×




Rodamas Group: Designing Strategies for Changing Realities in Emerging Economies Net Present Value (NPV) / MBA Resources

Introduction to Net Present Value (NPV) - What is Net Present Value (NPV) ? How it impacts financial decisions regarding project management?

NPV solution for Rodamas Group: Designing Strategies for Changing Realities in Emerging Economies case study


At Oak Spring University, we provide corporate level professional Net Present Value (NPV) case study solution. Rodamas Group: Designing Strategies for Changing Realities in Emerging Economies case study is a Harvard Business School (HBR) case study written by Marleen Dieleman, Shawkat Kamal. The Rodamas Group: Designing Strategies for Changing Realities in Emerging Economies (referred as “Rodamas Indonesia” from here on) case study provides evaluation & decision scenario in field of Global Business. It also touches upon business topics such as - Value proposition, Emerging markets, Joint ventures, Manufacturing, Strategic planning, Strategic thinking.

The net present value (NPV) of an investment proposal is the present value of the proposal’s net cash flows less the proposal’s initial cash outflow. If a project’s NPV is greater than or equal to zero, the project should be accepted.

NPV = Present Value of Future Cash Flows LESS Project’s Initial Investment






Case Description of Rodamas Group: Designing Strategies for Changing Realities in Emerging Economies Case Study


The case narrates the story of the Rodamas Group, owned by the ethnic Chinese Tan family in Indonesia. The company started as a trading firm in 1951 and, over time, became a joint venture partner in manufacturing businesses with a range of mainly Japanese partners after Indonesia started to embark on an industrialization program in the late 1960s. In the 1980s, the company was slowly transferred to the second generation leader, and continued to grow and prosper until it became part of the top-20 business groups in Indonesia. The businesses included glass manufacturing (with Asahi), personal care products (with Kao), packaging (with Dai Nippon) and MSG production. The role of Rodamas in these partnerships was to deal with local regulations, hire local personnel and distribute the products in Indonesia. When the then President Suharto was toppled in the Asian Crisis in 1998, Indonesia underwent several drastic changes, including the transition to democracy. Its economy became more open, and foreign firms were allowed to operate in the country without having a local partner. In addition, several global business developments, including the tendency of multinationals to rely on lawyers and consultants rather than local equity partners, threatened the Rodamas business model. In view of this, the current leader, Mucki Tan, is reconsidering the future of his company and weighing a few options. The case ends with these strategic options: 1) internationalize with existing partners; 2) develop own businesses that need little technology, such as property; 3) buy existing manufacturing firms; 4) focus on distribution of products for foreign multinationals; 5) focus on a traditional partnership role with a new wave of foreign direct investment (FDI) from developing market multinationals, more specifically, China. Students are asked to analyze the company and its environment, decide on a strategic direction and reflect on the consequences.


Case Authors : Marleen Dieleman, Shawkat Kamal

Topic : Global Business

Related Areas : Emerging markets, Joint ventures, Manufacturing, Strategic planning, Strategic thinking




Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 6% for Rodamas Group: Designing Strategies for Changing Realities in Emerging Economies Case Study


Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 6 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10027103) -10027103 - -
Year 1 3468198 -6558905 3468198 0.9434 3271885
Year 2 3959618 -2599287 7427816 0.89 3524046
Year 3 3952624 1353337 11380440 0.8396 3318699
Year 4 3240795 4594132 14621235 0.7921 2567013
TOTAL 14621235 12681643




The Net Present Value at 6% discount rate is 2654540

In isolation the NPV number doesn't mean much but put in right context then it is one of the best method to evaluate project returns. In this article we will cover -

Different methods of capital budgeting


What is NPV & Formula of NPV,
How it is calculated,
How to use NPV number for project evaluation, and
Scenario Planning given risks and management priorities.




Capital Budgeting Approaches

Methods of Capital Budgeting


There are four types of capital budgeting techniques that are widely used in the corporate world –

1. Profitability Index
2. Internal Rate of Return
3. Net Present Value
4. Payback Period

Apart from the Payback period method which is an additive method, rest of the methods are based on Discounted Cash Flow technique. Even though cash flow can be calculated based on the nature of the project, for the simplicity of the article we are assuming that all the expected cash flows are realized at the end of the year.

Discounted Cash Flow approaches provide a more objective basis for evaluating and selecting investment projects. They take into consideration both –

1. Timing of the expected cash flows – stockholders of Rodamas Indonesia have higher preference for cash returns over 4-5 years rather than 10-15 years given the nature of the volatility in the industry.
2. Magnitude of both incoming and outgoing cash flows – Projects can be capital intensive, time intensive, or both. Rodamas Indonesia shareholders have preference for diversified projects investment rather than prospective high income from a single capital intensive project.






Formula and Steps to Calculate Net Present Value (NPV) of Rodamas Group: Designing Strategies for Changing Realities in Emerging Economies

NPV = Net Cash In Flowt1 / (1+r)t1 + Net Cash In Flowt2 / (1+r)t2 + … Net Cash In Flowtn / (1+r)tn
Less Net Cash Out Flowt0 / (1+r)t0

Where t = time period, in this case year 1, year 2 and so on.
r = discount rate or return that could be earned using other safe proposition such as fixed deposit or treasury bond rate. Net Cash In Flow – What the firm will get each year.
Net Cash Out Flow – What the firm needs to invest initially in the project.

