×




The Beer Cases (C): Tsingtao Brewery Negotiation Strategy / MBA Resources

Introduction to Negotiation Strategy

Negotiation Strategy solution for The Beer Cases (C): Tsingtao Brewery case study


At Oak Spring University, we provide corporate level professional Negotiation Strategy and other business case study solution. The Beer Cases (C): Tsingtao Brewery case study is a Harvard Business School (HBR) case study written by Donna Jimenez, Andrew Delios. The The Beer Cases (C): Tsingtao Brewery (referred as “Beer Industry” from here on) case study provides evaluation & decision scenario in field of Strategy & Execution. It also touches upon business topics such as - negotiation strategy, negotiation framework, Joint ventures, Marketing.

Negotiation strategy solution for case study The Beer Cases (C): Tsingtao Brewery ” provides a comprehensive framework to analyse all issues at hand and reach a unambiguous negotiated agreement. At Oak Spring University, we provide comprehensive negotiation strategies that have proven their worth both in the academic sphere and corporate world.


BATNA in Negotiation Strategy


Three questions every negotiator should ask before entering into a negotiation process-

What’s my BATNA (Best Alternative To a Negotiated Agreement) – my walkaway option if the deal fails?

What are my most important interests, in ranked order?

What is the other side’s BATNA, and what are his interests?



12 Hrs

$59.99
per Page
  • 100% Plagiarism Free
  • On Time Delivery | 27x7
  • PayPal Secure
  • 300 Words / Page
  • Buy Now

24 Hrs

$49.99
per Page
  • 100% Plagiarism Free
  • On Time Delivery | 27x7
  • PayPal Secure
  • 300 Words / Page
  • Buy Now

48 Hrs

$39.99
per Page
  • 100% Plagiarism Free
  • On Time Delivery | 27x7
  • PayPal Secure
  • 300 Words / Page
  • Buy Now




Case Description of The Beer Cases (C): Tsingtao Brewery Case Study


The Beer Cases present a means to explore industry evolution in a rapidly globalizing industry. In 2011, the beer industry had elements of sub-national, national and global competition. Giants, such as AB Inbev, as well as national champions, such as Tiger Breweries and Tsingtao, which were aspiring to become major regional and global players, populated the industry. Further, industry players used alternative models (strategic approaches) to meet their objectives for national, regional and global expansion. By focusing on presentations of the strategies of five major beer companies (AB InBev, Groupo Modelo, Tiger Breweries, Tsingtao and San Miguel), this set of cases helps to illustrate these points. The format used for the cases involves in-class presentations of each case, alongside rigorous questioning from the instructor to not only explore the logic of the analysis and strategy proposed in the presentation for each company, but to also nudge the class toward an understanding of the major trends in the growth of the beer industry and key success factors for companies that operate in the beer industry. The class can be pushed further to connect the implications of one's assumptions about what drives success in beer sales, alongside their understanding of industry growth trends and drivers, to understand models of global competition in this industry, and forecast anticipated outcomes and strategies for the major beer companies considered in this set of presentations. Ultimately, the observations from the beer industry, which is a fairly easy product and industry to understand, can be extrapolated to other industries, to see how closely they fit the development of the beer industry. Further, lessons can also be drawn about how industry pressures influence the four key components of an international expansion strategy: product choice for expansion, market choice for geographic expansion, timing of entry and mode of entry.


Case Authors : Donna Jimenez, Andrew Delios

Topic : Strategy & Execution

Related Areas : Joint ventures, Marketing




Seven Elemental Tools of Negotiation that can be used in The Beer Cases (C): Tsingtao Brewery solution


1. Satisfies everyone’s core interests (yours and theirs)


By interests, we do not mean the preconceived demands or positions that you or the other party may have, but rather the underlying needs, aims, fears, and concerns that shape what you want. Negotiation is more than getting what you want. It is not winning at all cost. Number of times Win-Win is better option that outright winning or getting what you want.





