×




Weetman Pearson and the Mexican Oil Industry (A) Net Present Value (NPV) / MBA Resources

Introduction to Net Present Value (NPV) - What is Net Present Value (NPV) ? How it impacts financial decisions regarding project management?

NPV solution for Weetman Pearson and the Mexican Oil Industry (A) case study


At Oak Spring University, we provide corporate level professional Net Present Value (NPV) case study solution. Weetman Pearson and the Mexican Oil Industry (A) case study is a Harvard Business School (HBR) case study written by Geoffrey G. Jones, Lisa Bud-Frierman. The Weetman Pearson and the Mexican Oil Industry (A) (referred as “Pearson Oil” from here on) case study provides evaluation & decision scenario in field of Global Business. It also touches upon business topics such as - Value proposition, Collaboration, Economic development, Emerging markets, Entrepreneurship, Managing uncertainty, Operations management, Risk management.

The net present value (NPV) of an investment proposal is the present value of the proposal’s net cash flows less the proposal’s initial cash outflow. If a project’s NPV is greater than or equal to zero, the project should be accepted.

NPV = Present Value of Future Cash Flows LESS Project’s Initial Investment






Case Description of Weetman Pearson and the Mexican Oil Industry (A) Case Study


Taught in the MBA Evolution of Global Business course, a business history course on the growth of multinationals. Explores the role of the British entrepreneur Weetman Pearson in developing the Mexican oil industry before 1914. Shows this entrepreneur's evolution from a domestic British builder to an international contractor, building tunnels, railroads, and harbors worldwide, including the United States and Mexico. In Mexico, where Pearson developed close relations with the dictator Porfirio Diaz, the government awarded large oil concessions. In 1910, Pearson discovered one of the world's largest oil wells, and this was used as a basis to build an integrated oil company. But by 1918--when the case ends--Pearson is considering whether to sell his investment in the face of growing political risk.


Case Authors : Geoffrey G. Jones, Lisa Bud-Frierman

Topic : Global Business

Related Areas : Collaboration, Economic development, Emerging markets, Entrepreneurship, Managing uncertainty, Operations management, Risk management




Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 6% for Weetman Pearson and the Mexican Oil Industry (A) Case Study


Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 6 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10022738) -10022738 - -
Year 1 3467985 -6554753 3467985 0.9434 3271684
Year 2 3981850 -2572903 7449835 0.89 3543832
Year 3 3954047 1381144 11403882 0.8396 3319894
Year 4 3240477 4621621 14644359 0.7921 2566761
TOTAL 14644359 12702172




The Net Present Value at 6% discount rate is 2679434

In isolation the NPV number doesn't mean much but put in right context then it is one of the best method to evaluate project returns. In this article we will cover -

Different methods of capital budgeting


What is NPV & Formula of NPV,
How it is calculated,
How to use NPV number for project evaluation, and
Scenario Planning given risks and management priorities.




Capital Budgeting Approaches

Methods of Capital Budgeting


There are four types of capital budgeting techniques that are widely used in the corporate world –

1. Payback Period
2. Profitability Index
3. Net Present Value
4. Internal Rate of Return

Apart from the Payback period method which is an additive method, rest of the methods are based on Discounted Cash Flow technique. Even though cash flow can be calculated based on the nature of the project, for the simplicity of the article we are assuming that all the expected cash flows are realized at the end of the year.

Discounted Cash Flow approaches provide a more objective basis for evaluating and selecting investment projects. They take into consideration both –

1. Timing of the expected cash flows – stockholders of Pearson Oil have higher preference for cash returns over 4-5 years rather than 10-15 years given the nature of the volatility in the industry.
2. Magnitude of both incoming and outgoing cash flows – Projects can be capital intensive, time intensive, or both. Pearson Oil shareholders have preference for diversified projects investment rather than prospective high income from a single capital intensive project.






Formula and Steps to Calculate Net Present Value (NPV) of Weetman Pearson and the Mexican Oil Industry (A)

NPV = Net Cash In Flowt1 / (1+r)t1 + Net Cash In Flowt2 / (1+r)t2 + … Net Cash In Flowtn / (1+r)tn
Less Net Cash Out Flowt0 / (1+r)t0

Where t = time period, in this case year 1, year 2 and so on.
r = discount rate or return that could be earned using other safe proposition such as fixed deposit or treasury bond rate. Net Cash In Flow – What the firm will get each year.
Net Cash Out Flow – What the firm needs to invest initially in the project.

