×




Jocelyn Chang: Comparing Angel-Investing Models Net Present Value (NPV) / MBA Resources

Introduction to Net Present Value (NPV) - What is Net Present Value (NPV) ? How it impacts financial decisions regarding project management?

NPV solution for Jocelyn Chang: Comparing Angel-Investing Models case study


At Oak Spring University, we provide corporate level professional Net Present Value (NPV) case study solution. Jocelyn Chang: Comparing Angel-Investing Models case study is a Harvard Business School (HBR) case study written by Gregory Fairchild, Dorothy C. Kelly, Susan Chaplinsky, John W. Glynn Jr.. The Jocelyn Chang: Comparing Angel-Investing Models (referred as “Angel Jocelyn” from here on) case study provides evaluation & decision scenario in field of Finance & Accounting. It also touches upon business topics such as - Value proposition, Innovation, Venture capital.

The net present value (NPV) of an investment proposal is the present value of the proposal’s net cash flows less the proposal’s initial cash outflow. If a project’s NPV is greater than or equal to zero, the project should be accepted.

NPV = Present Value of Future Cash Flows LESS Project’s Initial Investment






Case Description of Jocelyn Chang: Comparing Angel-Investing Models Case Study


In late 2004, a cashed-out entrepreneur in the health sciences decides to pursue private-equity angel investing as a means to fulfill her professional, financial, and personal objectives. Jocelyn Chang investigates three different types of angel organizations: the Band of Angels, Tenex Medical Investors, and the Washington Dinner Club. As part of her research into private-equity investing, she explores recent (postbubble) developments in both angel investing and the venture-capital industry.


Case Authors : Gregory Fairchild, Dorothy C. Kelly, Susan Chaplinsky, John W. Glynn Jr.

Topic : Finance & Accounting

Related Areas : Innovation, Venture capital




Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 6% for Jocelyn Chang: Comparing Angel-Investing Models Case Study


Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 6 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10010323) -10010323 - -
Year 1 3444845 -6565478 3444845 0.9434 3249854
Year 2 3972977 -2592501 7417822 0.89 3535935
Year 3 3943389 1350888 11361211 0.8396 3310945
Year 4 3245461 4596349 14606672 0.7921 2570709
TOTAL 14606672 12667444




The Net Present Value at 6% discount rate is 2657121

In isolation the NPV number doesn't mean much but put in right context then it is one of the best method to evaluate project returns. In this article we will cover -

Different methods of capital budgeting


What is NPV & Formula of NPV,
How it is calculated,
How to use NPV number for project evaluation, and
Scenario Planning given risks and management priorities.




Capital Budgeting Approaches

Methods of Capital Budgeting


There are four types of capital budgeting techniques that are widely used in the corporate world –

1. Payback Period
2. Profitability Index
3. Net Present Value
4. Internal Rate of Return

Apart from the Payback period method which is an additive method, rest of the methods are based on Discounted Cash Flow technique. Even though cash flow can be calculated based on the nature of the project, for the simplicity of the article we are assuming that all the expected cash flows are realized at the end of the year.

Discounted Cash Flow approaches provide a more objective basis for evaluating and selecting investment projects. They take into consideration both –

1. Timing of the expected cash flows – stockholders of Angel Jocelyn have higher preference for cash returns over 4-5 years rather than 10-15 years given the nature of the volatility in the industry.
2. Magnitude of both incoming and outgoing cash flows – Projects can be capital intensive, time intensive, or both. Angel Jocelyn shareholders have preference for diversified projects investment rather than prospective high income from a single capital intensive project.






Formula and Steps to Calculate Net Present Value (NPV) of Jocelyn Chang: Comparing Angel-Investing Models

NPV = Net Cash In Flowt1 / (1+r)t1 + Net Cash In Flowt2 / (1+r)t2 + … Net Cash In Flowtn / (1+r)tn
Less Net Cash Out Flowt0 / (1+r)t0

Where t = time period, in this case year 1, year 2 and so on.
r = discount rate or return that could be earned using other safe proposition such as fixed deposit or treasury bond rate. Net Cash In Flow – What the firm will get each year.
Net Cash Out Flow – What the firm needs to invest initially in the project.

Step 1 – Understand the nature of the project and calculate cash flow for each year.
Step 2 – Discount those cash flow based on the discount rate.
Step 3 – Add all the discounted cash flow.
Step 4 – Selection of the project

Why Finance & Accounting Managers need to know Financial Tools such as Net Present Value (NPV)?

