×




Aligning Corporate Learning with Strategy Net Present Value (NPV) / MBA Resources

Introduction to Net Present Value (NPV) - What is Net Present Value (NPV) ? How it impacts financial decisions regarding project management?

NPV solution for Aligning Corporate Learning with Strategy case study


At Oak Spring University, we provide corporate level professional Net Present Value (NPV) case study solution. Aligning Corporate Learning with Strategy case study is a Harvard Business School (HBR) case study written by Shlomo Ben-Hur, Bernie Jaworski, David Gray. The Aligning Corporate Learning with Strategy (referred as “Learning Agenda” from here on) case study provides evaluation & decision scenario in field of Strategy & Execution. It also touches upon business topics such as - Value proposition, .

The net present value (NPV) of an investment proposal is the present value of the proposal’s net cash flows less the proposal’s initial cash outflow. If a project’s NPV is greater than or equal to zero, the project should be accepted.

NPV = Present Value of Future Cash Flows LESS Project’s Initial Investment






Case Description of Aligning Corporate Learning with Strategy Case Study


Surveys of CEOs point to a shortage of leadership and management talent as a leading concern. It's not that companies refrain from investing in developing their people: In 2012, companies in developed economies spent nearly $400 billion on training. But, as authors Shlomo Ben-Hur, Bernard Jaworski, and David Gray argue, much of the investment and effort that organizations spend on learning is focused on the wrong things. Instead of focusing on new modes of instruction and technology, they write, corporate learning executives need to emphasize aligning learning programs with business strategy.Although learning executives such as chief learning officers must shoulder the burden of developing the company's talent capabilities and supporting strategic priorities, the authors argue that CEOs and other top executives have a critical role to play. Personal engagement and leadership on the part of the CEO can make a big difference in setting the right tone for the organization. While companies often begin with training-needs assessments, the authors recommend starting by mapping what they call the "CEO agenda"to ensure that learning gets properly aligned with strategy. This connects learning and development with the company's specific needs and cuts through the noise of multiple initiatives vying for attention -highlighting the critical "must-win battles"that the CEO has identified. The next task is to operationalize the learning agenda through a portfolio of learning and development activities. This involves doing an inventory of existing learning and development resources. Companies should repeat this on a regular basis, the authors say, to ensure that the activities in place reflect the company's learning strategy. Companies should be wary about making wholesale changes to learning portfolios and organizational structures, the authors warn, unless there are major shifts in the company's mission or business context. Reorganizations "should be limited to situations where they are warranted -for example, when the learning agenda is misaligned with corporate strategy or the strategy changes." Like the CEO agenda, the company's learning agenda should articulate the essential strategic initiatives for corporate learning. Choices about what to include or eliminate to bring learning activities in line with current priorities should not be made in isolation, and the authors say it's important to get input and buy-in from both the learning organization and business leaders -all the way to the CEO level. Although the CEO's personal involvement is valuable, a broader effort of stakeholder management is typically required to promote and gain buy-in for the learning agenda. Learning leaders should map out a concerted "campaign"to inform and gather input from key influencers and decision makers in other parts of the business. A disciplined effort of stakeholder engagement and outreach gives learning leaders an opportunity to deepen their understanding of strategic priorities and demonstrate the business value of learning interventions. This is an MIT Sloan Management Review article.


Case Authors : Shlomo Ben-Hur, Bernie Jaworski, David Gray

Topic : Strategy & Execution

Related Areas :




Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 6% for Aligning Corporate Learning with Strategy Case Study


Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 6 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10022490) -10022490 - -
Year 1 3461725 -6560765 3461725 0.9434 3265778
Year 2 3955522 -2605243 7417247 0.89 3520400
Year 3 3973985 1368742 11391232 0.8396 3336634
Year 4 3237261 4606003 14628493 0.7921 2564214
TOTAL 14628493 12687027




The Net Present Value at 6% discount rate is 2664537

In isolation the NPV number doesn't mean much but put in right context then it is one of the best method to evaluate project returns. In this article we will cover -

Different methods of capital budgeting


What is NPV & Formula of NPV,
How it is calculated,
How to use NPV number for project evaluation, and
Scenario Planning given risks and management priorities.




Capital Budgeting Approaches

Methods of Capital Budgeting


There are four types of capital budgeting techniques that are widely used in the corporate world –

1. Internal Rate of Return
2. Payback Period
3. Profitability Index
4. Net Present Value

Apart from the Payback period method which is an additive method, rest of the methods are based on Discounted Cash Flow technique. Even though cash flow can be calculated based on the nature of the project, for the simplicity of the article we are assuming that all the expected cash flows are realized at the end of the year.

Discounted Cash Flow approaches provide a more objective basis for evaluating and selecting investment projects. They take into consideration both –

1. Timing of the expected cash flows – stockholders of Learning Agenda have higher preference for cash returns over 4-5 years rather than 10-15 years given the nature of the volatility in the industry.
2. Magnitude of both incoming and outgoing cash flows – Projects can be capital intensive, time intensive, or both. Learning Agenda shareholders have preference for diversified projects investment rather than prospective high income from a single capital intensive project.






