×




Note on the Nonprofit Coherence Framework Net Present Value (NPV) / MBA Resources

Introduction to Net Present Value (NPV) - What is Net Present Value (NPV) ? How it impacts financial decisions regarding project management?

NPV solution for Note on the Nonprofit Coherence Framework case study


At Oak Spring University, we provide corporate level professional Net Present Value (NPV) case study solution. Note on the Nonprofit Coherence Framework case study is a Harvard Business School (HBR) case study written by Stacey Childress, Allen Grossman. The Note on the Nonprofit Coherence Framework (referred as “Coherence Nonprofit” from here on) case study provides evaluation & decision scenario in field of Leadership & Managing People. It also touches upon business topics such as - Value proposition, Corporate governance, Developing employees, Organizational structure, Strategy.

The net present value (NPV) of an investment proposal is the present value of the proposal’s net cash flows less the proposal’s initial cash outflow. If a project’s NPV is greater than or equal to zero, the project should be accepted.

NPV = Present Value of Future Cash Flows LESS Project’s Initial Investment






Case Description of Note on the Nonprofit Coherence Framework Case Study


This note presents the Nonprofit Coherence Framework. It helps nonprofit leaders identify the key elements that support an organizational strategy focused on attaining high performance, bring those elements into a coherent relationship with the strategy and each other, and help guide the actions of people throughout an organization in the pursuit of high levels of individual and organizational achievement. This note proposes that to attain high performance, a nonprofit organization must have all of its organizational elements-culture, structure, systems, resources, stakeholders, and the operating environment- working together to drive strategy.


Case Authors : Stacey Childress, Allen Grossman

Topic : Leadership & Managing People

Related Areas : Corporate governance, Developing employees, Organizational structure, Strategy




Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 6% for Note on the Nonprofit Coherence Framework Case Study


Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 6 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10023937) -10023937 - -
Year 1 3452761 -6571176 3452761 0.9434 3257322
Year 2 3955807 -2615369 7408568 0.89 3520654
Year 3 3974981 1359612 11383549 0.8396 3337471
Year 4 3229288 4588900 14612837 0.7921 2557899
TOTAL 14612837 12673345




The Net Present Value at 6% discount rate is 2649408

In isolation the NPV number doesn't mean much but put in right context then it is one of the best method to evaluate project returns. In this article we will cover -

Different methods of capital budgeting


What is NPV & Formula of NPV,
How it is calculated,
How to use NPV number for project evaluation, and
Scenario Planning given risks and management priorities.




Capital Budgeting Approaches

Methods of Capital Budgeting


There are four types of capital budgeting techniques that are widely used in the corporate world –

1. Payback Period
2. Internal Rate of Return
3. Net Present Value
4. Profitability Index

Apart from the Payback period method which is an additive method, rest of the methods are based on Discounted Cash Flow technique. Even though cash flow can be calculated based on the nature of the project, for the simplicity of the article we are assuming that all the expected cash flows are realized at the end of the year.

Discounted Cash Flow approaches provide a more objective basis for evaluating and selecting investment projects. They take into consideration both –

1. Magnitude of both incoming and outgoing cash flows – Projects can be capital intensive, time intensive, or both. Coherence Nonprofit shareholders have preference for diversified projects investment rather than prospective high income from a single capital intensive project.
2. Timing of the expected cash flows – stockholders of Coherence Nonprofit have higher preference for cash returns over 4-5 years rather than 10-15 years given the nature of the volatility in the industry.






Formula and Steps to Calculate Net Present Value (NPV) of Note on the Nonprofit Coherence Framework

NPV = Net Cash In Flowt1 / (1+r)t1 + Net Cash In Flowt2 / (1+r)t2 + … Net Cash In Flowtn / (1+r)tn
Less Net Cash Out Flowt0 / (1+r)t0

Where t = time period, in this case year 1, year 2 and so on.
r = discount rate or return that could be earned using other safe proposition such as fixed deposit or treasury bond rate. Net Cash In Flow – What the firm will get each year.
Net Cash Out Flow – What the firm needs to invest initially in the project.

Step 1 – Understand the nature of the project and calculate cash flow for each year.
Step 2 – Discount those cash flow based on the discount rate.
Step 3 – Add all the discounted cash flow.
Step 4 – Selection of the project

Why Leadership & Managing People Managers need to know Financial Tools such as Net Present Value (NPV)?

