×




Delegate Responsibilities and Go Beyond the Task: Motivating Yourself & Your Team Net Present Value (NPV) / MBA Resources

Introduction to Net Present Value (NPV) - What is Net Present Value (NPV) ? How it impacts financial decisions regarding project management?

NPV solution for Delegate Responsibilities and Go Beyond the Task: Motivating Yourself & Your Team case study


At Oak Spring University, we provide corporate level professional Net Present Value (NPV) case study solution. Delegate Responsibilities and Go Beyond the Task: Motivating Yourself & Your Team case study is a Harvard Business School (HBR) case study written by Carlos Garcia Pont, J. Ignacio Canales. The Delegate Responsibilities and Go Beyond the Task: Motivating Yourself & Your Team (referred as “Tasks Tedx” from here on) case study provides evaluation & decision scenario in field of Strategy & Execution. It also touches upon business topics such as - Value proposition, Motivating people, Strategy.

The net present value (NPV) of an investment proposal is the present value of the proposal’s net cash flows less the proposal’s initial cash outflow. If a project’s NPV is greater than or equal to zero, the project should be accepted.

NPV = Present Value of Future Cash Flows LESS Project’s Initial Investment






Case Description of Delegate Responsibilities and Go Beyond the Task: Motivating Yourself & Your Team Case Study


Unless you are at the top of the hierarchy, most managers will find themselves caught in a conflicting position, having to carry out certain tasks delegated from above, while not delegating to those below, and where no one experiences much freedom of movement. In the face of this reality, a change of management style is required. Based on research, teaching, consulting and a recent TEDx Talk delivered on the subject, this article shares the keys that will help readers earn the trust of senior management, enabling every person to convert his or her tasks into more enriching responsibilities. The authors suggest the necessary managerial and organizational conditions to do so. If people begin to look beyond the goal of simply checking off tasks, and instead focus on each person's personal and professional development, this paradigm shift will bring benefits for the organization as a whole.


Case Authors : Carlos Garcia Pont, J. Ignacio Canales

Topic : Strategy & Execution

Related Areas : Motivating people, Strategy




Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 6% for Delegate Responsibilities and Go Beyond the Task: Motivating Yourself & Your Team Case Study


Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 6 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10014180) -10014180 - -
Year 1 3464509 -6549671 3464509 0.9434 3268405
Year 2 3961059 -2588612 7425568 0.89 3525328
Year 3 3967306 1378694 11392874 0.8396 3331027
Year 4 3236817 4615511 14629691 0.7921 2563862
TOTAL 14629691 12688622




The Net Present Value at 6% discount rate is 2674442

In isolation the NPV number doesn't mean much but put in right context then it is one of the best method to evaluate project returns. In this article we will cover -

Different methods of capital budgeting


What is NPV & Formula of NPV,
How it is calculated,
How to use NPV number for project evaluation, and
Scenario Planning given risks and management priorities.




Capital Budgeting Approaches

Methods of Capital Budgeting


There are four types of capital budgeting techniques that are widely used in the corporate world –

1. Profitability Index
2. Payback Period
3. Net Present Value
4. Internal Rate of Return

Apart from the Payback period method which is an additive method, rest of the methods are based on Discounted Cash Flow technique. Even though cash flow can be calculated based on the nature of the project, for the simplicity of the article we are assuming that all the expected cash flows are realized at the end of the year.

Discounted Cash Flow approaches provide a more objective basis for evaluating and selecting investment projects. They take into consideration both –

1. Timing of the expected cash flows – stockholders of Tasks Tedx have higher preference for cash returns over 4-5 years rather than 10-15 years given the nature of the volatility in the industry.
2. Magnitude of both incoming and outgoing cash flows – Projects can be capital intensive, time intensive, or both. Tasks Tedx shareholders have preference for diversified projects investment rather than prospective high income from a single capital intensive project.






Formula and Steps to Calculate Net Present Value (NPV) of Delegate Responsibilities and Go Beyond the Task: Motivating Yourself & Your Team

NPV = Net Cash In Flowt1 / (1+r)t1 + Net Cash In Flowt2 / (1+r)t2 + … Net Cash In Flowtn / (1+r)tn
Less Net Cash Out Flowt0 / (1+r)t0

Where t = time period, in this case year 1, year 2 and so on.
r = discount rate or return that could be earned using other safe proposition such as fixed deposit or treasury bond rate. Net Cash In Flow – What the firm will get each year.
Net Cash Out Flow – What the firm needs to invest initially in the project.

Step 1 – Understand the nature of the project and calculate cash flow for each year.
Step 2 – Discount those cash flow based on the discount rate.
Step 3 – Add all the discounted cash flow.
Step 4 – Selection of the project

Why Strategy & Execution Managers need to know Financial Tools such as Net Present Value (NPV)?

