×




TradeCard: Building a Global Trading Electronic Payment System Net Present Value (NPV) / MBA Resources

Introduction to Net Present Value (NPV) - What is Net Present Value (NPV) ? How it impacts financial decisions regarding project management?

NPV solution for TradeCard: Building a Global Trading Electronic Payment System case study


At Oak Spring University, we provide corporate level professional Net Present Value (NPV) case study solution. TradeCard: Building a Global Trading Electronic Payment System case study is a Harvard Business School (HBR) case study written by Ali F. Farhoomand, Marissa McCauley. The TradeCard: Building a Global Trading Electronic Payment System (referred as “Tradecard Payment” from here on) case study provides evaluation & decision scenario in field of Technology & Operations. It also touches upon business topics such as - Value proposition, Globalization.

The net present value (NPV) of an investment proposal is the present value of the proposal’s net cash flows less the proposal’s initial cash outflow. If a project’s NPV is greater than or equal to zero, the project should be accepted.

NPV = Present Value of Future Cash Flows LESS Project’s Initial Investment






Case Description of TradeCard: Building a Global Trading Electronic Payment System Case Study


In an attempt to provide an online payment mechanism for large-dollar cross-border transactions, TradeCard, Inc. developed TradeCard, considered to be the world's first and only "Credit card" for international trade that contains all three "C's" of global trade transactions: credit, connectivity, and compliance. The case provides a study on how to build a viable international electronic payment system for business-to-business e-commerce. Looks into this new alternative online payment mechanism and how it is changing the international trade payment environment. Focuses on how TradeCard, Inc. built TradeCard: its technical architecture capable of providing a seamless online settlement transaction and a secure electronic solution involving synchronization of huge databases in an international transaction. Also revolves around the marketing issue that TradeCard, Inc. is facing: how to build the network of players in international trading and aggregating the disparate services necessary onto the TradeCard system.


Case Authors : Ali F. Farhoomand, Marissa McCauley

Topic : Technology & Operations

Related Areas : Globalization




Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 6% for TradeCard: Building a Global Trading Electronic Payment System Case Study


Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 6 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10017166) -10017166 - -
Year 1 3470338 -6546828 3470338 0.9434 3273904
Year 2 3961194 -2585634 7431532 0.89 3525449
Year 3 3959670 1374036 11391202 0.8396 3324615
Year 4 3240746 4614782 14631948 0.7921 2566974
TOTAL 14631948 12690942




The Net Present Value at 6% discount rate is 2673776

In isolation the NPV number doesn't mean much but put in right context then it is one of the best method to evaluate project returns. In this article we will cover -

Different methods of capital budgeting


What is NPV & Formula of NPV,
How it is calculated,
How to use NPV number for project evaluation, and
Scenario Planning given risks and management priorities.




Capital Budgeting Approaches

Methods of Capital Budgeting


There are four types of capital budgeting techniques that are widely used in the corporate world –

1. Profitability Index
2. Payback Period
3. Internal Rate of Return
4. Net Present Value

Apart from the Payback period method which is an additive method, rest of the methods are based on Discounted Cash Flow technique. Even though cash flow can be calculated based on the nature of the project, for the simplicity of the article we are assuming that all the expected cash flows are realized at the end of the year.

Discounted Cash Flow approaches provide a more objective basis for evaluating and selecting investment projects. They take into consideration both –

1. Magnitude of both incoming and outgoing cash flows – Projects can be capital intensive, time intensive, or both. Tradecard Payment shareholders have preference for diversified projects investment rather than prospective high income from a single capital intensive project.
2. Timing of the expected cash flows – stockholders of Tradecard Payment have higher preference for cash returns over 4-5 years rather than 10-15 years given the nature of the volatility in the industry.






Formula and Steps to Calculate Net Present Value (NPV) of TradeCard: Building a Global Trading Electronic Payment System

NPV = Net Cash In Flowt1 / (1+r)t1 + Net Cash In Flowt2 / (1+r)t2 + … Net Cash In Flowtn / (1+r)tn
Less Net Cash Out Flowt0 / (1+r)t0

Where t = time period, in this case year 1, year 2 and so on.
r = discount rate or return that could be earned using other safe proposition such as fixed deposit or treasury bond rate. Net Cash In Flow – What the firm will get each year.
Net Cash Out Flow – What the firm needs to invest initially in the project.

