×




Odebrecht: Dreaming The Client's Dreams Negotiation Strategy / MBA Resources

Introduction to Negotiation Strategy

Negotiation Strategy solution for Odebrecht: Dreaming The Client's Dreams case study


At Oak Spring University, we provide corporate level professional Negotiation Strategy and other business case study solution. Odebrecht: Dreaming The Client's Dreams case study is a Harvard Business School (HBR) case study written by Benoit Leleux, Anne Catrin Glemser. The Odebrecht: Dreaming The Client's Dreams (referred as “Odebrecht Marcelo” from here on) case study provides evaluation & decision scenario in field of Leadership & Managing People. It also touches upon business topics such as - negotiation strategy , negotiation framework, Design, Emerging markets, Social responsibility, Sustainability.

Negotiation strategy solution for case study Odebrecht: Dreaming The Client's Dreams ” provides a comprehensive framework to analyse all issues at hand and reach a unambiguous negotiated agreement. At Oak Spring University, we provide comprehensive negotiation strategies that have proven their worth both in the academic sphere and corporate world.


BATNA in Negotiation Strategy


Three questions every negotiator should ask before entering into a negotiation process-

What’s my BATNA (Best Alternative To a Negotiated Agreement) – my walkaway option if the deal fails?

What are my most important interests, in ranked order?

What is the other side’s BATNA, and what are his interests?



12 Hrs

$59.99
per Page
  • 100% Plagiarism Free
  • On Time Delivery | 27x7
  • PayPal Secure
  • 300 Words / Page
  • Buy Now

24 Hrs

$49.99
per Page
  • 100% Plagiarism Free
  • On Time Delivery | 27x7
  • PayPal Secure
  • 300 Words / Page
  • Buy Now

48 Hrs

$39.99
per Page
  • 100% Plagiarism Free
  • On Time Delivery | 27x7
  • PayPal Secure
  • 300 Words / Page
  • Buy Now




Case Description of Odebrecht: Dreaming The Client's Dreams Case Study


SALVADOR DA BAHIA - BRAZIL. When Marcelo Odebrecht took over executive control of Odebrecht in 2009, he knew that he would have to light his own beacon for the firm. The company, launched in 1944 and still family-controlled, exhibited a strong entrepreneurial empowerment culture rooted in the life and business philosophy of the founder Norberto, Marcelo's grandfather. This meant he could involve and rely on the support of major entrepreneur-partners of the firm in defining ambitious yet reachable targets for the firm.Vision 2020 aimed to achieve annual revenues in excess of $200 billion by offering innovative integrated solutions to major global challenges such as the availability of water, energy and infrastructure. To "dream the client's dreams," the plan required over 200,000 new employees worldwide, united by a common entrepreneurial bond. Such projections would have sounded extravagant for any other firm; for Odebrecht, these were simple linear extrapolations of the company's performance over the last 10 years, during which the firm grew its revenues at an annualized rate of over 21%... Odebrecht also aspired to become a model of sustainable development and socio-environmental responsibility. For this, it could already rely on its massive investments in "green" plastics and ethanol production facilities. It also rallied behind a colossal hydroelectric project, pioneering CSR practices and novel turbine and dam technology to reduce the impact of such facilities on sensitive Amazon ecosystems. These investments set the tune for the firm in the second decade of the century. For Marcelo, the issue was how to translate the vision into "a dream with a deadline." Could he depend on the old recipes for growth? Were historical clients the right ones going forward? Would the forces and culture that had created the opportunities in the past support the future? Was Odebrecht ready to handle another massive bout of growth? As Marcelo assumed sole executive leadership for the $23 billion family business at the age of 42, he was aware of his responsibility and challenges. He knew he was expected to build on his forefathers' successes, and they had set a very high bar for him, but he also knew he could rely on the entrepreneur-partners he inherited. Learning objectives: Managing growth, family business governance, succession, CSR, sustainable development, renewable energy, managing the value chain.


Case Authors : Benoit Leleux, Anne Catrin Glemser

Topic : Leadership & Managing People

Related Areas : Design, Emerging markets, Social responsibility, Sustainability




Seven Elemental Tools of Negotiation that can be used in Odebrecht: Dreaming The Client's Dreams solution


1. Satisfies everyone’s core interests (yours and theirs)


By interests, we do not mean the preconceived demands or positions that you or the other party may have, but rather the underlying needs, aims, fears, and concerns that shape what you want. Negotiation is more than getting what you want. It is not winning at all cost. Number of times Win-Win is better option that outright winning or getting what you want.





