×




What a Difference a Word Makes: Understanding Threats to Performance in a VUCA World Net Present Value (NPV) / MBA Resources

Introduction to Net Present Value (NPV) - What is Net Present Value (NPV) ? How it impacts financial decisions regarding project management?

NPV solution for What a Difference a Word Makes: Understanding Threats to Performance in a VUCA World case study


At Oak Spring University, we provide corporate level professional Net Present Value (NPV) case study solution. What a Difference a Word Makes: Understanding Threats to Performance in a VUCA World case study is a Harvard Business School (HBR) case study written by Nathan Bennett, G. James Lemoine. The What a Difference a Word Makes: Understanding Threats to Performance in a VUCA World (referred as “Vuca Ambiguity” from here on) case study provides evaluation & decision scenario in field of Leadership & Managing People. It also touches upon business topics such as - Value proposition, Managing uncertainty, Risk management, Strategic planning.

The net present value (NPV) of an investment proposal is the present value of the proposal’s net cash flows less the proposal’s initial cash outflow. If a project’s NPV is greater than or equal to zero, the project should be accepted.

NPV = Present Value of Future Cash Flows LESS Project’s Initial Investment






Case Description of What a Difference a Word Makes: Understanding Threats to Performance in a VUCA World Case Study


VUCA is an acronym that has recently found its way into the business lexicon. The components it refers to--volatility, uncertainty, complexity, and ambiguity--are words that have been variously used to describe an environment which defies confident diagnosis and befuddles executives. In a 'VUCA world,' both pundits and executives have said, core activities essential to driving organizational performance--like strategic planning--are viewed as mere exercises in futility. VUCA conditions render useless any efforts to understand the future and to plan responses. When leaders are left with little to do other than wring their hands, organizational performance quickly falls at risk. In this installment of Organizational Performance, we demonstrate that by overlooking important differences in the conditions that volatility, uncertainty, complexity, and ambiguity describe, we have disempowered leaders. We show how leaders can appreciate the differences among each of these challenging situations in order to properly allocate scarce resources to preserve and enhance organizational performance.


Case Authors : Nathan Bennett, G. James Lemoine

Topic : Leadership & Managing People

Related Areas : Managing uncertainty, Risk management, Strategic planning




Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 6% for What a Difference a Word Makes: Understanding Threats to Performance in a VUCA World Case Study


Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 6 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10009618) -10009618 - -
Year 1 3472731 -6536887 3472731 0.9434 3276161
Year 2 3976936 -2559951 7449667 0.89 3539459
Year 3 3946084 1386133 11395751 0.8396 3313208
Year 4 3228896 4615029 14624647 0.7921 2557588
TOTAL 14624647 12686416




The Net Present Value at 6% discount rate is 2676798

In isolation the NPV number doesn't mean much but put in right context then it is one of the best method to evaluate project returns. In this article we will cover -

Different methods of capital budgeting


What is NPV & Formula of NPV,
How it is calculated,
How to use NPV number for project evaluation, and
Scenario Planning given risks and management priorities.




Capital Budgeting Approaches

Methods of Capital Budgeting


There are four types of capital budgeting techniques that are widely used in the corporate world –

1. Payback Period
2. Net Present Value
3. Internal Rate of Return
4. Profitability Index

Apart from the Payback period method which is an additive method, rest of the methods are based on Discounted Cash Flow technique. Even though cash flow can be calculated based on the nature of the project, for the simplicity of the article we are assuming that all the expected cash flows are realized at the end of the year.

Discounted Cash Flow approaches provide a more objective basis for evaluating and selecting investment projects. They take into consideration both –

1. Magnitude of both incoming and outgoing cash flows – Projects can be capital intensive, time intensive, or both. Vuca Ambiguity shareholders have preference for diversified projects investment rather than prospective high income from a single capital intensive project.
2. Timing of the expected cash flows – stockholders of Vuca Ambiguity have higher preference for cash returns over 4-5 years rather than 10-15 years given the nature of the volatility in the industry.






Formula and Steps to Calculate Net Present Value (NPV) of What a Difference a Word Makes: Understanding Threats to Performance in a VUCA World

NPV = Net Cash In Flowt1 / (1+r)t1 + Net Cash In Flowt2 / (1+r)t2 + … Net Cash In Flowtn / (1+r)tn
Less Net Cash Out Flowt0 / (1+r)t0

Where t = time period, in this case year 1, year 2 and so on.
r = discount rate or return that could be earned using other safe proposition such as fixed deposit or treasury bond rate. Net Cash In Flow – What the firm will get each year.
Net Cash Out Flow – What the firm needs to invest initially in the project.

