×




Danfoss - Global Manufacturing Footprint Net Present Value (NPV) / MBA Resources

Introduction to Net Present Value (NPV) - What is Net Present Value (NPV) ? How it impacts financial decisions regarding project management?

NPV solution for Danfoss - Global Manufacturing Footprint case study


At Oak Spring University, we provide corporate level professional Net Present Value (NPV) case study solution. Danfoss - Global Manufacturing Footprint case study is a Harvard Business School (HBR) case study written by Torben Pedersen, Jacob Pyndt. The Danfoss - Global Manufacturing Footprint (referred as “Danfoss Internationalization” from here on) case study provides evaluation & decision scenario in field of Strategy & Execution. It also touches upon business topics such as - Value proposition, Competitive strategy, Crisis management.

The net present value (NPV) of an investment proposal is the present value of the proposal’s net cash flows less the proposal’s initial cash outflow. If a project’s NPV is greater than or equal to zero, the project should be accepted.

NPV = Present Value of Future Cash Flows LESS Project’s Initial Investment






Case Description of Danfoss - Global Manufacturing Footprint Case Study


The case examines the supply chain, managerial, and organizational challenges facing a large European industrial company competing in a mature industry with strong price pressure. Established in the 1930s in Southern Jutland, Denmark, Danfoss initially produced automatic valves for refrigeration plants. The company has since grown into a major industrial group. Until the mid-1990s, Danfoss was very Europe-focused, having the majority of its sales and production there. This changed, however, with the arrival of the founder's son, Jorgen Mads Clausen, as the new CEO of the company. He initiated a process to change the company into a global player within all of its main business areas. Following this process of internationalization, the company was facing various challenges. There were three main issues which top management was concerned about: namely, Danfoss's manufacturing network; its continued global growth; and its highly engineering-based culture. The first issue came from the fact that Danfoss had followed a strategy of one product, one plant. This meant that all of its plants were set up to focus on the production of one product. This had created a situation with a lot of very specialized product lines and very few common features between them. On the other hand, the internationalization strategy had so far been quite successful for Danfoss in both Eastern Europe and China. In the United States, however, the company was still experiencing difficulties despite heavy investments in its manufacturing capacity in Mexico. In China, the company had experienced success and wanted to secure long-term growth in the market. The third issue was the very engineering-based culture of the company, which among other things was manifested in the fact that Danfoss previously developed products at the expense of consumer demand and preferences.


Case Authors : Torben Pedersen, Jacob Pyndt

Topic : Strategy & Execution

Related Areas : Competitive strategy, Crisis management




Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 6% for Danfoss - Global Manufacturing Footprint Case Study


Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 6 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10019249) -10019249 - -
Year 1 3466026 -6553223 3466026 0.9434 3269836
Year 2 3968457 -2584766 7434483 0.89 3531913
Year 3 3960613 1375847 11395096 0.8396 3325407
Year 4 3237227 4613074 14632323 0.7921 2564187
TOTAL 14632323 12691342




The Net Present Value at 6% discount rate is 2672093

In isolation the NPV number doesn't mean much but put in right context then it is one of the best method to evaluate project returns. In this article we will cover -

Different methods of capital budgeting


What is NPV & Formula of NPV,
How it is calculated,
How to use NPV number for project evaluation, and
Scenario Planning given risks and management priorities.




Capital Budgeting Approaches

Methods of Capital Budgeting


There are four types of capital budgeting techniques that are widely used in the corporate world –

1. Payback Period
2. Net Present Value
3. Profitability Index
4. Internal Rate of Return

Apart from the Payback period method which is an additive method, rest of the methods are based on Discounted Cash Flow technique. Even though cash flow can be calculated based on the nature of the project, for the simplicity of the article we are assuming that all the expected cash flows are realized at the end of the year.

Discounted Cash Flow approaches provide a more objective basis for evaluating and selecting investment projects. They take into consideration both –

1. Magnitude of both incoming and outgoing cash flows – Projects can be capital intensive, time intensive, or both. Danfoss Internationalization shareholders have preference for diversified projects investment rather than prospective high income from a single capital intensive project.
2. Timing of the expected cash flows – stockholders of Danfoss Internationalization have higher preference for cash returns over 4-5 years rather than 10-15 years given the nature of the volatility in the industry.






Formula and Steps to Calculate Net Present Value (NPV) of Danfoss - Global Manufacturing Footprint

NPV = Net Cash In Flowt1 / (1+r)t1 + Net Cash In Flowt2 / (1+r)t2 + … Net Cash In Flowtn / (1+r)tn
Less Net Cash Out Flowt0 / (1+r)t0

Where t = time period, in this case year 1, year 2 and so on.
r = discount rate or return that could be earned using other safe proposition such as fixed deposit or treasury bond rate. Net Cash In Flow – What the firm will get each year.
Net Cash Out Flow – What the firm needs to invest initially in the project.

