×




Boeing: The Case for Supplier Diversity Net Present Value (NPV) / MBA Resources

Introduction to Net Present Value (NPV) - What is Net Present Value (NPV) ? How it impacts financial decisions regarding project management?

NPV solution for Boeing: The Case for Supplier Diversity case study


At Oak Spring University, we provide corporate level professional Net Present Value (NPV) case study solution. Boeing: The Case for Supplier Diversity case study is a Harvard Business School (HBR) case study written by Karen L. Proudford, Laurin Hodge. The Boeing: The Case for Supplier Diversity (referred as “Boeing Diversity” from here on) case study provides evaluation & decision scenario in field of Leadership & Managing People. It also touches upon business topics such as - Value proposition, Manufacturing.

The net present value (NPV) of an investment proposal is the present value of the proposal’s net cash flows less the proposal’s initial cash outflow. If a project’s NPV is greater than or equal to zero, the project should be accepted.

NPV = Present Value of Future Cash Flows LESS Project’s Initial Investment






Case Description of Boeing: The Case for Supplier Diversity Case Study


The Boeing Company, one of the dominant players in the aerospace industry, aimed to construct a supply chain architecture that was effective both domestically and globally, while simultaneously building its capacity to enter into agreements with small and diverse suppliers. A top executive at Boeing, who was responsible for both corporate supplier relationships and small business liaisons, needed to determine the approach that would yield the most optimal results for the company. Should she adapt supply chain principles to incorporate diversity, or should she view supply chain management as one element in an overall drive to increase diversity at the company? Karen L. Proudford is affiliated with Morgan State University.


Case Authors : Karen L. Proudford, Laurin Hodge

Topic : Leadership & Managing People

Related Areas : Manufacturing




Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 6% for Boeing: The Case for Supplier Diversity Case Study


Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 6 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10026719) -10026719 - -
Year 1 3471536 -6555183 3471536 0.9434 3275034
Year 2 3954160 -2601023 7425696 0.89 3519188
Year 3 3937692 1336669 11363388 0.8396 3306162
Year 4 3228971 4565640 14592359 0.7921 2557647
TOTAL 14592359 12658032




The Net Present Value at 6% discount rate is 2631313

In isolation the NPV number doesn't mean much but put in right context then it is one of the best method to evaluate project returns. In this article we will cover -

Different methods of capital budgeting


What is NPV & Formula of NPV,
How it is calculated,
How to use NPV number for project evaluation, and
Scenario Planning given risks and management priorities.




Capital Budgeting Approaches

Methods of Capital Budgeting


There are four types of capital budgeting techniques that are widely used in the corporate world –

1. Profitability Index
2. Payback Period
3. Internal Rate of Return
4. Net Present Value

Apart from the Payback period method which is an additive method, rest of the methods are based on Discounted Cash Flow technique. Even though cash flow can be calculated based on the nature of the project, for the simplicity of the article we are assuming that all the expected cash flows are realized at the end of the year.

Discounted Cash Flow approaches provide a more objective basis for evaluating and selecting investment projects. They take into consideration both –

1. Timing of the expected cash flows – stockholders of Boeing Diversity have higher preference for cash returns over 4-5 years rather than 10-15 years given the nature of the volatility in the industry.
2. Magnitude of both incoming and outgoing cash flows – Projects can be capital intensive, time intensive, or both. Boeing Diversity shareholders have preference for diversified projects investment rather than prospective high income from a single capital intensive project.






Formula and Steps to Calculate Net Present Value (NPV) of Boeing: The Case for Supplier Diversity

NPV = Net Cash In Flowt1 / (1+r)t1 + Net Cash In Flowt2 / (1+r)t2 + … Net Cash In Flowtn / (1+r)tn
Less Net Cash Out Flowt0 / (1+r)t0

Where t = time period, in this case year 1, year 2 and so on.
r = discount rate or return that could be earned using other safe proposition such as fixed deposit or treasury bond rate. Net Cash In Flow – What the firm will get each year.
Net Cash Out Flow – What the firm needs to invest initially in the project.

Step 1 – Understand the nature of the project and calculate cash flow for each year.
Step 2 – Discount those cash flow based on the discount rate.
Step 3 – Add all the discounted cash flow.
Step 4 – Selection of the project

Why Leadership & Managing People Managers need to know Financial Tools such as Net Present Value (NPV)?

