Introduction to Net Present Value (NPV) - What is Net Present Value (NPV) ? How it impacts financial decisions regarding project management?

At Oak Spring University, we provide corporate level professional Net Present Value (NPV) case study solution. DR. REDDY'S: MEDICINE IS FOR PEOPLE, PROFITS FOLLOW case study is a Harvard Business School (HBR) case study written by Bala Chakravarthy, Sophie Coughlan. The DR. REDDY'S: MEDICINE IS FOR PEOPLE, PROFITS FOLLOW (referred as “Rhp Pill” from here on) case study provides evaluation & decision scenario in field of Leadership & Managing People. It also touches upon business topics such as - Value proposition, .

The net present value (NPV) of an investment proposal is the present value of the proposal’s net cash flows less the proposal’s initial cash outflow. If a project’s NPV is greater than or equal to zero, the project should be accepted.

This case describes the launching of a polypill at Dr. Reddy's to help patients with a high risk of Cardio Vascular Disease (CVD) prevent a second heart attack or stroke. Called the Red Heart Pill (RHP), this combination pill included four therapeutic agents: One to lower cholesterol, the other two to lower blood pressure and a fourth, Aspirin, to thin out the blood.Taken together they were estimated to lower the risk of a second heart attack or stroke by 55%.The RHP was particularly attractive to treat the poor. At a treatment cost of just US$ 25 a year, the RHP was expected to make a major dent in lowering CVD-related deaths and disabilities in India. Dr. Reddy's had completed clinical trials to launch the pill in India and international clinical trials were under way to launch the pill in other markets. The company also hoped to introduce a variant of the pill for primary prevention, helping patients with a low to moderate risk of CVD avert a first heart attack or stroke. The case details the many dilemmas that the top management team of Dr. Reddy's faced in pursuing the RHP project. The active ingredients in the RHP were generic drugs; and yet, because the combination had never been offered before, the RHP had to go through clinical trials to prove its bioequivalence to each of the constituent drugs. The RHP also had to be marketed to physicians and could be sold only through a prescription. The added R&D and marketing costs had to be recouped through the price of the RHP, although this price had to be closer to generics prices. In addition, it would be hard to get a patent for the RHP. Here was a pill that was neither a new discovery drug nor a straight generic. Shaping a strategy for it was demanding and yet if the RHP could be launched successfully, there would be several other opportunities for a combination pill to treat other chronic diseases like depression and osteoarthritis. Learning objectives: The case is a good vehicle to discuss the changing landscape of the global pharmaceutical industry which is faced with the simultaneous challenge of a thinning new product pipeline and increasing pressures from government regulators and third party payers to cut costs. Projects like the RHP at Dr. Reddy's provide examples of the new business models (and the dilemmas that underlie them) that industry leaders would have to consider. Projects like the RHP at Dr. Reddy's provide examples of the new business models (and the dilemmas that underlie them) that industry leaders would have to consider. The case also provides an excellent background from which to profile effective social entrepreneurs, such as the executive in charge of the RHP, Raghu Cidambi.

Years | Cash Flow | Net Cash Flow | Cumulative Cash Flow |
Discount Rate @ 6 % |
Discounted Cash Flows |
---|---|---|---|---|---|

Year 0 | (10020540) | -10020540 | - | - | |

Year 1 | 3471837 | -6548703 | 3471837 | 0.9434 | 3275318 |

Year 2 | 3962455 | -2586248 | 7434292 | 0.89 | 3526571 |

Year 3 | 3952770 | 1366522 | 11387062 | 0.8396 | 3318822 |

Year 4 | 3227550 | 4594072 | 14614612 | 0.7921 | 2556522 |

TOTAL | 14614612 | 12677233 |

In isolation the NPV number doesn't mean much but put in right context then it is one of the best method to evaluate project returns. In this article we will cover -

What is NPV & Formula of NPV,

How it is calculated,

How to use NPV number for project evaluation, and

Scenario Planning given risks and management priorities.

Capital Budgeting Approaches

There are four types of capital budgeting techniques that are widely used in the corporate world –

1. Payback Period

2. Net Present Value

3. Internal Rate of Return

4. Profitability Index

Apart from the Payback period method which is an additive method, rest of the methods are based on
**Discounted Cash Flow **
technique. Even though cash flow can be calculated based on the nature of the project, for the simplicity of the article we are assuming that all the expected cash flows are realized at the end of the year.

Discounted Cash Flow approaches provide a more objective basis for evaluating and selecting investment projects. They take into consideration both –

1. Magnitude of both incoming and outgoing cash flows – Projects can be capital intensive, time intensive, or both. Rhp Pill shareholders have preference for diversified projects investment rather than prospective high income from a single capital intensive project.

2. Timing of the expected cash flows – stockholders of Rhp Pill have higher preference for cash returns over 4-5 years rather than 10-15 years given the nature of the volatility in the industry.

NPV = Net Cash In Flowt1 / (1+r)t1 + Net Cash In Flowt2 / (1+r)t2 + … Net Cash In Flowtn / (1+r)tn

**Less** Net Cash Out Flowt0 / (1+r)t0

Where t = time period, in this case year 1, year 2 and so on.

r = discount rate or return that could be earned using other safe proposition such as fixed deposit or treasury bond rate.
Net Cash In Flow – What the firm will get each year.

Net Cash Out Flow – What the firm needs to invest initially in the project.

Step 1 – Understand the nature of the project and calculate cash flow for each year.

Step 2 – Discount those cash flow based on the discount rate.