2. Is the best of many options

Options are the solutions you generate that could meet your and your counterpart’s interests . Often people come to negotiations with very fixed ideas and things they want to achieve. This strategy leaves unexplored options which might be even better than the one that one party wanted to achieve. So always try to provide as many options as possible during the negotiation process. The best outcome should be out of many options rather than few options.


3. Meets legitimate, fair standards

When soft bargainers meet hard bargainers there is always the danger of soft bargainers ceding more than what is necessary. To avoid this scenario you should always focus on legitimate standards or expectations. Standards are often external and objective measures to assess the fairness such as rules and regulations, financial values & resources , market prices etc. If the negotiated agreement is going beyond the industry norms or established standards of fairness then it is prudent to get out of the negotiation.


4. Is better than your alternatives or BATNA

Every negotiators going into the negotiations should always work out the “what if” scenario. The negotiating parties in the “The Beer Cases (C): Tsingtao Brewery” has three to four plausible scenarios. The negotiating protagonist needs to have clear idea of – what will happen if the negotiations fail. To put it in the negotiating literature – BATNA - Best Alternative to a Negotiated Agreement. If the negotiated agreement is not better than BATNA then there is no point in accepting the negotiated solution.


5. Is comprised of clear, realistic commitments

One of the biggest problems in implementing the negotiated agreements in corporate world is – the ambiguity in the negotiated agreement. Sometimes the negotiated agreements are not realistic or various parties interpret the outcomes based on their understanding of the situation. It is critical to do negotiations as water tight as possible so that there is less scope for ambiguity.


6. Is the result of effective communication?

Many negotiators make the mistake of focusing only on the substance of the negotiation (interests, options, standards, and so on). How you communicate about that substance, however, can make all the difference. The language you use and the way that you build understanding, jointly solve problems, and together determine the process of the negotiation with your counterpart make your negotiation more efficient, yield clear agreements that each party understands, and help you build better relationships.


7. Managing relationship with counterparty

Another critical factor in the success of your negotiation is how you manage your relationship with your counterpart. According to “Donna Jimenez, Andrew Delios”, the protagonist may want to establish a new connection or repair a damaged one; in any case, you want to build a strong working relationship built on mutual respect, well-established trust, and a side-by-side problem- solving approach.




Different types of negotiators – what is your style of negotiation

According to Harvard Business Review , there are three types of negotiators – Hard Bargainers, Soft Bargainers, and Principled Bargainers.

Hard Bargainers – These people see negotiations as an activity that they need to win. They are less focused less on the real objectives of the negotiations but more on winning. In the “The Beer Cases (C): Tsingtao Brewery ”, do you think a hard bargaining strategy will deliver desired results? Hard bargainers are easy to negotiate with as they often have a very predictable strategy

Soft Bargainers – These people are focused on relationship rather than hard outcomes of the negotiations. It doesn’t mean they are pushovers. These negotiators often scribe to long term relationship rather than immediate bargain.

Principled Bargainers – As explained in the seven elemental tools of negotiations above, these negotiators are more concern about the standards and norms of fairness. They often have inclusive approach to negotiations and like to work on numerous solutions that can improve the BATNA of both parties.

Open lines of communication between parties in the case study “The Beer Cases (C): Tsingtao Brewery” can make for an effective negotiation strategy and will make it easier to negotiate with this party the next time as well.





NPV Analysis of The Beer Cases (C): Tsingtao Brewery



References & Further Readings

Donna Jimenez, Andrew Delios (2018), "The Beer Cases (C): Tsingtao Brewery Harvard Business Review Case Study. Published by HBR Publications.


Eagle Industry SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Basic Materials , Fabricated Plastic & Rubber


Nakamoto Packs Co SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Basic Materials , Containers & Packaging


Consolidated Water SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Services , Waste Management Services


Guangtai Equip A SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer Cyclical , Recreational Products


GasLog Ltd Pref SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Transportation , Water Transportation


Zhongsheng SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Services , Retail (Specialty)


PBA Infrastructure Ltd SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Capital Goods , Construction Services


SL Green SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Services , Real Estate Operations