In our daily workplace we often come across people and colleagues who are just focused on their core competency and targets they have to deliver. For example marketing managers at Boeing Diversity often design programs whose objective is to drive brand awareness and customer reach. But how that 30 point increase in brand awareness or 10 point increase in customer touch points will result into shareholders’ value is not specified.

To overcome such scenarios managers at Boeing Diversity needs to not only know the financial aspect of project management but also needs to have tools to integrate them into part of the project development and monitoring plan.

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 15%

After working through various assumptions we reached a conclusion that risk is far higher than 6%. In a reasonably stable industry with weak competition - 15% discount rate can be a good benchmark.



Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 15 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10026719) -10026719 - -
Year 1 3471536 -6555183 3471536 0.8696 3018727
Year 2 3954160 -2601023 7425696 0.7561 2989913
Year 3 3937692 1336669 11363388 0.6575 2589096
Year 4 3228971 4565640 14592359 0.5718 1846175
TOTAL 10443911


The Net NPV after 4 years is 417192

(10443911 - 10026719 )








Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 20%


If the risk component is high in the industry then we should go for a higher hurdle rate / discount rate of 20%.

Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 20 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10026719) -10026719 - -
Year 1 3471536 -6555183 3471536 0.8333 2892947
Year 2 3954160 -2601023 7425696 0.6944 2745944
Year 3 3937692 1336669 11363388 0.5787 2278757
Year 4 3228971 4565640 14592359 0.4823 1557181
TOTAL 9474829


The Net NPV after 4 years is -551890

At 20% discount rate the NPV is negative (9474829 - 10026719 ) so ideally we can't select the project if macro and micro factors don't allow financial managers of Boeing Diversity to discount cash flow at lower discount rates such as 15%.





Acceptance Criteria of a Project based on NPV

Simplest Approach – If the investment project of Boeing Diversity has a NPV value higher than Zero then finance managers at Boeing Diversity can ACCEPT the project, otherwise they can reject the project. This means that project will deliver higher returns over the period of time than any alternate investment strategy.

In theory if the required rate of return or discount rate is chosen correctly by finance managers at Boeing Diversity, then the stock price of the Boeing Diversity should change by same amount of the NPV. In real world we know that share price also reflects various other factors that can be related to both macro and micro environment.

In the same vein – accepting the project with zero NPV should result in stagnant share price. Finance managers use discount rates as a measure of risk components in the project execution process.

Sensitivity Analysis

Project selection is often a far more complex decision than just choosing it based on the NPV number. Finance managers at Boeing Diversity should conduct a sensitivity analysis to better understand not only the inherent risk of the projects but also how those risks can be either factored in or mitigated during the project execution. Sensitivity analysis helps in –

What are the uncertainties surrounding the project Initial Cash Outlay (ICO’s). ICO’s often have several different components such as land, machinery, building, and other equipment.

What are the key aspects of the projects that need to be monitored, refined, and retuned for continuous delivery of projected cash flows.

What can impact the cash flow of the project.

What will be a multi year spillover effect of various taxation regulations.

Understanding of risks involved in the project.

Some of the assumptions while using the Discounted Cash Flow Methods –

Projects are assumed to be Mutually Exclusive – This is seldom the came in modern day giant organizations where projects are often inter-related and rejecting a project solely based on NPV can result in sunk cost from a related project.

Independent projects have independent cash flows – As explained in the marketing project – though the project may look independent but in reality it is not as the brand awareness project can be closely associated with the spending on sales promotions and product specific advertising.






Negotiation Strategy of Boeing: The Case for Supplier Diversity

References & Further Readings

Karen L. Proudford, Laurin Hodge (2018), "Boeing: The Case for Supplier Diversity Harvard Business Review Case Study. Published by HBR Publications.


MacDonald Dettwiler SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Communications Equipment


1347 Property In SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Financial , Insurance (Prop. & Casualty)


Scorpio Bulkers SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Transportation , Water Transportation


Tenax Therapeutics SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Healthcare , Biotechnology & Drugs


Sanderson Farms SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer/Non-Cyclical , Food Processing


Kanro SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer/Non-Cyclical , Food Processing


BP SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Energy , Oil & Gas Operations


Technics Oil & Gas Ltd SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Energy , Oil Well Services & Equipment


Big Rock Partners Unit SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Financial , Misc. Financial Services


Melcor Developments SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Capital Goods , Construction Services