×




AXA Way: The Pursuit of Excellence Through Quality of Service Net Present Value (NPV) / MBA Resources

Introduction to Net Present Value (NPV) - What is Net Present Value (NPV) ? How it impacts financial decisions regarding project management?

NPV solution for AXA Way: The Pursuit of Excellence Through Quality of Service case study


At Oak Spring University, we provide corporate level professional Net Present Value (NPV) case study solution. AXA Way: The Pursuit of Excellence Through Quality of Service case study is a Harvard Business School (HBR) case study written by John Weeks, Jean-Pierre Baillot, Suzanne Weeks. The AXA Way: The Pursuit of Excellence Through Quality of Service (referred as “Axa Sigma” from here on) case study provides evaluation & decision scenario in field of Global Business. It also touches upon business topics such as - Value proposition, Customer service, Operations management.

The net present value (NPV) of an investment proposal is the present value of the proposal’s net cash flows less the proposal’s initial cash outflow. If a project’s NPV is greater than or equal to zero, the project should be accepted.

NPV = Present Value of Future Cash Flows LESS Project’s Initial Investment






Case Description of AXA Way: The Pursuit of Excellence Through Quality of Service Case Study


By 2005, AXA had become one of the world's largest and most successful insurance companies, but Claude Brunet, Member of the Management Board, in charge of Transversal Operations, Communication, Marketing and Human Resources, believed that to achieve its ambitions the company was going to have to become much more customer focused. AXA Way, a culture change program that included many elements of Six Sigma philosophy and methodology, was the spearhead of this change. The case describes the AXA Way program, the challenges of its implementation, and how AXA overcame those challenges. Learning objectives: Understand how to manage the culture change necessary to improve customer service using Six Sigma. Six Sigma is sometimes seen as a technical change, as just a methodology, but change in attitude and mindset--in culture--are required for Six Sigma to succeed. Understand how Six Sigma can be successfully adopted in a service industry.


Case Authors : John Weeks, Jean-Pierre Baillot, Suzanne Weeks

Topic : Global Business

Related Areas : Customer service, Operations management




Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 6% for AXA Way: The Pursuit of Excellence Through Quality of Service Case Study


Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 6 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10020822) -10020822 - -
Year 1 3465582 -6555240 3465582 0.9434 3269417
Year 2 3961252 -2593988 7426834 0.89 3525500
Year 3 3939293 1345305 11366127 0.8396 3307506
Year 4 3246205 4591510 14612332 0.7921 2571298
TOTAL 14612332 12673722




The Net Present Value at 6% discount rate is 2652900

In isolation the NPV number doesn't mean much but put in right context then it is one of the best method to evaluate project returns. In this article we will cover -

Different methods of capital budgeting


What is NPV & Formula of NPV,
How it is calculated,
How to use NPV number for project evaluation, and
Scenario Planning given risks and management priorities.




Capital Budgeting Approaches

Methods of Capital Budgeting


There are four types of capital budgeting techniques that are widely used in the corporate world –

1. Payback Period
2. Internal Rate of Return
3. Profitability Index
4. Net Present Value

Apart from the Payback period method which is an additive method, rest of the methods are based on Discounted Cash Flow technique. Even though cash flow can be calculated based on the nature of the project, for the simplicity of the article we are assuming that all the expected cash flows are realized at the end of the year.

Discounted Cash Flow approaches provide a more objective basis for evaluating and selecting investment projects. They take into consideration both –

1. Timing of the expected cash flows – stockholders of Axa Sigma have higher preference for cash returns over 4-5 years rather than 10-15 years given the nature of the volatility in the industry.
2. Magnitude of both incoming and outgoing cash flows – Projects can be capital intensive, time intensive, or both. Axa Sigma shareholders have preference for diversified projects investment rather than prospective high income from a single capital intensive project.






Formula and Steps to Calculate Net Present Value (NPV) of AXA Way: The Pursuit of Excellence Through Quality of Service

NPV = Net Cash In Flowt1 / (1+r)t1 + Net Cash In Flowt2 / (1+r)t2 + … Net Cash In Flowtn / (1+r)tn
Less Net Cash Out Flowt0 / (1+r)t0

Where t = time period, in this case year 1, year 2 and so on.
r = discount rate or return that could be earned using other safe proposition such as fixed deposit or treasury bond rate. Net Cash In Flow – What the firm will get each year.
Net Cash Out Flow – What the firm needs to invest initially in the project.

