Mistake-Proofing Healthcare: Why Stopping Processes May be a Good Start Net Present Value (NPV) / MBA Resources

Introduction to Net Present Value (NPV) - What is Net Present Value (NPV) ? How it impacts financial decisions regarding project management?

NPV solution for Mistake-Proofing Healthcare: Why Stopping Processes May be a Good Start case study

At Oak Spring University, we provide corporate level professional Net Present Value (NPV) case study solution. Mistake-Proofing Healthcare: Why Stopping Processes May be a Good Start case study is a Harvard Business School (HBR) case study written by John R. Grout, John S. Toussaint. The Mistake-Proofing Healthcare: Why Stopping Processes May be a Good Start (referred as “Processes Stop” from here on) case study provides evaluation & decision scenario in field of Technology & Operations. It also touches upon business topics such as - Value proposition, Product development.

The net present value (NPV) of an investment proposal is the present value of the proposal’s net cash flows less the proposal’s initial cash outflow. If a project’s NPV is greater than or equal to zero, the project should be accepted.

NPV = Present Value of Future Cash Flows LESS Project’s Initial Investment

---

Case Description of Mistake-Proofing Healthcare: Why Stopping Processes May be a Good Start Case Study

Two significant concerns in healthcare are spiraling costs and medical errors. These two concerns are correlated: eliminating medical errors leads to significant cost reductions. We provide an example, ThedaCare Inc., where both problems are improved by providing mechanisms that stop healthcare processes. While businesses often view having their processes stopped as a negative, increasing the stoppages, or creating process failures, is often a precursor to improved performance. A good rule of thumb is: if in doubt, stop. This concept of creating or engineering stoppages in the processes is linked to two "lean" concepts that come from the Toyota Production System: jidoka and poka-yoke. A spectrum of methods for stopping processes is discussed, ranging from warnings in the work environment to mechanical devices designed to stop processes and empower humans to stop the process. The preliminary results achieved at ThedaCare demonstrate the financial and medical improvements that may be obtainable from utilizing these methods.

Case Authors : John R. Grout, John S. Toussaint

Topic : Technology & Operations

Related Areas : Product development

---

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 6% for Mistake-Proofing Healthcare: Why Stopping Processes May be a Good Start Case Study

Years	Cash Flow	Net Cash Flow	Cumulative     Cash Flow	Discount Rate @ 6 %	Discounted Cash Flows
Year 0	(10010087)	-10010087	-	-
Year 1	3461993	-6548094	3461993	0.9434	3266031
Year 2	3958566	-2589528	7420559	0.89	3523110
Year 3	3968665	1379137	11389224	0.8396	3332168
Year 4	3229020	4608157	14618244	0.7921	2557686
TOTAL			14618244		12678995

The Net Present Value at 6% discount rate is 2668908

In isolation the NPV number doesn't mean much but put in right context then it is one of the best method to evaluate project returns. In this article we will cover -

Different methods of capital budgeting

What is NPV & Formula of NPV,
How it is calculated,
How to use NPV number for project evaluation, and
Scenario Planning given risks and management priorities.

---

Capital Budgeting Approaches

Methods of Capital Budgeting

There are four types of capital budgeting techniques that are widely used in the corporate world –

1. Payback Period
2. Internal Rate of Return
3. Profitability Index
4. Net Present Value

Apart from the Payback period method which is an additive method, rest of the methods are based on Discounted Cash Flow technique. Even though cash flow can be calculated based on the nature of the project, for the simplicity of the article we are assuming that all the expected cash flows are realized at the end of the year.

Discounted Cash Flow approaches provide a more objective basis for evaluating and selecting investment projects. They take into consideration both –

1. Magnitude of both incoming and outgoing cash flows – Projects can be capital intensive, time intensive, or both. Processes Stop shareholders have preference for diversified projects investment rather than prospective high income from a single capital intensive project.
2. Timing of the expected cash flows – stockholders of Processes Stop have higher preference for cash returns over 4-5 years rather than 10-15 years given the nature of the volatility in the industry.

---

Formula and Steps to Calculate Net Present Value (NPV) of Mistake-Proofing Healthcare: Why Stopping Processes May be a Good Start

NPV = Net Cash In Flowt1 / (1+r)t1 + Net Cash In Flowt2 / (1+r)t2 + … Net Cash In Flowtn / (1+r)tn
Less Net Cash Out Flowt0 / (1+r)t0

Where t = time period, in this case year 1, year 2 and so on.
r = discount rate or return that could be earned using other safe proposition such as fixed deposit or treasury bond rate. Net Cash In Flow – What the firm will get each year.
Net Cash Out Flow – What the firm needs to invest initially in the project.

