×




Lima Museum of Art (MALI): Give and You Shall Receive Net Present Value (NPV) / MBA Resources

Introduction to Net Present Value (NPV) - What is Net Present Value (NPV) ? How it impacts financial decisions regarding project management?

NPV solution for Lima Museum of Art (MALI): Give and You Shall Receive case study


At Oak Spring University, we provide corporate level professional Net Present Value (NPV) case study solution. Lima Museum of Art (MALI): Give and You Shall Receive case study is a Harvard Business School (HBR) case study written by Matthew Bird. The Lima Museum of Art (MALI): Give and You Shall Receive (referred as “Museum Mali” from here on) case study provides evaluation & decision scenario in field of Leadership & Managing People. It also touches upon business topics such as - Value proposition, Social responsibility.

The net present value (NPV) of an investment proposal is the present value of the proposal’s net cash flows less the proposal’s initial cash outflow. If a project’s NPV is greater than or equal to zero, the project should be accepted.

NPV = Present Value of Future Cash Flows LESS Project’s Initial Investment






Case Description of Lima Museum of Art (MALI): Give and You Shall Receive Case Study


Initially, the dilemma seemed to be centered on how to respond to the bad news about delayed building renovations due to government red tape, which would continue to have a negative impact on the museum. However, this was a mere symptom of the real dilema of how to further develop an institution within a society lacking institutions or with very weak institutions. The case then proceeds to outline the major periods in the museum's institutional development: Building a Past: 1954-1968 The museum was founded within a specific social and historical context which served as the foundation from which later developments emerged. Its mission was identified, a network of trustees was established, the building was secured, and perhaps most importantly, its permanent collection was acquired. Storm and Stress: 1968-1993 Major benefactors suffered economically, left the country, or both. In the 1980s, political violence and economic instability added to the challenges. During this time, the museum adapted itself to the context. Starving for revenues, it offered art classes, which contributed to its economic survival (at worst), and enabled it to achieve a modicum of self-sufficiency (at best). MALIA?s Rise and Institutional Questioning: 1993-2002 The museum began to emerge in fuller form in the 1990s under the leadership of Walter Piazza, drawing support from a younger generation. In parallel with the country's rising fortunes, the museum began to broaden its support and diversify its revenues. In addition, foreign companies joined in to sponsor activities. Institutional Strengthening and the Next Five Years: 2003-2013 New activities were started and the museum gradually revived, culminating in its rebranding as MALI. However, this institutionalization process occurred within a healthy economic context. With a slowdown on the horizon and its potential subsequent pressures, would MALI as an institution be able to withstand the strain? Within this context, would Calda, Majluf, and Verme manage to further institutionalize MALI in a country devoid of institutions? Universidad del PacA?fico' case collection


Case Authors : Matthew Bird

Topic : Leadership & Managing People

Related Areas : Social responsibility




Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 6% for Lima Museum of Art (MALI): Give and You Shall Receive Case Study


Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 6 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10011169) -10011169 - -
Year 1 3468277 -6542892 3468277 0.9434 3271959
Year 2 3978437 -2564455 7446714 0.89 3540795
Year 3 3963698 1399243 11410412 0.8396 3327997
Year 4 3234784 4634027 14645196 0.7921 2562252
TOTAL 14645196 12703003




The Net Present Value at 6% discount rate is 2691834

In isolation the NPV number doesn't mean much but put in right context then it is one of the best method to evaluate project returns. In this article we will cover -

Different methods of capital budgeting


What is NPV & Formula of NPV,
How it is calculated,
How to use NPV number for project evaluation, and
Scenario Planning given risks and management priorities.




Capital Budgeting Approaches

Methods of Capital Budgeting


There are four types of capital budgeting techniques that are widely used in the corporate world –

1. Internal Rate of Return
2. Net Present Value
3. Profitability Index
4. Payback Period

Apart from the Payback period method which is an additive method, rest of the methods are based on Discounted Cash Flow technique. Even though cash flow can be calculated based on the nature of the project, for the simplicity of the article we are assuming that all the expected cash flows are realized at the end of the year.

Discounted Cash Flow approaches provide a more objective basis for evaluating and selecting investment projects. They take into consideration both –

1. Timing of the expected cash flows – stockholders of Museum Mali have higher preference for cash returns over 4-5 years rather than 10-15 years given the nature of the volatility in the industry.
2. Magnitude of both incoming and outgoing cash flows – Projects can be capital intensive, time intensive, or both. Museum Mali shareholders have preference for diversified projects investment rather than prospective high income from a single capital intensive project.