Step 1 – Understand the nature of the project and calculate cash flow for each year.
Step 2 – Discount those cash flow based on the discount rate.
Step 3 – Add all the discounted cash flow.
Step 4 – Selection of the project

Why Global Business Managers need to know Financial Tools such as Net Present Value (NPV)?

In our daily workplace we often come across people and colleagues who are just focused on their core competency and targets they have to deliver. For example marketing managers at Rodamas Indonesia often design programs whose objective is to drive brand awareness and customer reach. But how that 30 point increase in brand awareness or 10 point increase in customer touch points will result into shareholders’ value is not specified.

To overcome such scenarios managers at Rodamas Indonesia needs to not only know the financial aspect of project management but also needs to have tools to integrate them into part of the project development and monitoring plan.

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 15%

After working through various assumptions we reached a conclusion that risk is far higher than 6%. In a reasonably stable industry with weak competition - 15% discount rate can be a good benchmark.



Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 15 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10027103) -10027103 - -
Year 1 3468198 -6558905 3468198 0.8696 3015824
Year 2 3959618 -2599287 7427816 0.7561 2994040
Year 3 3952624 1353337 11380440 0.6575 2598914
Year 4 3240795 4594132 14621235 0.5718 1852935
TOTAL 10461714


The Net NPV after 4 years is 434611

(10461714 - 10027103 )








Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 20%


If the risk component is high in the industry then we should go for a higher hurdle rate / discount rate of 20%.

Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 20 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10027103) -10027103 - -
Year 1 3468198 -6558905 3468198 0.8333 2890165
Year 2 3959618 -2599287 7427816 0.6944 2749735
Year 3 3952624 1353337 11380440 0.5787 2287398
Year 4 3240795 4594132 14621235 0.4823 1562883
TOTAL 9490181


The Net NPV after 4 years is -536922

At 20% discount rate the NPV is negative (9490181 - 10027103 ) so ideally we can't select the project if macro and micro factors don't allow financial managers of Rodamas Indonesia to discount cash flow at lower discount rates such as 15%.





Acceptance Criteria of a Project based on NPV

Simplest Approach – If the investment project of Rodamas Indonesia has a NPV value higher than Zero then finance managers at Rodamas Indonesia can ACCEPT the project, otherwise they can reject the project. This means that project will deliver higher returns over the period of time than any alternate investment strategy.

In theory if the required rate of return or discount rate is chosen correctly by finance managers at Rodamas Indonesia, then the stock price of the Rodamas Indonesia should change by same amount of the NPV. In real world we know that share price also reflects various other factors that can be related to both macro and micro environment.

In the same vein – accepting the project with zero NPV should result in stagnant share price. Finance managers use discount rates as a measure of risk components in the project execution process.

Sensitivity Analysis

Project selection is often a far more complex decision than just choosing it based on the NPV number. Finance managers at Rodamas Indonesia should conduct a sensitivity analysis to better understand not only the inherent risk of the projects but also how those risks can be either factored in or mitigated during the project execution. Sensitivity analysis helps in –

What will be a multi year spillover effect of various taxation regulations.

What can impact the cash flow of the project.

What are the uncertainties surrounding the project Initial Cash Outlay (ICO’s). ICO’s often have several different components such as land, machinery, building, and other equipment.

Understanding of risks involved in the project.

What are the key aspects of the projects that need to be monitored, refined, and retuned for continuous delivery of projected cash flows.

Some of the assumptions while using the Discounted Cash Flow Methods –

Projects are assumed to be Mutually Exclusive – This is seldom the came in modern day giant organizations where projects are often inter-related and rejecting a project solely based on NPV can result in sunk cost from a related project.

Independent projects have independent cash flows – As explained in the marketing project – though the project may look independent but in reality it is not as the brand awareness project can be closely associated with the spending on sales promotions and product specific advertising.






Negotiation Strategy of Rodamas Group: Designing Strategies for Changing Realities in Emerging Economies

References & Further Readings

Marleen Dieleman, Shawkat Kamal (2018), "Rodamas Group: Designing Strategies for Changing Realities in Emerging Economies Harvard Business Review Case Study. Published by HBR Publications.


Hybrid Energy Holdin SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Financial , Misc. Financial Services


Osaki Electric SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Electronic Instr. & Controls


Hammer Metals Ltd SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Basic Materials , Gold & Silver


Polatechno SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer Cyclical , Photography


Toyo Kanetsu KK SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Basic Materials , Containers & Packaging


Petron Refining SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Energy , Oil & Gas - Integrated


Jiangsu Zhongshe SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Capital Goods , Construction Services


China Fangda SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Capital Goods , Constr. - Supplies & Fixtures


Industrias Bachoco ADR SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer/Non-Cyclical , Fish/Livestock