×




Customer Analytics at Bigbasket - Product Recommendations Negotiation Strategy / MBA Resources

Introduction to Negotiation Strategy

Negotiation Strategy solution for Customer Analytics at Bigbasket - Product Recommendations case study


At Oak Spring University, we provide corporate level professional Negotiation Strategy and other business case study solution. Customer Analytics at Bigbasket - Product Recommendations case study is a Harvard Business School (HBR) case study written by Paul Abraham, Manaranjan Pradhan, Lakshminarayanan S, Ganesh Iyer. The Customer Analytics at Bigbasket - Product Recommendations (referred as “Bigbasket Grocery” from here on) case study provides evaluation & decision scenario in field of Sales & Marketing. It also touches upon business topics such as - negotiation strategy , negotiation framework, Sales.

Negotiation strategy solution for case study Customer Analytics at Bigbasket - Product Recommendations ” provides a comprehensive framework to analyse all issues at hand and reach a unambiguous negotiated agreement. At Oak Spring University, we provide comprehensive negotiation strategies that have proven their worth both in the academic sphere and corporate world.


BATNA in Negotiation Strategy


Three questions every negotiator should ask before entering into a negotiation process-

What’s my BATNA (Best Alternative To a Negotiated Agreement) – my walkaway option if the deal fails?

What are my most important interests, in ranked order?

What is the other side’s BATNA, and what are his interests?



12 Hrs

$59.99
per Page
  • 100% Plagiarism Free
  • On Time Delivery | 27x7
  • PayPal Secure
  • 300 Words / Page
  • Buy Now

24 Hrs

$49.99
per Page
  • 100% Plagiarism Free
  • On Time Delivery | 27x7
  • PayPal Secure
  • 300 Words / Page
  • Buy Now

48 Hrs

$39.99
per Page
  • 100% Plagiarism Free
  • On Time Delivery | 27x7
  • PayPal Secure
  • 300 Words / Page
  • Buy Now




Case Description of Customer Analytics at Bigbasket - Product Recommendations Case Study


Bigbasket was India's largest online grocery and food store established in 2011 by a group of entrepreneurs Hari Menon, Vipul Parekh, V S Ramesh, V S Sudhakar, and Abhinay Choudhari. In 2016, Bigbasket sold more than 18,000 products and 1,000 brands operating across 12 Indian cities. Online grocery market in India has been small, but a rapidly growing segment. According to "The Retailer" Ernst and Young's publication in consumer products and retail sector, during July-September 2015, India was among the top-10 food and grocery markets in the world, with an estimated size of INR 22.5 trillion (approximately USD 350 billion). The market has grown at 10-12% CAGR between 2010 and 2015, with food and grocery being the largest segment, accounting for close to 60% in 2015 alone. The protagonist of the case, Pramod Jajoo, Chief Technology Officer, at Bigbasket was trying to solve two problems frequently encountered by customers of online grocery stores. It was estimated that about 30% of Bigbasket customers place orders through smart phones. Unlike other e-commerce companies such as Amazon, Bigbasket customers place order for several products in a single order, sometimes as high as 80 in one order depending on their purchase frequency. When the basket size is high, using smart phones to place order is challenging. Also, it is a common phenomenon that customers forget to place order few grocery items which may result either in placing additional orders or customers purchasing those products from neighborhood stores resulting in a financial loss to online grocery stores. Jajoo and his team wanted to create a "Smart Basket" that would make placing orders easier for their customers and "Did you forget?" feature that would identify the items the customer may have forgotten to order.


Case Authors : Paul Abraham, Manaranjan Pradhan, Lakshminarayanan S, Ganesh Iyer

Topic : Sales & Marketing

Related Areas : Sales




Seven Elemental Tools of Negotiation that can be used in Customer Analytics at Bigbasket - Product Recommendations solution


1. Satisfies everyone’s core interests (yours and theirs)


By interests, we do not mean the preconceived demands or positions that you or the other party may have, but rather the underlying needs, aims, fears, and concerns that shape what you want. Negotiation is more than getting what you want. It is not winning at all cost. Number of times Win-Win is better option that outright winning or getting what you want.