Formula and Steps to Calculate Net Present Value (NPV) of Lima Museum of Art (MALI): Give and You Shall Receive

NPV = Net Cash In Flowt1 / (1+r)t1 + Net Cash In Flowt2 / (1+r)t2 + … Net Cash In Flowtn / (1+r)tn
Less Net Cash Out Flowt0 / (1+r)t0

Where t = time period, in this case year 1, year 2 and so on.
r = discount rate or return that could be earned using other safe proposition such as fixed deposit or treasury bond rate. Net Cash In Flow – What the firm will get each year.
Net Cash Out Flow – What the firm needs to invest initially in the project.

Step 1 – Understand the nature of the project and calculate cash flow for each year.
Step 2 – Discount those cash flow based on the discount rate.
Step 3 – Add all the discounted cash flow.
Step 4 – Selection of the project

Why Leadership & Managing People Managers need to know Financial Tools such as Net Present Value (NPV)?

In our daily workplace we often come across people and colleagues who are just focused on their core competency and targets they have to deliver. For example marketing managers at Museum Mali often design programs whose objective is to drive brand awareness and customer reach. But how that 30 point increase in brand awareness or 10 point increase in customer touch points will result into shareholders’ value is not specified.

To overcome such scenarios managers at Museum Mali needs to not only know the financial aspect of project management but also needs to have tools to integrate them into part of the project development and monitoring plan.

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 15%

After working through various assumptions we reached a conclusion that risk is far higher than 6%. In a reasonably stable industry with weak competition - 15% discount rate can be a good benchmark.



Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 15 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10011169) -10011169 - -
Year 1 3468277 -6542892 3468277 0.8696 3015893
Year 2 3978437 -2564455 7446714 0.7561 3008270
Year 3 3963698 1399243 11410412 0.6575 2606196
Year 4 3234784 4634027 14645196 0.5718 1849498
TOTAL 10479857


The Net NPV after 4 years is 468688

(10479857 - 10011169 )








Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 20%


If the risk component is high in the industry then we should go for a higher hurdle rate / discount rate of 20%.

Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 20 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10011169) -10011169 - -
Year 1 3468277 -6542892 3468277 0.8333 2890231
Year 2 3978437 -2564455 7446714 0.6944 2762803
Year 3 3963698 1399243 11410412 0.5787 2293807
Year 4 3234784 4634027 14645196 0.4823 1559985
TOTAL 9506826


The Net NPV after 4 years is -504343

At 20% discount rate the NPV is negative (9506826 - 10011169 ) so ideally we can't select the project if macro and micro factors don't allow financial managers of Museum Mali to discount cash flow at lower discount rates such as 15%.





Acceptance Criteria of a Project based on NPV

Simplest Approach – If the investment project of Museum Mali has a NPV value higher than Zero then finance managers at Museum Mali can ACCEPT the project, otherwise they can reject the project. This means that project will deliver higher returns over the period of time than any alternate investment strategy.

In theory if the required rate of return or discount rate is chosen correctly by finance managers at Museum Mali, then the stock price of the Museum Mali should change by same amount of the NPV. In real world we know that share price also reflects various other factors that can be related to both macro and micro environment.

In the same vein – accepting the project with zero NPV should result in stagnant share price. Finance managers use discount rates as a measure of risk components in the project execution process.

Sensitivity Analysis

Project selection is often a far more complex decision than just choosing it based on the NPV number. Finance managers at Museum Mali should conduct a sensitivity analysis to better understand not only the inherent risk of the projects but also how those risks can be either factored in or mitigated during the project execution. Sensitivity analysis helps in –

What will be a multi year spillover effect of various taxation regulations.

What can impact the cash flow of the project.

Understanding of risks involved in the project.

What are the key aspects of the projects that need to be monitored, refined, and retuned for continuous delivery of projected cash flows.

What are the uncertainties surrounding the project Initial Cash Outlay (ICO’s). ICO’s often have several different components such as land, machinery, building, and other equipment.

Some of the assumptions while using the Discounted Cash Flow Methods –

Projects are assumed to be Mutually Exclusive – This is seldom the came in modern day giant organizations where projects are often inter-related and rejecting a project solely based on NPV can result in sunk cost from a related project.

Independent projects have independent cash flows – As explained in the marketing project – though the project may look independent but in reality it is not as the brand awareness project can be closely associated with the spending on sales promotions and product specific advertising.






Negotiation Strategy of Lima Museum of Art (MALI): Give and You Shall Receive

References & Further Readings

Matthew Bird (2018), "Lima Museum of Art (MALI): Give and You Shall Receive Harvard Business Review Case Study. Published by HBR Publications.


TC PipeLines LP SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Utilities , Natural Gas Utilities


Castlight Health SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Software & Programming


Infomedia Press Ltd SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Services , Printing & Publishing


Bioneutral Group Inc SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Basic Materials , Chemical Manufacturing


Indle Fin. Entrepr. SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Capital Goods , Construction Services