FANUC Corporation: Reassessing the Firm's Governance and Financial Policies Net Present Value (NPV) / MBA Resources

Introduction to Net Present Value (NPV) - What is Net Present Value (NPV) ? How it impacts financial decisions regarding project management?

NPV solution for FANUC Corporation: Reassessing the Firm's Governance and Financial Policies case study

At Oak Spring University, we provide corporate level professional Net Present Value (NPV) case study solution. FANUC Corporation: Reassessing the Firm's Governance and Financial Policies case study is a Harvard Business School (HBR) case study written by Benjamin C. Esty, Nobuo Sato, Akiko Kanno. The FANUC Corporation: Reassessing the Firm's Governance and Financial Policies (referred as “Fanuc Inaba” from here on) case study provides evaluation & decision scenario in field of Finance & Accounting. It also touches upon business topics such as - Value proposition, Corporate governance, Economics, Financial analysis, Financial management, Policy, Regulation.

The net present value (NPV) of an investment proposal is the present value of the proposal’s net cash flows less the proposal’s initial cash outflow. If a project’s NPV is greater than or equal to zero, the project should be accepted.

NPV = Present Value of Future Cash Flows LESS Project’s Initial Investment

---

Case Description of FANUC Corporation: Reassessing the Firm's Governance and Financial Policies Case Study

In February 2015, Daniel Loeb (a US-based activist investor) announced his firm had a large investment in FANUC Corporation, a leading producer of industrial robots and software for machine tools. Loeb was demanding that the Japanese firm change its financial and governance policies (e.g., distribute more cash, fix its "illogical" capital structure, and provide more information to shareholders). FANUC's CEO, Yoshiharu Inaba, and his board must decide if and how to respond. One the one hand, the firm had been very successful having built leading global market shares in each of its core divisions and profitability that exceeded what Goldman Sachs earned on a per person basis. On the other hand, the Japanese government was calling for financial and governance reform as part of the prime minister's recently-announced economic growth strategy known as "Abenomics". Although Inaba and his team had previously considered many of the proposed changes, the question was whether it was now time to actually make some of the changes.

Case Authors : Benjamin C. Esty, Nobuo Sato, Akiko Kanno

Topic : Finance & Accounting

Related Areas : Corporate governance, Economics, Financial analysis, Financial management, Policy, Regulation

---

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 6% for FANUC Corporation: Reassessing the Firm's Governance and Financial Policies Case Study

Years	Cash Flow	Net Cash Flow	Cumulative     Cash Flow	Discount Rate @ 6 %	Discounted Cash Flows
Year 0	(10010923)	-10010923	-	-
Year 1	3456973	-6553950	3456973	0.9434	3261295
Year 2	3967778	-2586172	7424751	0.89	3531308
Year 3	3946174	1360002	11370925	0.8396	3313284
Year 4	3239378	4599380	14610303	0.7921	2565891
TOTAL			14610303		12671778

The Net Present Value at 6% discount rate is 2660855

In isolation the NPV number doesn't mean much but put in right context then it is one of the best method to evaluate project returns. In this article we will cover -

Different methods of capital budgeting

What is NPV & Formula of NPV,
How it is calculated,
How to use NPV number for project evaluation, and
Scenario Planning given risks and management priorities.

---

Capital Budgeting Approaches

Methods of Capital Budgeting

There are four types of capital budgeting techniques that are widely used in the corporate world –

1. Payback Period
2. Net Present Value
3. Internal Rate of Return
4. Profitability Index

Apart from the Payback period method which is an additive method, rest of the methods are based on Discounted Cash Flow technique. Even though cash flow can be calculated based on the nature of the project, for the simplicity of the article we are assuming that all the expected cash flows are realized at the end of the year.

Discounted Cash Flow approaches provide a more objective basis for evaluating and selecting investment projects. They take into consideration both –

1. Timing of the expected cash flows – stockholders of Fanuc Inaba have higher preference for cash returns over 4-5 years rather than 10-15 years given the nature of the volatility in the industry.
2. Magnitude of both incoming and outgoing cash flows – Projects can be capital intensive, time intensive, or both. Fanuc Inaba shareholders have preference for diversified projects investment rather than prospective high income from a single capital intensive project.

---

Formula and Steps to Calculate Net Present Value (NPV) of FANUC Corporation: Reassessing the Firm's Governance and Financial Policies

NPV = Net Cash In Flowt1 / (1+r)t1 + Net Cash In Flowt2 / (1+r)t2 + … Net Cash In Flowtn / (1+r)tn
Less Net Cash Out Flowt0 / (1+r)t0

Where t = time period, in this case year 1, year 2 and so on.
r = discount rate or return that could be earned using other safe proposition such as fixed deposit or treasury bond rate. Net Cash In Flow – What the firm will get each year.
Net Cash Out Flow – What the firm needs to invest initially in the project.