Step 1 – Understand the nature of the project and calculate cash flow for each year.
Step 2 – Discount those cash flow based on the discount rate.
Step 3 – Add all the discounted cash flow.
Step 4 – Selection of the project

Why Global Business Managers need to know Financial Tools such as Net Present Value (NPV)?

In our daily workplace we often come across people and colleagues who are just focused on their core competency and targets they have to deliver. For example marketing managers at Axa Sigma often design programs whose objective is to drive brand awareness and customer reach. But how that 30 point increase in brand awareness or 10 point increase in customer touch points will result into shareholders’ value is not specified.

To overcome such scenarios managers at Axa Sigma needs to not only know the financial aspect of project management but also needs to have tools to integrate them into part of the project development and monitoring plan.

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 15%

After working through various assumptions we reached a conclusion that risk is far higher than 6%. In a reasonably stable industry with weak competition - 15% discount rate can be a good benchmark.



Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 15 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10020822) -10020822 - -
Year 1 3465582 -6555240 3465582 0.8696 3013550
Year 2 3961252 -2593988 7426834 0.7561 2995276
Year 3 3939293 1345305 11366127 0.6575 2590149
Year 4 3246205 4591510 14612332 0.5718 1856028
TOTAL 10455003


The Net NPV after 4 years is 434181

(10455003 - 10020822 )








Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 20%


If the risk component is high in the industry then we should go for a higher hurdle rate / discount rate of 20%.

Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 20 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10020822) -10020822 - -
Year 1 3465582 -6555240 3465582 0.8333 2887985
Year 2 3961252 -2593988 7426834 0.6944 2750869
Year 3 3939293 1345305 11366127 0.5787 2279683
Year 4 3246205 4591510 14612332 0.4823 1565492
TOTAL 9484030


The Net NPV after 4 years is -536792

At 20% discount rate the NPV is negative (9484030 - 10020822 ) so ideally we can't select the project if macro and micro factors don't allow financial managers of Axa Sigma to discount cash flow at lower discount rates such as 15%.





Acceptance Criteria of a Project based on NPV

Simplest Approach – If the investment project of Axa Sigma has a NPV value higher than Zero then finance managers at Axa Sigma can ACCEPT the project, otherwise they can reject the project. This means that project will deliver higher returns over the period of time than any alternate investment strategy.

In theory if the required rate of return or discount rate is chosen correctly by finance managers at Axa Sigma, then the stock price of the Axa Sigma should change by same amount of the NPV. In real world we know that share price also reflects various other factors that can be related to both macro and micro environment.

In the same vein – accepting the project with zero NPV should result in stagnant share price. Finance managers use discount rates as a measure of risk components in the project execution process.

Sensitivity Analysis

Project selection is often a far more complex decision than just choosing it based on the NPV number. Finance managers at Axa Sigma should conduct a sensitivity analysis to better understand not only the inherent risk of the projects but also how those risks can be either factored in or mitigated during the project execution. Sensitivity analysis helps in –

Understanding of risks involved in the project.

What are the key aspects of the projects that need to be monitored, refined, and retuned for continuous delivery of projected cash flows.

What can impact the cash flow of the project.

What will be a multi year spillover effect of various taxation regulations.

What are the uncertainties surrounding the project Initial Cash Outlay (ICO’s). ICO’s often have several different components such as land, machinery, building, and other equipment.

Some of the assumptions while using the Discounted Cash Flow Methods –

Projects are assumed to be Mutually Exclusive – This is seldom the came in modern day giant organizations where projects are often inter-related and rejecting a project solely based on NPV can result in sunk cost from a related project.

Independent projects have independent cash flows – As explained in the marketing project – though the project may look independent but in reality it is not as the brand awareness project can be closely associated with the spending on sales promotions and product specific advertising.






Negotiation Strategy of AXA Way: The Pursuit of Excellence Through Quality of Service

References & Further Readings

John Weeks, Jean-Pierre Baillot, Suzanne Weeks (2018), "AXA Way: The Pursuit of Excellence Through Quality of Service Harvard Business Review Case Study. Published by HBR Publications.


NxStage SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Healthcare , Medical Equipment & Supplies


MobileIron SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Software & Programming


Pure Alumina SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Basic Materials , Chemical Manufacturing


Rision SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer Cyclical , Textiles - Non Apparel


Acadia Healthcare SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Healthcare , Healthcare Facilities


Liquidmetal Tech SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Basic Materials , Metal Mining


Kronos Worldwide SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Basic Materials , Chemical Manufacturing