In our daily workplace we often come across people and colleagues who are just focused on their core competency and targets they have to deliver. For example marketing managers at Tasks Tedx often design programs whose objective is to drive brand awareness and customer reach. But how that 30 point increase in brand awareness or 10 point increase in customer touch points will result into shareholders’ value is not specified.

To overcome such scenarios managers at Tasks Tedx needs to not only know the financial aspect of project management but also needs to have tools to integrate them into part of the project development and monitoring plan.

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 15%

After working through various assumptions we reached a conclusion that risk is far higher than 6%. In a reasonably stable industry with weak competition - 15% discount rate can be a good benchmark.



Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 15 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10014180) -10014180 - -
Year 1 3464509 -6549671 3464509 0.8696 3012617
Year 2 3961059 -2588612 7425568 0.7561 2995130
Year 3 3967306 1378694 11392874 0.6575 2608568
Year 4 3236817 4615511 14629691 0.5718 1850661
TOTAL 10466975


The Net NPV after 4 years is 452795

(10466975 - 10014180 )








Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 20%


If the risk component is high in the industry then we should go for a higher hurdle rate / discount rate of 20%.

Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 20 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10014180) -10014180 - -
Year 1 3464509 -6549671 3464509 0.8333 2887091
Year 2 3961059 -2588612 7425568 0.6944 2750735
Year 3 3967306 1378694 11392874 0.5787 2295895
Year 4 3236817 4615511 14629691 0.4823 1560965
TOTAL 9494686


The Net NPV after 4 years is -519494

At 20% discount rate the NPV is negative (9494686 - 10014180 ) so ideally we can't select the project if macro and micro factors don't allow financial managers of Tasks Tedx to discount cash flow at lower discount rates such as 15%.





Acceptance Criteria of a Project based on NPV

Simplest Approach – If the investment project of Tasks Tedx has a NPV value higher than Zero then finance managers at Tasks Tedx can ACCEPT the project, otherwise they can reject the project. This means that project will deliver higher returns over the period of time than any alternate investment strategy.

In theory if the required rate of return or discount rate is chosen correctly by finance managers at Tasks Tedx, then the stock price of the Tasks Tedx should change by same amount of the NPV. In real world we know that share price also reflects various other factors that can be related to both macro and micro environment.

In the same vein – accepting the project with zero NPV should result in stagnant share price. Finance managers use discount rates as a measure of risk components in the project execution process.

Sensitivity Analysis

Project selection is often a far more complex decision than just choosing it based on the NPV number. Finance managers at Tasks Tedx should conduct a sensitivity analysis to better understand not only the inherent risk of the projects but also how those risks can be either factored in or mitigated during the project execution. Sensitivity analysis helps in –

What are the uncertainties surrounding the project Initial Cash Outlay (ICO’s). ICO’s often have several different components such as land, machinery, building, and other equipment.

What can impact the cash flow of the project.

Understanding of risks involved in the project.

What will be a multi year spillover effect of various taxation regulations.

What are the key aspects of the projects that need to be monitored, refined, and retuned for continuous delivery of projected cash flows.

Some of the assumptions while using the Discounted Cash Flow Methods –

Projects are assumed to be Mutually Exclusive – This is seldom the came in modern day giant organizations where projects are often inter-related and rejecting a project solely based on NPV can result in sunk cost from a related project.

Independent projects have independent cash flows – As explained in the marketing project – though the project may look independent but in reality it is not as the brand awareness project can be closely associated with the spending on sales promotions and product specific advertising.






Negotiation Strategy of Delegate Responsibilities and Go Beyond the Task: Motivating Yourself & Your Team

References & Further Readings

Carlos Garcia Pont, J. Ignacio Canales (2018), "Delegate Responsibilities and Go Beyond the Task: Motivating Yourself & Your Team Harvard Business Review Case Study. Published by HBR Publications.


Uzin Utz SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Capital Goods , Construction Services


Linhai Co Ltd SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer Cyclical , Auto & Truck Manufacturers


Coromandel Int SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Basic Materials , Chemical Manufacturing


Fuhrmeister Electronics SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Electronic Instr. & Controls


UMS Holdings Bhd SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Capital Goods , Misc. Capital Goods


Superior Industries SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer Cyclical , Auto & Truck Parts


Superdry SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Services , Retail (Apparel)


Eurotex Industries Exports SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer Cyclical , Textiles - Non Apparel


Chongqing Changan Auto SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer Cyclical , Auto & Truck Manufacturers


Saturn Metals SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Basic Materials , Gold & Silver


Deluxe Family SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Capital Goods , Construction Services