×




Partners In Health: The PACT Project Net Present Value (NPV) / MBA Resources

Introduction to Net Present Value (NPV) - What is Net Present Value (NPV) ? How it impacts financial decisions regarding project management?

NPV solution for Partners In Health: The PACT Project case study


At Oak Spring University, we provide corporate level professional Net Present Value (NPV) case study solution. Partners In Health: The PACT Project case study is a Harvard Business School (HBR) case study written by Richard Bohmer, Josh Friedman. The Partners In Health: The PACT Project (referred as “Pact Care” from here on) case study provides evaluation & decision scenario in field of Technology & Operations. It also touches upon business topics such as - Value proposition, Emerging markets, Health, Supply chain.

The net present value (NPV) of an investment proposal is the present value of the proposal’s net cash flows less the proposal’s initial cash outflow. If a project’s NPV is greater than or equal to zero, the project should be accepted.

NPV = Present Value of Future Cash Flows LESS Project’s Initial Investment






Case Description of Partners In Health: The PACT Project Case Study


Partners in Health is a Boston-based, not-for-profit that provides health care to people in some of the poorest regions of the world, including Haiti, Malawi, Rwanda, and Peru. In 1998, PIH established a program (PACT) in Boston to bring care to AIDS and TB patients who were not well served by existing care delivery systems. Describes PIH's programs in the developing world and the way in which lessons learned in these countries informed the design and management of PACT. Examines the balance between customized and standardized approaches to care and challenges students to examine their preconceived notions of the social role of a health care delivery organization. Dr. Heidi Behforouz, PACT's director, must decide whether a service design honed in developing countries can be rolled out more broadly in one the world's richest nations.


Case Authors : Richard Bohmer, Josh Friedman

Topic : Technology & Operations

Related Areas : Emerging markets, Health, Supply chain




Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 6% for Partners In Health: The PACT Project Case Study


Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 6 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10024913) -10024913 - -
Year 1 3444973 -6579940 3444973 0.9434 3249975
Year 2 3980497 -2599443 7425470 0.89 3542628
Year 3 3950006 1350563 11375476 0.8396 3316501
Year 4 3245829 4596392 14621305 0.7921 2571001
TOTAL 14621305 12680104




The Net Present Value at 6% discount rate is 2655191

In isolation the NPV number doesn't mean much but put in right context then it is one of the best method to evaluate project returns. In this article we will cover -

Different methods of capital budgeting


What is NPV & Formula of NPV,
How it is calculated,
How to use NPV number for project evaluation, and
Scenario Planning given risks and management priorities.




Capital Budgeting Approaches

Methods of Capital Budgeting


There are four types of capital budgeting techniques that are widely used in the corporate world –

1. Profitability Index
2. Net Present Value
3. Payback Period
4. Internal Rate of Return

Apart from the Payback period method which is an additive method, rest of the methods are based on Discounted Cash Flow technique. Even though cash flow can be calculated based on the nature of the project, for the simplicity of the article we are assuming that all the expected cash flows are realized at the end of the year.

Discounted Cash Flow approaches provide a more objective basis for evaluating and selecting investment projects. They take into consideration both –

1. Magnitude of both incoming and outgoing cash flows – Projects can be capital intensive, time intensive, or both. Pact Care shareholders have preference for diversified projects investment rather than prospective high income from a single capital intensive project.
2. Timing of the expected cash flows – stockholders of Pact Care have higher preference for cash returns over 4-5 years rather than 10-15 years given the nature of the volatility in the industry.






Formula and Steps to Calculate Net Present Value (NPV) of Partners In Health: The PACT Project

NPV = Net Cash In Flowt1 / (1+r)t1 + Net Cash In Flowt2 / (1+r)t2 + … Net Cash In Flowtn / (1+r)tn
Less Net Cash Out Flowt0 / (1+r)t0

Where t = time period, in this case year 1, year 2 and so on.
r = discount rate or return that could be earned using other safe proposition such as fixed deposit or treasury bond rate. Net Cash In Flow – What the firm will get each year.
Net Cash Out Flow – What the firm needs to invest initially in the project.

Step 1 – Understand the nature of the project and calculate cash flow for each year.
Step 2 – Discount those cash flow based on the discount rate.
Step 3 – Add all the discounted cash flow.
Step 4 – Selection of the project

Why Technology & Operations Managers need to know Financial Tools such as Net Present Value (NPV)?

