×




Vietnam's Private Sector Development: Mr. Nam's Dilemma Net Present Value (NPV) / MBA Resources

Introduction to Net Present Value (NPV) - What is Net Present Value (NPV) ? How it impacts financial decisions regarding project management?

NPV solution for Vietnam's Private Sector Development: Mr. Nam's Dilemma case study


At Oak Spring University, we provide corporate level professional Net Present Value (NPV) case study solution. Vietnam's Private Sector Development: Mr. Nam's Dilemma case study is a Harvard Business School (HBR) case study written by Eli Mazur, Nguyen Ngoc Bich, Lam Quynh Anh, Bui Van. The Vietnam's Private Sector Development: Mr. Nam's Dilemma (referred as “Nam Vietnam's” from here on) case study provides evaluation & decision scenario in field of Finance & Accounting. It also touches upon business topics such as - Value proposition, Economic development, Economics, Financial management, Financial markets, Pricing, Regulation, Social responsibility.

The net present value (NPV) of an investment proposal is the present value of the proposal’s net cash flows less the proposal’s initial cash outflow. If a project’s NPV is greater than or equal to zero, the project should be accepted.

NPV = Present Value of Future Cash Flows LESS Project’s Initial Investment






Case Description of Vietnam's Private Sector Development: Mr. Nam's Dilemma Case Study


In 2000, Vietnam passed the Enterprise Law to spur private sector development and facilitate its transition from a centrally-planned to a market economy. The Enterprise Law changed the paradigm for private business in Vietnam by making business registration a legal right, rather than a privilege. Between 2000-2005, the number of private enterprises increased by more than 100%, adding over 2.5 million jobs to Vietnam's labor market. Despite this success, Vietnam's private sector remained undercapitalized, having only 12 companies with over $33 million in total capital. This case study follows Mr. Nam, a successful Vietnamese furniture manufacturer trying to identify sources of funding to expand his firm, which was established under the Enterprise Law. In the past, Mr. Nam managed to finance business expansion from retained earning and informal credit, however continued expansion required Mr. Nam to identify "arm's length" financing. In this search, Mr. Nam encountered two fundamental problems. First, the banking sector, still under state influence, did not have strong incentives to lend to the private sector. Second, private banks and other sources of capital require Mr. Nam to submit his business to an independent audit, which would certainly uncover many business practices which were technically illegal - and essential to competitiveness. This case study encourages students to consider the social cost of weak regulatory environments, poorly designed economic laws, and the relationship between these conditions and the production of (undesirable) commercial norms. Instructors of development finance, small and medium enterprise finance, and legal and regulatory courses should find this case study useful. HKS Case Number 1812.0


Case Authors : Eli Mazur, Nguyen Ngoc Bich, Lam Quynh Anh, Bui Van

Topic : Finance & Accounting

Related Areas : Economic development, Economics, Financial management, Financial markets, Pricing, Regulation, Social responsibility




Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 6% for Vietnam's Private Sector Development: Mr. Nam's Dilemma Case Study


Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 6 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10003593) -10003593 - -
Year 1 3460232 -6543361 3460232 0.9434 3264370
Year 2 3978891 -2564470 7439123 0.89 3541199
Year 3 3971281 1406811 11410404 0.8396 3334364
Year 4 3234000 4640811 14644404 0.7921 2561631
TOTAL 14644404 12701564




The Net Present Value at 6% discount rate is 2697971

In isolation the NPV number doesn't mean much but put in right context then it is one of the best method to evaluate project returns. In this article we will cover -

Different methods of capital budgeting


What is NPV & Formula of NPV,
How it is calculated,
How to use NPV number for project evaluation, and
Scenario Planning given risks and management priorities.




Capital Budgeting Approaches

Methods of Capital Budgeting


There are four types of capital budgeting techniques that are widely used in the corporate world –

1. Payback Period
2. Net Present Value
3. Profitability Index
4. Internal Rate of Return

Apart from the Payback period method which is an additive method, rest of the methods are based on Discounted Cash Flow technique. Even though cash flow can be calculated based on the nature of the project, for the simplicity of the article we are assuming that all the expected cash flows are realized at the end of the year.

Discounted Cash Flow approaches provide a more objective basis for evaluating and selecting investment projects. They take into consideration both –

1. Timing of the expected cash flows – stockholders of Nam Vietnam's have higher preference for cash returns over 4-5 years rather than 10-15 years given the nature of the volatility in the industry.
2. Magnitude of both incoming and outgoing cash flows – Projects can be capital intensive, time intensive, or both. Nam Vietnam's shareholders have preference for diversified projects investment rather than prospective high income from a single capital intensive project.






Formula and Steps to Calculate Net Present Value (NPV) of Vietnam's Private Sector Development: Mr. Nam's Dilemma

NPV = Net Cash In Flowt1 / (1+r)t1 + Net Cash In Flowt2 / (1+r)t2 + … Net Cash In Flowtn / (1+r)tn
Less Net Cash Out Flowt0 / (1+r)t0

Where t = time period, in this case year 1, year 2 and so on.
r = discount rate or return that could be earned using other safe proposition such as fixed deposit or treasury bond rate. Net Cash In Flow – What the firm will get each year.
Net Cash Out Flow – What the firm needs to invest initially in the project.