Step 1 – Understand the nature of the project and calculate cash flow for each year.
Step 2 – Discount those cash flow based on the discount rate.
Step 3 – Add all the discounted cash flow.
Step 4 – Selection of the project

Why Technology & Operations Managers need to know Financial Tools such as Net Present Value (NPV)?

In our daily workplace we often come across people and colleagues who are just focused on their core competency and targets they have to deliver. For example marketing managers at Processes Stop often design programs whose objective is to drive brand awareness and customer reach. But how that 30 point increase in brand awareness or 10 point increase in customer touch points will result into shareholders’ value is not specified.

To overcome such scenarios managers at Processes Stop needs to not only know the financial aspect of project management but also needs to have tools to integrate them into part of the project development and monitoring plan.

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 15%

After working through various assumptions we reached a conclusion that risk is far higher than 6%. In a reasonably stable industry with weak competition - 15% discount rate can be a good benchmark.

Years	Cash Flow	Net Cash Flow	Cumulative     Cash Flow	Discount Rate @ 15 %	Discounted Cash Flows
Year 0	(10010087)	-10010087	-	-
Year 1	3461993	-6548094	3461993	0.8696	3010429
Year 2	3958566	-2589528	7420559	0.7561	2993245
Year 3	3968665	1379137	11389224	0.6575	2609462
Year 4	3229020	4608157	14618244	0.5718	1846203
TOTAL					10459338

The Net NPV after 4 years is 449251

(10459338 - 10010087 )

---

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 20%

If the risk component is high in the industry then we should go for a higher hurdle rate / discount rate of 20%.

Years	Cash Flow	Net Cash Flow	Cumulative     Cash Flow	Discount Rate @ 20 %	Discounted Cash Flows
Year 0	(10010087)	-10010087	-	-
Year 1	3461993	-6548094	3461993	0.8333	2884994
Year 2	3958566	-2589528	7420559	0.6944	2749004
Year 3	3968665	1379137	11389224	0.5787	2296681
Year 4	3229020	4608157	14618244	0.4823	1557205
TOTAL					9487884

The Net NPV after 4 years is -522203

At 20% discount rate the NPV is negative (9487884 - 10010087 ) so ideally we can't select the project if macro and micro factors don't allow financial managers of Processes Stop to discount cash flow at lower discount rates such as 15%.

Acceptance Criteria of a Project based on NPV

Simplest Approach – If the investment project of Processes Stop has a NPV value higher than Zero then finance managers at Processes Stop can ACCEPT the project, otherwise they can reject the project. This means that project will deliver higher returns over the period of time than any alternate investment strategy.

In theory if the required rate of return or discount rate is chosen correctly by finance managers at Processes Stop, then the stock price of the Processes Stop should change by same amount of the NPV. In real world we know that share price also reflects various other factors that can be related to both macro and micro environment.

In the same vein – accepting the project with zero NPV should result in stagnant share price. Finance managers use discount rates as a measure of risk components in the project execution process.

Sensitivity Analysis

Project selection is often a far more complex decision than just choosing it based on the NPV number. Finance managers at Processes Stop should conduct a sensitivity analysis to better understand not only the inherent risk of the projects but also how those risks can be either factored in or mitigated during the project execution. Sensitivity analysis helps in –

Understanding of risks involved in the project.

What will be a multi year spillover effect of various taxation regulations.

What are the uncertainties surrounding the project Initial Cash Outlay (ICO’s). ICO’s often have several different components such as land, machinery, building, and other equipment.

What are the key aspects of the projects that need to be monitored, refined, and retuned for continuous delivery of projected cash flows.

What can impact the cash flow of the project.

Some of the assumptions while using the Discounted Cash Flow Methods –

Projects are assumed to be Mutually Exclusive – This is seldom the came in modern day giant organizations where projects are often inter-related and rejecting a project solely based on NPV can result in sunk cost from a related project.

Independent projects have independent cash flows – As explained in the marketing project – though the project may look independent but in reality it is not as the brand awareness project can be closely associated with the spending on sales promotions and product specific advertising.

---

Negotiation Strategy of Mistake-Proofing Healthcare: Why Stopping Processes May be a Good Start

References & Further Readings

John R. Grout, John S. Toussaint (2018), "Mistake-Proofing Healthcare: Why Stopping Processes May be a Good Start Harvard Business Review Case Study. Published by HBR Publications.