×




Corning--1983-96: Transition at the Top Net Present Value (NPV) / MBA Resources

Introduction to Net Present Value (NPV) - What is Net Present Value (NPV) ? How it impacts financial decisions regarding project management?

NPV solution for Corning--1983-96: Transition at the Top case study


At Oak Spring University, we provide corporate level professional Net Present Value (NPV) case study solution. Corning--1983-96: Transition at the Top case study is a Harvard Business School (HBR) case study written by Michael J. Roberts, Michael L. Tushman. The Corning--1983-96: Transition at the Top (referred as “Corning 1983” from here on) case study provides evaluation & decision scenario in field of Leadership & Managing People. It also touches upon business topics such as - Value proposition, Leadership, Organizational culture.

The net present value (NPV) of an investment proposal is the present value of the proposal’s net cash flows less the proposal’s initial cash outflow. If a project’s NPV is greater than or equal to zero, the project should be accepted.

NPV = Present Value of Future Cash Flows LESS Project’s Initial Investment






Case Description of Corning--1983-96: Transition at the Top Case Study


Focuses on Jamie Houghton's efforts to revitalize Corning from 1983-1996, including the development of a very strong set of values and culture. The issue centers around Roger Ackerman's rise to president, then chairman/CEO, and his drive to both change the business strategically and financially and develop a new culture to support this change.


Case Authors : Michael J. Roberts, Michael L. Tushman

Topic : Leadership & Managing People

Related Areas : Leadership, Organizational culture




Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 6% for Corning--1983-96: Transition at the Top Case Study


Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 6 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10021458) -10021458 - -
Year 1 3455713 -6565745 3455713 0.9434 3260107
Year 2 3978647 -2587098 7434360 0.89 3540982
Year 3 3970301 1383203 11404661 0.8396 3333541
Year 4 3230859 4614062 14635520 0.7921 2559143
TOTAL 14635520 12693772




The Net Present Value at 6% discount rate is 2672314

In isolation the NPV number doesn't mean much but put in right context then it is one of the best method to evaluate project returns. In this article we will cover -

Different methods of capital budgeting


What is NPV & Formula of NPV,
How it is calculated,
How to use NPV number for project evaluation, and
Scenario Planning given risks and management priorities.




Capital Budgeting Approaches

Methods of Capital Budgeting


There are four types of capital budgeting techniques that are widely used in the corporate world –

1. Net Present Value
2. Internal Rate of Return
3. Profitability Index
4. Payback Period

Apart from the Payback period method which is an additive method, rest of the methods are based on Discounted Cash Flow technique. Even though cash flow can be calculated based on the nature of the project, for the simplicity of the article we are assuming that all the expected cash flows are realized at the end of the year.

Discounted Cash Flow approaches provide a more objective basis for evaluating and selecting investment projects. They take into consideration both –

1. Timing of the expected cash flows – stockholders of Corning 1983 have higher preference for cash returns over 4-5 years rather than 10-15 years given the nature of the volatility in the industry.
2. Magnitude of both incoming and outgoing cash flows – Projects can be capital intensive, time intensive, or both. Corning 1983 shareholders have preference for diversified projects investment rather than prospective high income from a single capital intensive project.






Formula and Steps to Calculate Net Present Value (NPV) of Corning--1983-96: Transition at the Top

NPV = Net Cash In Flowt1 / (1+r)t1 + Net Cash In Flowt2 / (1+r)t2 + … Net Cash In Flowtn / (1+r)tn
Less Net Cash Out Flowt0 / (1+r)t0

Where t = time period, in this case year 1, year 2 and so on.
r = discount rate or return that could be earned using other safe proposition such as fixed deposit or treasury bond rate. Net Cash In Flow – What the firm will get each year.
Net Cash Out Flow – What the firm needs to invest initially in the project.

Step 1 – Understand the nature of the project and calculate cash flow for each year.
Step 2 – Discount those cash flow based on the discount rate.
Step 3 – Add all the discounted cash flow.
Step 4 – Selection of the project

Why Leadership & Managing People Managers need to know Financial Tools such as Net Present Value (NPV)?

