×




Nissan's Electric Vehicle Strategy in 2011: Leading the Way Toward Zero-Emission Negotiation Strategy / MBA Resources

Introduction to Negotiation Strategy

Negotiation Strategy solution for Nissan's Electric Vehicle Strategy in 2011: Leading the Way Toward Zero-Emission case study


At Oak Spring University, we provide corporate level professional Negotiation Strategy and other business case study solution. Nissan's Electric Vehicle Strategy in 2011: Leading the Way Toward Zero-Emission case study is a Harvard Business School (HBR) case study written by Robert A. Burgelman, Debra Schifrin. The Nissan's Electric Vehicle Strategy in 2011: Leading the Way Toward Zero-Emission (referred as “Nissan's Electric” from here on) case study provides evaluation & decision scenario in field of Strategy & Execution. It also touches upon business topics such as - negotiation strategy , negotiation framework, .

Negotiation strategy solution for case study Nissan's Electric Vehicle Strategy in 2011: Leading the Way Toward Zero-Emission ” provides a comprehensive framework to analyse all issues at hand and reach a unambiguous negotiated agreement. At Oak Spring University, we provide comprehensive negotiation strategies that have proven their worth both in the academic sphere and corporate world.


BATNA in Negotiation Strategy


Three questions every negotiator should ask before entering into a negotiation process-

What’s my BATNA (Best Alternative To a Negotiated Agreement) – my walkaway option if the deal fails?

What are my most important interests, in ranked order?

What is the other side’s BATNA, and what are his interests?



12 Hrs

$59.99
per Page
  • 100% Plagiarism Free
  • On Time Delivery | 27x7
  • PayPal Secure
  • 300 Words / Page
  • Buy Now

24 Hrs

$49.99
per Page
  • 100% Plagiarism Free
  • On Time Delivery | 27x7
  • PayPal Secure
  • 300 Words / Page
  • Buy Now

48 Hrs

$39.99
per Page
  • 100% Plagiarism Free
  • On Time Delivery | 27x7
  • PayPal Secure
  • 300 Words / Page
  • Buy Now




Case Description of Nissan's Electric Vehicle Strategy in 2011: Leading the Way Toward Zero-Emission Case Study


This case details the strategic decisions that went into Nissan's development of the LEAF, the first mass- produced all-electric car. Carlos Ghosn, president and CEO of the Renault-Nissan Alliance, was making a $5 billion bet that electric cars would be the wave of the future. The Alliance was building capacity for 500,000 zero-emission vehicles in Japan, the United States and Europe. The case covers the inception and launch of the LEAF; Nissan's marketing strategy for the car; the building of charging stations; and Nissan's electric car strategy in the context of the Renault-Nissan Alliance. It also discusses the challenges caused by the high cost of electric vehicle batteries, as well as the advantages of Nissan's joint venture with Japanese battery maker NEC. To handle battery reuse and recycling, Nissan created a separate company called 4R Energy Corporation. The case also provides an overview of the electric car industry and the different economic, psychological and political forces that could either advance or impede the success of the electric car. It discusses Nissan's competitors, including: General Motors, which came out with its plug-in hybrid vehicle the Volt at the same time the LEAF was launched; Tesla; China-based BYD; and the upcoming electric cars promised by Ford, Volkswagen and Toyota.


Case Authors : Robert A. Burgelman, Debra Schifrin

Topic : Strategy & Execution

Related Areas :




Seven Elemental Tools of Negotiation that can be used in Nissan's Electric Vehicle Strategy in 2011: Leading the Way Toward Zero-Emission solution


1. Satisfies everyone’s core interests (yours and theirs)


By interests, we do not mean the preconceived demands or positions that you or the other party may have, but rather the underlying needs, aims, fears, and concerns that shape what you want. Negotiation is more than getting what you want. It is not winning at all cost. Number of times Win-Win is better option that outright winning or getting what you want.





2. Is the best of many options

Options are the solutions you generate that could meet your and your counterpart’s interests . Often people come to negotiations with very fixed ideas and things they want to achieve. This strategy leaves unexplored options which might be even better than the one that one party wanted to achieve. So always try to provide as many options as possible during the negotiation process . The best outcome should be out of many options rather than few options.


