×




Gone Rural Net Present Value (NPV) / MBA Resources

Introduction to Net Present Value (NPV) - What is Net Present Value (NPV) ? How it impacts financial decisions regarding project management?

NPV solution for Gone Rural case study


At Oak Spring University, we provide corporate level professional Net Present Value (NPV) case study solution. Gone Rural case study is a Harvard Business School (HBR) case study written by Andre F. Perold. The Gone Rural (referred as “Rural Women” from here on) case study provides evaluation & decision scenario in field of Finance & Accounting. It also touches upon business topics such as - Value proposition, Entrepreneurial finance, Financial analysis, Forecasting, Social enterprise, Social responsibility.

The net present value (NPV) of an investment proposal is the present value of the proposal’s net cash flows less the proposal’s initial cash outflow. If a project’s NPV is greater than or equal to zero, the project should be accepted.

NPV = Present Value of Future Cash Flows LESS Project’s Initial Investment






Case Description of Gone Rural Case Study


To maximize their effectiveness, color cases should be printed in color.Gone Rural employs 750 women in rural communities across Swaziland to produce handwoven baskets and other hand-crafted items. The women are mostly grandmothers caring for children orphaned as a result of the country's high AIDS-related death rate. The company has a strong social mission to improve the economic situation of these women and wants to grow rapidly. It has been very successful designing, making, and selling its products in the high-end global market place. It now needs to raise significant external capital to build new facilities. This may be the first time in its 18-year history that the company brings in external profit-minded stakeholders.


Case Authors : Andre F. Perold

Topic : Finance & Accounting

Related Areas : Entrepreneurial finance, Financial analysis, Forecasting, Social enterprise, Social responsibility




Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 6% for Gone Rural Case Study


Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 6 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10025577) -10025577 - -
Year 1 3463514 -6562063 3463514 0.9434 3267466
Year 2 3975981 -2586082 7439495 0.89 3538609
Year 3 3957257 1371175 11396752 0.8396 3322589
Year 4 3245949 4617124 14642701 0.7921 2571096
TOTAL 14642701 12699760




The Net Present Value at 6% discount rate is 2674183

In isolation the NPV number doesn't mean much but put in right context then it is one of the best method to evaluate project returns. In this article we will cover -

Different methods of capital budgeting


What is NPV & Formula of NPV,
How it is calculated,
How to use NPV number for project evaluation, and
Scenario Planning given risks and management priorities.




Capital Budgeting Approaches

Methods of Capital Budgeting


There are four types of capital budgeting techniques that are widely used in the corporate world –

1. Payback Period
2. Net Present Value
3. Profitability Index
4. Internal Rate of Return

Apart from the Payback period method which is an additive method, rest of the methods are based on Discounted Cash Flow technique. Even though cash flow can be calculated based on the nature of the project, for the simplicity of the article we are assuming that all the expected cash flows are realized at the end of the year.

Discounted Cash Flow approaches provide a more objective basis for evaluating and selecting investment projects. They take into consideration both –

1. Magnitude of both incoming and outgoing cash flows – Projects can be capital intensive, time intensive, or both. Rural Women shareholders have preference for diversified projects investment rather than prospective high income from a single capital intensive project.
2. Timing of the expected cash flows – stockholders of Rural Women have higher preference for cash returns over 4-5 years rather than 10-15 years given the nature of the volatility in the industry.






Formula and Steps to Calculate Net Present Value (NPV) of Gone Rural

NPV = Net Cash In Flowt1 / (1+r)t1 + Net Cash In Flowt2 / (1+r)t2 + … Net Cash In Flowtn / (1+r)tn
Less Net Cash Out Flowt0 / (1+r)t0

Where t = time period, in this case year 1, year 2 and so on.
r = discount rate or return that could be earned using other safe proposition such as fixed deposit or treasury bond rate. Net Cash In Flow – What the firm will get each year.
Net Cash Out Flow – What the firm needs to invest initially in the project.

Step 1 – Understand the nature of the project and calculate cash flow for each year.
Step 2 – Discount those cash flow based on the discount rate.
Step 3 – Add all the discounted cash flow.
Step 4 – Selection of the project

Why Finance & Accounting Managers need to know Financial Tools such as Net Present Value (NPV)?

