×




Re-THINK-ing THINK: The Electric Car Company Net Present Value (NPV) / MBA Resources

Introduction to Net Present Value (NPV) - What is Net Present Value (NPV) ? How it impacts financial decisions regarding project management?

NPV solution for Re-THINK-ing THINK: The Electric Car Company case study


At Oak Spring University, we provide corporate level professional Net Present Value (NPV) case study solution. Re-THINK-ing THINK: The Electric Car Company case study is a Harvard Business School (HBR) case study written by Joseph B. Lassiter, David Kiron. The Re-THINK-ing THINK: The Electric Car Company (referred as “Canny Evs” from here on) case study provides evaluation & decision scenario in field of Innovation & Entrepreneurship. It also touches upon business topics such as - Value proposition, Entrepreneurial management, Financial management, International business, Joint ventures, Marketing, Product development.

The net present value (NPV) of an investment proposal is the present value of the proposal’s net cash flows less the proposal’s initial cash outflow. If a project’s NPV is greater than or equal to zero, the project should be accepted.

NPV = Present Value of Future Cash Flows LESS Project’s Initial Investment






Case Description of Re-THINK-ing THINK: The Electric Car Company Case Study


To maximize their effectiveness, color cases should be printed in color.On January 5, 2010, 48-year-old Richard Canny was on his way to meet the Governor of Indiana. He was reading his newly issued press release, announcing that THINK planned to start automobile production in Elkhart County, Indiana and to launch its THINK City battery-operated electric vehicle (EV) in the North American market. The announcement boldly outlined plans to invest $43.5 million in a factory that could begin assembling vehicles in early 2011 and that was sized for a manufacturing capacity for more than 20,000 vehicles per year. A proven automotive industry executive, but a first-time entrepreneur, Canny was CEO of Think Global AS (THINK), a privately held Norwegian maker of battery-operated electric vehicles (EVs) that were rechargeable through residential electrical power outlets. With this announcement, Canny was committing the company to support the broad North American launch of its line of EVs, among the very first commercially available, highway-approved safe cars in the world that produced zero greenhouse gas tailpipe emissions.


Case Authors : Joseph B. Lassiter, David Kiron

Topic : Innovation & Entrepreneurship

Related Areas : Entrepreneurial management, Financial management, International business, Joint ventures, Marketing, Product development




Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 6% for Re-THINK-ing THINK: The Electric Car Company Case Study


Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 6 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10002116) -10002116 - -
Year 1 3455143 -6546973 3455143 0.9434 3259569
Year 2 3977478 -2569495 7432621 0.89 3539941
Year 3 3962191 1392696 11394812 0.8396 3326732
Year 4 3234060 4626756 14628872 0.7921 2561678
TOTAL 14628872 12687921




The Net Present Value at 6% discount rate is 2685805

In isolation the NPV number doesn't mean much but put in right context then it is one of the best method to evaluate project returns. In this article we will cover -

Different methods of capital budgeting


What is NPV & Formula of NPV,
How it is calculated,
How to use NPV number for project evaluation, and
Scenario Planning given risks and management priorities.




Capital Budgeting Approaches

Methods of Capital Budgeting


There are four types of capital budgeting techniques that are widely used in the corporate world –

1. Profitability Index
2. Net Present Value
3. Internal Rate of Return
4. Payback Period

Apart from the Payback period method which is an additive method, rest of the methods are based on Discounted Cash Flow technique. Even though cash flow can be calculated based on the nature of the project, for the simplicity of the article we are assuming that all the expected cash flows are realized at the end of the year.

Discounted Cash Flow approaches provide a more objective basis for evaluating and selecting investment projects. They take into consideration both –

1. Magnitude of both incoming and outgoing cash flows – Projects can be capital intensive, time intensive, or both. Canny Evs shareholders have preference for diversified projects investment rather than prospective high income from a single capital intensive project.
2. Timing of the expected cash flows – stockholders of Canny Evs have higher preference for cash returns over 4-5 years rather than 10-15 years given the nature of the volatility in the industry.






Formula and Steps to Calculate Net Present Value (NPV) of Re-THINK-ing THINK: The Electric Car Company

NPV = Net Cash In Flowt1 / (1+r)t1 + Net Cash In Flowt2 / (1+r)t2 + … Net Cash In Flowtn / (1+r)tn
Less Net Cash Out Flowt0 / (1+r)t0

Where t = time period, in this case year 1, year 2 and so on.
r = discount rate or return that could be earned using other safe proposition such as fixed deposit or treasury bond rate. Net Cash In Flow – What the firm will get each year.
Net Cash Out Flow – What the firm needs to invest initially in the project.

