×




Racing into the Future: Strategic Marketing for the Regina Auto Racing Club Net Present Value (NPV) / MBA Resources

Introduction to Net Present Value (NPV) - What is Net Present Value (NPV) ? How it impacts financial decisions regarding project management?

NPV solution for Racing into the Future: Strategic Marketing for the Regina Auto Racing Club case study


At Oak Spring University, we provide corporate level professional Net Present Value (NPV) case study solution. Racing into the Future: Strategic Marketing for the Regina Auto Racing Club case study is a Harvard Business School (HBR) case study written by Dwight Heinrichs, Chris Street, Michael Taylor. The Racing into the Future: Strategic Marketing for the Regina Auto Racing Club (referred as “Club Racing” from here on) case study provides evaluation & decision scenario in field of Sales & Marketing. It also touches upon business topics such as - Value proposition, .

The net present value (NPV) of an investment proposal is the present value of the proposal’s net cash flows less the proposal’s initial cash outflow. If a project’s NPV is greater than or equal to zero, the project should be accepted.

NPV = Present Value of Future Cash Flows LESS Project’s Initial Investment






Case Description of Racing into the Future: Strategic Marketing for the Regina Auto Racing Club Case Study


The Regina Auto Racing Club (RARC) had been operating the Kings Park Speedway since 1967. In 2016, the race track and facilities were beginning to show their age and were in need of costly upgrading. Unfortunately, the club had also been suffering from declining attendance over the past five years, and the associated decline in ticket revenue had led to a shrinking race schedule. At the end of the race season in 2016, the club managed to break even financially and had a modest bank account balance. Although RARC was a non-profit organization, the continued financial viability of the club was at risk, and action was required to increase revenue. The club needed to decide among four non-mutually exclusive business strategies. Should it repair and rebuild the facilities to renew the appeal of the venue and attract more spectators? Should it increase its advertising and promotion activities to improve awareness of the club and events? Should it increase the number of race classes and special racing events, or should it introduce non-racing events to the facility to take advantage of other revenue-generating opportunities?


Case Authors : Dwight Heinrichs, Chris Street, Michael Taylor

Topic : Sales & Marketing

Related Areas :




Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 6% for Racing into the Future: Strategic Marketing for the Regina Auto Racing Club Case Study


Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 6 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10026307) -10026307 - -
Year 1 3470814 -6555493 3470814 0.9434 3274353
Year 2 3957055 -2598438 7427869 0.89 3521765
Year 3 3956000 1357562 11383869 0.8396 3321534
Year 4 3230529 4588091 14614398 0.7921 2558882
TOTAL 14614398 12676533




The Net Present Value at 6% discount rate is 2650226

In isolation the NPV number doesn't mean much but put in right context then it is one of the best method to evaluate project returns. In this article we will cover -

Different methods of capital budgeting


What is NPV & Formula of NPV,
How it is calculated,
How to use NPV number for project evaluation, and
Scenario Planning given risks and management priorities.




Capital Budgeting Approaches

Methods of Capital Budgeting


There are four types of capital budgeting techniques that are widely used in the corporate world –

1. Net Present Value
2. Payback Period
3. Internal Rate of Return
4. Profitability Index

Apart from the Payback period method which is an additive method, rest of the methods are based on Discounted Cash Flow technique. Even though cash flow can be calculated based on the nature of the project, for the simplicity of the article we are assuming that all the expected cash flows are realized at the end of the year.

Discounted Cash Flow approaches provide a more objective basis for evaluating and selecting investment projects. They take into consideration both –

1. Timing of the expected cash flows – stockholders of Club Racing have higher preference for cash returns over 4-5 years rather than 10-15 years given the nature of the volatility in the industry.
2. Magnitude of both incoming and outgoing cash flows – Projects can be capital intensive, time intensive, or both. Club Racing shareholders have preference for diversified projects investment rather than prospective high income from a single capital intensive project.






Formula and Steps to Calculate Net Present Value (NPV) of Racing into the Future: Strategic Marketing for the Regina Auto Racing Club

NPV = Net Cash In Flowt1 / (1+r)t1 + Net Cash In Flowt2 / (1+r)t2 + … Net Cash In Flowtn / (1+r)tn
Less Net Cash Out Flowt0 / (1+r)t0

Where t = time period, in this case year 1, year 2 and so on.
r = discount rate or return that could be earned using other safe proposition such as fixed deposit or treasury bond rate. Net Cash In Flow – What the firm will get each year.
Net Cash Out Flow – What the firm needs to invest initially in the project.

