JFDI Asia: Southeast Asia's Leading Accelerator Net Present Value (NPV) / MBA Resources

Introduction to Net Present Value (NPV) - What is Net Present Value (NPV) ? How it impacts financial decisions regarding project management?

NPV solution for JFDI Asia: Southeast Asia's Leading Accelerator case study

At Oak Spring University, we provide corporate level professional Net Present Value (NPV) case study solution. JFDI Asia: Southeast Asia's Leading Accelerator case study is a Harvard Business School (HBR) case study written by Sarah L.Y. Cheah, Vivien K.G. Lim, Norvin W. Chan. The JFDI Asia: Southeast Asia's Leading Accelerator (referred as “Jfdi Accelerator” from here on) case study provides evaluation & decision scenario in field of Leadership & Managing People. It also touches upon business topics such as - Value proposition, Financial management, Government, Innovation.

The net present value (NPV) of an investment proposal is the present value of the proposal’s net cash flows less the proposal’s initial cash outflow. If a project’s NPV is greater than or equal to zero, the project should be accepted.

NPV = Present Value of Future Cash Flows LESS Project’s Initial Investment

Case Description of JFDI Asia: Southeast Asia's Leading Accelerator Case Study

In 2010, two entrepreneurs launched Joyful Frog Digital Incubator (JFDI), Southeast Asia's first start-up accelerator in Singapore. They aimed to help develop Singapore's start-up environment through a structured program that provided access to early stage funding and mentorship. More than 70 start-ups had graduated from the program, and more than half had raised substantial funding. However, five years later, in 2015, JFDI faced challenges as a result of Singapore's small market size, the more than 20 accelerators that had entered the market, and an uncertain macroeconomic climate. The founders wondered whether JFDI should open up new revenue streams by diversifying into advisory and consultancy services, such as in-house accelerator programs in established corporations. Alternatively, should the company expand geographically to broaden its access to capital, talent, and new markets? Or were there still other options that the founders should pursue? Lai Yin Sarah Cheah and Vivien K.G. Lim are affiliated with National University of Singapore.

Case Authors : Sarah L.Y. Cheah, Vivien K.G. Lim, Norvin W. Chan

Topic : Leadership & Managing People

Related Areas : Financial management, Government, Innovation

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 6% for JFDI Asia: Southeast Asia's Leading Accelerator Case Study

Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 6 %
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10018939) -10018939 - -
Year 1 3471320 -6547619 3471320 0.9434 3274830
Year 2 3961502 -2586117 7432822 0.89 3525723
Year 3 3969327 1383210 11402149 0.8396 3332723
Year 4 3222370 4605580 14624519 0.7921 2552419
TOTAL 14624519 12685695

The Net Present Value at 6% discount rate is 2666756

In isolation the NPV number doesn't mean much but put in right context then it is one of the best method to evaluate project returns. In this article we will cover -

Different methods of capital budgeting

What is NPV & Formula of NPV,
How it is calculated,
How to use NPV number for project evaluation, and
Scenario Planning given risks and management priorities.

Capital Budgeting Approaches

Methods of Capital Budgeting

There are four types of capital budgeting techniques that are widely used in the corporate world –

1. Profitability Index
2. Payback Period
3. Internal Rate of Return
4. Net Present Value

Apart from the Payback period method which is an additive method, rest of the methods are based on Discounted Cash Flow technique. Even though cash flow can be calculated based on the nature of the project, for the simplicity of the article we are assuming that all the expected cash flows are realized at the end of the year.

Discounted Cash Flow approaches provide a more objective basis for evaluating and selecting investment projects. They take into consideration both –

1. Magnitude of both incoming and outgoing cash flows – Projects can be capital intensive, time intensive, or both. Jfdi Accelerator shareholders have preference for diversified projects investment rather than prospective high income from a single capital intensive project.
2. Timing of the expected cash flows – stockholders of Jfdi Accelerator have higher preference for cash returns over 4-5 years rather than 10-15 years given the nature of the volatility in the industry.

Formula and Steps to Calculate Net Present Value (NPV) of JFDI Asia: Southeast Asia's Leading Accelerator

NPV = Net Cash In Flowt1 / (1+r)t1 + Net Cash In Flowt2 / (1+r)t2 + … Net Cash In Flowtn / (1+r)tn
Less Net Cash Out Flowt0 / (1+r)t0

Where t = time period, in this case year 1, year 2 and so on.
r = discount rate or return that could be earned using other safe proposition such as fixed deposit or treasury bond rate. Net Cash In Flow – What the firm will get each year.
Net Cash Out Flow – What the firm needs to invest initially in the project.