2. Is the best of many options

Options are the solutions you generate that could meet your and your counterpart’s interests . Often people come to negotiations with very fixed ideas and things they want to achieve. This strategy leaves unexplored options which might be even better than the one that one party wanted to achieve. So always try to provide as many options as possible during the negotiation process . The best outcome should be out of many options rather than few options.


3. Meets legitimate, fair standards

When soft bargainers meet hard bargainers there is always the danger of soft bargainers ceding more than what is necessary. To avoid this scenario you should always focus on legitimate standards or expectations, clearly understanding the arbitrage . Standards are often external and objective measures to assess the fairness such as rules and regulations, financial values & resources , market prices etc. If the negotiated agreement is going beyond the industry norms or established standards of fairness then it is prudent to get out of the negotiation.


4. Is better than your alternatives or BATNA

Every negotiators going into the negotiations should always work out the “what if” scenario. The negotiating parties in the “Customer Analytics at Bigbasket - Product Recommendations” has three to four plausible scenarios. The negotiating protagonist needs to have clear idea of – what will happen if the negotiations fail. To put it in the negotiating literature – BATNA - Best Alternative to a Negotiated Agreement. If the negotiated agreement is not better than BATNA (Negotiations options), then there is no point in accepting the negotiated solution.


5. Is comprised of clear, realistic commitments

One of the biggest problems in implementing the negotiated agreements in corporate world is – the ambiguity in the negotiated agreement. Sometimes the negotiated agreements are not realistic or various parties interpret the outcomes based on their understanding of the situation. It is critical to do negotiations as water tight as possible so that there is less scope for ambiguity.


6. Is the result of effective communication?

Many negotiators make the mistake of focusing only on the substance of the negotiation (interests, options, standards, and so on). How you communicate about that substance, however, can make all the difference. The language you use and the way that you build understanding, jointly solve problems, and together determine the process of the negotiation with your counterpart make your negotiation more efficient, yield clear agreements that each party understands, and help you build better relationships.


7. Managing relationship with counterparty

Another critical factor in the success of your negotiation is how you manage your relationship with your counterpart and other people doing the mediation. According to “Paul Abraham, Manaranjan Pradhan, Lakshminarayanan S, Ganesh Iyer”, the protagonist may want to establish a new connection or repair a damaged one; in any case, you want to build a strong working relationship built on mutual respect, well-established trust, and a side-by-side problem- solving approach.




Different types of negotiators – what is your style of negotiation

According to Harvard Business Review , there are three types of negotiators – Hard Bargainers, Soft Bargainers, and Principled Bargainers.

Hard Bargainers – These people see negotiations as an activity that they need to win. They are less focused less on the real objectives of the negotiations but more on winning. In the “Customer Analytics at Bigbasket - Product Recommendations ”, do you think a hard bargaining strategy will deliver desired results? Hard bargainers are easy to negotiate with as they often have a very predictable strategy

Soft Bargainers – These people are focused on relationship rather than hard outcomes of the negotiations. It doesn’t mean they are pushovers. These negotiators often scribe to long term relationship rather than immediate bargain.

Principled Bargainers – As explained in the seven elemental tools of negotiations above, these negotiators are more concern about the standards and norms of fairness. They often have inclusive approach to negotiations and like to work on numerous solutions that can improve the BATNA of both parties.

Open lines of communication between parties in the case study “Customer Analytics at Bigbasket - Product Recommendations” can make for an effective negotiation strategy and will make it easier to negotiate with this party the next time as well.





NPV Analysis of Customer Analytics at Bigbasket - Product Recommendations



References & Further Readings

Paul Abraham, Manaranjan Pradhan, Lakshminarayanan S, Ganesh Iyer (2018), "Customer Analytics at Bigbasket - Product Recommendations Harvard Business Review Case Study. Published by HBR Publications.


Vardhman Acrylics Ltd SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Basic Materials , Chemicals - Plastics & Rubber


Vivos SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Basic Materials , Chemical Manufacturing


GRC International SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Software & Programming


Niigata Kotsu SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Transportation , Misc. Transportation


China Aoyuan Property SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Capital Goods , Construction Services


Spartan Motors SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer Cyclical , Auto & Truck Manufacturers


Stem Lab SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Healthcare , Medical Equipment & Supplies


Fidelity Financial SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Financial , Insurance (Prop. & Casualty)


Centuria Capital SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Financial , Investment Services


Genmab SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Healthcare , Biotechnology & Drugs