Step 3 – Add all the discounted cash flow.

Step 4 – Selection of the project

In our daily workplace we often come across people and colleagues who are just focused on their core competency and targets they have to deliver. For example marketing managers at Rhp Pill often design programs whose objective is to drive brand awareness and customer reach. But how that 30 point increase in brand awareness or 10 point increase in customer touch points will result into shareholders’ value is not specified.

To overcome such scenarios managers at Rhp Pill needs to not only know the financial aspect of project management but also needs to have tools to integrate them into part of the project development and monitoring plan.

After working through various assumptions we reached a conclusion that risk is far higher than 6%. In a reasonably stable industry with weak competition - 15% discount rate can be a good benchmark.

Years | Cash Flow | Net Cash Flow | Cumulative Cash Flow |
Discount Rate @ 15 % |
Discounted Cash Flows |
---|---|---|---|---|---|

Year 0 | (10020540) | -10020540 | - | - | |

Year 1 | 3471837 | -6548703 | 3471837 | 0.8696 | 3018989 |

Year 2 | 3962455 | -2586248 | 7434292 | 0.7561 | 2996185 |

Year 3 | 3952770 | 1366522 | 11387062 | 0.6575 | 2599010 |

Year 4 | 3227550 | 4594072 | 14614612 | 0.5718 | 1845362 |

TOTAL | 10459547 |

(10459547 - 10020540 )

If the risk component is high in the industry then we should go for a higher hurdle rate / discount rate of 20%.

Years | Cash Flow | Net Cash Flow | Cumulative Cash Flow |
Discount Rate @ 20 % |
Discounted Cash Flows |
---|---|---|---|---|---|

Year 0 | (10020540) | -10020540 | - | - | |

Year 1 | 3471837 | -6548703 | 3471837 | 0.8333 | 2893198 |

Year 2 | 3962455 | -2586248 | 7434292 | 0.6944 | 2751705 |

Year 3 | 3952770 | 1366522 | 11387062 | 0.5787 | 2287483 |

Year 4 | 3227550 | 4594072 | 14614612 | 0.4823 | 1556496 |

TOTAL | 9488881 |

At 20% discount rate the NPV is negative (9488881 - 10020540 ) so ideally we can't select the project if macro and micro factors don't allow financial managers of Rhp Pill to discount cash flow at lower discount rates such as 15%.

Simplest Approach – If the investment project of Rhp Pill has a NPV value higher than Zero then finance managers at Rhp Pill can ACCEPT the project, otherwise they can reject the project. This means that project will deliver higher returns over the period of time than any alternate investment strategy.

In theory if the required rate of return or discount rate is chosen correctly by finance managers at Rhp Pill, then the stock price of the Rhp Pill should change by same amount of the NPV. In real world we know that share price also reflects various other factors that can be related to both macro and micro environment.

In the same vein – accepting the project with zero NPV should result in stagnant share price. Finance managers use discount rates as a measure of risk components in the project execution process.

Project selection is often a far more complex decision than just choosing it based on the NPV number. Finance managers at Rhp Pill should conduct a sensitivity analysis to better understand not only the inherent risk of the projects but also how those risks can be either factored in or mitigated during the project execution. Sensitivity analysis helps in –

Understanding of risks involved in the project.

What can impact the cash flow of the project.

What are the uncertainties surrounding the project Initial Cash Outlay (ICO’s). ICO’s often have several different components such as land, machinery, building, and other equipment.

What are the key aspects of the projects that need to be monitored, refined, and retuned for continuous delivery of projected cash flows.

What will be a multi year spillover effect of various taxation regulations.

Projects are assumed to be Mutually Exclusive – This is seldom the came in modern day giant organizations where projects are often inter-related and rejecting a project solely based on NPV can result in sunk cost from a related project.

Independent projects have independent cash flows – As explained in the marketing project – though the project may look independent but in reality it is not as the brand awareness project can be closely associated with the spending on sales promotions and product specific advertising.

** Bala Chakravarthy, Sophie Coughlan (2018)**, "DR. REDDY'S: MEDICINE IS FOR PEOPLE, PROFITS FOLLOW Harvard Business Review Case Study. Published by HBR Publications.

- Digital Transformation at Novartis to Improve Customer Engagement Net Present Value (NPV) Case Study Solution & Analysis
- Cambridge Consulting Group: Bob Anderson Net Present Value (NPV) Case Study Solution & Analysis
- Ecolab, Inc. Net Present Value (NPV) Case Study Solution & Analysis
- Eden McCallum: A Network-Based Consulting Firm (A) Net Present Value (NPV)Case Study Solution & Analysis
- Martha McCaskey Net Present Value (NPV) Case Study Solution & Analysis

- Abbott and the AIDS Crisis (C): What Lies Ahead? Net Present Value (NPV) Case Study Solution & Analysis
- Martha Goldberg Aronson: Leadership Decisions at Mid-Career Net Present Value (NPV) Case Study Solution & Analysis
- THE MERCKS OF DARMSTADT: WHAT FAMILY CAN DO (A) Net Present Value (NPV) Case Study Solution & Analysis
- Michael Fernandes at Nicholas Piramal Net Present Value (NPV) Case Study Solution & Analysis
- Labour Dispute at Dr. Reddy's: Tip of the Iceberg in a Globalization Effort Net Present Value (NPV) Case Study Solution & Analysis

Feel free to connect with us if you need business research.

You can download Excel Template of Case Study Solution & Analysis of DR. REDDY'S: MEDICINE IS FOR PEOPLE, PROFITS FOLLOW