×




E-Business: Revolution, Evolution, or Hype? Net Present Value (NPV) / MBA Resources

Introduction to Net Present Value (NPV) - What is Net Present Value (NPV) ? How it impacts financial decisions regarding project management?

NPV solution for E-Business: Revolution, Evolution, or Hype? case study


At Oak Spring University, we provide corporate level professional Net Present Value (NPV) case study solution. E-Business: Revolution, Evolution, or Hype? case study is a Harvard Business School (HBR) case study written by Tim Coltman, Timothy M. Devinney, Alopi Latukefu, David F. Midgley. The E-Business: Revolution, Evolution, or Hype? (referred as “Firms Internet” from here on) case study provides evaluation & decision scenario in field of Technology & Operations. It also touches upon business topics such as - Value proposition, Competitive strategy, Internet.

The net present value (NPV) of an investment proposal is the present value of the proposal’s net cash flows less the proposal’s initial cash outflow. If a project’s NPV is greater than or equal to zero, the project should be accepted.

NPV = Present Value of Future Cash Flows LESS Project’s Initial Investment






Case Description of E-Business: Revolution, Evolution, or Hype? Case Study


Will e-business ultimately represent a revolution in the way firms operate or does it represent a more normal evolution in the operations of some firms? Despite the bursting of the Internet stock bubble, it is important to answer this question. As the Internet continues to grow in size and capability, many firms are implementing Web-based applications, and Internet-derived economic change continues to occur. If this change is revolutionary, now or in the near future, then many managers will be required to rethink their firm strategies and managerial responses in a profound way. On the other hand, if the change is simply evolutionary, it will apply more to some firms than to others, and pre-Internet strategies and managerial responses will still be appropriate in many circumstances. Although it is premature to categorize e-business as revolutionary, e-business is not a silver bullet; rather, it will be a useful tool for some firms and some tasks. There are a number of key questions firms should ask to make sense of e-business.


Case Authors : Tim Coltman, Timothy M. Devinney, Alopi Latukefu, David F. Midgley

Topic : Technology & Operations

Related Areas : Competitive strategy, Internet




Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 6% for E-Business: Revolution, Evolution, or Hype? Case Study


Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 6 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10016248) -10016248 - -
Year 1 3455497 -6560751 3455497 0.9434 3259903
Year 2 3962810 -2597941 7418307 0.89 3526887
Year 3 3956373 1358432 11374680 0.8396 3321847
Year 4 3224790 4583222 14599470 0.7921 2554336
TOTAL 14599470 12662972




The Net Present Value at 6% discount rate is 2646724

In isolation the NPV number doesn't mean much but put in right context then it is one of the best method to evaluate project returns. In this article we will cover -

Different methods of capital budgeting


What is NPV & Formula of NPV,
How it is calculated,
How to use NPV number for project evaluation, and
Scenario Planning given risks and management priorities.




Capital Budgeting Approaches

Methods of Capital Budgeting


There are four types of capital budgeting techniques that are widely used in the corporate world –

1. Internal Rate of Return
2. Net Present Value
3. Payback Period
4. Profitability Index

Apart from the Payback period method which is an additive method, rest of the methods are based on Discounted Cash Flow technique. Even though cash flow can be calculated based on the nature of the project, for the simplicity of the article we are assuming that all the expected cash flows are realized at the end of the year.

Discounted Cash Flow approaches provide a more objective basis for evaluating and selecting investment projects. They take into consideration both –

1. Timing of the expected cash flows – stockholders of Firms Internet have higher preference for cash returns over 4-5 years rather than 10-15 years given the nature of the volatility in the industry.
2. Magnitude of both incoming and outgoing cash flows – Projects can be capital intensive, time intensive, or both. Firms Internet shareholders have preference for diversified projects investment rather than prospective high income from a single capital intensive project.






Formula and Steps to Calculate Net Present Value (NPV) of E-Business: Revolution, Evolution, or Hype?

NPV = Net Cash In Flowt1 / (1+r)t1 + Net Cash In Flowt2 / (1+r)t2 + … Net Cash In Flowtn / (1+r)tn
Less Net Cash Out Flowt0 / (1+r)t0

Where t = time period, in this case year 1, year 2 and so on.
r = discount rate or return that could be earned using other safe proposition such as fixed deposit or treasury bond rate. Net Cash In Flow – What the firm will get each year.
Net Cash Out Flow – What the firm needs to invest initially in the project.

