×




Mobil USM&R (B): New England Sales and Distribution, Spanish Version Net Present Value (NPV) / MBA Resources

Introduction to Net Present Value (NPV) - What is Net Present Value (NPV) ? How it impacts financial decisions regarding project management?

NPV solution for Mobil USM&R (B): New England Sales and Distribution, Spanish Version case study


At Oak Spring University, we provide corporate level professional Net Present Value (NPV) case study solution. Mobil USM&R (B): New England Sales and Distribution, Spanish Version case study is a Harvard Business School (HBR) case study written by Robert S. Kaplan. The Mobil USM&R (B): New England Sales and Distribution, Spanish Version (referred as “Bsc Bowl” from here on) case study provides evaluation & decision scenario in field of Finance & Accounting. It also touches upon business topics such as - Value proposition, Assessing performance, Balanced scorecard, Boards, Business processes, Financial analysis, Growth strategy, Motivating people, Sales, Strategic planning, Strategy execution.

The net present value (NPV) of an investment proposal is the present value of the proposal’s net cash flows less the proposal’s initial cash outflow. If a project’s NPV is greater than or equal to zero, the project should be accepted.

NPV = Present Value of Future Cash Flows LESS Project’s Initial Investment






Case Description of Mobil USM&R (B): New England Sales and Distribution, Spanish Version Case Study


The general manager of a local gasoline/distillate sales and distribution business unit must communicate a new strategy to the unit's 300 employees. An initial strategic planning exercise identified a high-priority list of opportunities that blended the parent division's national strategy with a customized, local strategy. But for the new strategy to be effective, the old measurement system, which stressed only sales volume and cost reduction, had to be replaced. The manager led the development of a local Balanced Scorecard (BSC), derived from the division scorecard (described in the (A) case). To communicate the critical features of the local BSC, the unit's senior managers established a Super Bowl competition in which all employees were challenged to achieve stretch targets on five BSC measures. This case describes the communication and management processes for the Super Bowl measures.


Case Authors : Robert S. Kaplan

Topic : Finance & Accounting

Related Areas : Assessing performance, Balanced scorecard, Boards, Business processes, Financial analysis, Growth strategy, Motivating people, Sales, Strategic planning, Strategy execution




Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 6% for Mobil USM&R (B): New England Sales and Distribution, Spanish Version Case Study


Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 6 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10019516) -10019516 - -
Year 1 3453682 -6565834 3453682 0.9434 3258191
Year 2 3954218 -2611616 7407900 0.89 3519240
Year 3 3973130 1361514 11381030 0.8396 3335917
Year 4 3231358 4592872 14612388 0.7921 2559538
TOTAL 14612388 12672885




The Net Present Value at 6% discount rate is 2653369

In isolation the NPV number doesn't mean much but put in right context then it is one of the best method to evaluate project returns. In this article we will cover -

Different methods of capital budgeting


What is NPV & Formula of NPV,
How it is calculated,
How to use NPV number for project evaluation, and
Scenario Planning given risks and management priorities.




Capital Budgeting Approaches

Methods of Capital Budgeting


There are four types of capital budgeting techniques that are widely used in the corporate world –

1. Net Present Value
2. Internal Rate of Return
3. Profitability Index
4. Payback Period

Apart from the Payback period method which is an additive method, rest of the methods are based on Discounted Cash Flow technique. Even though cash flow can be calculated based on the nature of the project, for the simplicity of the article we are assuming that all the expected cash flows are realized at the end of the year.

Discounted Cash Flow approaches provide a more objective basis for evaluating and selecting investment projects. They take into consideration both –

1. Timing of the expected cash flows – stockholders of Bsc Bowl have higher preference for cash returns over 4-5 years rather than 10-15 years given the nature of the volatility in the industry.
2. Magnitude of both incoming and outgoing cash flows – Projects can be capital intensive, time intensive, or both. Bsc Bowl shareholders have preference for diversified projects investment rather than prospective high income from a single capital intensive project.






Formula and Steps to Calculate Net Present Value (NPV) of Mobil USM&R (B): New England Sales and Distribution, Spanish Version

NPV = Net Cash In Flowt1 / (1+r)t1 + Net Cash In Flowt2 / (1+r)t2 + … Net Cash In Flowtn / (1+r)tn
Less Net Cash Out Flowt0 / (1+r)t0

Where t = time period, in this case year 1, year 2 and so on.
r = discount rate or return that could be earned using other safe proposition such as fixed deposit or treasury bond rate. Net Cash In Flow – What the firm will get each year.
Net Cash Out Flow – What the firm needs to invest initially in the project.