2. Is the best of many options

Options are the solutions you generate that could meet your and your counterpart’s interests . Often people come to negotiations with very fixed ideas and things they want to achieve. This strategy leaves unexplored options which might be even better than the one that one party wanted to achieve. So always try to provide as many options as possible during the negotiation process . The best outcome should be out of many options rather than few options.


3. Meets legitimate, fair standards

When soft bargainers meet hard bargainers there is always the danger of soft bargainers ceding more than what is necessary. To avoid this scenario you should always focus on legitimate standards or expectations, clearly understanding the arbitrage . Standards are often external and objective measures to assess the fairness such as rules and regulations, financial values & resources , market prices etc. If the negotiated agreement is going beyond the industry norms or established standards of fairness then it is prudent to get out of the negotiation.


4. Is better than your alternatives or BATNA

Every negotiators going into the negotiations should always work out the “what if” scenario. The negotiating parties in the “Odebrecht: Dreaming The Client's Dreams” has three to four plausible scenarios. The negotiating protagonist needs to have clear idea of – what will happen if the negotiations fail. To put it in the negotiating literature – BATNA - Best Alternative to a Negotiated Agreement. If the negotiated agreement is not better than BATNA (Negotiations options), then there is no point in accepting the negotiated solution.


5. Is comprised of clear, realistic commitments

One of the biggest problems in implementing the negotiated agreements in corporate world is – the ambiguity in the negotiated agreement. Sometimes the negotiated agreements are not realistic or various parties interpret the outcomes based on their understanding of the situation. It is critical to do negotiations as water tight as possible so that there is less scope for ambiguity.


6. Is the result of effective communication?

Many negotiators make the mistake of focusing only on the substance of the negotiation (interests, options, standards, and so on). How you communicate about that substance, however, can make all the difference. The language you use and the way that you build understanding, jointly solve problems, and together determine the process of the negotiation with your counterpart make your negotiation more efficient, yield clear agreements that each party understands, and help you build better relationships.


7. Managing relationship with counterparty

Another critical factor in the success of your negotiation is how you manage your relationship with your counterpart and other people doing the mediation. According to “Benoit Leleux, Anne Catrin Glemser”, the protagonist may want to establish a new connection or repair a damaged one; in any case, you want to build a strong working relationship built on mutual respect, well-established trust, and a side-by-side problem- solving approach.




Different types of negotiators – what is your style of negotiation

According to Harvard Business Review , there are three types of negotiators – Hard Bargainers, Soft Bargainers, and Principled Bargainers.

Hard Bargainers – These people see negotiations as an activity that they need to win. They are less focused less on the real objectives of the negotiations but more on winning. In the “Odebrecht: Dreaming The Client's Dreams ”, do you think a hard bargaining strategy will deliver desired results? Hard bargainers are easy to negotiate with as they often have a very predictable strategy

Soft Bargainers – These people are focused on relationship rather than hard outcomes of the negotiations. It doesn’t mean they are pushovers. These negotiators often scribe to long term relationship rather than immediate bargain.

Principled Bargainers – As explained in the seven elemental tools of negotiations above, these negotiators are more concern about the standards and norms of fairness. They often have inclusive approach to negotiations and like to work on numerous solutions that can improve the BATNA of both parties.

Open lines of communication between parties in the case study “Odebrecht: Dreaming The Client's Dreams” can make for an effective negotiation strategy and will make it easier to negotiate with this party the next time as well.





NPV Analysis of Odebrecht: Dreaming The Client's Dreams



References & Further Readings

Benoit Leleux, Anne Catrin Glemser (2018), "Odebrecht: Dreaming The Client's Dreams Harvard Business Review Case Study. Published by HBR Publications.


Deutsche Boerse SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Financial , Investment Services


STV Group SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Services , Motion Pictures


Rio Tinto Ltd SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Basic Materials , Metal Mining


ParkerVision SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Semiconductors


Capro SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Basic Materials , Chemical Manufacturing


Savaria Corporation SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Capital Goods , Misc. Capital Goods


MBM Resources SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer Cyclical , Auto & Truck Parts


Ningbo Shanshan SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer Cyclical , Apparel/Accessories


Focus Lumber SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Capital Goods , Constr. - Supplies & Fixtures