Step 1 – Understand the nature of the project and calculate cash flow for each year.
Step 2 – Discount those cash flow based on the discount rate.
Step 3 – Add all the discounted cash flow.
Step 4 – Selection of the project

Why Leadership & Managing People Managers need to know Financial Tools such as Net Present Value (NPV)?

In our daily workplace we often come across people and colleagues who are just focused on their core competency and targets they have to deliver. For example marketing managers at Vuca Ambiguity often design programs whose objective is to drive brand awareness and customer reach. But how that 30 point increase in brand awareness or 10 point increase in customer touch points will result into shareholders’ value is not specified.

To overcome such scenarios managers at Vuca Ambiguity needs to not only know the financial aspect of project management but also needs to have tools to integrate them into part of the project development and monitoring plan.

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 15%

After working through various assumptions we reached a conclusion that risk is far higher than 6%. In a reasonably stable industry with weak competition - 15% discount rate can be a good benchmark.



Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 15 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10009618) -10009618 - -
Year 1 3472731 -6536887 3472731 0.8696 3019766
Year 2 3976936 -2559951 7449667 0.7561 3007135
Year 3 3946084 1386133 11395751 0.6575 2594614
Year 4 3228896 4615029 14624647 0.5718 1846132
TOTAL 10467647


The Net NPV after 4 years is 458029

(10467647 - 10009618 )








Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 20%


If the risk component is high in the industry then we should go for a higher hurdle rate / discount rate of 20%.

Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 20 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10009618) -10009618 - -
Year 1 3472731 -6536887 3472731 0.8333 2893943
Year 2 3976936 -2559951 7449667 0.6944 2761761
Year 3 3946084 1386133 11395751 0.5787 2283613
Year 4 3228896 4615029 14624647 0.4823 1557145
TOTAL 9496462


The Net NPV after 4 years is -513156

At 20% discount rate the NPV is negative (9496462 - 10009618 ) so ideally we can't select the project if macro and micro factors don't allow financial managers of Vuca Ambiguity to discount cash flow at lower discount rates such as 15%.





Acceptance Criteria of a Project based on NPV

Simplest Approach – If the investment project of Vuca Ambiguity has a NPV value higher than Zero then finance managers at Vuca Ambiguity can ACCEPT the project, otherwise they can reject the project. This means that project will deliver higher returns over the period of time than any alternate investment strategy.

In theory if the required rate of return or discount rate is chosen correctly by finance managers at Vuca Ambiguity, then the stock price of the Vuca Ambiguity should change by same amount of the NPV. In real world we know that share price also reflects various other factors that can be related to both macro and micro environment.

In the same vein – accepting the project with zero NPV should result in stagnant share price. Finance managers use discount rates as a measure of risk components in the project execution process.

Sensitivity Analysis

Project selection is often a far more complex decision than just choosing it based on the NPV number. Finance managers at Vuca Ambiguity should conduct a sensitivity analysis to better understand not only the inherent risk of the projects but also how those risks can be either factored in or mitigated during the project execution. Sensitivity analysis helps in –

What can impact the cash flow of the project.

What will be a multi year spillover effect of various taxation regulations.

What are the key aspects of the projects that need to be monitored, refined, and retuned for continuous delivery of projected cash flows.

Understanding of risks involved in the project.

What are the uncertainties surrounding the project Initial Cash Outlay (ICO’s). ICO’s often have several different components such as land, machinery, building, and other equipment.

Some of the assumptions while using the Discounted Cash Flow Methods –

Projects are assumed to be Mutually Exclusive – This is seldom the came in modern day giant organizations where projects are often inter-related and rejecting a project solely based on NPV can result in sunk cost from a related project.

Independent projects have independent cash flows – As explained in the marketing project – though the project may look independent but in reality it is not as the brand awareness project can be closely associated with the spending on sales promotions and product specific advertising.






Negotiation Strategy of What a Difference a Word Makes: Understanding Threats to Performance in a VUCA World

References & Further Readings

Nathan Bennett, G. James Lemoine (2018), "What a Difference a Word Makes: Understanding Threats to Performance in a VUCA World Harvard Business Review Case Study. Published by HBR Publications.


Posco ICT SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Software & Programming


Source Energy SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Capital Goods , Construction - Raw Materials


Majapahit Intiora SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Financial , Investment Services


Hang Lung Ppt SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Services , Real Estate Operations


iOne SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Services , Printing Services


Jupiter FM SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Financial , Investment Services


Dunxin Financial SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Financial , Consumer Financial Services


Rosslyn Data SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Financial , Misc. Financial Services