×




Leveraging Collective Intelligence: How to Design and Manage Crowd-Based Business Models Net Present Value (NPV) / MBA Resources

Introduction to Net Present Value (NPV) - What is Net Present Value (NPV) ? How it impacts financial decisions regarding project management?

NPV solution for Leveraging Collective Intelligence: How to Design and Manage Crowd-Based Business Models case study


At Oak Spring University, we provide corporate level professional Net Present Value (NPV) case study solution. Leveraging Collective Intelligence: How to Design and Manage Crowd-Based Business Models case study is a Harvard Business School (HBR) case study written by Karl Tauscher. The Leveraging Collective Intelligence: How to Design and Manage Crowd-Based Business Models (referred as “Cbbms Crowd” from here on) case study provides evaluation & decision scenario in field of Leadership & Managing People. It also touches upon business topics such as - Value proposition, Growth strategy.

The net present value (NPV) of an investment proposal is the present value of the proposal’s net cash flows less the proposal’s initial cash outflow. If a project’s NPV is greater than or equal to zero, the project should be accepted.

NPV = Present Value of Future Cash Flows LESS Project’s Initial Investment






Case Description of Leveraging Collective Intelligence: How to Design and Manage Crowd-Based Business Models Case Study


Advances in digital technologies have increased the possibilities for outsourcing business activities to crowds of independent contributors. Using the collective intelligence of a crowd opens a new range of business opportunities. In fact, crowdsourcing has led to the emergence of entirely new business models. Such crowd-based business models (CBBMs) can lead to an important competitive advantage while simultaneously presenting new challenges to entrepreneurs and executives. The author identifies and discusses three key challenges in designing and managing CBBMs: determining (1) the crowd's value to the firm, (2) how to create superior value for the crowd, and (3) how to capture value from the crowd effectively. Building on the crowd capital perspective and an analysis of the tactics and practices of successful CBBMs, this article offers propositions on how to overcome these challenges and manage such business models effectively. The identified practices can inspire decision makers when designing innovative CBBMs for their industries. Finally, the article concludes with a framework with the key decisions and tactics for effectively managing CBBMs.


Case Authors : Karl Tauscher

Topic : Leadership & Managing People

Related Areas : Growth strategy




Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 6% for Leveraging Collective Intelligence: How to Design and Manage Crowd-Based Business Models Case Study


Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 6 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10004709) -10004709 - -
Year 1 3466163 -6538546 3466163 0.9434 3269965
Year 2 3960343 -2578203 7426506 0.89 3524691
Year 3 3970619 1392416 11397125 0.8396 3333808
Year 4 3239916 4632332 14637041 0.7921 2566317
TOTAL 14637041 12694781




The Net Present Value at 6% discount rate is 2690072

In isolation the NPV number doesn't mean much but put in right context then it is one of the best method to evaluate project returns. In this article we will cover -

Different methods of capital budgeting


What is NPV & Formula of NPV,
How it is calculated,
How to use NPV number for project evaluation, and
Scenario Planning given risks and management priorities.




Capital Budgeting Approaches

Methods of Capital Budgeting


There are four types of capital budgeting techniques that are widely used in the corporate world –

1. Payback Period
2. Internal Rate of Return
3. Net Present Value
4. Profitability Index

Apart from the Payback period method which is an additive method, rest of the methods are based on Discounted Cash Flow technique. Even though cash flow can be calculated based on the nature of the project, for the simplicity of the article we are assuming that all the expected cash flows are realized at the end of the year.

Discounted Cash Flow approaches provide a more objective basis for evaluating and selecting investment projects. They take into consideration both –

1. Timing of the expected cash flows – stockholders of Cbbms Crowd have higher preference for cash returns over 4-5 years rather than 10-15 years given the nature of the volatility in the industry.
2. Magnitude of both incoming and outgoing cash flows – Projects can be capital intensive, time intensive, or both. Cbbms Crowd shareholders have preference for diversified projects investment rather than prospective high income from a single capital intensive project.






Formula and Steps to Calculate Net Present Value (NPV) of Leveraging Collective Intelligence: How to Design and Manage Crowd-Based Business Models

NPV = Net Cash In Flowt1 / (1+r)t1 + Net Cash In Flowt2 / (1+r)t2 + … Net Cash In Flowtn / (1+r)tn
Less Net Cash Out Flowt0 / (1+r)t0

Where t = time period, in this case year 1, year 2 and so on.
r = discount rate or return that could be earned using other safe proposition such as fixed deposit or treasury bond rate. Net Cash In Flow – What the firm will get each year.
Net Cash Out Flow – What the firm needs to invest initially in the project.

