×




VidaGas: VillageReach - The Mozambican Foundation for Community Development Joint Venture Negotiation Strategy / MBA Resources

Introduction to Negotiation Strategy

Negotiation Strategy solution for VidaGas: VillageReach - The Mozambican Foundation for Community Development Joint Venture case study


At Oak Spring University, we provide corporate level professional Negotiation Strategy and other business case study solution. VidaGas: VillageReach - The Mozambican Foundation for Community Development Joint Venture case study is a Harvard Business School (HBR) case study written by Noel Watson, Santiago Kraiselburd. The VidaGas: VillageReach - The Mozambican Foundation for Community Development Joint Venture (referred as “Villagereach Lpg” from here on) case study provides evaluation & decision scenario in field of Technology & Operations. It also touches upon business topics such as - negotiation strategy, negotiation framework, Entrepreneurship, Financial management, Operations management.

Negotiation strategy solution for case study VidaGas: VillageReach - The Mozambican Foundation for Community Development Joint Venture ” provides a comprehensive framework to analyse all issues at hand and reach a unambiguous negotiated agreement. At Oak Spring University, we provide comprehensive negotiation strategies that have proven their worth both in the academic sphere and corporate world.


BATNA in Negotiation Strategy


Three questions every negotiator should ask before entering into a negotiation process-

What’s my BATNA (Best Alternative To a Negotiated Agreement) – my walkaway option if the deal fails?

What are my most important interests, in ranked order?

What is the other side’s BATNA, and what are his interests?



12 Hrs

$59.99
per Page
  • 100% Plagiarism Free
  • On Time Delivery | 27x7
  • PayPal Secure
  • 300 Words / Page
  • Buy Now

24 Hrs

$49.99
per Page
  • 100% Plagiarism Free
  • On Time Delivery | 27x7
  • PayPal Secure
  • 300 Words / Page
  • Buy Now

48 Hrs

$39.99
per Page
  • 100% Plagiarism Free
  • On Time Delivery | 27x7
  • PayPal Secure
  • 300 Words / Page
  • Buy Now




Case Description of VidaGas: VillageReach - The Mozambican Foundation for Community Development Joint Venture Case Study


Subjects Covered: Healthcare, Supply Chain, Developing Countries, Venture CapitalThis case describes the evolution of a liquid petroleum gas (LPG) distributor start-up, incubated by two not-for-profit NGOs to help improve the vaccine cold chain in Northern Mozambique. These NGOs must face the decision whether and how to sell their participation in the start-up. VillageReach and the Mozambican Foundation for Community Development (FDC), both NGOs, got involved in the national immunization program, the Expanded Program on Immunization (EPI), in northern Mozambique. This program's goal was to ensure prompt and universal access to vaccines and other medical supplies. Early on, VillageReach had realized that the program's goals could not be satisfied unless cold storage (and transportation) of the vaccines was guaranteed. Because electricity was scarce and unreliable in the region, VillageReach searched for alternative solutions for supporting cold storage. VillageReach finally decided to use LPG powered refrigerators, and, due to the lack of reliable sources of LPG in the region, FDC and VillageReach went on to fund VidaGas, an LPG distribution company. It soon became evident that an efficient distribution network of LPG could provide benefits to society above and beyond health: at the time, most businesses and households in the region cooked using biomass fuels. Such fuels are a significant health hazard, and also contribute to deforestation in the region. Although VidaGas could be considered a success, it had yet to reach breakeven in its current operations. In addition, new investments would be required to expand operations to neighboring provinces beyond the province used for the pilot, Cabo Delgado. As the Ministry of Health (MoH), FDC and VillageReach are planning to expand the improvements in the national immunization program to these provinces, the presence of a reliable source of LPG would be essential to their goals. At the same time, VillageReach and FDC's resources for further investment are limited.


Case Authors : Noel Watson, Santiago Kraiselburd

Topic : Technology & Operations

Related Areas : Entrepreneurship, Financial management, Operations management




Seven Elemental Tools of Negotiation that can be used in VidaGas: VillageReach - The Mozambican Foundation for Community Development Joint Venture solution


1. Satisfies everyone’s core interests (yours and theirs)


By interests, we do not mean the preconceived demands or positions that you or the other party may have, but rather the underlying needs, aims, fears, and concerns that shape what you want. Negotiation is more than getting what you want. It is not winning at all cost. Number of times Win-Win is better option that outright winning or getting what you want.





