×




How Much Are adidas's Three Stripes Worth? adidas v. Payless and Its $300 Million Verdict Net Present Value (NPV) / MBA Resources

Introduction to Net Present Value (NPV) - What is Net Present Value (NPV) ? How it impacts financial decisions regarding project management?

NPV solution for How Much Are adidas's Three Stripes Worth? adidas v. Payless and Its $300 Million Verdict case study


At Oak Spring University, we provide corporate level professional Net Present Value (NPV) case study solution. How Much Are adidas's Three Stripes Worth? adidas v. Payless and Its $300 Million Verdict case study is a Harvard Business School (HBR) case study written by Michel Tuan Pham. The How Much Are adidas's Three Stripes Worth? adidas v. Payless and Its $300 Million Verdict (referred as “Payless Adidas” from here on) case study provides evaluation & decision scenario in field of Global Business. It also touches upon business topics such as - Value proposition, Ethics, Market research.

The net present value (NPV) of an investment proposal is the present value of the proposal’s net cash flows less the proposal’s initial cash outflow. If a project’s NPV is greater than or equal to zero, the project should be accepted.

NPV = Present Value of Future Cash Flows LESS Project’s Initial Investment






Case Description of How Much Are adidas's Three Stripes Worth? adidas v. Payless and Its $300 Million Verdict Case Study


During its 50-year history, adidas had spent heavily to establish its three-stripe logo as a symbol for athletic achievement. When value-priced shoe retailer Payless ShoeSource started selling athletic shoes with two or four vertical stripes, adidas brought an action against Payless. adidas claimed Payless' lower-cost athletic shoes could dilute its famous logo in the minds of consumers and tarnish its brand by association with a lower-quality product. In 2008, the jury found in favor of adidas, awarding $305 million, believed to be the largest verdict in a trademark case. In this case students examine the histories and brand status of adidas and Payless as well as both companies' legal arguments before discussing consumer psychology, branding, and whether the jury made the right decision.


Case Authors : Michel Tuan Pham

Topic : Global Business

Related Areas : Ethics, Market research




Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 6% for How Much Are adidas's Three Stripes Worth? adidas v. Payless and Its $300 Million Verdict Case Study


Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 6 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10013990) -10013990 - -
Year 1 3452932 -6561058 3452932 0.9434 3257483
Year 2 3956975 -2604083 7409907 0.89 3521694
Year 3 3939254 1335171 11349161 0.8396 3307474
Year 4 3223920 4559091 14573081 0.7921 2553647
TOTAL 14573081 12640297




The Net Present Value at 6% discount rate is 2626307

In isolation the NPV number doesn't mean much but put in right context then it is one of the best method to evaluate project returns. In this article we will cover -

Different methods of capital budgeting


What is NPV & Formula of NPV,
How it is calculated,
How to use NPV number for project evaluation, and
Scenario Planning given risks and management priorities.




Capital Budgeting Approaches

Methods of Capital Budgeting


There are four types of capital budgeting techniques that are widely used in the corporate world –

1. Payback Period
2. Internal Rate of Return
3. Profitability Index
4. Net Present Value

Apart from the Payback period method which is an additive method, rest of the methods are based on Discounted Cash Flow technique. Even though cash flow can be calculated based on the nature of the project, for the simplicity of the article we are assuming that all the expected cash flows are realized at the end of the year.

Discounted Cash Flow approaches provide a more objective basis for evaluating and selecting investment projects. They take into consideration both –

1. Magnitude of both incoming and outgoing cash flows – Projects can be capital intensive, time intensive, or both. Payless Adidas shareholders have preference for diversified projects investment rather than prospective high income from a single capital intensive project.
2. Timing of the expected cash flows – stockholders of Payless Adidas have higher preference for cash returns over 4-5 years rather than 10-15 years given the nature of the volatility in the industry.






Formula and Steps to Calculate Net Present Value (NPV) of How Much Are adidas's Three Stripes Worth? adidas v. Payless and Its $300 Million Verdict

NPV = Net Cash In Flowt1 / (1+r)t1 + Net Cash In Flowt2 / (1+r)t2 + … Net Cash In Flowtn / (1+r)tn
Less Net Cash Out Flowt0 / (1+r)t0

Where t = time period, in this case year 1, year 2 and so on.
r = discount rate or return that could be earned using other safe proposition such as fixed deposit or treasury bond rate. Net Cash In Flow – What the firm will get each year.
Net Cash Out Flow – What the firm needs to invest initially in the project.

