×




Auto-Graphics, Inc. and the Library-Automation Industry-the New Technology Frontier Negotiation Strategy / MBA Resources

Introduction to Negotiation Strategy

Negotiation Strategy solution for Auto-Graphics, Inc. and the Library-Automation Industry-the New Technology Frontier case study


At Oak Spring University, we provide corporate level professional Negotiation Strategy and other business case study solution. Auto-Graphics, Inc. and the Library-Automation Industry-the New Technology Frontier case study is a Harvard Business School (HBR) case study written by Olukemi Sawyerr, Stanley Abraham. The Auto-Graphics, Inc. and the Library-Automation Industry-the New Technology Frontier (referred as “Library Automation” from here on) case study provides evaluation & decision scenario in field of Strategy & Execution. It also touches upon business topics such as - negotiation strategy, negotiation framework, Entrepreneurial management, Strategic planning.

Negotiation strategy solution for case study Auto-Graphics, Inc. and the Library-Automation Industry-the New Technology Frontier ” provides a comprehensive framework to analyse all issues at hand and reach a unambiguous negotiated agreement. At Oak Spring University, we provide comprehensive negotiation strategies that have proven their worth both in the academic sphere and corporate world.


BATNA in Negotiation Strategy


Three questions every negotiator should ask before entering into a negotiation process-

What’s my BATNA (Best Alternative To a Negotiated Agreement) – my walkaway option if the deal fails?

What are my most important interests, in ranked order?

What is the other side’s BATNA, and what are his interests?



12 Hrs

$59.99
per Page
  • 100% Plagiarism Free
  • On Time Delivery | 27x7
  • PayPal Secure
  • 300 Words / Page
  • Buy Now

24 Hrs

$49.99
per Page
  • 100% Plagiarism Free
  • On Time Delivery | 27x7
  • PayPal Secure
  • 300 Words / Page
  • Buy Now

48 Hrs

$39.99
per Page
  • 100% Plagiarism Free
  • On Time Delivery | 27x7
  • PayPal Secure
  • 300 Words / Page
  • Buy Now




Case Description of Auto-Graphics, Inc. and the Library-Automation Industry-the New Technology Frontier Case Study


The Auto-Graphics, Inc. ("A-G") case is an example of a small business that has survived over three generations through adapting to industry and market trends, yet still faces challenges as technology continues inexorably to change the business environment. A-G competed in the public, academic, and consortia (PAC) segment of the library-automation industry. It was founded in 1950 in Alhambra, CA by Ira C. Cope and in 2011 was led by his grandson, Paul Cope.The case opens with Paul Cope's excitement and optimism about the future possibilities of the library-automation industry. His optimism was tempered by the fact that the library market was very mature and libraries in both Canada and the U.S. were confronted with shrinking budgets. Although Paul Cope was hopeful about the future possibilities of the library-automation industry, A-G had to find a way to increase revenues in its North American business in the face of declining library budgets. The case describes the library-automation industry, the market segments served, the products offered by the firms in the industry, the trends affecting the industry, and the challenges faced by incumbents in the industry. It then describes competition in the PAC segment, which was intense throughout the 2000s. Competing technologies included SaaS (Software as a Service) and open-systems software. Markets were also changing. One ongoing issue was that library patrons belonged to a generation accustomed to Google-like search engines and the latest and greatest technologies, so held high expectations for a library's ease of use and breadth of content. Libraries needed to make radical changes to redefine their relevancy with their community of users and to keep up with changes in technologies including eBooks, eJournals and other online resources. The case then describes A-G itself-how it innovates, its product line, and its financial statements over the past five years. The case ends with the challenges facing Paul Cope and A-G. The case will challenge students to integrate industry and competitive dynamics with market demands and technological trends and devise a set of worthy strategic alternatives commensurate with its financial resources to help A-G continue to grow in the future.


Case Authors : Olukemi Sawyerr, Stanley Abraham

Topic : Strategy & Execution

Related Areas : Entrepreneurial management, Strategic planning




Seven Elemental Tools of Negotiation that can be used in Auto-Graphics, Inc. and the Library-Automation Industry-the New Technology Frontier solution


1. Satisfies everyone’s core interests (yours and theirs)


By interests, we do not mean the preconceived demands or positions that you or the other party may have, but rather the underlying needs, aims, fears, and concerns that shape what you want. Negotiation is more than getting what you want. It is not winning at all cost. Number of times Win-Win is better option that outright winning or getting what you want.