Step 1 – Understand the nature of the project and calculate cash flow for each year.
Step 2 – Discount those cash flow based on the discount rate.
Step 3 – Add all the discounted cash flow.
Step 4 – Selection of the project

Why Technology & Operations Managers need to know Financial Tools such as Net Present Value (NPV)?

In our daily workplace we often come across people and colleagues who are just focused on their core competency and targets they have to deliver. For example marketing managers at Tradecard Payment often design programs whose objective is to drive brand awareness and customer reach. But how that 30 point increase in brand awareness or 10 point increase in customer touch points will result into shareholders’ value is not specified.

To overcome such scenarios managers at Tradecard Payment needs to not only know the financial aspect of project management but also needs to have tools to integrate them into part of the project development and monitoring plan.

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 15%

After working through various assumptions we reached a conclusion that risk is far higher than 6%. In a reasonably stable industry with weak competition - 15% discount rate can be a good benchmark.



Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 15 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10017166) -10017166 - -
Year 1 3470338 -6546828 3470338 0.8696 3017685
Year 2 3961194 -2585634 7431532 0.7561 2995232
Year 3 3959670 1374036 11391202 0.6575 2603547
Year 4 3240746 4614782 14631948 0.5718 1852907
TOTAL 10469371


The Net NPV after 4 years is 452205

(10469371 - 10017166 )








Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 20%


If the risk component is high in the industry then we should go for a higher hurdle rate / discount rate of 20%.

Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 20 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10017166) -10017166 - -
Year 1 3470338 -6546828 3470338 0.8333 2891948
Year 2 3961194 -2585634 7431532 0.6944 2750829
Year 3 3959670 1374036 11391202 0.5787 2291476
Year 4 3240746 4614782 14631948 0.4823 1562860
TOTAL 9497113


The Net NPV after 4 years is -520053

At 20% discount rate the NPV is negative (9497113 - 10017166 ) so ideally we can't select the project if macro and micro factors don't allow financial managers of Tradecard Payment to discount cash flow at lower discount rates such as 15%.





Acceptance Criteria of a Project based on NPV

Simplest Approach – If the investment project of Tradecard Payment has a NPV value higher than Zero then finance managers at Tradecard Payment can ACCEPT the project, otherwise they can reject the project. This means that project will deliver higher returns over the period of time than any alternate investment strategy.

In theory if the required rate of return or discount rate is chosen correctly by finance managers at Tradecard Payment, then the stock price of the Tradecard Payment should change by same amount of the NPV. In real world we know that share price also reflects various other factors that can be related to both macro and micro environment.

In the same vein – accepting the project with zero NPV should result in stagnant share price. Finance managers use discount rates as a measure of risk components in the project execution process.

Sensitivity Analysis

Project selection is often a far more complex decision than just choosing it based on the NPV number. Finance managers at Tradecard Payment should conduct a sensitivity analysis to better understand not only the inherent risk of the projects but also how those risks can be either factored in or mitigated during the project execution. Sensitivity analysis helps in –

What are the uncertainties surrounding the project Initial Cash Outlay (ICO’s). ICO’s often have several different components such as land, machinery, building, and other equipment.

Understanding of risks involved in the project.

What are the key aspects of the projects that need to be monitored, refined, and retuned for continuous delivery of projected cash flows.

What will be a multi year spillover effect of various taxation regulations.

What can impact the cash flow of the project.

Some of the assumptions while using the Discounted Cash Flow Methods –

Projects are assumed to be Mutually Exclusive – This is seldom the came in modern day giant organizations where projects are often inter-related and rejecting a project solely based on NPV can result in sunk cost from a related project.

Independent projects have independent cash flows – As explained in the marketing project – though the project may look independent but in reality it is not as the brand awareness project can be closely associated with the spending on sales promotions and product specific advertising.






Negotiation Strategy of TradeCard: Building a Global Trading Electronic Payment System

References & Further Readings

Ali F. Farhoomand, Marissa McCauley (2018), "TradeCard: Building a Global Trading Electronic Payment System Harvard Business Review Case Study. Published by HBR Publications.


Perceptron SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Scientific & Technical Instr.


China Sandi SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Services , Real Estate Operations


Amper SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Communications Equipment


Advanced Life Scienc SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Healthcare , Biotechnology & Drugs


Tilaknagar Industries Ltd SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer/Non-Cyclical , Beverages (Alcoholic)


Babcock & Wilcox Enterprises SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Scientific & Technical Instr.


Xingda Int SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer Cyclical , Textiles - Non Apparel


D.L.S.I SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Services , Business Services


Shijiazhuang Kelin Electric SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Electronic Instr. & Controls