Step 1 – Understand the nature of the project and calculate cash flow for each year.
Step 2 – Discount those cash flow based on the discount rate.
Step 3 – Add all the discounted cash flow.
Step 4 – Selection of the project

Why Global Business Managers need to know Financial Tools such as Net Present Value (NPV)?

In our daily workplace we often come across people and colleagues who are just focused on their core competency and targets they have to deliver. For example marketing managers at Payless Adidas often design programs whose objective is to drive brand awareness and customer reach. But how that 30 point increase in brand awareness or 10 point increase in customer touch points will result into shareholders’ value is not specified.

To overcome such scenarios managers at Payless Adidas needs to not only know the financial aspect of project management but also needs to have tools to integrate them into part of the project development and monitoring plan.

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 15%

After working through various assumptions we reached a conclusion that risk is far higher than 6%. In a reasonably stable industry with weak competition - 15% discount rate can be a good benchmark.



Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 15 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10013990) -10013990 - -
Year 1 3452932 -6561058 3452932 0.8696 3002550
Year 2 3956975 -2604083 7409907 0.7561 2992042
Year 3 3939254 1335171 11349161 0.6575 2590123
Year 4 3223920 4559091 14573081 0.5718 1843287
TOTAL 10428001


The Net NPV after 4 years is 414011

(10428001 - 10013990 )








Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 20%


If the risk component is high in the industry then we should go for a higher hurdle rate / discount rate of 20%.

Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 20 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10013990) -10013990 - -
Year 1 3452932 -6561058 3452932 0.8333 2877443
Year 2 3956975 -2604083 7409907 0.6944 2747899
Year 3 3939254 1335171 11349161 0.5787 2279661
Year 4 3223920 4559091 14573081 0.4823 1554745
TOTAL 9459749


The Net NPV after 4 years is -554241

At 20% discount rate the NPV is negative (9459749 - 10013990 ) so ideally we can't select the project if macro and micro factors don't allow financial managers of Payless Adidas to discount cash flow at lower discount rates such as 15%.





Acceptance Criteria of a Project based on NPV

Simplest Approach – If the investment project of Payless Adidas has a NPV value higher than Zero then finance managers at Payless Adidas can ACCEPT the project, otherwise they can reject the project. This means that project will deliver higher returns over the period of time than any alternate investment strategy.

In theory if the required rate of return or discount rate is chosen correctly by finance managers at Payless Adidas, then the stock price of the Payless Adidas should change by same amount of the NPV. In real world we know that share price also reflects various other factors that can be related to both macro and micro environment.

In the same vein – accepting the project with zero NPV should result in stagnant share price. Finance managers use discount rates as a measure of risk components in the project execution process.

Sensitivity Analysis

Project selection is often a far more complex decision than just choosing it based on the NPV number. Finance managers at Payless Adidas should conduct a sensitivity analysis to better understand not only the inherent risk of the projects but also how those risks can be either factored in or mitigated during the project execution. Sensitivity analysis helps in –

What will be a multi year spillover effect of various taxation regulations.

What can impact the cash flow of the project.

Understanding of risks involved in the project.

What are the uncertainties surrounding the project Initial Cash Outlay (ICO’s). ICO’s often have several different components such as land, machinery, building, and other equipment.

What are the key aspects of the projects that need to be monitored, refined, and retuned for continuous delivery of projected cash flows.

Some of the assumptions while using the Discounted Cash Flow Methods –

Projects are assumed to be Mutually Exclusive – This is seldom the came in modern day giant organizations where projects are often inter-related and rejecting a project solely based on NPV can result in sunk cost from a related project.

Independent projects have independent cash flows – As explained in the marketing project – though the project may look independent but in reality it is not as the brand awareness project can be closely associated with the spending on sales promotions and product specific advertising.






Negotiation Strategy of How Much Are adidas's Three Stripes Worth? adidas v. Payless and Its $300 Million Verdict

References & Further Readings

Michel Tuan Pham (2018), "How Much Are adidas's Three Stripes Worth? adidas v. Payless and Its $300 Million Verdict Harvard Business Review Case Study. Published by HBR Publications.


Falcon Minerals A SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Energy , Oil & Gas - Integrated


FNB SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Financial , Regional Banks


Hannans Reward Ltd SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Basic Materials , Gold & Silver


VT Holdings SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Services , Retail (Specialty)


G & M SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Capital Goods , Construction Services


AstraZeneca SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Healthcare , Biotechnology & Drugs


Red Star Macalline A SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Services , Retail (Home Improvement)


Mechanical Technolgy SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Scientific & Technical Instr.


Sosei Group SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Healthcare , Biotechnology & Drugs


Bajaj Corp SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer/Non-Cyclical , Personal & Household Prods.