Introduction to Negotiation Strategy
At Oak Spring University, we provide corporate level professional Negotiation Strategy and other business case study solution. Selling CFLs at Wal-Mart case study is a Harvard Business School (HBR) case study written by Eric J. Johnson, Daniel M. Bartels. The Selling CFLs at Wal-Mart (referred as “Bulbs Cfl” from here on) case study provides evaluation & decision scenario in field of Sales & Marketing. It also touches upon business topics such as - negotiation strategy, negotiation framework, Sustainability.
Negotiation strategy solution for case study Selling CFLs at Wal-Mart ” provides a comprehensive framework to analyse all issues at hand and reach a unambiguous negotiated agreement. At Oak Spring University, we provide comprehensive negotiation strategies that have proven their worth both in the academic sphere and corporate world.
What’s my BATNA (Best Alternative To a Negotiated Agreement) – my walkaway option if the deal fails?
What are my most important interests, in ranked order?
What is the other side’s BATNA, and what are his interests?
In early 2009, Wal-Mart executive Andy Barron realized the firm's lighting business was facing a challenge. After achieving a goal of selling 100 million compact fluorescent light (CFL) bulbs by the end of 2007, sales of the energy-efficient bulbs had started to plateau, leading to a dim outlook for 2009. Barron needed to examine what barriers might be keeping consumers from adopting more of the bulbs, which offer both cost savings and environmental benefits. In this 2-part case students study the historic price points and sales of CFL bulbs, Wal-Mart's 2007 promotion of CFL lighting, and research about consumer adoption of the bulbs in order to understand how the retailer might achieve its goals. The case asks: How can consumer habits be changed? How can new products overcome barriers to adoption? What can managers do to promote sales of new products, given human behavior where biases, values and emotions have an impact on the choices people make? How can economic theories explain consumer behavior as it occurs in the real world? The Epilogue to the first case asks students to discuss what developments occurred after the 2009 implementation and how they impacted CFL sales.
By interests, we do not mean the preconceived demands or positions that you or the other party may have, but rather the underlying needs, aims, fears, and concerns that shape what you want. Negotiation is more than getting what you want. It is not winning at all cost. Number of times Win-Win is better option that outright winning or getting what you want.
Options are the solutions you generate that could meet your and your counterpart’s interests . Often people come to negotiations with very fixed ideas and things they want to achieve. This strategy leaves unexplored options which might be even better than the one that one party wanted to achieve. So always try to provide as many options as possible during the negotiation process. The best outcome should be out of many options rather than few options.
When soft bargainers meet hard bargainers there is always the danger of soft bargainers ceding more than what is necessary. To avoid this scenario you should always focus on legitimate standards or expectations. Standards are often external and objective measures to assess the fairness such as rules and regulations, financial values & resources , market prices etc. If the negotiated agreement is going beyond the industry norms or established standards of fairness then it is prudent to get out of the negotiation.
Every negotiators going into the negotiations should always work out the “what if” scenario. The negotiating parties in the “Selling CFLs at Wal-Mart” has three to four plausible scenarios. The negotiating protagonist needs to have clear idea of – what will happen if the negotiations fail. To put it in the negotiating literature – BATNA - Best Alternative to a Negotiated Agreement. If the negotiated agreement is not better than BATNA then there is no point in accepting the negotiated solution.
One of the biggest problems in implementing the negotiated agreements in corporate world is – the ambiguity in the negotiated agreement. Sometimes the negotiated agreements are not realistic or various parties interpret the outcomes based on their understanding of the situation. It is critical to do negotiations as water tight as possible so that there is less scope for ambiguity.
Many negotiators make the mistake of focusing only on the substance of the negotiation (interests, options, standards, and so on). How you communicate about that substance, however, can make all the difference. The language you use and the way that you build understanding, jointly solve problems, and together determine the process of the negotiation with your counterpart make your negotiation more efficient, yield clear agreements that each party understands, and help you build better relationships.
Another critical factor in the success of your negotiation is how you manage your relationship with your counterpart. According to “Eric J. Johnson, Daniel M. Bartels”, the protagonist may want to establish a new connection or repair a damaged one; in any case, you want to build a strong working relationship built on mutual respect, well-established trust, and a side-by-side problem- solving approach.
According to
Harvard Business Review
, there are three types of negotiators – Hard Bargainers, Soft Bargainers, and Principled Bargainers.
Hard Bargainers – These people see negotiations as an activity that they need to win. They are less focused less on the real objectives of the negotiations but more on winning. In the “Selling CFLs at Wal-Mart ”, do you think a hard bargaining strategy will deliver desired results? Hard bargainers are easy to negotiate with as they often have a very
predictable strategy
Soft Bargainers – These people are focused on relationship rather than hard outcomes of the negotiations. It doesn’t mean they are pushovers. These negotiators often scribe to long term relationship rather than immediate bargain.
Principled Bargainers – As explained in the seven elemental tools of negotiations above, these negotiators are more concern about the standards and norms of fairness. They often have inclusive approach to negotiations and like to work on numerous solutions that can improve the BATNA of both parties.
Open lines of communication between parties in the case study “Selling CFLs at Wal-Mart” can make for an effective negotiation strategy and will make it easier to negotiate with this party the next time as well.
Eric J. Johnson, Daniel M. Bartels (2018), "Selling CFLs at Wal-Mart Harvard Business Review Case Study. Published by HBR Publications.
Feel free to connect with us if you need business research.
You can download Excel Template of Case Study Solution & Analysis of Selling CFLs at Wal-Mart
Basic Materials , Containers & Packaging
Consumer/Non-Cyclical , Crops
Technology , Computer Services
Financial , Insurance (Life)
Technology , Software & Programming
Technology , Computer Networks
Healthcare , Biotechnology & Drugs
Transportation , Water Transportation
Healthcare , Biotechnology & Drugs
Services , Business Services
Services , Motion Pictures
Technology , Software & Programming
