×




JCDecaux, 2016: Global Leader ... Again Negotiation Strategy / MBA Resources

Introduction to Negotiation Strategy

Negotiation Strategy solution for JCDecaux, 2016: Global Leader ... Again case study


At Oak Spring University, we provide corporate level professional Negotiation Strategy and other business case study solution. JCDecaux, 2016: Global Leader ... Again case study is a Harvard Business School (HBR) case study written by John R. Wells, Gabriel Ellsworth. The JCDecaux, 2016: Global Leader ... Again (referred as “Jcdecaux Jean” from here on) case study provides evaluation & decision scenario in field of Strategy & Execution. It also touches upon business topics such as - negotiation strategy , negotiation framework, Business history, Business models, Competition, Customers, Design, Economy, Financial management, Globalization, Growth strategy, Human resource management, Joint ventures, Manufacturing, Mergers & acquisitions, Negotiations, Organizational structure, Performance measurement, Pricing, Product development, Public relations, Regulation, Technology, Work-life balance.

Negotiation strategy solution for case study JCDecaux, 2016: Global Leader ... Again ” provides a comprehensive framework to analyse all issues at hand and reach a unambiguous negotiated agreement. At Oak Spring University, we provide comprehensive negotiation strategies that have proven their worth both in the academic sphere and corporate world.


BATNA in Negotiation Strategy


Three questions every negotiator should ask before entering into a negotiation process-

What’s my BATNA (Best Alternative To a Negotiated Agreement) – my walkaway option if the deal fails?

What are my most important interests, in ranked order?

What is the other side’s BATNA, and what are his interests?



12 Hrs

$59.99
per Page
  • 100% Plagiarism Free
  • On Time Delivery | 27x7
  • PayPal Secure
  • 300 Words / Page
  • Buy Now

24 Hrs

$49.99
per Page
  • 100% Plagiarism Free
  • On Time Delivery | 27x7
  • PayPal Secure
  • 300 Words / Page
  • Buy Now

48 Hrs

$39.99
per Page
  • 100% Plagiarism Free
  • On Time Delivery | 27x7
  • PayPal Secure
  • 300 Words / Page
  • Buy Now




Case Description of JCDecaux, 2016: Global Leader ... Again Case Study


In 2016, JCDecaux was number one in the world in outdoor advertising. This was a far cry from the situation in 2003; at that time, JCDecaux had been unseated by Clear Channel from the number-one spot that it had held for decades, and it was fighting for second place with OUTFRONT (then owned by Viacom). Over the 12 intervening years, JCDecaux had doubled in size, building leadership positions in China, Japan, Latin America, Africa, and Russia, and in 2010, it had passed Clear Channel to lead the industry once more. Now, co-CEOs Jean-FranA?ois Decaux and Jean-Charles Decaux were looking for new ways and new places to grow. After the company overtook Clear Channel in 2010, Jean-FranA?ois had indicated that he believed that another doubling in size was feasible, but it would probably take a major acquisition to do so. And JCDecaux faced more pressing short-term issues. The contract for London bus shelters that the company had won with much fanfare in August 2015 was behind schedule. To make matters worse, the United Kingdom's June 2016 "Brexit" vote to leave the European Union cast a shadow over the project, and the markets reacted negatively. By the start of November, JCDecaux's share price had fallen 21% since the beginning of the year. Just what the economic uncertainty of Brexit would mean for global outdoor advertising in general, and U.K. outdoor advertising in particular, was not clear. Doubling in size in such an environment appeared a daunting task.


Case Authors : John R. Wells, Gabriel Ellsworth

Topic : Strategy & Execution

Related Areas : Business history, Business models, Competition, Customers, Design, Economy, Financial management, Globalization, Growth strategy, Human resource management, Joint ventures, Manufacturing, Mergers & acquisitions, Negotiations, Organizational structure, Performance measurement, Pricing, Product development, Public relations, Regulation, Technology, Work-life balance




Seven Elemental Tools of Negotiation that can be used in JCDecaux, 2016: Global Leader ... Again solution


1. Satisfies everyone’s core interests (yours and theirs)


By interests, we do not mean the preconceived demands or positions that you or the other party may have, but rather the underlying needs, aims, fears, and concerns that shape what you want. Negotiation is more than getting what you want. It is not winning at all cost. Number of times Win-Win is better option that outright winning or getting what you want.