Step 1 – Understand the nature of the project and calculate cash flow for each year.
Step 2 – Discount those cash flow based on the discount rate.
Step 3 – Add all the discounted cash flow.
Step 4 – Selection of the project

Why Global Business Managers need to know Financial Tools such as Net Present Value (NPV)?

In our daily workplace we often come across people and colleagues who are just focused on their core competency and targets they have to deliver. For example marketing managers at Pearson Oil often design programs whose objective is to drive brand awareness and customer reach. But how that 30 point increase in brand awareness or 10 point increase in customer touch points will result into shareholders’ value is not specified.

To overcome such scenarios managers at Pearson Oil needs to not only know the financial aspect of project management but also needs to have tools to integrate them into part of the project development and monitoring plan.

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 15%

After working through various assumptions we reached a conclusion that risk is far higher than 6%. In a reasonably stable industry with weak competition - 15% discount rate can be a good benchmark.



Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 15 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10022738) -10022738 - -
Year 1 3467985 -6554753 3467985 0.8696 3015639
Year 2 3981850 -2572903 7449835 0.7561 3010851
Year 3 3954047 1381144 11403882 0.6575 2599850
Year 4 3240477 4621621 14644359 0.5718 1852753
TOTAL 10479093


The Net NPV after 4 years is 456355

(10479093 - 10022738 )








Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 20%


If the risk component is high in the industry then we should go for a higher hurdle rate / discount rate of 20%.

Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 20 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10022738) -10022738 - -
Year 1 3467985 -6554753 3467985 0.8333 2889988
Year 2 3981850 -2572903 7449835 0.6944 2765174
Year 3 3954047 1381144 11403882 0.5787 2288222
Year 4 3240477 4621621 14644359 0.4823 1562730
TOTAL 9506113


The Net NPV after 4 years is -516625

At 20% discount rate the NPV is negative (9506113 - 10022738 ) so ideally we can't select the project if macro and micro factors don't allow financial managers of Pearson Oil to discount cash flow at lower discount rates such as 15%.





Acceptance Criteria of a Project based on NPV

Simplest Approach – If the investment project of Pearson Oil has a NPV value higher than Zero then finance managers at Pearson Oil can ACCEPT the project, otherwise they can reject the project. This means that project will deliver higher returns over the period of time than any alternate investment strategy.

In theory if the required rate of return or discount rate is chosen correctly by finance managers at Pearson Oil, then the stock price of the Pearson Oil should change by same amount of the NPV. In real world we know that share price also reflects various other factors that can be related to both macro and micro environment.

In the same vein – accepting the project with zero NPV should result in stagnant share price. Finance managers use discount rates as a measure of risk components in the project execution process.

Sensitivity Analysis

Project selection is often a far more complex decision than just choosing it based on the NPV number. Finance managers at Pearson Oil should conduct a sensitivity analysis to better understand not only the inherent risk of the projects but also how those risks can be either factored in or mitigated during the project execution. Sensitivity analysis helps in –

What are the key aspects of the projects that need to be monitored, refined, and retuned for continuous delivery of projected cash flows.

What can impact the cash flow of the project.

What are the uncertainties surrounding the project Initial Cash Outlay (ICO’s). ICO’s often have several different components such as land, machinery, building, and other equipment.

What will be a multi year spillover effect of various taxation regulations.

Understanding of risks involved in the project.

Some of the assumptions while using the Discounted Cash Flow Methods –

Projects are assumed to be Mutually Exclusive – This is seldom the came in modern day giant organizations where projects are often inter-related and rejecting a project solely based on NPV can result in sunk cost from a related project.

Independent projects have independent cash flows – As explained in the marketing project – though the project may look independent but in reality it is not as the brand awareness project can be closely associated with the spending on sales promotions and product specific advertising.






Negotiation Strategy of Weetman Pearson and the Mexican Oil Industry (A)

References & Further Readings

Geoffrey G. Jones, Lisa Bud-Frierman (2018), "Weetman Pearson and the Mexican Oil Industry (A) Harvard Business Review Case Study. Published by HBR Publications.


Entra ASA SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Services , Real Estate Operations


Filta Group SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer/Non-Cyclical , Food Processing


Servtech Global SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Software & Programming


Discovery Holdings SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Financial , Insurance (Accident & Health)


Inabox Group Ltd SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Services , Communications Services


McCormick&Co SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer/Non-Cyclical , Food Processing


Prostemics SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Financial , Misc. Financial Services


Global SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Services , Personal Services


Howard SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Financial , Regional Banks


Cloudera SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Software & Programming


Tsubakimoto Kogyo SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Basic Materials , Misc. Fabricated Products