2. Is the best of many options

Options are the solutions you generate that could meet your and your counterpart’s interests . Often people come to negotiations with very fixed ideas and things they want to achieve. This strategy leaves unexplored options which might be even better than the one that one party wanted to achieve. So always try to provide as many options as possible during the negotiation process. The best outcome should be out of many options rather than few options.


3. Meets legitimate, fair standards

When soft bargainers meet hard bargainers there is always the danger of soft bargainers ceding more than what is necessary. To avoid this scenario you should always focus on legitimate standards or expectations. Standards are often external and objective measures to assess the fairness such as rules and regulations, financial values & resources , market prices etc. If the negotiated agreement is going beyond the industry norms or established standards of fairness then it is prudent to get out of the negotiation.


4. Is better than your alternatives or BATNA

Every negotiators going into the negotiations should always work out the “what if” scenario. The negotiating parties in the “Auto-Graphics, Inc. and the Library-Automation Industry-the New Technology Frontier” has three to four plausible scenarios. The negotiating protagonist needs to have clear idea of – what will happen if the negotiations fail. To put it in the negotiating literature – BATNA - Best Alternative to a Negotiated Agreement. If the negotiated agreement is not better than BATNA then there is no point in accepting the negotiated solution.


5. Is comprised of clear, realistic commitments

One of the biggest problems in implementing the negotiated agreements in corporate world is – the ambiguity in the negotiated agreement. Sometimes the negotiated agreements are not realistic or various parties interpret the outcomes based on their understanding of the situation. It is critical to do negotiations as water tight as possible so that there is less scope for ambiguity.


6. Is the result of effective communication?

Many negotiators make the mistake of focusing only on the substance of the negotiation (interests, options, standards, and so on). How you communicate about that substance, however, can make all the difference. The language you use and the way that you build understanding, jointly solve problems, and together determine the process of the negotiation with your counterpart make your negotiation more efficient, yield clear agreements that each party understands, and help you build better relationships.


7. Managing relationship with counterparty

Another critical factor in the success of your negotiation is how you manage your relationship with your counterpart. According to “Olukemi Sawyerr, Stanley Abraham”, the protagonist may want to establish a new connection or repair a damaged one; in any case, you want to build a strong working relationship built on mutual respect, well-established trust, and a side-by-side problem- solving approach.




Different types of negotiators – what is your style of negotiation

According to Harvard Business Review , there are three types of negotiators – Hard Bargainers, Soft Bargainers, and Principled Bargainers.

Hard Bargainers – These people see negotiations as an activity that they need to win. They are less focused less on the real objectives of the negotiations but more on winning. In the “Auto-Graphics, Inc. and the Library-Automation Industry-the New Technology Frontier ”, do you think a hard bargaining strategy will deliver desired results? Hard bargainers are easy to negotiate with as they often have a very predictable strategy

Soft Bargainers – These people are focused on relationship rather than hard outcomes of the negotiations. It doesn’t mean they are pushovers. These negotiators often scribe to long term relationship rather than immediate bargain.

Principled Bargainers – As explained in the seven elemental tools of negotiations above, these negotiators are more concern about the standards and norms of fairness. They often have inclusive approach to negotiations and like to work on numerous solutions that can improve the BATNA of both parties.

Open lines of communication between parties in the case study “Auto-Graphics, Inc. and the Library-Automation Industry-the New Technology Frontier” can make for an effective negotiation strategy and will make it easier to negotiate with this party the next time as well.





NPV Analysis of Auto-Graphics, Inc. and the Library-Automation Industry-the New Technology Frontier



References & Further Readings

Olukemi Sawyerr, Stanley Abraham (2018), "Auto-Graphics, Inc. and the Library-Automation Industry-the New Technology Frontier Harvard Business Review Case Study. Published by HBR Publications.


Tibet Tourism SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Services , Personal Services


KFC SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Capital Goods , Constr. - Supplies & Fixtures


AFH Financial SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Financial , Investment Services


PLDT ADR SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Services , Communications Services


Berkeley Energy SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Basic Materials , Metal Mining


BioNovelus SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Services , Retail (Specialty)


Crucialtec SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Electronic Instr. & Controls


Cequence Energy SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Energy , Oil & Gas - Integrated


Xref SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Services , Business Services


China Success Finance SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Financial , Misc. Financial Services


IRB InvIT Fund SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Capital Goods , Construction Services