×




Microfinance at Credit Suisse: Linking the TOP with the BOP Net Present Value (NPV) / MBA Resources

Introduction to Net Present Value (NPV) - What is Net Present Value (NPV) ? How it impacts financial decisions regarding project management?

NPV solution for Microfinance at Credit Suisse: Linking the TOP with the BOP case study


At Oak Spring University, we provide corporate level professional Net Present Value (NPV) case study solution. Microfinance at Credit Suisse: Linking the TOP with the BOP case study is a Harvard Business School (HBR) case study written by Pierre Hillion, Jean Wee, Olivier Rousset. The Microfinance at Credit Suisse: Linking the TOP with the BOP (referred as “Suisse Microfinance” from here on) case study provides evaluation & decision scenario in field of Leadership & Managing People. It also touches upon business topics such as - Value proposition, Entrepreneurial finance, Recession, Risk management, Social responsibility, Sustainability.

The net present value (NPV) of an investment proposal is the present value of the proposal’s net cash flows less the proposal’s initial cash outflow. If a project’s NPV is greater than or equal to zero, the project should be accepted.

NPV = Present Value of Future Cash Flows LESS Project’s Initial Investment






Case Description of Microfinance at Credit Suisse: Linking the TOP with the BOP Case Study


"Microfinance investment opportunities have been well received by Credit Suisse clients seeking socially responsible investments. They provide a ""double bottom line"": a positive financial return (despite the global financial crisis), and a social impact by offering first-time access to financial services to the poor. From $5 million in 2003, total assets under management in microfinance at Credit Suisse reached $1 billion by 2009, and untapped demand is estimated at $300 billion. The firm has positioned itself as a link between the TOP of the wealth pyramid (its clients) and the BOP (base of the pyramid, the poor), but as microfinance comes under fierce criticism for over-indebting the poor, and with a decline in growth, performance and portfolio quality, Credit Suisse must consider its future engagement in this sector of the emerging markets. "


Case Authors : Pierre Hillion, Jean Wee, Olivier Rousset

Topic : Leadership & Managing People

Related Areas : Entrepreneurial finance, Recession, Risk management, Social responsibility, Sustainability




Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 6% for Microfinance at Credit Suisse: Linking the TOP with the BOP Case Study


Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 6 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10025337) -10025337 - -
Year 1 3460397 -6564940 3460397 0.9434 3264525
Year 2 3957876 -2607064 7418273 0.89 3522496
Year 3 3955445 1348381 11373718 0.8396 3321068
Year 4 3223854 4572235 14597572 0.7921 2553594
TOTAL 14597572 12661683




The Net Present Value at 6% discount rate is 2636346

In isolation the NPV number doesn't mean much but put in right context then it is one of the best method to evaluate project returns. In this article we will cover -

Different methods of capital budgeting


What is NPV & Formula of NPV,
How it is calculated,
How to use NPV number for project evaluation, and
Scenario Planning given risks and management priorities.




Capital Budgeting Approaches

Methods of Capital Budgeting


There are four types of capital budgeting techniques that are widely used in the corporate world –

1. Payback Period
2. Internal Rate of Return
3. Net Present Value
4. Profitability Index

Apart from the Payback period method which is an additive method, rest of the methods are based on Discounted Cash Flow technique. Even though cash flow can be calculated based on the nature of the project, for the simplicity of the article we are assuming that all the expected cash flows are realized at the end of the year.

Discounted Cash Flow approaches provide a more objective basis for evaluating and selecting investment projects. They take into consideration both –

1. Magnitude of both incoming and outgoing cash flows – Projects can be capital intensive, time intensive, or both. Suisse Microfinance shareholders have preference for diversified projects investment rather than prospective high income from a single capital intensive project.
2. Timing of the expected cash flows – stockholders of Suisse Microfinance have higher preference for cash returns over 4-5 years rather than 10-15 years given the nature of the volatility in the industry.






Formula and Steps to Calculate Net Present Value (NPV) of Microfinance at Credit Suisse: Linking the TOP with the BOP

NPV = Net Cash In Flowt1 / (1+r)t1 + Net Cash In Flowt2 / (1+r)t2 + … Net Cash In Flowtn / (1+r)tn
Less Net Cash Out Flowt0 / (1+r)t0

Where t = time period, in this case year 1, year 2 and so on.
r = discount rate or return that could be earned using other safe proposition such as fixed deposit or treasury bond rate. Net Cash In Flow – What the firm will get each year.
Net Cash Out Flow – What the firm needs to invest initially in the project.

