×




Building the Digital Manufacturing Enterprise of the Future at Siemens Net Present Value (NPV) / MBA Resources

Introduction to Net Present Value (NPV) - What is Net Present Value (NPV) ? How it impacts financial decisions regarding project management?

NPV solution for Building the Digital Manufacturing Enterprise of the Future at Siemens case study


At Oak Spring University, we provide corporate level professional Net Present Value (NPV) case study solution. Building the Digital Manufacturing Enterprise of the Future at Siemens case study is a Harvard Business School (HBR) case study written by Willy Shih. The Building the Digital Manufacturing Enterprise of the Future at Siemens (referred as “Siemens Industrie” from here on) case study provides evaluation & decision scenario in field of Technology & Operations. It also touches upon business topics such as - Value proposition, Innovation, Internet, IT, Manufacturing.

The net present value (NPV) of an investment proposal is the present value of the proposal’s net cash flows less the proposal’s initial cash outflow. If a project’s NPV is greater than or equal to zero, the project should be accepted.

NPV = Present Value of Future Cash Flows LESS Project’s Initial Investment






Case Description of Building the Digital Manufacturing Enterprise of the Future at Siemens Case Study


This case describes the motivation for and the development of Siemens' digital manufacturing enterprise vision, which became the foundation for its implementation of Industrie 4.0. While the effort started with a purely defensive move by Anton Huber, head of the Digital Factory Division, to protect his core programmable logic controller business from the migration of value to software from hardware, the scope expanded radically as the company completed the acquisition of UGS. It was then able to articulate a complete roadmap from computer-aided product inception and design through simulation and automation system design all the way to the factory floor. The initial implementation at the Electronics Works Amberg became widely cited as the prototype for Industrie 4.0. The central question of the case is the importance of vertical integration to the delivery of the vision, in the face of pressure for open standards that will expose large parts of the system to competition and price pressure. How will Siemens earn a reasonable rate of return?


Case Authors : Willy Shih

Topic : Technology & Operations

Related Areas : Innovation, Internet, IT, Manufacturing




Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 6% for Building the Digital Manufacturing Enterprise of the Future at Siemens Case Study


Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 6 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10014924) -10014924 - -
Year 1 3451121 -6563803 3451121 0.9434 3255775
Year 2 3976632 -2587171 7427753 0.89 3539188
Year 3 3944577 1357406 11372330 0.8396 3311943
Year 4 3244221 4601627 14616551 0.7921 2569727
TOTAL 14616551 12676633




The Net Present Value at 6% discount rate is 2661709

In isolation the NPV number doesn't mean much but put in right context then it is one of the best method to evaluate project returns. In this article we will cover -

Different methods of capital budgeting


What is NPV & Formula of NPV,
How it is calculated,
How to use NPV number for project evaluation, and
Scenario Planning given risks and management priorities.




Capital Budgeting Approaches

Methods of Capital Budgeting


There are four types of capital budgeting techniques that are widely used in the corporate world –

1. Net Present Value
2. Payback Period
3. Internal Rate of Return
4. Profitability Index

Apart from the Payback period method which is an additive method, rest of the methods are based on Discounted Cash Flow technique. Even though cash flow can be calculated based on the nature of the project, for the simplicity of the article we are assuming that all the expected cash flows are realized at the end of the year.

Discounted Cash Flow approaches provide a more objective basis for evaluating and selecting investment projects. They take into consideration both –

1. Magnitude of both incoming and outgoing cash flows – Projects can be capital intensive, time intensive, or both. Siemens Industrie shareholders have preference for diversified projects investment rather than prospective high income from a single capital intensive project.
2. Timing of the expected cash flows – stockholders of Siemens Industrie have higher preference for cash returns over 4-5 years rather than 10-15 years given the nature of the volatility in the industry.






Formula and Steps to Calculate Net Present Value (NPV) of Building the Digital Manufacturing Enterprise of the Future at Siemens

NPV = Net Cash In Flowt1 / (1+r)t1 + Net Cash In Flowt2 / (1+r)t2 + … Net Cash In Flowtn / (1+r)tn
Less Net Cash Out Flowt0 / (1+r)t0

Where t = time period, in this case year 1, year 2 and so on.
r = discount rate or return that could be earned using other safe proposition such as fixed deposit or treasury bond rate. Net Cash In Flow – What the firm will get each year.
Net Cash Out Flow – What the firm needs to invest initially in the project.