Step 1 – Understand the nature of the project and calculate cash flow for each year.
Step 2 – Discount those cash flow based on the discount rate.
Step 3 – Add all the discounted cash flow.
Step 4 – Selection of the project

Why Technology & Operations Managers need to know Financial Tools such as Net Present Value (NPV)?

In our daily workplace we often come across people and colleagues who are just focused on their core competency and targets they have to deliver. For example marketing managers at Firms Internet often design programs whose objective is to drive brand awareness and customer reach. But how that 30 point increase in brand awareness or 10 point increase in customer touch points will result into shareholders’ value is not specified.

To overcome such scenarios managers at Firms Internet needs to not only know the financial aspect of project management but also needs to have tools to integrate them into part of the project development and monitoring plan.

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 15%

After working through various assumptions we reached a conclusion that risk is far higher than 6%. In a reasonably stable industry with weak competition - 15% discount rate can be a good benchmark.



Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 15 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10016248) -10016248 - -
Year 1 3455497 -6560751 3455497 0.8696 3004780
Year 2 3962810 -2597941 7418307 0.7561 2996454
Year 3 3956373 1358432 11374680 0.6575 2601379
Year 4 3224790 4583222 14599470 0.5718 1843784
TOTAL 10446397


The Net NPV after 4 years is 430149

(10446397 - 10016248 )








Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 20%


If the risk component is high in the industry then we should go for a higher hurdle rate / discount rate of 20%.

Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 20 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10016248) -10016248 - -
Year 1 3455497 -6560751 3455497 0.8333 2879581
Year 2 3962810 -2597941 7418307 0.6944 2751951
Year 3 3956373 1358432 11374680 0.5787 2289568
Year 4 3224790 4583222 14599470 0.4823 1555165
TOTAL 9476265


The Net NPV after 4 years is -539983

At 20% discount rate the NPV is negative (9476265 - 10016248 ) so ideally we can't select the project if macro and micro factors don't allow financial managers of Firms Internet to discount cash flow at lower discount rates such as 15%.





Acceptance Criteria of a Project based on NPV

Simplest Approach – If the investment project of Firms Internet has a NPV value higher than Zero then finance managers at Firms Internet can ACCEPT the project, otherwise they can reject the project. This means that project will deliver higher returns over the period of time than any alternate investment strategy.

In theory if the required rate of return or discount rate is chosen correctly by finance managers at Firms Internet, then the stock price of the Firms Internet should change by same amount of the NPV. In real world we know that share price also reflects various other factors that can be related to both macro and micro environment.

In the same vein – accepting the project with zero NPV should result in stagnant share price. Finance managers use discount rates as a measure of risk components in the project execution process.

Sensitivity Analysis

Project selection is often a far more complex decision than just choosing it based on the NPV number. Finance managers at Firms Internet should conduct a sensitivity analysis to better understand not only the inherent risk of the projects but also how those risks can be either factored in or mitigated during the project execution. Sensitivity analysis helps in –

What will be a multi year spillover effect of various taxation regulations.

What are the key aspects of the projects that need to be monitored, refined, and retuned for continuous delivery of projected cash flows.

Understanding of risks involved in the project.

What can impact the cash flow of the project.

What are the uncertainties surrounding the project Initial Cash Outlay (ICO’s). ICO’s often have several different components such as land, machinery, building, and other equipment.

Some of the assumptions while using the Discounted Cash Flow Methods –

Projects are assumed to be Mutually Exclusive – This is seldom the came in modern day giant organizations where projects are often inter-related and rejecting a project solely based on NPV can result in sunk cost from a related project.

Independent projects have independent cash flows – As explained in the marketing project – though the project may look independent but in reality it is not as the brand awareness project can be closely associated with the spending on sales promotions and product specific advertising.






Negotiation Strategy of E-Business: Revolution, Evolution, or Hype?

References & Further Readings

Tim Coltman, Timothy M. Devinney, Alopi Latukefu, David F. Midgley (2018), "E-Business: Revolution, Evolution, or Hype? Harvard Business Review Case Study. Published by HBR Publications.


Jayjun Co SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer/Non-Cyclical , Personal & Household Prods.


Maeda Kosen Co Ltd SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Basic Materials , Fabricated Plastic & Rubber


Buildingresearch A SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Capital Goods , Construction - Raw Materials


Zhejiang Starry Pharm SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Healthcare , Biotechnology & Drugs


PHI NV SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Energy , Oil Well Services & Equipment


GAME Digital SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Services , Retail (Specialty)


Shanghai Zhongji SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Software & Programming


GCL System SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Semiconductors


TransAlta Corp SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Utilities , Electric Utilities