Formula and Steps to Calculate Net Present Value (NPV) of Aligning Corporate Learning with Strategy

NPV = Net Cash In Flowt1 / (1+r)t1 + Net Cash In Flowt2 / (1+r)t2 + … Net Cash In Flowtn / (1+r)tn
Less Net Cash Out Flowt0 / (1+r)t0

Where t = time period, in this case year 1, year 2 and so on.
r = discount rate or return that could be earned using other safe proposition such as fixed deposit or treasury bond rate. Net Cash In Flow – What the firm will get each year.
Net Cash Out Flow – What the firm needs to invest initially in the project.

Step 1 – Understand the nature of the project and calculate cash flow for each year.
Step 2 – Discount those cash flow based on the discount rate.
Step 3 – Add all the discounted cash flow.
Step 4 – Selection of the project

Why Strategy & Execution Managers need to know Financial Tools such as Net Present Value (NPV)?

In our daily workplace we often come across people and colleagues who are just focused on their core competency and targets they have to deliver. For example marketing managers at Learning Agenda often design programs whose objective is to drive brand awareness and customer reach. But how that 30 point increase in brand awareness or 10 point increase in customer touch points will result into shareholders’ value is not specified.

To overcome such scenarios managers at Learning Agenda needs to not only know the financial aspect of project management but also needs to have tools to integrate them into part of the project development and monitoring plan.

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 15%

After working through various assumptions we reached a conclusion that risk is far higher than 6%. In a reasonably stable industry with weak competition - 15% discount rate can be a good benchmark.



Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 15 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10022490) -10022490 - -
Year 1 3461725 -6560765 3461725 0.8696 3010196
Year 2 3955522 -2605243 7417247 0.7561 2990943
Year 3 3973985 1368742 11391232 0.6575 2612960
Year 4 3237261 4606003 14628493 0.5718 1850914
TOTAL 10465013


The Net NPV after 4 years is 442523

(10465013 - 10022490 )








Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 20%


If the risk component is high in the industry then we should go for a higher hurdle rate / discount rate of 20%.

Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 20 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10022490) -10022490 - -
Year 1 3461725 -6560765 3461725 0.8333 2884771
Year 2 3955522 -2605243 7417247 0.6944 2746890
Year 3 3973985 1368742 11391232 0.5787 2299760
Year 4 3237261 4606003 14628493 0.4823 1561179
TOTAL 9492600


The Net NPV after 4 years is -529890

At 20% discount rate the NPV is negative (9492600 - 10022490 ) so ideally we can't select the project if macro and micro factors don't allow financial managers of Learning Agenda to discount cash flow at lower discount rates such as 15%.





Acceptance Criteria of a Project based on NPV

Simplest Approach – If the investment project of Learning Agenda has a NPV value higher than Zero then finance managers at Learning Agenda can ACCEPT the project, otherwise they can reject the project. This means that project will deliver higher returns over the period of time than any alternate investment strategy.

In theory if the required rate of return or discount rate is chosen correctly by finance managers at Learning Agenda, then the stock price of the Learning Agenda should change by same amount of the NPV. In real world we know that share price also reflects various other factors that can be related to both macro and micro environment.

In the same vein – accepting the project with zero NPV should result in stagnant share price. Finance managers use discount rates as a measure of risk components in the project execution process.

Sensitivity Analysis

Project selection is often a far more complex decision than just choosing it based on the NPV number. Finance managers at Learning Agenda should conduct a sensitivity analysis to better understand not only the inherent risk of the projects but also how those risks can be either factored in or mitigated during the project execution. Sensitivity analysis helps in –

Understanding of risks involved in the project.

What are the key aspects of the projects that need to be monitored, refined, and retuned for continuous delivery of projected cash flows.

What are the uncertainties surrounding the project Initial Cash Outlay (ICO’s). ICO’s often have several different components such as land, machinery, building, and other equipment.

What will be a multi year spillover effect of various taxation regulations.

What can impact the cash flow of the project.

Some of the assumptions while using the Discounted Cash Flow Methods –

Projects are assumed to be Mutually Exclusive – This is seldom the came in modern day giant organizations where projects are often inter-related and rejecting a project solely based on NPV can result in sunk cost from a related project.

Independent projects have independent cash flows – As explained in the marketing project – though the project may look independent but in reality it is not as the brand awareness project can be closely associated with the spending on sales promotions and product specific advertising.






Negotiation Strategy of Aligning Corporate Learning with Strategy

References & Further Readings

Shlomo Ben-Hur, Bernie Jaworski, David Gray (2018), "Aligning Corporate Learning with Strategy Harvard Business Review Case Study. Published by HBR Publications.


5Barz International SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Communications Equipment


TDM SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer/Non-Cyclical , Crops


Imaginatik SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Software & Programming


Xiaomi SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Services , Retail (Technology)


Pernod Ricard SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer/Non-Cyclical , Beverages (Alcoholic)


Kubota Pharma SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Healthcare , Biotechnology & Drugs


FFI SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Services , Motion Pictures


Pioneer Pow SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Electronic Instr. & Controls


Abeo SAS SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer Cyclical , Recreational Products