×




Privatizing Poland's Telecom Industry: Opportunities and Challenges in the New Economy and e-Business Net Present Value (NPV) / MBA Resources

Introduction to Net Present Value (NPV) - What is Net Present Value (NPV) ? How it impacts financial decisions regarding project management?

NPV solution for Privatizing Poland's Telecom Industry: Opportunities and Challenges in the New Economy and e-Business case study


At Oak Spring University, we provide corporate level professional Net Present Value (NPV) case study solution. Privatizing Poland's Telecom Industry: Opportunities and Challenges in the New Economy and e-Business case study is a Harvard Business School (HBR) case study written by David W. Conklin, Marius Siwak. The Privatizing Poland's Telecom Industry: Opportunities and Challenges in the New Economy and e-Business (referred as “Government Telecom” from here on) case study provides evaluation & decision scenario in field of Global Business. It also touches upon business topics such as - Value proposition, Technology.

The net present value (NPV) of an investment proposal is the present value of the proposal’s net cash flows less the proposal’s initial cash outflow. If a project’s NPV is greater than or equal to zero, the project should be accepted.

NPV = Present Value of Future Cash Flows LESS Project’s Initial Investment






Case Description of Privatizing Poland's Telecom Industry: Opportunities and Challenges in the New Economy and e-Business Case Study


As it entered the 21st century, the Polish government faced the dilemma of how to develop an optimal telecom structure and related services. For decades, the government owned and operated a national telecom monopoly; but in the late 1990s, it gradually allowed the entry of some competitors, many of whom brought new technologies. The government had undertaken a major privatization program, and it faced the question of whether, and how, it should privatize; yet privatization would have to be accompanied by ongoing regulation to ensure that managerial decisions were made in the interests of the nation as a whole. This challenge of continual government intervention could reduce the attractiveness of acquiring the government-owned agency, in spite of its market dominance.


Case Authors : David W. Conklin, Marius Siwak

Topic : Global Business

Related Areas : Technology




Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 6% for Privatizing Poland's Telecom Industry: Opportunities and Challenges in the New Economy and e-Business Case Study


Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 6 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10004760) -10004760 - -
Year 1 3456727 -6548033 3456727 0.9434 3261063
Year 2 3957449 -2590584 7414176 0.89 3522116
Year 3 3955242 1364658 11369418 0.8396 3320897
Year 4 3226776 4591434 14596194 0.7921 2555909
TOTAL 14596194 12659985




The Net Present Value at 6% discount rate is 2655225

In isolation the NPV number doesn't mean much but put in right context then it is one of the best method to evaluate project returns. In this article we will cover -

Different methods of capital budgeting


What is NPV & Formula of NPV,
How it is calculated,
How to use NPV number for project evaluation, and
Scenario Planning given risks and management priorities.




Capital Budgeting Approaches

Methods of Capital Budgeting


There are four types of capital budgeting techniques that are widely used in the corporate world –

1. Payback Period
2. Profitability Index
3. Net Present Value
4. Internal Rate of Return

Apart from the Payback period method which is an additive method, rest of the methods are based on Discounted Cash Flow technique. Even though cash flow can be calculated based on the nature of the project, for the simplicity of the article we are assuming that all the expected cash flows are realized at the end of the year.

Discounted Cash Flow approaches provide a more objective basis for evaluating and selecting investment projects. They take into consideration both –

1. Magnitude of both incoming and outgoing cash flows – Projects can be capital intensive, time intensive, or both. Government Telecom shareholders have preference for diversified projects investment rather than prospective high income from a single capital intensive project.
2. Timing of the expected cash flows – stockholders of Government Telecom have higher preference for cash returns over 4-5 years rather than 10-15 years given the nature of the volatility in the industry.






Formula and Steps to Calculate Net Present Value (NPV) of Privatizing Poland's Telecom Industry: Opportunities and Challenges in the New Economy and e-Business

NPV = Net Cash In Flowt1 / (1+r)t1 + Net Cash In Flowt2 / (1+r)t2 + … Net Cash In Flowtn / (1+r)tn
Less Net Cash Out Flowt0 / (1+r)t0

Where t = time period, in this case year 1, year 2 and so on.
r = discount rate or return that could be earned using other safe proposition such as fixed deposit or treasury bond rate. Net Cash In Flow – What the firm will get each year.
Net Cash Out Flow – What the firm needs to invest initially in the project.

