×




Role of Personal Relationships in Inter-Firm Alliances: Benefits, Dysfunctions, and Some Suggestions. Net Present Value (NPV) / MBA Resources

Introduction to Net Present Value (NPV) - What is Net Present Value (NPV) ? How it impacts financial decisions regarding project management?

NPV solution for Role of Personal Relationships in Inter-Firm Alliances: Benefits, Dysfunctions, and Some Suggestions. case study


At Oak Spring University, we provide corporate level professional Net Present Value (NPV) case study solution. Role of Personal Relationships in Inter-Firm Alliances: Benefits, Dysfunctions, and Some Suggestions. case study is a Harvard Business School (HBR) case study written by Henry Adobor. The Role of Personal Relationships in Inter-Firm Alliances: Benefits, Dysfunctions, and Some Suggestions. (referred as “Alliances Personal” from here on) case study provides evaluation & decision scenario in field of Leadership & Managing People. It also touches upon business topics such as - Value proposition, Managing people, Sales.

The net present value (NPV) of an investment proposal is the present value of the proposal’s net cash flows less the proposal’s initial cash outflow. If a project’s NPV is greater than or equal to zero, the project should be accepted.

NPV = Present Value of Future Cash Flows LESS Project’s Initial Investment






Case Description of Role of Personal Relationships in Inter-Firm Alliances: Benefits, Dysfunctions, and Some Suggestions. Case Study


Strategic alliances have become an important means for developing and improving a firm's level of competitiveness. Although attractive, alliances are risky and difficult to manage. One crucial mechanism in managing and reducing alliance risk is reliance on personal relationships between managers in partnering firms. Personal ties are beneficial in that they can form the basis for developing trust between partners and aid joint decision-making and information sharing, thereby reducing some of the risks inherent in alliances. Despite their usefulness, however, personal relationships may have drawbacks. For example, strong interpersonal ties in alliances can sometimes prevent dissolution of faltering arrangements, as feelings may prevent the making of difficult, yet prudent, termination decisions. In order to combat this possibility, firms can reduce the downside of personal relationships by carefully managing the role of performance managers across the life of the relationship.


Case Authors : Henry Adobor

Topic : Leadership & Managing People

Related Areas : Managing people, Sales




Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 6% for Role of Personal Relationships in Inter-Firm Alliances: Benefits, Dysfunctions, and Some Suggestions. Case Study


Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 6 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10014665) -10014665 - -
Year 1 3460810 -6553855 3460810 0.9434 3264915
Year 2 3980294 -2573561 7441104 0.89 3542447
Year 3 3963670 1390109 11404774 0.8396 3327974
Year 4 3245609 4635718 14650383 0.7921 2570826
TOTAL 14650383 12706163




The Net Present Value at 6% discount rate is 2691498

In isolation the NPV number doesn't mean much but put in right context then it is one of the best method to evaluate project returns. In this article we will cover -

Different methods of capital budgeting


What is NPV & Formula of NPV,
How it is calculated,
How to use NPV number for project evaluation, and
Scenario Planning given risks and management priorities.




Capital Budgeting Approaches

Methods of Capital Budgeting


There are four types of capital budgeting techniques that are widely used in the corporate world –

1. Profitability Index
2. Internal Rate of Return
3. Net Present Value
4. Payback Period

Apart from the Payback period method which is an additive method, rest of the methods are based on Discounted Cash Flow technique. Even though cash flow can be calculated based on the nature of the project, for the simplicity of the article we are assuming that all the expected cash flows are realized at the end of the year.

Discounted Cash Flow approaches provide a more objective basis for evaluating and selecting investment projects. They take into consideration both –

1. Magnitude of both incoming and outgoing cash flows – Projects can be capital intensive, time intensive, or both. Alliances Personal shareholders have preference for diversified projects investment rather than prospective high income from a single capital intensive project.
2. Timing of the expected cash flows – stockholders of Alliances Personal have higher preference for cash returns over 4-5 years rather than 10-15 years given the nature of the volatility in the industry.






Formula and Steps to Calculate Net Present Value (NPV) of Role of Personal Relationships in Inter-Firm Alliances: Benefits, Dysfunctions, and Some Suggestions.

NPV = Net Cash In Flowt1 / (1+r)t1 + Net Cash In Flowt2 / (1+r)t2 + … Net Cash In Flowtn / (1+r)tn
Less Net Cash Out Flowt0 / (1+r)t0

Where t = time period, in this case year 1, year 2 and so on.
r = discount rate or return that could be earned using other safe proposition such as fixed deposit or treasury bond rate. Net Cash In Flow – What the firm will get each year.
Net Cash Out Flow – What the firm needs to invest initially in the project.