Step 1 – Understand the nature of the project and calculate cash flow for each year.
Step 2 – Discount those cash flow based on the discount rate.
Step 3 – Add all the discounted cash flow.
Step 4 – Selection of the project

Why Strategy & Execution Managers need to know Financial Tools such as Net Present Value (NPV)?

In our daily workplace we often come across people and colleagues who are just focused on their core competency and targets they have to deliver. For example marketing managers at Danfoss Internationalization often design programs whose objective is to drive brand awareness and customer reach. But how that 30 point increase in brand awareness or 10 point increase in customer touch points will result into shareholders’ value is not specified.

To overcome such scenarios managers at Danfoss Internationalization needs to not only know the financial aspect of project management but also needs to have tools to integrate them into part of the project development and monitoring plan.

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 15%

After working through various assumptions we reached a conclusion that risk is far higher than 6%. In a reasonably stable industry with weak competition - 15% discount rate can be a good benchmark.



Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 15 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10019249) -10019249 - -
Year 1 3466026 -6553223 3466026 0.8696 3013936
Year 2 3968457 -2584766 7434483 0.7561 3000724
Year 3 3960613 1375847 11395096 0.6575 2604167
Year 4 3237227 4613074 14632323 0.5718 1850895
TOTAL 10469722


The Net NPV after 4 years is 450473

(10469722 - 10019249 )








Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 20%


If the risk component is high in the industry then we should go for a higher hurdle rate / discount rate of 20%.

Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 20 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10019249) -10019249 - -
Year 1 3466026 -6553223 3466026 0.8333 2888355
Year 2 3968457 -2584766 7434483 0.6944 2755873
Year 3 3960613 1375847 11395096 0.5787 2292021
Year 4 3237227 4613074 14632323 0.4823 1561163
TOTAL 9497412


The Net NPV after 4 years is -521837

At 20% discount rate the NPV is negative (9497412 - 10019249 ) so ideally we can't select the project if macro and micro factors don't allow financial managers of Danfoss Internationalization to discount cash flow at lower discount rates such as 15%.





Acceptance Criteria of a Project based on NPV

Simplest Approach – If the investment project of Danfoss Internationalization has a NPV value higher than Zero then finance managers at Danfoss Internationalization can ACCEPT the project, otherwise they can reject the project. This means that project will deliver higher returns over the period of time than any alternate investment strategy.

In theory if the required rate of return or discount rate is chosen correctly by finance managers at Danfoss Internationalization, then the stock price of the Danfoss Internationalization should change by same amount of the NPV. In real world we know that share price also reflects various other factors that can be related to both macro and micro environment.

In the same vein – accepting the project with zero NPV should result in stagnant share price. Finance managers use discount rates as a measure of risk components in the project execution process.

Sensitivity Analysis

Project selection is often a far more complex decision than just choosing it based on the NPV number. Finance managers at Danfoss Internationalization should conduct a sensitivity analysis to better understand not only the inherent risk of the projects but also how those risks can be either factored in or mitigated during the project execution. Sensitivity analysis helps in –

What are the key aspects of the projects that need to be monitored, refined, and retuned for continuous delivery of projected cash flows.

What are the uncertainties surrounding the project Initial Cash Outlay (ICO’s). ICO’s often have several different components such as land, machinery, building, and other equipment.

Understanding of risks involved in the project.

What will be a multi year spillover effect of various taxation regulations.

What can impact the cash flow of the project.

Some of the assumptions while using the Discounted Cash Flow Methods –

Projects are assumed to be Mutually Exclusive – This is seldom the came in modern day giant organizations where projects are often inter-related and rejecting a project solely based on NPV can result in sunk cost from a related project.

Independent projects have independent cash flows – As explained in the marketing project – though the project may look independent but in reality it is not as the brand awareness project can be closely associated with the spending on sales promotions and product specific advertising.






Negotiation Strategy of Danfoss - Global Manufacturing Footprint

References & Further Readings

Torben Pedersen, Jacob Pyndt (2018), "Danfoss - Global Manufacturing Footprint Harvard Business Review Case Study. Published by HBR Publications.


Shenwan Hongyuan SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Financial , Investment Services


Sam Young Chem SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Basic Materials , Containers & Packaging


City Of London SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Financial , Investment Services


Delisi Food A SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer/Non-Cyclical , Food Processing


Minerva Neurosciences SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Healthcare , Biotechnology & Drugs


Accenture SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Computer Services