In our daily workplace we often come across people and colleagues who are just focused on their core competency and targets they have to deliver. For example marketing managers at Rural Women often design programs whose objective is to drive brand awareness and customer reach. But how that 30 point increase in brand awareness or 10 point increase in customer touch points will result into shareholders’ value is not specified.

To overcome such scenarios managers at Rural Women needs to not only know the financial aspect of project management but also needs to have tools to integrate them into part of the project development and monitoring plan.

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 15%

After working through various assumptions we reached a conclusion that risk is far higher than 6%. In a reasonably stable industry with weak competition - 15% discount rate can be a good benchmark.



Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 15 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10025577) -10025577 - -
Year 1 3463514 -6562063 3463514 0.8696 3011751
Year 2 3975981 -2586082 7439495 0.7561 3006413
Year 3 3957257 1371175 11396752 0.6575 2601961
Year 4 3245949 4617124 14642701 0.5718 1855882
TOTAL 10476007


The Net NPV after 4 years is 450430

(10476007 - 10025577 )








Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 20%


If the risk component is high in the industry then we should go for a higher hurdle rate / discount rate of 20%.

Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 20 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10025577) -10025577 - -
Year 1 3463514 -6562063 3463514 0.8333 2886262
Year 2 3975981 -2586082 7439495 0.6944 2761098
Year 3 3957257 1371175 11396752 0.5787 2290079
Year 4 3245949 4617124 14642701 0.4823 1565369
TOTAL 9502808


The Net NPV after 4 years is -522769

At 20% discount rate the NPV is negative (9502808 - 10025577 ) so ideally we can't select the project if macro and micro factors don't allow financial managers of Rural Women to discount cash flow at lower discount rates such as 15%.





Acceptance Criteria of a Project based on NPV

Simplest Approach – If the investment project of Rural Women has a NPV value higher than Zero then finance managers at Rural Women can ACCEPT the project, otherwise they can reject the project. This means that project will deliver higher returns over the period of time than any alternate investment strategy.

In theory if the required rate of return or discount rate is chosen correctly by finance managers at Rural Women, then the stock price of the Rural Women should change by same amount of the NPV. In real world we know that share price also reflects various other factors that can be related to both macro and micro environment.

In the same vein – accepting the project with zero NPV should result in stagnant share price. Finance managers use discount rates as a measure of risk components in the project execution process.

Sensitivity Analysis

Project selection is often a far more complex decision than just choosing it based on the NPV number. Finance managers at Rural Women should conduct a sensitivity analysis to better understand not only the inherent risk of the projects but also how those risks can be either factored in or mitigated during the project execution. Sensitivity analysis helps in –

What are the key aspects of the projects that need to be monitored, refined, and retuned for continuous delivery of projected cash flows.

Understanding of risks involved in the project.

What will be a multi year spillover effect of various taxation regulations.

What can impact the cash flow of the project.

What are the uncertainties surrounding the project Initial Cash Outlay (ICO’s). ICO’s often have several different components such as land, machinery, building, and other equipment.

Some of the assumptions while using the Discounted Cash Flow Methods –

Projects are assumed to be Mutually Exclusive – This is seldom the came in modern day giant organizations where projects are often inter-related and rejecting a project solely based on NPV can result in sunk cost from a related project.

Independent projects have independent cash flows – As explained in the marketing project – though the project may look independent but in reality it is not as the brand awareness project can be closely associated with the spending on sales promotions and product specific advertising.






Negotiation Strategy of Gone Rural

References & Further Readings

Andre F. Perold (2018), "Gone Rural Harvard Business Review Case Study. Published by HBR Publications.


Just Group SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Financial , Insurance (Life)


Ratio L SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Energy , Oil & Gas - Integrated


Fujian SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Services , Hotels & Motels


Energean Oil Gas SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Energy , Oil & Gas - Integrated


Foresight Autonomous SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Software & Programming


Adhunik SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Basic Materials , Iron & Steel


Tessi SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Software & Programming


Cepatwawasan SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer/Non-Cyclical , Food Processing