Step 1 – Understand the nature of the project and calculate cash flow for each year.
Step 2 – Discount those cash flow based on the discount rate.
Step 3 – Add all the discounted cash flow.
Step 4 – Selection of the project

Why Technology & Operations Managers need to know Financial Tools such as Net Present Value (NPV)?

In our daily workplace we often come across people and colleagues who are just focused on their core competency and targets they have to deliver. For example marketing managers at Siemens Industrie often design programs whose objective is to drive brand awareness and customer reach. But how that 30 point increase in brand awareness or 10 point increase in customer touch points will result into shareholders’ value is not specified.

To overcome such scenarios managers at Siemens Industrie needs to not only know the financial aspect of project management but also needs to have tools to integrate them into part of the project development and monitoring plan.

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 15%

After working through various assumptions we reached a conclusion that risk is far higher than 6%. In a reasonably stable industry with weak competition - 15% discount rate can be a good benchmark.



Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 15 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10014924) -10014924 - -
Year 1 3451121 -6563803 3451121 0.8696 3000975
Year 2 3976632 -2587171 7427753 0.7561 3006905
Year 3 3944577 1357406 11372330 0.6575 2593623
Year 4 3244221 4601627 14616551 0.5718 1854894
TOTAL 10456397


The Net NPV after 4 years is 441473

(10456397 - 10014924 )








Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 20%


If the risk component is high in the industry then we should go for a higher hurdle rate / discount rate of 20%.

Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 20 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10014924) -10014924 - -
Year 1 3451121 -6563803 3451121 0.8333 2875934
Year 2 3976632 -2587171 7427753 0.6944 2761550
Year 3 3944577 1357406 11372330 0.5787 2282741
Year 4 3244221 4601627 14616551 0.4823 1564536
TOTAL 9484761


The Net NPV after 4 years is -530163

At 20% discount rate the NPV is negative (9484761 - 10014924 ) so ideally we can't select the project if macro and micro factors don't allow financial managers of Siemens Industrie to discount cash flow at lower discount rates such as 15%.





Acceptance Criteria of a Project based on NPV

Simplest Approach – If the investment project of Siemens Industrie has a NPV value higher than Zero then finance managers at Siemens Industrie can ACCEPT the project, otherwise they can reject the project. This means that project will deliver higher returns over the period of time than any alternate investment strategy.

In theory if the required rate of return or discount rate is chosen correctly by finance managers at Siemens Industrie, then the stock price of the Siemens Industrie should change by same amount of the NPV. In real world we know that share price also reflects various other factors that can be related to both macro and micro environment.

In the same vein – accepting the project with zero NPV should result in stagnant share price. Finance managers use discount rates as a measure of risk components in the project execution process.

Sensitivity Analysis

Project selection is often a far more complex decision than just choosing it based on the NPV number. Finance managers at Siemens Industrie should conduct a sensitivity analysis to better understand not only the inherent risk of the projects but also how those risks can be either factored in or mitigated during the project execution. Sensitivity analysis helps in –

What are the key aspects of the projects that need to be monitored, refined, and retuned for continuous delivery of projected cash flows.

What will be a multi year spillover effect of various taxation regulations.

What are the uncertainties surrounding the project Initial Cash Outlay (ICO’s). ICO’s often have several different components such as land, machinery, building, and other equipment.

What can impact the cash flow of the project.

Understanding of risks involved in the project.

Some of the assumptions while using the Discounted Cash Flow Methods –

Projects are assumed to be Mutually Exclusive – This is seldom the came in modern day giant organizations where projects are often inter-related and rejecting a project solely based on NPV can result in sunk cost from a related project.

Independent projects have independent cash flows – As explained in the marketing project – though the project may look independent but in reality it is not as the brand awareness project can be closely associated with the spending on sales promotions and product specific advertising.






Negotiation Strategy of Building the Digital Manufacturing Enterprise of the Future at Siemens

References & Further Readings

Willy Shih (2018), "Building the Digital Manufacturing Enterprise of the Future at Siemens Harvard Business Review Case Study. Published by HBR Publications.


ETV Pennsylvania MIT SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Financial , Misc. Financial Services


Temple Bar SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Financial , Misc. Financial Services


KC Feed SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer/Non-Cyclical , Food Processing


Sonic Healthcare SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Healthcare , Healthcare Facilities


Rothschild & Co SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Financial , Investment Services


Mirvac Group SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Capital Goods , Construction Services


Lexaria Bioscience SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer/Non-Cyclical , Food Processing


Diasorin SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Healthcare , Biotechnology & Drugs


Alpha Real Trust Ltd SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Financial , Misc. Financial Services