In our daily workplace we often come across people and colleagues who are just focused on their core competency and targets they have to deliver. For example marketing managers at Angel Jocelyn often design programs whose objective is to drive brand awareness and customer reach. But how that 30 point increase in brand awareness or 10 point increase in customer touch points will result into shareholders’ value is not specified.

To overcome such scenarios managers at Angel Jocelyn needs to not only know the financial aspect of project management but also needs to have tools to integrate them into part of the project development and monitoring plan.

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 15%

After working through various assumptions we reached a conclusion that risk is far higher than 6%. In a reasonably stable industry with weak competition - 15% discount rate can be a good benchmark.



Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 15 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10010323) -10010323 - -
Year 1 3444845 -6565478 3444845 0.8696 2995517
Year 2 3972977 -2592501 7417822 0.7561 3004141
Year 3 3943389 1350888 11361211 0.6575 2592842
Year 4 3245461 4596349 14606672 0.5718 1855603
TOTAL 10448104


The Net NPV after 4 years is 437781

(10448104 - 10010323 )








Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 20%


If the risk component is high in the industry then we should go for a higher hurdle rate / discount rate of 20%.

Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 20 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10010323) -10010323 - -
Year 1 3444845 -6565478 3444845 0.8333 2870704
Year 2 3972977 -2592501 7417822 0.6944 2759012
Year 3 3943389 1350888 11361211 0.5787 2282054
Year 4 3245461 4596349 14606672 0.4823 1565134
TOTAL 9476903


The Net NPV after 4 years is -533420

At 20% discount rate the NPV is negative (9476903 - 10010323 ) so ideally we can't select the project if macro and micro factors don't allow financial managers of Angel Jocelyn to discount cash flow at lower discount rates such as 15%.





Acceptance Criteria of a Project based on NPV

Simplest Approach – If the investment project of Angel Jocelyn has a NPV value higher than Zero then finance managers at Angel Jocelyn can ACCEPT the project, otherwise they can reject the project. This means that project will deliver higher returns over the period of time than any alternate investment strategy.

In theory if the required rate of return or discount rate is chosen correctly by finance managers at Angel Jocelyn, then the stock price of the Angel Jocelyn should change by same amount of the NPV. In real world we know that share price also reflects various other factors that can be related to both macro and micro environment.

In the same vein – accepting the project with zero NPV should result in stagnant share price. Finance managers use discount rates as a measure of risk components in the project execution process.

Sensitivity Analysis

Project selection is often a far more complex decision than just choosing it based on the NPV number. Finance managers at Angel Jocelyn should conduct a sensitivity analysis to better understand not only the inherent risk of the projects but also how those risks can be either factored in or mitigated during the project execution. Sensitivity analysis helps in –

What will be a multi year spillover effect of various taxation regulations.

What are the key aspects of the projects that need to be monitored, refined, and retuned for continuous delivery of projected cash flows.

What can impact the cash flow of the project.

Understanding of risks involved in the project.

What are the uncertainties surrounding the project Initial Cash Outlay (ICO’s). ICO’s often have several different components such as land, machinery, building, and other equipment.

Some of the assumptions while using the Discounted Cash Flow Methods –

Projects are assumed to be Mutually Exclusive – This is seldom the came in modern day giant organizations where projects are often inter-related and rejecting a project solely based on NPV can result in sunk cost from a related project.

Independent projects have independent cash flows – As explained in the marketing project – though the project may look independent but in reality it is not as the brand awareness project can be closely associated with the spending on sales promotions and product specific advertising.






Negotiation Strategy of Jocelyn Chang: Comparing Angel-Investing Models

References & Further Readings

Gregory Fairchild, Dorothy C. Kelly, Susan Chaplinsky, John W. Glynn Jr. (2018), "Jocelyn Chang: Comparing Angel-Investing Models Harvard Business Review Case Study. Published by HBR Publications.


Tadir Gan SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer Cyclical , Auto & Truck Parts


Jaya Konstruksi SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Capital Goods , Construction Services


Telford Homes SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Services , Real Estate Operations


BIG SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Services , Rental & Leasing


Nos SGPS SA SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Services , Communications Services


Sensen Networks SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Software & Programming


Wuhan Yangtze SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Electronic Instr. & Controls


Shekhawati Poly Yarn Ltd SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer Cyclical , Textiles - Non Apparel


Axxis Tech SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Computer Services