Step 1 – Understand the nature of the project and calculate cash flow for each year.
Step 2 – Discount those cash flow based on the discount rate.
Step 3 – Add all the discounted cash flow.
Step 4 – Selection of the project

Why Innovation & Entrepreneurship Managers need to know Financial Tools such as Net Present Value (NPV)?

In our daily workplace we often come across people and colleagues who are just focused on their core competency and targets they have to deliver. For example marketing managers at Canny Evs often design programs whose objective is to drive brand awareness and customer reach. But how that 30 point increase in brand awareness or 10 point increase in customer touch points will result into shareholders’ value is not specified.

To overcome such scenarios managers at Canny Evs needs to not only know the financial aspect of project management but also needs to have tools to integrate them into part of the project development and monitoring plan.

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 15%

After working through various assumptions we reached a conclusion that risk is far higher than 6%. In a reasonably stable industry with weak competition - 15% discount rate can be a good benchmark.



Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 15 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10002116) -10002116 - -
Year 1 3455143 -6546973 3455143 0.8696 3004472
Year 2 3977478 -2569495 7432621 0.7561 3007545
Year 3 3962191 1392696 11394812 0.6575 2605205
Year 4 3234060 4626756 14628872 0.5718 1849084
TOTAL 10466306


The Net NPV after 4 years is 464190

(10466306 - 10002116 )








Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 20%


If the risk component is high in the industry then we should go for a higher hurdle rate / discount rate of 20%.

Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 20 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10002116) -10002116 - -
Year 1 3455143 -6546973 3455143 0.8333 2879286
Year 2 3977478 -2569495 7432621 0.6944 2762138
Year 3 3962191 1392696 11394812 0.5787 2292935
Year 4 3234060 4626756 14628872 0.4823 1559635
TOTAL 9493993


The Net NPV after 4 years is -508123

At 20% discount rate the NPV is negative (9493993 - 10002116 ) so ideally we can't select the project if macro and micro factors don't allow financial managers of Canny Evs to discount cash flow at lower discount rates such as 15%.





Acceptance Criteria of a Project based on NPV

Simplest Approach – If the investment project of Canny Evs has a NPV value higher than Zero then finance managers at Canny Evs can ACCEPT the project, otherwise they can reject the project. This means that project will deliver higher returns over the period of time than any alternate investment strategy.

In theory if the required rate of return or discount rate is chosen correctly by finance managers at Canny Evs, then the stock price of the Canny Evs should change by same amount of the NPV. In real world we know that share price also reflects various other factors that can be related to both macro and micro environment.

In the same vein – accepting the project with zero NPV should result in stagnant share price. Finance managers use discount rates as a measure of risk components in the project execution process.

Sensitivity Analysis

Project selection is often a far more complex decision than just choosing it based on the NPV number. Finance managers at Canny Evs should conduct a sensitivity analysis to better understand not only the inherent risk of the projects but also how those risks can be either factored in or mitigated during the project execution. Sensitivity analysis helps in –

What can impact the cash flow of the project.

Understanding of risks involved in the project.

What are the uncertainties surrounding the project Initial Cash Outlay (ICO’s). ICO’s often have several different components such as land, machinery, building, and other equipment.

What are the key aspects of the projects that need to be monitored, refined, and retuned for continuous delivery of projected cash flows.

What will be a multi year spillover effect of various taxation regulations.

Some of the assumptions while using the Discounted Cash Flow Methods –

Projects are assumed to be Mutually Exclusive – This is seldom the came in modern day giant organizations where projects are often inter-related and rejecting a project solely based on NPV can result in sunk cost from a related project.

Independent projects have independent cash flows – As explained in the marketing project – though the project may look independent but in reality it is not as the brand awareness project can be closely associated with the spending on sales promotions and product specific advertising.






Negotiation Strategy of Re-THINK-ing THINK: The Electric Car Company

References & Further Readings

Joseph B. Lassiter, David Kiron (2018), "Re-THINK-ing THINK: The Electric Car Company Harvard Business Review Case Study. Published by HBR Publications.


CCR SA ON SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Transportation , Misc. Transportation


Dalian Insulator A SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Electronic Instr. & Controls


CSS SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Services , Business Services


AYS Ventures SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Capital Goods , Constr. - Supplies & Fixtures


Trencor SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Services , Rental & Leasing


Iron Mountain SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Transportation , Misc. Transportation


ITV SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Services , Broadcasting & Cable TV