Step 1 – Understand the nature of the project and calculate cash flow for each year.
Step 2 – Discount those cash flow based on the discount rate.
Step 3 – Add all the discounted cash flow.
Step 4 – Selection of the project

Why Sales & Marketing Managers need to know Financial Tools such as Net Present Value (NPV)?

In our daily workplace we often come across people and colleagues who are just focused on their core competency and targets they have to deliver. For example marketing managers at Club Racing often design programs whose objective is to drive brand awareness and customer reach. But how that 30 point increase in brand awareness or 10 point increase in customer touch points will result into shareholders’ value is not specified.

To overcome such scenarios managers at Club Racing needs to not only know the financial aspect of project management but also needs to have tools to integrate them into part of the project development and monitoring plan.

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 15%

After working through various assumptions we reached a conclusion that risk is far higher than 6%. In a reasonably stable industry with weak competition - 15% discount rate can be a good benchmark.



Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 15 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10026307) -10026307 - -
Year 1 3470814 -6555493 3470814 0.8696 3018099
Year 2 3957055 -2598438 7427869 0.7561 2992102
Year 3 3956000 1357562 11383869 0.6575 2601134
Year 4 3230529 4588091 14614398 0.5718 1847065
TOTAL 10458401


The Net NPV after 4 years is 432094

(10458401 - 10026307 )








Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 20%


If the risk component is high in the industry then we should go for a higher hurdle rate / discount rate of 20%.

Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 20 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10026307) -10026307 - -
Year 1 3470814 -6555493 3470814 0.8333 2892345
Year 2 3957055 -2598438 7427869 0.6944 2747955
Year 3 3956000 1357562 11383869 0.5787 2289352
Year 4 3230529 4588091 14614398 0.4823 1557933
TOTAL 9487584


The Net NPV after 4 years is -538723

At 20% discount rate the NPV is negative (9487584 - 10026307 ) so ideally we can't select the project if macro and micro factors don't allow financial managers of Club Racing to discount cash flow at lower discount rates such as 15%.





Acceptance Criteria of a Project based on NPV

Simplest Approach – If the investment project of Club Racing has a NPV value higher than Zero then finance managers at Club Racing can ACCEPT the project, otherwise they can reject the project. This means that project will deliver higher returns over the period of time than any alternate investment strategy.

In theory if the required rate of return or discount rate is chosen correctly by finance managers at Club Racing, then the stock price of the Club Racing should change by same amount of the NPV. In real world we know that share price also reflects various other factors that can be related to both macro and micro environment.

In the same vein – accepting the project with zero NPV should result in stagnant share price. Finance managers use discount rates as a measure of risk components in the project execution process.

Sensitivity Analysis

Project selection is often a far more complex decision than just choosing it based on the NPV number. Finance managers at Club Racing should conduct a sensitivity analysis to better understand not only the inherent risk of the projects but also how those risks can be either factored in or mitigated during the project execution. Sensitivity analysis helps in –

What will be a multi year spillover effect of various taxation regulations.

What can impact the cash flow of the project.

What are the key aspects of the projects that need to be monitored, refined, and retuned for continuous delivery of projected cash flows.

What are the uncertainties surrounding the project Initial Cash Outlay (ICO’s). ICO’s often have several different components such as land, machinery, building, and other equipment.

Understanding of risks involved in the project.

Some of the assumptions while using the Discounted Cash Flow Methods –

Projects are assumed to be Mutually Exclusive – This is seldom the came in modern day giant organizations where projects are often inter-related and rejecting a project solely based on NPV can result in sunk cost from a related project.

Independent projects have independent cash flows – As explained in the marketing project – though the project may look independent but in reality it is not as the brand awareness project can be closely associated with the spending on sales promotions and product specific advertising.






Negotiation Strategy of Racing into the Future: Strategic Marketing for the Regina Auto Racing Club

References & Further Readings

Dwight Heinrichs, Chris Street, Michael Taylor (2018), "Racing into the Future: Strategic Marketing for the Regina Auto Racing Club Harvard Business Review Case Study. Published by HBR Publications.


Swing Media Technology Group Ltd SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer Cyclical , Recreational Products


Gowa Makassar SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Capital Goods , Construction Services


Capitaland Mall SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Services , Real Estate Operations


Valuedesign SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Services , Business Services


Harbin Gong Da High-Tech SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer/Non-Cyclical , Food Processing


Bankia SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Financial , Money Center Banks


Comfort Sci Tech A SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer Cyclical , Appliance & Tool


Proto Labs SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Software & Programming