Step 1 – Understand the nature of the project and calculate cash flow for each year.
Step 2 – Discount those cash flow based on the discount rate.
Step 3 – Add all the discounted cash flow.
Step 4 – Selection of the project

Why Leadership & Managing People Managers need to know Financial Tools such as Net Present Value (NPV)?

In our daily workplace we often come across people and colleagues who are just focused on their core competency and targets they have to deliver. For example marketing managers at Jfdi Accelerator often design programs whose objective is to drive brand awareness and customer reach. But how that 30 point increase in brand awareness or 10 point increase in customer touch points will result into shareholders’ value is not specified.

To overcome such scenarios managers at Jfdi Accelerator needs to not only know the financial aspect of project management but also needs to have tools to integrate them into part of the project development and monitoring plan.

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 15%

After working through various assumptions we reached a conclusion that risk is far higher than 6%. In a reasonably stable industry with weak competition - 15% discount rate can be a good benchmark.

Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 15 %
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10018939) -10018939 - -
Year 1 3471320 -6547619 3471320 0.8696 3018539
Year 2 3961502 -2586117 7432822 0.7561 2995465
Year 3 3969327 1383210 11402149 0.6575 2609897
Year 4 3222370 4605580 14624519 0.5718 1842401
TOTAL 10466301

The Net NPV after 4 years is 447362

(10466301 - 10018939 )

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 20%

If the risk component is high in the industry then we should go for a higher hurdle rate / discount rate of 20%.

Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 20 %
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10018939) -10018939 - -
Year 1 3471320 -6547619 3471320 0.8333 2892767
Year 2 3961502 -2586117 7432822 0.6944 2751043
Year 3 3969327 1383210 11402149 0.5787 2297064
Year 4 3222370 4605580 14624519 0.4823 1553998
TOTAL 9494872

The Net NPV after 4 years is -524067

At 20% discount rate the NPV is negative (9494872 - 10018939 ) so ideally we can't select the project if macro and micro factors don't allow financial managers of Jfdi Accelerator to discount cash flow at lower discount rates such as 15%.

Acceptance Criteria of a Project based on NPV

Simplest Approach – If the investment project of Jfdi Accelerator has a NPV value higher than Zero then finance managers at Jfdi Accelerator can ACCEPT the project, otherwise they can reject the project. This means that project will deliver higher returns over the period of time than any alternate investment strategy.

In theory if the required rate of return or discount rate is chosen correctly by finance managers at Jfdi Accelerator, then the stock price of the Jfdi Accelerator should change by same amount of the NPV. In real world we know that share price also reflects various other factors that can be related to both macro and micro environment.

In the same vein – accepting the project with zero NPV should result in stagnant share price. Finance managers use discount rates as a measure of risk components in the project execution process.

Sensitivity Analysis

Project selection is often a far more complex decision than just choosing it based on the NPV number. Finance managers at Jfdi Accelerator should conduct a sensitivity analysis to better understand not only the inherent risk of the projects but also how those risks can be either factored in or mitigated during the project execution. Sensitivity analysis helps in –

What are the key aspects of the projects that need to be monitored, refined, and retuned for continuous delivery of projected cash flows.

Understanding of risks involved in the project.

What will be a multi year spillover effect of various taxation regulations.

What are the uncertainties surrounding the project Initial Cash Outlay (ICO’s). ICO’s often have several different components such as land, machinery, building, and other equipment.

What can impact the cash flow of the project.

Some of the assumptions while using the Discounted Cash Flow Methods –

Projects are assumed to be Mutually Exclusive – This is seldom the came in modern day giant organizations where projects are often inter-related and rejecting a project solely based on NPV can result in sunk cost from a related project.

Independent projects have independent cash flows – As explained in the marketing project – though the project may look independent but in reality it is not as the brand awareness project can be closely associated with the spending on sales promotions and product specific advertising.

References & Further Readings

Sarah L.Y. Cheah, Vivien K.G. Lim, Norvin W. Chan (2018), "JFDI Asia: Southeast Asia's Leading Accelerator Harvard Business Review Case Study. Published by HBR Publications.