Step 1 – Understand the nature of the project and calculate cash flow for each year.
Step 2 – Discount those cash flow based on the discount rate.
Step 3 – Add all the discounted cash flow.
Step 4 – Selection of the project

Why Finance & Accounting Managers need to know Financial Tools such as Net Present Value (NPV)?

In our daily workplace we often come across people and colleagues who are just focused on their core competency and targets they have to deliver. For example marketing managers at Fanuc Inaba often design programs whose objective is to drive brand awareness and customer reach. But how that 30 point increase in brand awareness or 10 point increase in customer touch points will result into shareholders’ value is not specified.

To overcome such scenarios managers at Fanuc Inaba needs to not only know the financial aspect of project management but also needs to have tools to integrate them into part of the project development and monitoring plan.

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 15%

After working through various assumptions we reached a conclusion that risk is far higher than 6%. In a reasonably stable industry with weak competition - 15% discount rate can be a good benchmark.

Years	Cash Flow	Net Cash Flow	Cumulative     Cash Flow	Discount Rate @ 15 %	Discounted Cash Flows
Year 0	(10010923)	-10010923	-	-
Year 1	3456973	-6553950	3456973	0.8696	3006063
Year 2	3967778	-2586172	7424751	0.7561	3000210
Year 3	3946174	1360002	11370925	0.6575	2594673
Year 4	3239378	4599380	14610303	0.5718	1852125
TOTAL					10453072

The Net NPV after 4 years is 442149

(10453072 - 10010923 )

---

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 20%

If the risk component is high in the industry then we should go for a higher hurdle rate / discount rate of 20%.

Years	Cash Flow	Net Cash Flow	Cumulative     Cash Flow	Discount Rate @ 20 %	Discounted Cash Flows
Year 0	(10010923)	-10010923	-	-
Year 1	3456973	-6553950	3456973	0.8333	2880811
Year 2	3967778	-2586172	7424751	0.6944	2755401
Year 3	3946174	1360002	11370925	0.5787	2283666
Year 4	3239378	4599380	14610303	0.4823	1562200
TOTAL					9482078

The Net NPV after 4 years is -528845

At 20% discount rate the NPV is negative (9482078 - 10010923 ) so ideally we can't select the project if macro and micro factors don't allow financial managers of Fanuc Inaba to discount cash flow at lower discount rates such as 15%.

Acceptance Criteria of a Project based on NPV

Simplest Approach – If the investment project of Fanuc Inaba has a NPV value higher than Zero then finance managers at Fanuc Inaba can ACCEPT the project, otherwise they can reject the project. This means that project will deliver higher returns over the period of time than any alternate investment strategy.

In theory if the required rate of return or discount rate is chosen correctly by finance managers at Fanuc Inaba, then the stock price of the Fanuc Inaba should change by same amount of the NPV. In real world we know that share price also reflects various other factors that can be related to both macro and micro environment.

In the same vein – accepting the project with zero NPV should result in stagnant share price. Finance managers use discount rates as a measure of risk components in the project execution process.

Sensitivity Analysis

Project selection is often a far more complex decision than just choosing it based on the NPV number. Finance managers at Fanuc Inaba should conduct a sensitivity analysis to better understand not only the inherent risk of the projects but also how those risks can be either factored in or mitigated during the project execution. Sensitivity analysis helps in –

What are the uncertainties surrounding the project Initial Cash Outlay (ICO’s). ICO’s often have several different components such as land, machinery, building, and other equipment.

What are the key aspects of the projects that need to be monitored, refined, and retuned for continuous delivery of projected cash flows.

What will be a multi year spillover effect of various taxation regulations.

What can impact the cash flow of the project.

Understanding of risks involved in the project.

Some of the assumptions while using the Discounted Cash Flow Methods –

Projects are assumed to be Mutually Exclusive – This is seldom the came in modern day giant organizations where projects are often inter-related and rejecting a project solely based on NPV can result in sunk cost from a related project.

Independent projects have independent cash flows – As explained in the marketing project – though the project may look independent but in reality it is not as the brand awareness project can be closely associated with the spending on sales promotions and product specific advertising.

---

Negotiation Strategy of FANUC Corporation: Reassessing the Firm's Governance and Financial Policies

References & Further Readings

Benjamin C. Esty, Nobuo Sato, Akiko Kanno (2018), "FANUC Corporation: Reassessing the Firm's Governance and Financial Policies Harvard Business Review Case Study. Published by HBR Publications.