×




Hypothesis-Driven Entrepreneurship: The Lean Startup Net Present Value (NPV) / MBA Resources

Introduction to Net Present Value (NPV) - What is Net Present Value (NPV) ? How it impacts financial decisions regarding project management?

NPV solution for Hypothesis-Driven Entrepreneurship: The Lean Startup case study


At Oak Spring University, we provide corporate level professional Net Present Value (NPV) case study solution. Hypothesis-Driven Entrepreneurship: The Lean Startup case study is a Harvard Business School (HBR) case study written by Thomas R. Eisenmann, Eric Ries, Sarah Dillard. The Hypothesis-Driven Entrepreneurship: The Lean Startup (referred as “Hypothesis Lean” from here on) case study provides evaluation & decision scenario in field of Innovation & Entrepreneurship. It also touches upon business topics such as - Value proposition, Market research, Project management.

The net present value (NPV) of an investment proposal is the present value of the proposal’s net cash flows less the proposal’s initial cash outflow. If a project’s NPV is greater than or equal to zero, the project should be accepted.

NPV = Present Value of Future Cash Flows LESS Project’s Initial Investment






Case Description of Hypothesis-Driven Entrepreneurship: The Lean Startup Case Study


Firms that follow a hypothesis-driven approach to evaluating entrepreneurial opportunity are called "lean startups." Entrepreneurs in these startups translate their vision into falsifiable business model hypotheses, then test the hypotheses using a series of "minimum viable products," each of which represents the smallest set of features/activities needed to rigorously validate a concept. Based on test feedback, entrepreneurs must then decide whether to persevere with their business model, "pivot" by changing some model elements, or abandon the startup. This note describes, step-by-step, how to follow the hypothesis-driven approach when evaluating entrepreneurial opportunity; explains how the approach mitigates cognitive biases that otherwise can contribute to poor decisions; and considers conditions that are best suited for lean startup methods.


Case Authors : Thomas R. Eisenmann, Eric Ries, Sarah Dillard

Topic : Innovation & Entrepreneurship

Related Areas : Market research, Project management




Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 6% for Hypothesis-Driven Entrepreneurship: The Lean Startup Case Study


Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 6 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10016522) -10016522 - -
Year 1 3469814 -6546708 3469814 0.9434 3273409
Year 2 3968323 -2578385 7438137 0.89 3531793
Year 3 3965807 1387422 11403944 0.8396 3329768
Year 4 3235492 4622914 14639436 0.7921 2562813
TOTAL 14639436 12697784




The Net Present Value at 6% discount rate is 2681262

In isolation the NPV number doesn't mean much but put in right context then it is one of the best method to evaluate project returns. In this article we will cover -

Different methods of capital budgeting


What is NPV & Formula of NPV,
How it is calculated,
How to use NPV number for project evaluation, and
Scenario Planning given risks and management priorities.




Capital Budgeting Approaches

Methods of Capital Budgeting


There are four types of capital budgeting techniques that are widely used in the corporate world –

1. Payback Period
2. Profitability Index
3. Internal Rate of Return
4. Net Present Value

Apart from the Payback period method which is an additive method, rest of the methods are based on Discounted Cash Flow technique. Even though cash flow can be calculated based on the nature of the project, for the simplicity of the article we are assuming that all the expected cash flows are realized at the end of the year.

Discounted Cash Flow approaches provide a more objective basis for evaluating and selecting investment projects. They take into consideration both –

1. Timing of the expected cash flows – stockholders of Hypothesis Lean have higher preference for cash returns over 4-5 years rather than 10-15 years given the nature of the volatility in the industry.
2. Magnitude of both incoming and outgoing cash flows – Projects can be capital intensive, time intensive, or both. Hypothesis Lean shareholders have preference for diversified projects investment rather than prospective high income from a single capital intensive project.






Formula and Steps to Calculate Net Present Value (NPV) of Hypothesis-Driven Entrepreneurship: The Lean Startup

NPV = Net Cash In Flowt1 / (1+r)t1 + Net Cash In Flowt2 / (1+r)t2 + … Net Cash In Flowtn / (1+r)tn
Less Net Cash Out Flowt0 / (1+r)t0

Where t = time period, in this case year 1, year 2 and so on.
r = discount rate or return that could be earned using other safe proposition such as fixed deposit or treasury bond rate. Net Cash In Flow – What the firm will get each year.
Net Cash Out Flow – What the firm needs to invest initially in the project.