Step 1 – Understand the nature of the project and calculate cash flow for each year.
Step 2 – Discount those cash flow based on the discount rate.
Step 3 – Add all the discounted cash flow.
Step 4 – Selection of the project

Why Global Business Managers need to know Financial Tools such as Net Present Value (NPV)?

In our daily workplace we often come across people and colleagues who are just focused on their core competency and targets they have to deliver. For example marketing managers at Government Telecom often design programs whose objective is to drive brand awareness and customer reach. But how that 30 point increase in brand awareness or 10 point increase in customer touch points will result into shareholders’ value is not specified.

To overcome such scenarios managers at Government Telecom needs to not only know the financial aspect of project management but also needs to have tools to integrate them into part of the project development and monitoring plan.

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 15%

After working through various assumptions we reached a conclusion that risk is far higher than 6%. In a reasonably stable industry with weak competition - 15% discount rate can be a good benchmark.



Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 15 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10004760) -10004760 - -
Year 1 3456727 -6548033 3456727 0.8696 3005850
Year 2 3957449 -2590584 7414176 0.7561 2992400
Year 3 3955242 1364658 11369418 0.6575 2600636
Year 4 3226776 4591434 14596194 0.5718 1844920
TOTAL 10443805


The Net NPV after 4 years is 439045

(10443805 - 10004760 )








Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 20%


If the risk component is high in the industry then we should go for a higher hurdle rate / discount rate of 20%.

Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 20 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10004760) -10004760 - -
Year 1 3456727 -6548033 3456727 0.8333 2880606
Year 2 3957449 -2590584 7414176 0.6944 2748228
Year 3 3955242 1364658 11369418 0.5787 2288913
Year 4 3226776 4591434 14596194 0.4823 1556123
TOTAL 9473870


The Net NPV after 4 years is -530890

At 20% discount rate the NPV is negative (9473870 - 10004760 ) so ideally we can't select the project if macro and micro factors don't allow financial managers of Government Telecom to discount cash flow at lower discount rates such as 15%.





Acceptance Criteria of a Project based on NPV

Simplest Approach – If the investment project of Government Telecom has a NPV value higher than Zero then finance managers at Government Telecom can ACCEPT the project, otherwise they can reject the project. This means that project will deliver higher returns over the period of time than any alternate investment strategy.

In theory if the required rate of return or discount rate is chosen correctly by finance managers at Government Telecom, then the stock price of the Government Telecom should change by same amount of the NPV. In real world we know that share price also reflects various other factors that can be related to both macro and micro environment.

In the same vein – accepting the project with zero NPV should result in stagnant share price. Finance managers use discount rates as a measure of risk components in the project execution process.

Sensitivity Analysis

Project selection is often a far more complex decision than just choosing it based on the NPV number. Finance managers at Government Telecom should conduct a sensitivity analysis to better understand not only the inherent risk of the projects but also how those risks can be either factored in or mitigated during the project execution. Sensitivity analysis helps in –

What can impact the cash flow of the project.

Understanding of risks involved in the project.

What will be a multi year spillover effect of various taxation regulations.

What are the uncertainties surrounding the project Initial Cash Outlay (ICO’s). ICO’s often have several different components such as land, machinery, building, and other equipment.

What are the key aspects of the projects that need to be monitored, refined, and retuned for continuous delivery of projected cash flows.

Some of the assumptions while using the Discounted Cash Flow Methods –

Projects are assumed to be Mutually Exclusive – This is seldom the came in modern day giant organizations where projects are often inter-related and rejecting a project solely based on NPV can result in sunk cost from a related project.

Independent projects have independent cash flows – As explained in the marketing project – though the project may look independent but in reality it is not as the brand awareness project can be closely associated with the spending on sales promotions and product specific advertising.






Negotiation Strategy of Privatizing Poland's Telecom Industry: Opportunities and Challenges in the New Economy and e-Business

References & Further Readings

David W. Conklin, Marius Siwak (2018), "Privatizing Poland's Telecom Industry: Opportunities and Challenges in the New Economy and e-Business Harvard Business Review Case Study. Published by HBR Publications.


Eyemaxx Real Estate SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Services , Real Estate Operations


Eastern Silk Industries Ltd SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer Cyclical , Textiles - Non Apparel


Mondadori Editore SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Services , Printing & Publishing


wige Media SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Services , Motion Pictures


Jiangshan Oupai Door SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Capital Goods , Constr. - Supplies & Fixtures


Hitachi Zosen Corp. SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Capital Goods , Misc. Capital Goods


Everest Industries Ltd SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Capital Goods , Constr. - Supplies & Fixtures


U&I SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Healthcare , Medical Equipment & Supplies