Step 1 – Understand the nature of the project and calculate cash flow for each year.
Step 2 – Discount those cash flow based on the discount rate.
Step 3 – Add all the discounted cash flow.
Step 4 – Selection of the project

Why Leadership & Managing People Managers need to know Financial Tools such as Net Present Value (NPV)?

In our daily workplace we often come across people and colleagues who are just focused on their core competency and targets they have to deliver. For example marketing managers at Alliances Personal often design programs whose objective is to drive brand awareness and customer reach. But how that 30 point increase in brand awareness or 10 point increase in customer touch points will result into shareholders’ value is not specified.

To overcome such scenarios managers at Alliances Personal needs to not only know the financial aspect of project management but also needs to have tools to integrate them into part of the project development and monitoring plan.

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 15%

After working through various assumptions we reached a conclusion that risk is far higher than 6%. In a reasonably stable industry with weak competition - 15% discount rate can be a good benchmark.



Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 15 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10014665) -10014665 - -
Year 1 3460810 -6553855 3460810 0.8696 3009400
Year 2 3980294 -2573561 7441104 0.7561 3009674
Year 3 3963670 1390109 11404774 0.6575 2606177
Year 4 3245609 4635718 14650383 0.5718 1855687
TOTAL 10480939


The Net NPV after 4 years is 466274

(10480939 - 10014665 )








Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 20%


If the risk component is high in the industry then we should go for a higher hurdle rate / discount rate of 20%.

Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 20 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10014665) -10014665 - -
Year 1 3460810 -6553855 3460810 0.8333 2884008
Year 2 3980294 -2573561 7441104 0.6944 2764093
Year 3 3963670 1390109 11404774 0.5787 2293791
Year 4 3245609 4635718 14650383 0.4823 1565205
TOTAL 9507097


The Net NPV after 4 years is -507568

At 20% discount rate the NPV is negative (9507097 - 10014665 ) so ideally we can't select the project if macro and micro factors don't allow financial managers of Alliances Personal to discount cash flow at lower discount rates such as 15%.





Acceptance Criteria of a Project based on NPV

Simplest Approach – If the investment project of Alliances Personal has a NPV value higher than Zero then finance managers at Alliances Personal can ACCEPT the project, otherwise they can reject the project. This means that project will deliver higher returns over the period of time than any alternate investment strategy.

In theory if the required rate of return or discount rate is chosen correctly by finance managers at Alliances Personal, then the stock price of the Alliances Personal should change by same amount of the NPV. In real world we know that share price also reflects various other factors that can be related to both macro and micro environment.

In the same vein – accepting the project with zero NPV should result in stagnant share price. Finance managers use discount rates as a measure of risk components in the project execution process.

Sensitivity Analysis

Project selection is often a far more complex decision than just choosing it based on the NPV number. Finance managers at Alliances Personal should conduct a sensitivity analysis to better understand not only the inherent risk of the projects but also how those risks can be either factored in or mitigated during the project execution. Sensitivity analysis helps in –

What will be a multi year spillover effect of various taxation regulations.

What can impact the cash flow of the project.

What are the key aspects of the projects that need to be monitored, refined, and retuned for continuous delivery of projected cash flows.

Understanding of risks involved in the project.

What are the uncertainties surrounding the project Initial Cash Outlay (ICO’s). ICO’s often have several different components such as land, machinery, building, and other equipment.

Some of the assumptions while using the Discounted Cash Flow Methods –

Projects are assumed to be Mutually Exclusive – This is seldom the came in modern day giant organizations where projects are often inter-related and rejecting a project solely based on NPV can result in sunk cost from a related project.

Independent projects have independent cash flows – As explained in the marketing project – though the project may look independent but in reality it is not as the brand awareness project can be closely associated with the spending on sales promotions and product specific advertising.






Negotiation Strategy of Role of Personal Relationships in Inter-Firm Alliances: Benefits, Dysfunctions, and Some Suggestions.

References & Further Readings

Henry Adobor (2018), "Role of Personal Relationships in Inter-Firm Alliances: Benefits, Dysfunctions, and Some Suggestions. Harvard Business Review Case Study. Published by HBR Publications.


Korea Cast Pip SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Capital Goods , Constr. - Supplies & Fixtures


Borealis Exploration SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Electronic Instr. & Controls


Dana SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer Cyclical , Auto & Truck Parts


Caihong Display Devices SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Electronic Instr. & Controls


Hugel SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Healthcare , Biotechnology & Drugs


Shenzhen Investment SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Capital Goods , Construction Services


Lotte Fine Chemical SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Basic Materials , Chemical Manufacturing


Ezwelfare SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Computer Services


Caltagirone SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Capital Goods , Construction - Raw Materials


Display Tech SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Electronic Instr. & Controls