Step 1 – Understand the nature of the project and calculate cash flow for each year.
Step 2 – Discount those cash flow based on the discount rate.
Step 3 – Add all the discounted cash flow.
Step 4 – Selection of the project

Why Finance & Accounting Managers need to know Financial Tools such as Net Present Value (NPV)?

In our daily workplace we often come across people and colleagues who are just focused on their core competency and targets they have to deliver. For example marketing managers at Nam Vietnam's often design programs whose objective is to drive brand awareness and customer reach. But how that 30 point increase in brand awareness or 10 point increase in customer touch points will result into shareholders’ value is not specified.

To overcome such scenarios managers at Nam Vietnam's needs to not only know the financial aspect of project management but also needs to have tools to integrate them into part of the project development and monitoring plan.

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 15%

After working through various assumptions we reached a conclusion that risk is far higher than 6%. In a reasonably stable industry with weak competition - 15% discount rate can be a good benchmark.



Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 15 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10003593) -10003593 - -
Year 1 3460232 -6543361 3460232 0.8696 3008897
Year 2 3978891 -2564470 7439123 0.7561 3008613
Year 3 3971281 1406811 11410404 0.6575 2611182
Year 4 3234000 4640811 14644404 0.5718 1849050
TOTAL 10477742


The Net NPV after 4 years is 474149

(10477742 - 10003593 )








Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 20%


If the risk component is high in the industry then we should go for a higher hurdle rate / discount rate of 20%.

Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 20 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10003593) -10003593 - -
Year 1 3460232 -6543361 3460232 0.8333 2883527
Year 2 3978891 -2564470 7439123 0.6944 2763119
Year 3 3971281 1406811 11410404 0.5787 2298195
Year 4 3234000 4640811 14644404 0.4823 1559606
TOTAL 9504447


The Net NPV after 4 years is -499146

At 20% discount rate the NPV is negative (9504447 - 10003593 ) so ideally we can't select the project if macro and micro factors don't allow financial managers of Nam Vietnam's to discount cash flow at lower discount rates such as 15%.





Acceptance Criteria of a Project based on NPV

Simplest Approach – If the investment project of Nam Vietnam's has a NPV value higher than Zero then finance managers at Nam Vietnam's can ACCEPT the project, otherwise they can reject the project. This means that project will deliver higher returns over the period of time than any alternate investment strategy.

In theory if the required rate of return or discount rate is chosen correctly by finance managers at Nam Vietnam's, then the stock price of the Nam Vietnam's should change by same amount of the NPV. In real world we know that share price also reflects various other factors that can be related to both macro and micro environment.

In the same vein – accepting the project with zero NPV should result in stagnant share price. Finance managers use discount rates as a measure of risk components in the project execution process.

Sensitivity Analysis

Project selection is often a far more complex decision than just choosing it based on the NPV number. Finance managers at Nam Vietnam's should conduct a sensitivity analysis to better understand not only the inherent risk of the projects but also how those risks can be either factored in or mitigated during the project execution. Sensitivity analysis helps in –

What will be a multi year spillover effect of various taxation regulations.

What are the key aspects of the projects that need to be monitored, refined, and retuned for continuous delivery of projected cash flows.

What can impact the cash flow of the project.

Understanding of risks involved in the project.

What are the uncertainties surrounding the project Initial Cash Outlay (ICO’s). ICO’s often have several different components such as land, machinery, building, and other equipment.

Some of the assumptions while using the Discounted Cash Flow Methods –

Projects are assumed to be Mutually Exclusive – This is seldom the came in modern day giant organizations where projects are often inter-related and rejecting a project solely based on NPV can result in sunk cost from a related project.

Independent projects have independent cash flows – As explained in the marketing project – though the project may look independent but in reality it is not as the brand awareness project can be closely associated with the spending on sales promotions and product specific advertising.






Negotiation Strategy of Vietnam's Private Sector Development: Mr. Nam's Dilemma

References & Further Readings

Eli Mazur, Nguyen Ngoc Bich, Lam Quynh Anh, Bui Van (2018), "Vietnam's Private Sector Development: Mr. Nam's Dilemma Harvard Business Review Case Study. Published by HBR Publications.


Eversendai Corp SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Capital Goods , Construction Services


Guangdong Hotata A SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Basic Materials , Fabricated Plastic & Rubber


Aucksun A SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Basic Materials , Misc. Fabricated Products


Naigai Trans Line SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Transportation , Water Transportation


Origin Energy SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Energy , Oil & Gas - Integrated


GPA SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Electronic Instr. & Controls


B2Gold SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Basic Materials , Gold & Silver


M&R Hld SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Capital Goods , Construction Services


Daewoo SBI Special 1 SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Financial , Misc. Financial Services


Kolon Corp SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer Cyclical , Textiles - Non Apparel


AU Small Finance Bank SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Financial , Consumer Financial Services