×




Surviving the Surge: New York City Hospitals Respond to Superstorm Sandy Net Present Value (NPV) / MBA Resources

Introduction to Net Present Value (NPV) - What is Net Present Value (NPV) ? How it impacts financial decisions regarding project management?

NPV solution for Surviving the Surge: New York City Hospitals Respond to Superstorm Sandy case study


At Oak Spring University, we provide corporate level professional Net Present Value (NPV) case study solution. Surviving the Surge: New York City Hospitals Respond to Superstorm Sandy case study is a Harvard Business School (HBR) case study written by David Giles, Arnold Howitt. The Surviving the Surge: New York City Hospitals Respond to Superstorm Sandy (referred as “Sandy Hospitals” from here on) case study provides evaluation & decision scenario in field of Leadership & Managing People. It also touches upon business topics such as - Value proposition, Government, Leadership.

The net present value (NPV) of an investment proposal is the present value of the proposal’s net cash flows less the proposal’s initial cash outflow. If a project’s NPV is greater than or equal to zero, the project should be accepted.

NPV = Present Value of Future Cash Flows LESS Project’s Initial Investment






Case Description of Surviving the Surge: New York City Hospitals Respond to Superstorm Sandy Case Study


This case explores the experiences of three Manhattan-based hospitals during Superstorm Sandy in 2012. Beginning with an overview of how the hospitals prepared in the months and days leading up to the storm, it focuses primarily on decisions made by each institution, as Sandy approached, about whether to shelter-in-place or evacuate hundreds of medically fragile patients -- the former strategy running the risk of exposing individuals to dangerous and life-threatening conditions, the latter being an especially complex and difficult process, not without its own dangers. Ultimately, each of the three hospitals profiled in the case took a different approach, informed by their differing perceptions of risk and other unique circumstances. The case illustrates the very difficult trade-offs hospital administrators and local and state public health authorities grappled with as Sandy bore down on New York and vividly depicts the ramifications of these decisions, with the storm ultimately inflicting serious damage on Manhattan and across much of the surrounding region.


Case Authors : David Giles, Arnold Howitt

Topic : Leadership & Managing People

Related Areas : Government, Leadership




Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 6% for Surviving the Surge: New York City Hospitals Respond to Superstorm Sandy Case Study


Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 6 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10024800) -10024800 - -
Year 1 3451717 -6573083 3451717 0.9434 3256337
Year 2 3966223 -2606860 7417940 0.89 3529924
Year 3 3958802 1351942 11376742 0.8396 3323886
Year 4 3239560 4591502 14616302 0.7921 2566035
TOTAL 14616302 12676183




The Net Present Value at 6% discount rate is 2651383

In isolation the NPV number doesn't mean much but put in right context then it is one of the best method to evaluate project returns. In this article we will cover -

Different methods of capital budgeting


What is NPV & Formula of NPV,
How it is calculated,
How to use NPV number for project evaluation, and
Scenario Planning given risks and management priorities.




Capital Budgeting Approaches

Methods of Capital Budgeting


There are four types of capital budgeting techniques that are widely used in the corporate world –

1. Internal Rate of Return
2. Profitability Index
3. Payback Period
4. Net Present Value

Apart from the Payback period method which is an additive method, rest of the methods are based on Discounted Cash Flow technique. Even though cash flow can be calculated based on the nature of the project, for the simplicity of the article we are assuming that all the expected cash flows are realized at the end of the year.

Discounted Cash Flow approaches provide a more objective basis for evaluating and selecting investment projects. They take into consideration both –

1. Magnitude of both incoming and outgoing cash flows – Projects can be capital intensive, time intensive, or both. Sandy Hospitals shareholders have preference for diversified projects investment rather than prospective high income from a single capital intensive project.
2. Timing of the expected cash flows – stockholders of Sandy Hospitals have higher preference for cash returns over 4-5 years rather than 10-15 years given the nature of the volatility in the industry.






Formula and Steps to Calculate Net Present Value (NPV) of Surviving the Surge: New York City Hospitals Respond to Superstorm Sandy

NPV = Net Cash In Flowt1 / (1+r)t1 + Net Cash In Flowt2 / (1+r)t2 + … Net Cash In Flowtn / (1+r)tn
Less Net Cash Out Flowt0 / (1+r)t0

Where t = time period, in this case year 1, year 2 and so on.
r = discount rate or return that could be earned using other safe proposition such as fixed deposit or treasury bond rate. Net Cash In Flow – What the firm will get each year.
Net Cash Out Flow – What the firm needs to invest initially in the project.

