×




Martin Marietta: Managing Corporate Ethics (B) Net Present Value (NPV) / MBA Resources

Introduction to Net Present Value (NPV) - What is Net Present Value (NPV) ? How it impacts financial decisions regarding project management?

NPV solution for Martin Marietta: Managing Corporate Ethics (B) case study


At Oak Spring University, we provide corporate level professional Net Present Value (NPV) case study solution. Martin Marietta: Managing Corporate Ethics (B) case study is a Harvard Business School (HBR) case study written by Lynn Sharp Paine. The Martin Marietta: Managing Corporate Ethics (B) (referred as “Irregularities Martin” from here on) case study provides evaluation & decision scenario in field of Leadership & Managing People. It also touches upon business topics such as - Value proposition, Business law, Conflict, Ethics, Firing, Leadership, Negotiations, Regulation.

The net present value (NPV) of an investment proposal is the present value of the proposal’s net cash flows less the proposal’s initial cash outflow. If a project’s NPV is greater than or equal to zero, the project should be accepted.

NPV = Present Value of Future Cash Flows LESS Project’s Initial Investment






Case Description of Martin Marietta: Managing Corporate Ethics (B) Case Study


The president of one of Martin Marietta's four main operating companies has learned of procurement irregularities in the company he manages. The problems involve U.S. government contracts the company is working on. After getting legal advice from the company's general counsel, the president must decide whether to disclose the irregularities to the U.S. government. Permits students to consider how managers should react if they learn about potential wrong-doing in their companies. Asks students to consider whether a policy of openness and disclosure should be generally favored and how such a policy should be applied.


Case Authors : Lynn Sharp Paine

Topic : Leadership & Managing People

Related Areas : Business law, Conflict, Ethics, Firing, Leadership, Negotiations, Regulation




Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 6% for Martin Marietta: Managing Corporate Ethics (B) Case Study


Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 6 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10000947) -10000947 - -
Year 1 3457435 -6543512 3457435 0.9434 3261731
Year 2 3967539 -2575973 7424974 0.89 3531096
Year 3 3938384 1362411 11363358 0.8396 3306743
Year 4 3248912 4611323 14612270 0.7921 2573443
TOTAL 14612270 12673012




The Net Present Value at 6% discount rate is 2672065

In isolation the NPV number doesn't mean much but put in right context then it is one of the best method to evaluate project returns. In this article we will cover -

Different methods of capital budgeting


What is NPV & Formula of NPV,
How it is calculated,
How to use NPV number for project evaluation, and
Scenario Planning given risks and management priorities.




Capital Budgeting Approaches

Methods of Capital Budgeting


There are four types of capital budgeting techniques that are widely used in the corporate world –

1. Net Present Value
2. Internal Rate of Return
3. Profitability Index
4. Payback Period

Apart from the Payback period method which is an additive method, rest of the methods are based on Discounted Cash Flow technique. Even though cash flow can be calculated based on the nature of the project, for the simplicity of the article we are assuming that all the expected cash flows are realized at the end of the year.

Discounted Cash Flow approaches provide a more objective basis for evaluating and selecting investment projects. They take into consideration both –

1. Magnitude of both incoming and outgoing cash flows – Projects can be capital intensive, time intensive, or both. Irregularities Martin shareholders have preference for diversified projects investment rather than prospective high income from a single capital intensive project.
2. Timing of the expected cash flows – stockholders of Irregularities Martin have higher preference for cash returns over 4-5 years rather than 10-15 years given the nature of the volatility in the industry.






Formula and Steps to Calculate Net Present Value (NPV) of Martin Marietta: Managing Corporate Ethics (B)

NPV = Net Cash In Flowt1 / (1+r)t1 + Net Cash In Flowt2 / (1+r)t2 + … Net Cash In Flowtn / (1+r)tn
Less Net Cash Out Flowt0 / (1+r)t0

Where t = time period, in this case year 1, year 2 and so on.
r = discount rate or return that could be earned using other safe proposition such as fixed deposit or treasury bond rate. Net Cash In Flow – What the firm will get each year.
Net Cash Out Flow – What the firm needs to invest initially in the project.

Step 1 – Understand the nature of the project and calculate cash flow for each year.
Step 2 – Discount those cash flow based on the discount rate.
Step 3 – Add all the discounted cash flow.
Step 4 – Selection of the project

Why Leadership & Managing People Managers need to know Financial Tools such as Net Present Value (NPV)?

