×




Parker House (B) Net Present Value (NPV) / MBA Resources

Introduction to Net Present Value (NPV) - What is Net Present Value (NPV) ? How it impacts financial decisions regarding project management?

NPV solution for Parker House (B) case study


At Oak Spring University, we provide corporate level professional Net Present Value (NPV) case study solution. Parker House (B) case study is a Harvard Business School (HBR) case study written by Christopher H. Lovelock, Penny Pittman Merliss. The Parker House (B) (referred as “Parker Dunfey” from here on) case study provides evaluation & decision scenario in field of Technology & Operations. It also touches upon business topics such as - Value proposition, Sales.

The net present value (NPV) of an investment proposal is the present value of the proposal’s net cash flows less the proposal’s initial cash outflow. If a project’s NPV is greater than or equal to zero, the project should be accepted.

NPV = Present Value of Future Cash Flows LESS Project’s Initial Investment






Case Description of Parker House (B) Case Study


The management of Boston's historic Parker House, owned by Dunfey Hotels, has received a request from a tour wholesaler to book a large number of rooms at the hotel during summer and fall 1980. This booking is tied to bookings at two other Dunfey hotels that need this business. Parker House management would prefer to cultivate more lucrative individual and corporate business, which they see as more in tune with the hotel's carefully developed market position. What should they do? Dunfey's detailed segmentation strategy is central to discussion of this case. Five pages of exhibits include financial data on the Parker House and details of requested reservations and space availability.


Case Authors : Christopher H. Lovelock, Penny Pittman Merliss

Topic : Technology & Operations

Related Areas : Sales




Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 6% for Parker House (B) Case Study


Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 6 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10007767) -10007767 - -
Year 1 3453598 -6554169 3453598 0.9434 3258111
Year 2 3976622 -2577547 7430220 0.89 3539179
Year 3 3947447 1369900 11377667 0.8396 3314353
Year 4 3243425 4613325 14621092 0.7921 2569096
TOTAL 14621092 12680740




The Net Present Value at 6% discount rate is 2672973

In isolation the NPV number doesn't mean much but put in right context then it is one of the best method to evaluate project returns. In this article we will cover -

Different methods of capital budgeting


What is NPV & Formula of NPV,
How it is calculated,
How to use NPV number for project evaluation, and
Scenario Planning given risks and management priorities.




Capital Budgeting Approaches

Methods of Capital Budgeting


There are four types of capital budgeting techniques that are widely used in the corporate world –

1. Payback Period
2. Net Present Value
3. Internal Rate of Return
4. Profitability Index

Apart from the Payback period method which is an additive method, rest of the methods are based on Discounted Cash Flow technique. Even though cash flow can be calculated based on the nature of the project, for the simplicity of the article we are assuming that all the expected cash flows are realized at the end of the year.

Discounted Cash Flow approaches provide a more objective basis for evaluating and selecting investment projects. They take into consideration both –

1. Magnitude of both incoming and outgoing cash flows – Projects can be capital intensive, time intensive, or both. Parker Dunfey shareholders have preference for diversified projects investment rather than prospective high income from a single capital intensive project.
2. Timing of the expected cash flows – stockholders of Parker Dunfey have higher preference for cash returns over 4-5 years rather than 10-15 years given the nature of the volatility in the industry.






Formula and Steps to Calculate Net Present Value (NPV) of Parker House (B)

NPV = Net Cash In Flowt1 / (1+r)t1 + Net Cash In Flowt2 / (1+r)t2 + … Net Cash In Flowtn / (1+r)tn
Less Net Cash Out Flowt0 / (1+r)t0

Where t = time period, in this case year 1, year 2 and so on.
r = discount rate or return that could be earned using other safe proposition such as fixed deposit or treasury bond rate. Net Cash In Flow – What the firm will get each year.
Net Cash Out Flow – What the firm needs to invest initially in the project.

Step 1 – Understand the nature of the project and calculate cash flow for each year.
Step 2 – Discount those cash flow based on the discount rate.
Step 3 – Add all the discounted cash flow.
Step 4 – Selection of the project

Why Technology & Operations Managers need to know Financial Tools such as Net Present Value (NPV)?