3. Meets legitimate, fair standards

When soft bargainers meet hard bargainers there is always the danger of soft bargainers ceding more than what is necessary. To avoid this scenario you should always focus on legitimate standards or expectations, clearly understanding the arbitrage . Standards are often external and objective measures to assess the fairness such as rules and regulations, financial values & resources , market prices etc. If the negotiated agreement is going beyond the industry norms or established standards of fairness then it is prudent to get out of the negotiation.


4. Is better than your alternatives or BATNA

Every negotiators going into the negotiations should always work out the “what if” scenario. The negotiating parties in the “Nissan's Electric Vehicle Strategy in 2011: Leading the Way Toward Zero-Emission” has three to four plausible scenarios. The negotiating protagonist needs to have clear idea of – what will happen if the negotiations fail. To put it in the negotiating literature – BATNA - Best Alternative to a Negotiated Agreement. If the negotiated agreement is not better than BATNA (Negotiations options), then there is no point in accepting the negotiated solution.


5. Is comprised of clear, realistic commitments

One of the biggest problems in implementing the negotiated agreements in corporate world is – the ambiguity in the negotiated agreement. Sometimes the negotiated agreements are not realistic or various parties interpret the outcomes based on their understanding of the situation. It is critical to do negotiations as water tight as possible so that there is less scope for ambiguity.


6. Is the result of effective communication?

Many negotiators make the mistake of focusing only on the substance of the negotiation (interests, options, standards, and so on). How you communicate about that substance, however, can make all the difference. The language you use and the way that you build understanding, jointly solve problems, and together determine the process of the negotiation with your counterpart make your negotiation more efficient, yield clear agreements that each party understands, and help you build better relationships.


7. Managing relationship with counterparty

Another critical factor in the success of your negotiation is how you manage your relationship with your counterpart and other people doing the mediation. According to “Robert A. Burgelman, Debra Schifrin”, the protagonist may want to establish a new connection or repair a damaged one; in any case, you want to build a strong working relationship built on mutual respect, well-established trust, and a side-by-side problem- solving approach.




Different types of negotiators – what is your style of negotiation

According to Harvard Business Review , there are three types of negotiators – Hard Bargainers, Soft Bargainers, and Principled Bargainers.

Hard Bargainers – These people see negotiations as an activity that they need to win. They are less focused less on the real objectives of the negotiations but more on winning. In the “Nissan's Electric Vehicle Strategy in 2011: Leading the Way Toward Zero-Emission ”, do you think a hard bargaining strategy will deliver desired results? Hard bargainers are easy to negotiate with as they often have a very predictable strategy

Soft Bargainers – These people are focused on relationship rather than hard outcomes of the negotiations. It doesn’t mean they are pushovers. These negotiators often scribe to long term relationship rather than immediate bargain.

Principled Bargainers – As explained in the seven elemental tools of negotiations above, these negotiators are more concern about the standards and norms of fairness. They often have inclusive approach to negotiations and like to work on numerous solutions that can improve the BATNA of both parties.

Open lines of communication between parties in the case study “Nissan's Electric Vehicle Strategy in 2011: Leading the Way Toward Zero-Emission” can make for an effective negotiation strategy and will make it easier to negotiate with this party the next time as well.





NPV Analysis of Nissan's Electric Vehicle Strategy in 2011: Leading the Way Toward Zero-Emission



References & Further Readings

Robert A. Burgelman, Debra Schifrin (2018), "Nissan's Electric Vehicle Strategy in 2011: Leading the Way Toward Zero-Emission Harvard Business Review Case Study. Published by HBR Publications.


Gulf Marine SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Transportation , Water Transportation


Aeon Credit Service SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Financial , Consumer Financial Services


Stellar Megaunion A SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer Cyclical , Recreational Products


Caesars SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Services , Casinos & Gaming


Mstns SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Capital Goods , Misc. Capital Goods


Guanfu Co Ltd A SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Basic Materials , Misc. Fabricated Products


Exor SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer Cyclical , Auto & Truck Manufacturers