In our daily workplace we often come across people and colleagues who are just focused on their core competency and targets they have to deliver. For example marketing managers at Irregularities Martin often design programs whose objective is to drive brand awareness and customer reach. But how that 30 point increase in brand awareness or 10 point increase in customer touch points will result into shareholders’ value is not specified.

To overcome such scenarios managers at Irregularities Martin needs to not only know the financial aspect of project management but also needs to have tools to integrate them into part of the project development and monitoring plan.

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 15%

After working through various assumptions we reached a conclusion that risk is far higher than 6%. In a reasonably stable industry with weak competition - 15% discount rate can be a good benchmark.



Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 15 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10000947) -10000947 - -
Year 1 3457435 -6543512 3457435 0.8696 3006465
Year 2 3967539 -2575973 7424974 0.7561 3000029
Year 3 3938384 1362411 11363358 0.6575 2589551
Year 4 3248912 4611323 14612270 0.5718 1857576
TOTAL 10453622


The Net NPV after 4 years is 452675

(10453622 - 10000947 )








Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 20%


If the risk component is high in the industry then we should go for a higher hurdle rate / discount rate of 20%.

Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 20 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10000947) -10000947 - -
Year 1 3457435 -6543512 3457435 0.8333 2881196
Year 2 3967539 -2575973 7424974 0.6944 2755235
Year 3 3938384 1362411 11363358 0.5787 2279157
Year 4 3248912 4611323 14612270 0.4823 1566798
TOTAL 9482386


The Net NPV after 4 years is -518561

At 20% discount rate the NPV is negative (9482386 - 10000947 ) so ideally we can't select the project if macro and micro factors don't allow financial managers of Irregularities Martin to discount cash flow at lower discount rates such as 15%.





Acceptance Criteria of a Project based on NPV

Simplest Approach – If the investment project of Irregularities Martin has a NPV value higher than Zero then finance managers at Irregularities Martin can ACCEPT the project, otherwise they can reject the project. This means that project will deliver higher returns over the period of time than any alternate investment strategy.

In theory if the required rate of return or discount rate is chosen correctly by finance managers at Irregularities Martin, then the stock price of the Irregularities Martin should change by same amount of the NPV. In real world we know that share price also reflects various other factors that can be related to both macro and micro environment.

In the same vein – accepting the project with zero NPV should result in stagnant share price. Finance managers use discount rates as a measure of risk components in the project execution process.

Sensitivity Analysis

Project selection is often a far more complex decision than just choosing it based on the NPV number. Finance managers at Irregularities Martin should conduct a sensitivity analysis to better understand not only the inherent risk of the projects but also how those risks can be either factored in or mitigated during the project execution. Sensitivity analysis helps in –

What are the uncertainties surrounding the project Initial Cash Outlay (ICO’s). ICO’s often have several different components such as land, machinery, building, and other equipment.

What can impact the cash flow of the project.

What will be a multi year spillover effect of various taxation regulations.

Understanding of risks involved in the project.

What are the key aspects of the projects that need to be monitored, refined, and retuned for continuous delivery of projected cash flows.

Some of the assumptions while using the Discounted Cash Flow Methods –

Projects are assumed to be Mutually Exclusive – This is seldom the came in modern day giant organizations where projects are often inter-related and rejecting a project solely based on NPV can result in sunk cost from a related project.

Independent projects have independent cash flows – As explained in the marketing project – though the project may look independent but in reality it is not as the brand awareness project can be closely associated with the spending on sales promotions and product specific advertising.






Negotiation Strategy of Martin Marietta: Managing Corporate Ethics (B)

References & Further Readings

Lynn Sharp Paine (2018), "Martin Marietta: Managing Corporate Ethics (B) Harvard Business Review Case Study. Published by HBR Publications.


Ituran SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Services , Security Systems & Services


Ferrum Crescent SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Basic Materials , Metal Mining


Artemis Resources SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Basic Materials , Gold & Silver


Hoya Cor SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Electronic Instr. & Controls


Tibet GaoZheng Explosive SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Basic Materials , Chemical Manufacturing


CoreLogic SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Computer Services


STG SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Electronic Instr. & Controls


Okamoto Glass SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Scientific & Technical Instr.