Step 1 – Understand the nature of the project and calculate cash flow for each year.
Step 2 – Discount those cash flow based on the discount rate.
Step 3 – Add all the discounted cash flow.
Step 4 – Selection of the project

Why Leadership & Managing People Managers need to know Financial Tools such as Net Present Value (NPV)?

In our daily workplace we often come across people and colleagues who are just focused on their core competency and targets they have to deliver. For example marketing managers at Suisse Microfinance often design programs whose objective is to drive brand awareness and customer reach. But how that 30 point increase in brand awareness or 10 point increase in customer touch points will result into shareholders’ value is not specified.

To overcome such scenarios managers at Suisse Microfinance needs to not only know the financial aspect of project management but also needs to have tools to integrate them into part of the project development and monitoring plan.

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 15%

After working through various assumptions we reached a conclusion that risk is far higher than 6%. In a reasonably stable industry with weak competition - 15% discount rate can be a good benchmark.



Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 15 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10025337) -10025337 - -
Year 1 3460397 -6564940 3460397 0.8696 3009041
Year 2 3957876 -2607064 7418273 0.7561 2992723
Year 3 3955445 1348381 11373718 0.6575 2600769
Year 4 3223854 4572235 14597572 0.5718 1843249
TOTAL 10445782


The Net NPV after 4 years is 420445

(10445782 - 10025337 )








Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 20%


If the risk component is high in the industry then we should go for a higher hurdle rate / discount rate of 20%.

Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 20 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10025337) -10025337 - -
Year 1 3460397 -6564940 3460397 0.8333 2883664
Year 2 3957876 -2607064 7418273 0.6944 2748525
Year 3 3955445 1348381 11373718 0.5787 2289031
Year 4 3223854 4572235 14597572 0.4823 1554714
TOTAL 9475933


The Net NPV after 4 years is -549404

At 20% discount rate the NPV is negative (9475933 - 10025337 ) so ideally we can't select the project if macro and micro factors don't allow financial managers of Suisse Microfinance to discount cash flow at lower discount rates such as 15%.





Acceptance Criteria of a Project based on NPV

Simplest Approach – If the investment project of Suisse Microfinance has a NPV value higher than Zero then finance managers at Suisse Microfinance can ACCEPT the project, otherwise they can reject the project. This means that project will deliver higher returns over the period of time than any alternate investment strategy.

In theory if the required rate of return or discount rate is chosen correctly by finance managers at Suisse Microfinance, then the stock price of the Suisse Microfinance should change by same amount of the NPV. In real world we know that share price also reflects various other factors that can be related to both macro and micro environment.

In the same vein – accepting the project with zero NPV should result in stagnant share price. Finance managers use discount rates as a measure of risk components in the project execution process.

Sensitivity Analysis

Project selection is often a far more complex decision than just choosing it based on the NPV number. Finance managers at Suisse Microfinance should conduct a sensitivity analysis to better understand not only the inherent risk of the projects but also how those risks can be either factored in or mitigated during the project execution. Sensitivity analysis helps in –

What are the key aspects of the projects that need to be monitored, refined, and retuned for continuous delivery of projected cash flows.

What are the uncertainties surrounding the project Initial Cash Outlay (ICO’s). ICO’s often have several different components such as land, machinery, building, and other equipment.

What can impact the cash flow of the project.

Understanding of risks involved in the project.

What will be a multi year spillover effect of various taxation regulations.

Some of the assumptions while using the Discounted Cash Flow Methods –

Projects are assumed to be Mutually Exclusive – This is seldom the came in modern day giant organizations where projects are often inter-related and rejecting a project solely based on NPV can result in sunk cost from a related project.

Independent projects have independent cash flows – As explained in the marketing project – though the project may look independent but in reality it is not as the brand awareness project can be closely associated with the spending on sales promotions and product specific advertising.






Negotiation Strategy of Microfinance at Credit Suisse: Linking the TOP with the BOP

References & Further Readings

Pierre Hillion, Jean Wee, Olivier Rousset (2018), "Microfinance at Credit Suisse: Linking the TOP with the BOP Harvard Business Review Case Study. Published by HBR Publications.


Ahmad Zaki Res SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Capital Goods , Construction Services


AuBEX SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer/Non-Cyclical , Office Supplies


Nabaltec SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Basic Materials , Chemical Manufacturing


Gedeon Richter SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Healthcare , Biotechnology & Drugs


Jiangsu Canlon Building SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Capital Goods , Constr. - Supplies & Fixtures