2. Is the best of many options

Options are the solutions you generate that could meet your and your counterpart’s interests . Often people come to negotiations with very fixed ideas and things they want to achieve. This strategy leaves unexplored options which might be even better than the one that one party wanted to achieve. So always try to provide as many options as possible during the negotiation process . The best outcome should be out of many options rather than few options.


3. Meets legitimate, fair standards

When soft bargainers meet hard bargainers there is always the danger of soft bargainers ceding more than what is necessary. To avoid this scenario you should always focus on legitimate standards or expectations, clearly understanding the arbitrage . Standards are often external and objective measures to assess the fairness such as rules and regulations, financial values & resources , market prices etc. If the negotiated agreement is going beyond the industry norms or established standards of fairness then it is prudent to get out of the negotiation.


4. Is better than your alternatives or BATNA

Every negotiators going into the negotiations should always work out the “what if” scenario. The negotiating parties in the “JCDecaux, 2016: Global Leader ... Again” has three to four plausible scenarios. The negotiating protagonist needs to have clear idea of – what will happen if the negotiations fail. To put it in the negotiating literature – BATNA - Best Alternative to a Negotiated Agreement. If the negotiated agreement is not better than BATNA (Negotiations options), then there is no point in accepting the negotiated solution.


5. Is comprised of clear, realistic commitments

One of the biggest problems in implementing the negotiated agreements in corporate world is – the ambiguity in the negotiated agreement. Sometimes the negotiated agreements are not realistic or various parties interpret the outcomes based on their understanding of the situation. It is critical to do negotiations as water tight as possible so that there is less scope for ambiguity.


6. Is the result of effective communication?

Many negotiators make the mistake of focusing only on the substance of the negotiation (interests, options, standards, and so on). How you communicate about that substance, however, can make all the difference. The language you use and the way that you build understanding, jointly solve problems, and together determine the process of the negotiation with your counterpart make your negotiation more efficient, yield clear agreements that each party understands, and help you build better relationships.


7. Managing relationship with counterparty

Another critical factor in the success of your negotiation is how you manage your relationship with your counterpart and other people doing the mediation. According to “John R. Wells, Gabriel Ellsworth”, the protagonist may want to establish a new connection or repair a damaged one; in any case, you want to build a strong working relationship built on mutual respect, well-established trust, and a side-by-side problem- solving approach.




Different types of negotiators – what is your style of negotiation

According to Harvard Business Review , there are three types of negotiators – Hard Bargainers, Soft Bargainers, and Principled Bargainers.

Hard Bargainers – These people see negotiations as an activity that they need to win. They are less focused less on the real objectives of the negotiations but more on winning. In the “JCDecaux, 2016: Global Leader ... Again ”, do you think a hard bargaining strategy will deliver desired results? Hard bargainers are easy to negotiate with as they often have a very predictable strategy

Soft Bargainers – These people are focused on relationship rather than hard outcomes of the negotiations. It doesn’t mean they are pushovers. These negotiators often scribe to long term relationship rather than immediate bargain.

Principled Bargainers – As explained in the seven elemental tools of negotiations above, these negotiators are more concern about the standards and norms of fairness. They often have inclusive approach to negotiations and like to work on numerous solutions that can improve the BATNA of both parties.

Open lines of communication between parties in the case study “JCDecaux, 2016: Global Leader ... Again” can make for an effective negotiation strategy and will make it easier to negotiate with this party the next time as well.





NPV Analysis of JCDecaux, 2016: Global Leader ... Again



References & Further Readings

John R. Wells, Gabriel Ellsworth (2018), "JCDecaux, 2016: Global Leader ... Again Harvard Business Review Case Study. Published by HBR Publications.


Top Glove Corp SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Healthcare , Medical Equipment & Supplies


Kimoto Co Ltd SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Basic Materials , Fabricated Plastic & Rubber


Beijing Etrol Tech SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Energy , Oil Well Services & Equipment


Ningbo Shenglong Automotive SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer Cyclical , Auto & Truck Parts


Ebro Foods SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer/Non-Cyclical , Food Processing


Hannover Rueckversicherung SE SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Financial , Insurance (Prop. & Casualty)


Echo Therapeutics SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Healthcare , Medical Equipment & Supplies