Step 1 – Understand the nature of the project and calculate cash flow for each year.
Step 2 – Discount those cash flow based on the discount rate.
Step 3 – Add all the discounted cash flow.
Step 4 – Selection of the project

Why Leadership & Managing People Managers need to know Financial Tools such as Net Present Value (NPV)?

In our daily workplace we often come across people and colleagues who are just focused on their core competency and targets they have to deliver. For example marketing managers at Cbbms Crowd often design programs whose objective is to drive brand awareness and customer reach. But how that 30 point increase in brand awareness or 10 point increase in customer touch points will result into shareholders’ value is not specified.

To overcome such scenarios managers at Cbbms Crowd needs to not only know the financial aspect of project management but also needs to have tools to integrate them into part of the project development and monitoring plan.

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 15%

After working through various assumptions we reached a conclusion that risk is far higher than 6%. In a reasonably stable industry with weak competition - 15% discount rate can be a good benchmark.



Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 15 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10004709) -10004709 - -
Year 1 3466163 -6538546 3466163 0.8696 3014055
Year 2 3960343 -2578203 7426506 0.7561 2994588
Year 3 3970619 1392416 11397125 0.6575 2610746
Year 4 3239916 4632332 14637041 0.5718 1852432
TOTAL 10471822


The Net NPV after 4 years is 467113

(10471822 - 10004709 )








Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 20%


If the risk component is high in the industry then we should go for a higher hurdle rate / discount rate of 20%.

Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 20 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10004709) -10004709 - -
Year 1 3466163 -6538546 3466163 0.8333 2888469
Year 2 3960343 -2578203 7426506 0.6944 2750238
Year 3 3970619 1392416 11397125 0.5787 2297812
Year 4 3239916 4632332 14637041 0.4823 1562459
TOTAL 9498979


The Net NPV after 4 years is -505730

At 20% discount rate the NPV is negative (9498979 - 10004709 ) so ideally we can't select the project if macro and micro factors don't allow financial managers of Cbbms Crowd to discount cash flow at lower discount rates such as 15%.





Acceptance Criteria of a Project based on NPV

Simplest Approach – If the investment project of Cbbms Crowd has a NPV value higher than Zero then finance managers at Cbbms Crowd can ACCEPT the project, otherwise they can reject the project. This means that project will deliver higher returns over the period of time than any alternate investment strategy.

In theory if the required rate of return or discount rate is chosen correctly by finance managers at Cbbms Crowd, then the stock price of the Cbbms Crowd should change by same amount of the NPV. In real world we know that share price also reflects various other factors that can be related to both macro and micro environment.

In the same vein – accepting the project with zero NPV should result in stagnant share price. Finance managers use discount rates as a measure of risk components in the project execution process.

Sensitivity Analysis

Project selection is often a far more complex decision than just choosing it based on the NPV number. Finance managers at Cbbms Crowd should conduct a sensitivity analysis to better understand not only the inherent risk of the projects but also how those risks can be either factored in or mitigated during the project execution. Sensitivity analysis helps in –

What can impact the cash flow of the project.

Understanding of risks involved in the project.

What will be a multi year spillover effect of various taxation regulations.

What are the uncertainties surrounding the project Initial Cash Outlay (ICO’s). ICO’s often have several different components such as land, machinery, building, and other equipment.

What are the key aspects of the projects that need to be monitored, refined, and retuned for continuous delivery of projected cash flows.

Some of the assumptions while using the Discounted Cash Flow Methods –

Projects are assumed to be Mutually Exclusive – This is seldom the came in modern day giant organizations where projects are often inter-related and rejecting a project solely based on NPV can result in sunk cost from a related project.

Independent projects have independent cash flows – As explained in the marketing project – though the project may look independent but in reality it is not as the brand awareness project can be closely associated with the spending on sales promotions and product specific advertising.






Negotiation Strategy of Leveraging Collective Intelligence: How to Design and Manage Crowd-Based Business Models

References & Further Readings

Karl Tauscher (2018), "Leveraging Collective Intelligence: How to Design and Manage Crowd-Based Business Models Harvard Business Review Case Study. Published by HBR Publications.


Piedmont Office SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Services , Real Estate Operations


Wetzel Pref SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer Cyclical , Auto & Truck Parts


GemVax & KAEL SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Capital Goods , Misc. Capital Goods


KT&G Corp SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer/Non-Cyclical , Tobacco


Lazard SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Financial , Investment Services


Pain Therapeutics SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Healthcare , Biotechnology & Drugs


KT Music SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Computer Services


Kasbah Resources SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Basic Materials , Metal Mining


Global Indemnity SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Financial , Insurance (Prop. & Casualty)


Agabang & Co SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer Cyclical , Apparel/Accessories