In our daily workplace we often come across people and colleagues who are just focused on their core competency and targets they have to deliver. For example marketing managers at Pact Care often design programs whose objective is to drive brand awareness and customer reach. But how that 30 point increase in brand awareness or 10 point increase in customer touch points will result into shareholders’ value is not specified.

To overcome such scenarios managers at Pact Care needs to not only know the financial aspect of project management but also needs to have tools to integrate them into part of the project development and monitoring plan.

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 15%

After working through various assumptions we reached a conclusion that risk is far higher than 6%. In a reasonably stable industry with weak competition - 15% discount rate can be a good benchmark.



Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 15 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10024913) -10024913 - -
Year 1 3444973 -6579940 3444973 0.8696 2995629
Year 2 3980497 -2599443 7425470 0.7561 3009828
Year 3 3950006 1350563 11375476 0.6575 2597193
Year 4 3245829 4596392 14621305 0.5718 1855813
TOTAL 10458463


The Net NPV after 4 years is 433550

(10458463 - 10024913 )








Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 20%


If the risk component is high in the industry then we should go for a higher hurdle rate / discount rate of 20%.

Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 20 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10024913) -10024913 - -
Year 1 3444973 -6579940 3444973 0.8333 2870811
Year 2 3980497 -2599443 7425470 0.6944 2764234
Year 3 3950006 1350563 11375476 0.5787 2285883
Year 4 3245829 4596392 14621305 0.4823 1565311
TOTAL 9486239


The Net NPV after 4 years is -538674

At 20% discount rate the NPV is negative (9486239 - 10024913 ) so ideally we can't select the project if macro and micro factors don't allow financial managers of Pact Care to discount cash flow at lower discount rates such as 15%.





Acceptance Criteria of a Project based on NPV

Simplest Approach – If the investment project of Pact Care has a NPV value higher than Zero then finance managers at Pact Care can ACCEPT the project, otherwise they can reject the project. This means that project will deliver higher returns over the period of time than any alternate investment strategy.

In theory if the required rate of return or discount rate is chosen correctly by finance managers at Pact Care, then the stock price of the Pact Care should change by same amount of the NPV. In real world we know that share price also reflects various other factors that can be related to both macro and micro environment.

In the same vein – accepting the project with zero NPV should result in stagnant share price. Finance managers use discount rates as a measure of risk components in the project execution process.

Sensitivity Analysis

Project selection is often a far more complex decision than just choosing it based on the NPV number. Finance managers at Pact Care should conduct a sensitivity analysis to better understand not only the inherent risk of the projects but also how those risks can be either factored in or mitigated during the project execution. Sensitivity analysis helps in –

What are the key aspects of the projects that need to be monitored, refined, and retuned for continuous delivery of projected cash flows.

What are the uncertainties surrounding the project Initial Cash Outlay (ICO’s). ICO’s often have several different components such as land, machinery, building, and other equipment.

What will be a multi year spillover effect of various taxation regulations.

What can impact the cash flow of the project.

Understanding of risks involved in the project.

Some of the assumptions while using the Discounted Cash Flow Methods –

Projects are assumed to be Mutually Exclusive – This is seldom the came in modern day giant organizations where projects are often inter-related and rejecting a project solely based on NPV can result in sunk cost from a related project.

Independent projects have independent cash flows – As explained in the marketing project – though the project may look independent but in reality it is not as the brand awareness project can be closely associated with the spending on sales promotions and product specific advertising.






Negotiation Strategy of Partners In Health: The PACT Project

References & Further Readings

Richard Bohmer, Josh Friedman (2018), "Partners In Health: The PACT Project Harvard Business Review Case Study. Published by HBR Publications.

Explore More

Feel free to connect with us if you need business research.

You can download Excel Template of Case Study Solution & Analysis of Partners In Health: The PACT Project


Xiakelor Spinning SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Basic Materials , Chemicals - Plastics & Rubber


Suzuden Corp SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Electronic Instr. & Controls


Fujitsu General Ltd SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Capital Goods , Misc. Capital Goods


Shaanxi Construction Machinery SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Capital Goods , Constr. & Agric. Machinery


Michael Hill SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Basic Materials , Misc. Fabricated Products


Just Eat SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Computer Services


Steady Safe TBK PT SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Transportation , Misc. Transportation