Step 1 – Understand the nature of the project and calculate cash flow for each year.
Step 2 – Discount those cash flow based on the discount rate.
Step 3 – Add all the discounted cash flow.
Step 4 – Selection of the project

Why Innovation & Entrepreneurship Managers need to know Financial Tools such as Net Present Value (NPV)?

In our daily workplace we often come across people and colleagues who are just focused on their core competency and targets they have to deliver. For example marketing managers at Hypothesis Lean often design programs whose objective is to drive brand awareness and customer reach. But how that 30 point increase in brand awareness or 10 point increase in customer touch points will result into shareholders’ value is not specified.

To overcome such scenarios managers at Hypothesis Lean needs to not only know the financial aspect of project management but also needs to have tools to integrate them into part of the project development and monitoring plan.

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 15%

After working through various assumptions we reached a conclusion that risk is far higher than 6%. In a reasonably stable industry with weak competition - 15% discount rate can be a good benchmark.



Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 15 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10016522) -10016522 - -
Year 1 3469814 -6546708 3469814 0.8696 3017230
Year 2 3968323 -2578385 7438137 0.7561 3000622
Year 3 3965807 1387422 11403944 0.6575 2607582
Year 4 3235492 4622914 14639436 0.5718 1849903
TOTAL 10475337


The Net NPV after 4 years is 458815

(10475337 - 10016522 )








Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 20%


If the risk component is high in the industry then we should go for a higher hurdle rate / discount rate of 20%.

Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 20 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10016522) -10016522 - -
Year 1 3469814 -6546708 3469814 0.8333 2891512
Year 2 3968323 -2578385 7438137 0.6944 2755780
Year 3 3965807 1387422 11403944 0.5787 2295027
Year 4 3235492 4622914 14639436 0.4823 1560326
TOTAL 9502645


The Net NPV after 4 years is -513877

At 20% discount rate the NPV is negative (9502645 - 10016522 ) so ideally we can't select the project if macro and micro factors don't allow financial managers of Hypothesis Lean to discount cash flow at lower discount rates such as 15%.





Acceptance Criteria of a Project based on NPV

Simplest Approach – If the investment project of Hypothesis Lean has a NPV value higher than Zero then finance managers at Hypothesis Lean can ACCEPT the project, otherwise they can reject the project. This means that project will deliver higher returns over the period of time than any alternate investment strategy.

In theory if the required rate of return or discount rate is chosen correctly by finance managers at Hypothesis Lean, then the stock price of the Hypothesis Lean should change by same amount of the NPV. In real world we know that share price also reflects various other factors that can be related to both macro and micro environment.

In the same vein – accepting the project with zero NPV should result in stagnant share price. Finance managers use discount rates as a measure of risk components in the project execution process.

Sensitivity Analysis

Project selection is often a far more complex decision than just choosing it based on the NPV number. Finance managers at Hypothesis Lean should conduct a sensitivity analysis to better understand not only the inherent risk of the projects but also how those risks can be either factored in or mitigated during the project execution. Sensitivity analysis helps in –

Understanding of risks involved in the project.

What are the key aspects of the projects that need to be monitored, refined, and retuned for continuous delivery of projected cash flows.

What will be a multi year spillover effect of various taxation regulations.

What are the uncertainties surrounding the project Initial Cash Outlay (ICO’s). ICO’s often have several different components such as land, machinery, building, and other equipment.

What can impact the cash flow of the project.

Some of the assumptions while using the Discounted Cash Flow Methods –

Projects are assumed to be Mutually Exclusive – This is seldom the came in modern day giant organizations where projects are often inter-related and rejecting a project solely based on NPV can result in sunk cost from a related project.

Independent projects have independent cash flows – As explained in the marketing project – though the project may look independent but in reality it is not as the brand awareness project can be closely associated with the spending on sales promotions and product specific advertising.






Negotiation Strategy of Hypothesis-Driven Entrepreneurship: The Lean Startup

References & Further Readings

Thomas R. Eisenmann, Eric Ries, Sarah Dillard (2018), "Hypothesis-Driven Entrepreneurship: The Lean Startup Harvard Business Review Case Study. Published by HBR Publications.


Kering SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Services , Retail (Apparel)


BMW ST SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer Cyclical , Auto & Truck Manufacturers


DongilTechnology SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Electronic Instr. & Controls


Zojirushi SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer Cyclical , Appliance & Tool


ABIOMED SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Healthcare , Medical Equipment & Supplies


Sh Belling SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Semiconductors


Stampede Capital SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Financial , Investment Services


Simpac SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Capital Goods , Misc. Capital Goods


Park24 Co Ltd SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Services , Business Services


COPEL ON SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Utilities , Electric Utilities