Step 1 – Understand the nature of the project and calculate cash flow for each year.
Step 2 – Discount those cash flow based on the discount rate.
Step 3 – Add all the discounted cash flow.
Step 4 – Selection of the project

Why Finance & Accounting Managers need to know Financial Tools such as Net Present Value (NPV)?

In our daily workplace we often come across people and colleagues who are just focused on their core competency and targets they have to deliver. For example marketing managers at Bsc Bowl often design programs whose objective is to drive brand awareness and customer reach. But how that 30 point increase in brand awareness or 10 point increase in customer touch points will result into shareholders’ value is not specified.

To overcome such scenarios managers at Bsc Bowl needs to not only know the financial aspect of project management but also needs to have tools to integrate them into part of the project development and monitoring plan.

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 15%

After working through various assumptions we reached a conclusion that risk is far higher than 6%. In a reasonably stable industry with weak competition - 15% discount rate can be a good benchmark.



Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 15 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10019516) -10019516 - -
Year 1 3453682 -6565834 3453682 0.8696 3003202
Year 2 3954218 -2611616 7407900 0.7561 2989957
Year 3 3973130 1361514 11381030 0.6575 2612397
Year 4 3231358 4592872 14612388 0.5718 1847539
TOTAL 10453096


The Net NPV after 4 years is 433580

(10453096 - 10019516 )








Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 20%


If the risk component is high in the industry then we should go for a higher hurdle rate / discount rate of 20%.

Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 20 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10019516) -10019516 - -
Year 1 3453682 -6565834 3453682 0.8333 2878068
Year 2 3954218 -2611616 7407900 0.6944 2745985
Year 3 3973130 1361514 11381030 0.5787 2299265
Year 4 3231358 4592872 14612388 0.4823 1558332
TOTAL 9481650


The Net NPV after 4 years is -537866

At 20% discount rate the NPV is negative (9481650 - 10019516 ) so ideally we can't select the project if macro and micro factors don't allow financial managers of Bsc Bowl to discount cash flow at lower discount rates such as 15%.





Acceptance Criteria of a Project based on NPV

Simplest Approach – If the investment project of Bsc Bowl has a NPV value higher than Zero then finance managers at Bsc Bowl can ACCEPT the project, otherwise they can reject the project. This means that project will deliver higher returns over the period of time than any alternate investment strategy.

In theory if the required rate of return or discount rate is chosen correctly by finance managers at Bsc Bowl, then the stock price of the Bsc Bowl should change by same amount of the NPV. In real world we know that share price also reflects various other factors that can be related to both macro and micro environment.

In the same vein – accepting the project with zero NPV should result in stagnant share price. Finance managers use discount rates as a measure of risk components in the project execution process.

Sensitivity Analysis

Project selection is often a far more complex decision than just choosing it based on the NPV number. Finance managers at Bsc Bowl should conduct a sensitivity analysis to better understand not only the inherent risk of the projects but also how those risks can be either factored in or mitigated during the project execution. Sensitivity analysis helps in –

Understanding of risks involved in the project.

What are the key aspects of the projects that need to be monitored, refined, and retuned for continuous delivery of projected cash flows.

What can impact the cash flow of the project.

What are the uncertainties surrounding the project Initial Cash Outlay (ICO’s). ICO’s often have several different components such as land, machinery, building, and other equipment.

What will be a multi year spillover effect of various taxation regulations.

Some of the assumptions while using the Discounted Cash Flow Methods –

Projects are assumed to be Mutually Exclusive – This is seldom the came in modern day giant organizations where projects are often inter-related and rejecting a project solely based on NPV can result in sunk cost from a related project.

Independent projects have independent cash flows – As explained in the marketing project – though the project may look independent but in reality it is not as the brand awareness project can be closely associated with the spending on sales promotions and product specific advertising.






Negotiation Strategy of Mobil USM&R (B): New England Sales and Distribution, Spanish Version

References & Further Readings

Robert S. Kaplan (2018), "Mobil USM&R (B): New England Sales and Distribution, Spanish Version Harvard Business Review Case Study. Published by HBR Publications.


John Wiley&Sons SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Services , Printing & Publishing


XL Energy Ltd SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Services , Communications Services


Human SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Services , Business Services


Emerson Radio SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer Cyclical , Appliance & Tool


Rebosis SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Services , Real Estate Operations


Inspire Medical Systems SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Healthcare , Medical Equipment & Supplies


Indomobil Multi Jasa SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Financial , Consumer Financial Services


UBI Banca SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Financial , S&Ls/Savings Banks


Shanghai Maling Aquarius SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer/Non-Cyclical , Fish/Livestock


Master Pack SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Basic Materials , Containers & Packaging


CPM SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Basic Materials , Chemical Manufacturing