In our daily workplace we often come across people and colleagues who are just focused on their core competency and targets they have to deliver. For example marketing managers at Corning 1983 often design programs whose objective is to drive brand awareness and customer reach. But how that 30 point increase in brand awareness or 10 point increase in customer touch points will result into shareholders’ value is not specified.

To overcome such scenarios managers at Corning 1983 needs to not only know the financial aspect of project management but also needs to have tools to integrate them into part of the project development and monitoring plan.

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 15%

After working through various assumptions we reached a conclusion that risk is far higher than 6%. In a reasonably stable industry with weak competition - 15% discount rate can be a good benchmark.



Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 15 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10021458) -10021458 - -
Year 1 3455713 -6565745 3455713 0.8696 3004968
Year 2 3978647 -2587098 7434360 0.7561 3008429
Year 3 3970301 1383203 11404661 0.6575 2610537
Year 4 3230859 4614062 14635520 0.5718 1847254
TOTAL 10471188


The Net NPV after 4 years is 449730

(10471188 - 10021458 )








Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 20%


If the risk component is high in the industry then we should go for a higher hurdle rate / discount rate of 20%.

Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 20 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10021458) -10021458 - -
Year 1 3455713 -6565745 3455713 0.8333 2879761
Year 2 3978647 -2587098 7434360 0.6944 2762949
Year 3 3970301 1383203 11404661 0.5787 2297628
Year 4 3230859 4614062 14635520 0.4823 1558092
TOTAL 9498430


The Net NPV after 4 years is -523028

At 20% discount rate the NPV is negative (9498430 - 10021458 ) so ideally we can't select the project if macro and micro factors don't allow financial managers of Corning 1983 to discount cash flow at lower discount rates such as 15%.





Acceptance Criteria of a Project based on NPV

Simplest Approach – If the investment project of Corning 1983 has a NPV value higher than Zero then finance managers at Corning 1983 can ACCEPT the project, otherwise they can reject the project. This means that project will deliver higher returns over the period of time than any alternate investment strategy.

In theory if the required rate of return or discount rate is chosen correctly by finance managers at Corning 1983, then the stock price of the Corning 1983 should change by same amount of the NPV. In real world we know that share price also reflects various other factors that can be related to both macro and micro environment.

In the same vein – accepting the project with zero NPV should result in stagnant share price. Finance managers use discount rates as a measure of risk components in the project execution process.

Sensitivity Analysis

Project selection is often a far more complex decision than just choosing it based on the NPV number. Finance managers at Corning 1983 should conduct a sensitivity analysis to better understand not only the inherent risk of the projects but also how those risks can be either factored in or mitigated during the project execution. Sensitivity analysis helps in –

What are the key aspects of the projects that need to be monitored, refined, and retuned for continuous delivery of projected cash flows.

Understanding of risks involved in the project.

What will be a multi year spillover effect of various taxation regulations.

What are the uncertainties surrounding the project Initial Cash Outlay (ICO’s). ICO’s often have several different components such as land, machinery, building, and other equipment.

What can impact the cash flow of the project.

Some of the assumptions while using the Discounted Cash Flow Methods –

Projects are assumed to be Mutually Exclusive – This is seldom the came in modern day giant organizations where projects are often inter-related and rejecting a project solely based on NPV can result in sunk cost from a related project.

Independent projects have independent cash flows – As explained in the marketing project – though the project may look independent but in reality it is not as the brand awareness project can be closely associated with the spending on sales promotions and product specific advertising.






Negotiation Strategy of Corning--1983-96: Transition at the Top

References & Further Readings

Michael J. Roberts, Michael L. Tushman (2018), "Corning--1983-96: Transition at the Top Harvard Business Review Case Study. Published by HBR Publications.


Tesco SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Services , Retail (Grocery)


Gmo Media SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Computer Services


Procter&Gamble SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer/Non-Cyclical , Personal & Household Prods.


Kimuratan Corp SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer Cyclical , Apparel/Accessories


Energiser SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Financial , Misc. Financial Services


United Corporations SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Financial , Misc. Financial Services