In our daily workplace we often come across people and colleagues who are just focused on their core competency and targets they have to deliver. For example marketing managers at Coherence Nonprofit often design programs whose objective is to drive brand awareness and customer reach. But how that 30 point increase in brand awareness or 10 point increase in customer touch points will result into shareholders’ value is not specified.

To overcome such scenarios managers at Coherence Nonprofit needs to not only know the financial aspect of project management but also needs to have tools to integrate them into part of the project development and monitoring plan.

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 15%

After working through various assumptions we reached a conclusion that risk is far higher than 6%. In a reasonably stable industry with weak competition - 15% discount rate can be a good benchmark.



Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 15 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10023937) -10023937 - -
Year 1 3452761 -6571176 3452761 0.8696 3002401
Year 2 3955807 -2615369 7408568 0.7561 2991158
Year 3 3974981 1359612 11383549 0.6575 2613615
Year 4 3229288 4588900 14612837 0.5718 1846356
TOTAL 10453530


The Net NPV after 4 years is 429593

(10453530 - 10023937 )








Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 20%


If the risk component is high in the industry then we should go for a higher hurdle rate / discount rate of 20%.

Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 20 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10023937) -10023937 - -
Year 1 3452761 -6571176 3452761 0.8333 2877301
Year 2 3955807 -2615369 7408568 0.6944 2747088
Year 3 3974981 1359612 11383549 0.5787 2300336
Year 4 3229288 4588900 14612837 0.4823 1557334
TOTAL 9482059


The Net NPV after 4 years is -541878

At 20% discount rate the NPV is negative (9482059 - 10023937 ) so ideally we can't select the project if macro and micro factors don't allow financial managers of Coherence Nonprofit to discount cash flow at lower discount rates such as 15%.





Acceptance Criteria of a Project based on NPV

Simplest Approach – If the investment project of Coherence Nonprofit has a NPV value higher than Zero then finance managers at Coherence Nonprofit can ACCEPT the project, otherwise they can reject the project. This means that project will deliver higher returns over the period of time than any alternate investment strategy.

In theory if the required rate of return or discount rate is chosen correctly by finance managers at Coherence Nonprofit, then the stock price of the Coherence Nonprofit should change by same amount of the NPV. In real world we know that share price also reflects various other factors that can be related to both macro and micro environment.

In the same vein – accepting the project with zero NPV should result in stagnant share price. Finance managers use discount rates as a measure of risk components in the project execution process.

Sensitivity Analysis

Project selection is often a far more complex decision than just choosing it based on the NPV number. Finance managers at Coherence Nonprofit should conduct a sensitivity analysis to better understand not only the inherent risk of the projects but also how those risks can be either factored in or mitigated during the project execution. Sensitivity analysis helps in –

What can impact the cash flow of the project.

Understanding of risks involved in the project.

What are the key aspects of the projects that need to be monitored, refined, and retuned for continuous delivery of projected cash flows.

What will be a multi year spillover effect of various taxation regulations.

What are the uncertainties surrounding the project Initial Cash Outlay (ICO’s). ICO’s often have several different components such as land, machinery, building, and other equipment.

Some of the assumptions while using the Discounted Cash Flow Methods –

Projects are assumed to be Mutually Exclusive – This is seldom the came in modern day giant organizations where projects are often inter-related and rejecting a project solely based on NPV can result in sunk cost from a related project.

Independent projects have independent cash flows – As explained in the marketing project – though the project may look independent but in reality it is not as the brand awareness project can be closely associated with the spending on sales promotions and product specific advertising.






Negotiation Strategy of Note on the Nonprofit Coherence Framework

References & Further Readings

Stacey Childress, Allen Grossman (2018), "Note on the Nonprofit Coherence Framework Harvard Business Review Case Study. Published by HBR Publications.


Pang Rim Spinn SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer Cyclical , Textiles - Non Apparel


Eurasia Mining SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Basic Materials , Metal Mining


Chinese Estates SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Capital Goods , Construction Services


Kyokuto Boeki Kaisha SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Capital Goods , Misc. Capital Goods


Cosmos Holdings SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Computer Services


Delphi Tech SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer Cyclical , Auto & Truck Parts


Imuraya Group SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer/Non-Cyclical , Food Processing


Guizhou Changzheng Tiancheng SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Electronic Instr. & Controls


Aoto Electronics A SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Electronic Instr. & Controls


Toukei Computer SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Software & Programming