Step 1 – Understand the nature of the project and calculate cash flow for each year.
Step 2 – Discount those cash flow based on the discount rate.
Step 3 – Add all the discounted cash flow.
Step 4 – Selection of the project

Why Leadership & Managing People Managers need to know Financial Tools such as Net Present Value (NPV)?

In our daily workplace we often come across people and colleagues who are just focused on their core competency and targets they have to deliver. For example marketing managers at Sandy Hospitals often design programs whose objective is to drive brand awareness and customer reach. But how that 30 point increase in brand awareness or 10 point increase in customer touch points will result into shareholders’ value is not specified.

To overcome such scenarios managers at Sandy Hospitals needs to not only know the financial aspect of project management but also needs to have tools to integrate them into part of the project development and monitoring plan.

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 15%

After working through various assumptions we reached a conclusion that risk is far higher than 6%. In a reasonably stable industry with weak competition - 15% discount rate can be a good benchmark.



Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 15 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10024800) -10024800 - -
Year 1 3451717 -6573083 3451717 0.8696 3001493
Year 2 3966223 -2606860 7417940 0.7561 2999034
Year 3 3958802 1351942 11376742 0.6575 2602977
Year 4 3239560 4591502 14616302 0.5718 1852229
TOTAL 10455733


The Net NPV after 4 years is 430933

(10455733 - 10024800 )








Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 20%


If the risk component is high in the industry then we should go for a higher hurdle rate / discount rate of 20%.

Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 20 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10024800) -10024800 - -
Year 1 3451717 -6573083 3451717 0.8333 2876431
Year 2 3966223 -2606860 7417940 0.6944 2754322
Year 3 3958802 1351942 11376742 0.5787 2290973
Year 4 3239560 4591502 14616302 0.4823 1562288
TOTAL 9484014


The Net NPV after 4 years is -540786

At 20% discount rate the NPV is negative (9484014 - 10024800 ) so ideally we can't select the project if macro and micro factors don't allow financial managers of Sandy Hospitals to discount cash flow at lower discount rates such as 15%.





Acceptance Criteria of a Project based on NPV

Simplest Approach – If the investment project of Sandy Hospitals has a NPV value higher than Zero then finance managers at Sandy Hospitals can ACCEPT the project, otherwise they can reject the project. This means that project will deliver higher returns over the period of time than any alternate investment strategy.

In theory if the required rate of return or discount rate is chosen correctly by finance managers at Sandy Hospitals, then the stock price of the Sandy Hospitals should change by same amount of the NPV. In real world we know that share price also reflects various other factors that can be related to both macro and micro environment.

In the same vein – accepting the project with zero NPV should result in stagnant share price. Finance managers use discount rates as a measure of risk components in the project execution process.

Sensitivity Analysis

Project selection is often a far more complex decision than just choosing it based on the NPV number. Finance managers at Sandy Hospitals should conduct a sensitivity analysis to better understand not only the inherent risk of the projects but also how those risks can be either factored in or mitigated during the project execution. Sensitivity analysis helps in –

What are the key aspects of the projects that need to be monitored, refined, and retuned for continuous delivery of projected cash flows.

What will be a multi year spillover effect of various taxation regulations.

Understanding of risks involved in the project.

What are the uncertainties surrounding the project Initial Cash Outlay (ICO’s). ICO’s often have several different components such as land, machinery, building, and other equipment.

What can impact the cash flow of the project.

Some of the assumptions while using the Discounted Cash Flow Methods –

Projects are assumed to be Mutually Exclusive – This is seldom the came in modern day giant organizations where projects are often inter-related and rejecting a project solely based on NPV can result in sunk cost from a related project.

Independent projects have independent cash flows – As explained in the marketing project – though the project may look independent but in reality it is not as the brand awareness project can be closely associated with the spending on sales promotions and product specific advertising.






Negotiation Strategy of Surviving the Surge: New York City Hospitals Respond to Superstorm Sandy

References & Further Readings

David Giles, Arnold Howitt (2018), "Surviving the Surge: New York City Hospitals Respond to Superstorm Sandy Harvard Business Review Case Study. Published by HBR Publications.


Tokyo Soir SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer Cyclical , Apparel/Accessories


Sartorius AG SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Scientific & Technical Instr.


Merchants SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Financial , Misc. Financial Services


Largo Resources SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Basic Materials , Metal Mining


Nexyz. Corp SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Computer Services


Mynet Inc SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Computer Services


Netcare SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Healthcare , Healthcare Facilities