In our daily workplace we often come across people and colleagues who are just focused on their core competency and targets they have to deliver. For example marketing managers at Parker Dunfey often design programs whose objective is to drive brand awareness and customer reach. But how that 30 point increase in brand awareness or 10 point increase in customer touch points will result into shareholders’ value is not specified.

To overcome such scenarios managers at Parker Dunfey needs to not only know the financial aspect of project management but also needs to have tools to integrate them into part of the project development and monitoring plan.

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 15%

After working through various assumptions we reached a conclusion that risk is far higher than 6%. In a reasonably stable industry with weak competition - 15% discount rate can be a good benchmark.



Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 15 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10007767) -10007767 - -
Year 1 3453598 -6554169 3453598 0.8696 3003129
Year 2 3976622 -2577547 7430220 0.7561 3006898
Year 3 3947447 1369900 11377667 0.6575 2595510
Year 4 3243425 4613325 14621092 0.5718 1854439
TOTAL 10459975


The Net NPV after 4 years is 452208

(10459975 - 10007767 )








Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 20%


If the risk component is high in the industry then we should go for a higher hurdle rate / discount rate of 20%.

Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 20 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10007767) -10007767 - -
Year 1 3453598 -6554169 3453598 0.8333 2877998
Year 2 3976622 -2577547 7430220 0.6944 2761543
Year 3 3947447 1369900 11377667 0.5787 2284402
Year 4 3243425 4613325 14621092 0.4823 1564152
TOTAL 9488095


The Net NPV after 4 years is -519672

At 20% discount rate the NPV is negative (9488095 - 10007767 ) so ideally we can't select the project if macro and micro factors don't allow financial managers of Parker Dunfey to discount cash flow at lower discount rates such as 15%.





Acceptance Criteria of a Project based on NPV

Simplest Approach – If the investment project of Parker Dunfey has a NPV value higher than Zero then finance managers at Parker Dunfey can ACCEPT the project, otherwise they can reject the project. This means that project will deliver higher returns over the period of time than any alternate investment strategy.

In theory if the required rate of return or discount rate is chosen correctly by finance managers at Parker Dunfey, then the stock price of the Parker Dunfey should change by same amount of the NPV. In real world we know that share price also reflects various other factors that can be related to both macro and micro environment.

In the same vein – accepting the project with zero NPV should result in stagnant share price. Finance managers use discount rates as a measure of risk components in the project execution process.

Sensitivity Analysis

Project selection is often a far more complex decision than just choosing it based on the NPV number. Finance managers at Parker Dunfey should conduct a sensitivity analysis to better understand not only the inherent risk of the projects but also how those risks can be either factored in or mitigated during the project execution. Sensitivity analysis helps in –

What are the uncertainties surrounding the project Initial Cash Outlay (ICO’s). ICO’s often have several different components such as land, machinery, building, and other equipment.

What will be a multi year spillover effect of various taxation regulations.

What are the key aspects of the projects that need to be monitored, refined, and retuned for continuous delivery of projected cash flows.

Understanding of risks involved in the project.

What can impact the cash flow of the project.

Some of the assumptions while using the Discounted Cash Flow Methods –

Projects are assumed to be Mutually Exclusive – This is seldom the came in modern day giant organizations where projects are often inter-related and rejecting a project solely based on NPV can result in sunk cost from a related project.

Independent projects have independent cash flows – As explained in the marketing project – though the project may look independent but in reality it is not as the brand awareness project can be closely associated with the spending on sales promotions and product specific advertising.






Negotiation Strategy of Parker House (B)

References & Further Readings

Christopher H. Lovelock, Penny Pittman Merliss (2018), "Parker House (B) Harvard Business Review Case Study. Published by HBR Publications.


MB World Group SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Basic Materials , Chemicals - Plastics & Rubber


Fastbrick Robotics SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Software & Programming


China First Capital SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer Cyclical , Auto & Truck Parts


Gildan Activewear SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer Cyclical , Apparel/Accessories


KLab Inc SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Computer Networks


Carry Wealth SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer Cyclical , Apparel/Accessories


Cheetah SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer Cyclical , Recreational Products


Gremz SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Semiconductors


Okta SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Software & Programming