2. Is the best of many options

Options are the solutions you generate that could meet your and your counterpart’s interests . Often people come to negotiations with very fixed ideas and things they want to achieve. This strategy leaves unexplored options which might be even better than the one that one party wanted to achieve. So always try to provide as many options as possible during the negotiation process. The best outcome should be out of many options rather than few options.


3. Meets legitimate, fair standards

When soft bargainers meet hard bargainers there is always the danger of soft bargainers ceding more than what is necessary. To avoid this scenario you should always focus on legitimate standards or expectations. Standards are often external and objective measures to assess the fairness such as rules and regulations, financial values & resources , market prices etc. If the negotiated agreement is going beyond the industry norms or established standards of fairness then it is prudent to get out of the negotiation.


4. Is better than your alternatives or BATNA

Every negotiators going into the negotiations should always work out the “what if” scenario. The negotiating parties in the “VidaGas: VillageReach - The Mozambican Foundation for Community Development Joint Venture” has three to four plausible scenarios. The negotiating protagonist needs to have clear idea of – what will happen if the negotiations fail. To put it in the negotiating literature – BATNA - Best Alternative to a Negotiated Agreement. If the negotiated agreement is not better than BATNA then there is no point in accepting the negotiated solution.


5. Is comprised of clear, realistic commitments

One of the biggest problems in implementing the negotiated agreements in corporate world is – the ambiguity in the negotiated agreement. Sometimes the negotiated agreements are not realistic or various parties interpret the outcomes based on their understanding of the situation. It is critical to do negotiations as water tight as possible so that there is less scope for ambiguity.


6. Is the result of effective communication?

Many negotiators make the mistake of focusing only on the substance of the negotiation (interests, options, standards, and so on). How you communicate about that substance, however, can make all the difference. The language you use and the way that you build understanding, jointly solve problems, and together determine the process of the negotiation with your counterpart make your negotiation more efficient, yield clear agreements that each party understands, and help you build better relationships.


7. Managing relationship with counterparty

Another critical factor in the success of your negotiation is how you manage your relationship with your counterpart. According to “Noel Watson, Santiago Kraiselburd”, the protagonist may want to establish a new connection or repair a damaged one; in any case, you want to build a strong working relationship built on mutual respect, well-established trust, and a side-by-side problem- solving approach.




Different types of negotiators – what is your style of negotiation

According to Harvard Business Review , there are three types of negotiators – Hard Bargainers, Soft Bargainers, and Principled Bargainers.

Hard Bargainers – These people see negotiations as an activity that they need to win. They are less focused less on the real objectives of the negotiations but more on winning. In the “VidaGas: VillageReach - The Mozambican Foundation for Community Development Joint Venture ”, do you think a hard bargaining strategy will deliver desired results? Hard bargainers are easy to negotiate with as they often have a very predictable strategy

Soft Bargainers – These people are focused on relationship rather than hard outcomes of the negotiations. It doesn’t mean they are pushovers. These negotiators often scribe to long term relationship rather than immediate bargain.

Principled Bargainers – As explained in the seven elemental tools of negotiations above, these negotiators are more concern about the standards and norms of fairness. They often have inclusive approach to negotiations and like to work on numerous solutions that can improve the BATNA of both parties.

Open lines of communication between parties in the case study “VidaGas: VillageReach - The Mozambican Foundation for Community Development Joint Venture” can make for an effective negotiation strategy and will make it easier to negotiate with this party the next time as well.





NPV Analysis of VidaGas: VillageReach - The Mozambican Foundation for Community Development Joint Venture



References & Further Readings

Noel Watson, Santiago Kraiselburd (2018), "VidaGas: VillageReach - The Mozambican Foundation for Community Development Joint Venture Harvard Business Review Case Study. Published by HBR Publications.


Bioneer SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Healthcare , Biotechnology & Drugs


Huons SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Healthcare , Biotechnology & Drugs


Olam SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer/Non-Cyclical , Food Processing


Kip McGrath Education SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Financial , Misc. Financial Services


Anhui Zhongyuan New Materials SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Basic Materials , Misc. Fabricated Products


Manulife SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Financial , Insurance (Life)


Nova SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Semiconductors


Shenzhen Tellus SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Services , Retail (Specialty)


Frasers Property SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Services , Real Estate Operations