References & Further Readings

Ranjay Gulati, Luciana Silvestri (2018), "Jones Lang LaSalle (2012): Integrated Services and the Architecture of Complexity (D) Harvard Business Review Case Study. Published by HBR Publications.


Mistral Ventures Inc SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Financial , Misc. Financial Services


IOI Properties SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Capital Goods , Construction Services


Kudo SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Capital Goods , Construction Services


Magma Fincorp SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Financial , Consumer Financial Services


Bitauto SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Computer Services


Allergan SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Healthcare , Biotechnology & Drugs


Morguard Corporation SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Services , Real Estate Operations


Haitong Securities SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Financial , Investment Services


Zhongtai Chem A SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Basic Materials , Chemicals - Plastics & Rubber


Transurban Group SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Transportation , Misc. Transportation