Introduction to Negotiation Strategy
At Oak Spring University, we provide corporate level professional Negotiation Strategy and other business case study solution. Catalyst Medical Solutions case study is a Harvard Business School (HBR) case study written by Amy C. Edmondson, Richard Bohmer, Naomi Atkins. The Catalyst Medical Solutions (referred as “Team Internet” from here on) case study provides evaluation & decision scenario in field of Technology & Operations. It also touches upon business topics such as - negotiation strategy , negotiation framework, Disruptive innovation, Entrepreneurship, Internet, IT, Strategy execution.
Negotiation strategy solution for case study Catalyst Medical Solutions ” provides a comprehensive framework to analyse all issues at hand and reach a unambiguous negotiated agreement. At Oak Spring University, we provide comprehensive negotiation strategies that have proven their worth both in the academic sphere and corporate world.
What’s my BATNA (Best Alternative To a Negotiated Agreement) – my walkaway option if the deal fails?
What are my most important interests, in ranked order?
What is the other side’s BATNA, and what are his interests?
Faced with a drop in the NASDAQ, four eHealth entrepreneurs must decide between two distribution strategies for their new company's technology. The team, comprised of three full-time resident physicians and an MBA, has developed software to enable electronic documentation and billing of medical and surgical procedures. The initial strategy was to distribute the technology through individual hospital intranets. Under pressure from venture capitalists and a "dot-com" frenzy in the market, the team starts to develop an "Internet portal" strategy, distributing the software over the Internet and adding traditional e-commerce services. When the stock market crashes in April 2000, the team must decide whether to push on with the Internet strategy or return to the intranet model. Throughout the case, a variety of new product development and team learning issues are explored: What is the optimal team composition? How quickly can the team overcome technical challenges? Who should their lead users be? How well do they understand the market? How quickly can they learn to work together, raise money, and build partnerships?
By interests, we do not mean the preconceived demands or positions that you or the other party may have, but rather the underlying needs, aims, fears, and concerns that shape what you want. Negotiation is more than getting what you want. It is not winning at all cost. Number of times Win-Win is better option that outright winning or getting what you want.
Options are the solutions you generate that could meet your and your counterpart’s interests . Often people come to negotiations with very fixed ideas and things they want to achieve. This strategy leaves unexplored options which might be even better than the one that one party wanted to achieve. So always try to provide as many options as possible during the negotiation process . The best outcome should be out of many options rather than few options.
When soft bargainers meet hard bargainers there is always the danger of soft bargainers ceding more than what is necessary. To avoid this scenario you should always focus on legitimate standards or expectations, clearly understanding the arbitrage . Standards are often external and objective measures to assess the fairness such as rules and regulations, financial values & resources , market prices etc. If the negotiated agreement is going beyond the industry norms or established standards of fairness then it is prudent to get out of the negotiation.
Every negotiators going into the negotiations should always work out the “what if” scenario. The negotiating parties in the “Catalyst Medical Solutions” has three to four plausible scenarios. The negotiating protagonist needs to have clear idea of – what will happen if the negotiations fail. To put it in the negotiating literature – BATNA - Best Alternative to a Negotiated Agreement. If the negotiated agreement is not better than BATNA (Negotiations options), then there is no point in accepting the negotiated solution.
One of the biggest problems in implementing the negotiated agreements in corporate world is – the ambiguity in the negotiated agreement. Sometimes the negotiated agreements are not realistic or various parties interpret the outcomes based on their understanding of the situation. It is critical to do negotiations as water tight as possible so that there is less scope for ambiguity.
Many negotiators make the mistake of focusing only on the substance of the negotiation (interests, options, standards, and so on). How you communicate about that substance, however, can make all the difference. The language you use and the way that you build understanding, jointly solve problems, and together determine the process of the negotiation with your counterpart make your negotiation more efficient, yield clear agreements that each party understands, and help you build better relationships.
Another critical factor in the success of your negotiation is how you manage your relationship with your counterpart and other people doing the mediation. According to “Amy C. Edmondson, Richard Bohmer, Naomi Atkins”, the protagonist may want to establish a new connection or repair a damaged one; in any case, you want to build a strong working relationship built on mutual respect, well-established trust, and a side-by-side problem- solving approach.
According to
Harvard Business Review
, there are three types of negotiators – Hard Bargainers, Soft Bargainers, and Principled Bargainers.
Hard Bargainers – These people see negotiations as an activity that they need to win. They are less focused less on the real objectives of the negotiations but more on winning. In the “Catalyst Medical Solutions ”, do you think a hard bargaining strategy will deliver desired results? Hard bargainers are easy to negotiate with as they often have a very
predictable strategy
Soft Bargainers – These people are focused on relationship rather than hard outcomes of the negotiations. It doesn’t mean they are pushovers. These negotiators often scribe to long term relationship rather than immediate bargain.
Principled Bargainers – As explained in the seven elemental tools of negotiations above, these negotiators are more concern about the standards and norms of fairness. They often have inclusive approach to negotiations and like to work on numerous solutions that can improve the BATNA of both parties.
Open lines of communication between parties in the case study “Catalyst Medical Solutions” can make for an effective negotiation strategy and will make it easier to negotiate with this party the next time as well.
Amy C. Edmondson, Richard Bohmer, Naomi Atkins (2018), "Catalyst Medical Solutions Harvard Business Review Case Study. Published by HBR Publications.
Feel free to connect with us if you need business research.
You can download Excel Template of Case Study Solution & Analysis of Catalyst Medical Solutions
Technology , Software & Programming
Financial , Regional Banks
Financial , Misc. Financial Services
Services , Restaurants
Consumer/Non-Cyclical , Food Processing
Consumer Cyclical , Audio & Video Equipment
Healthcare , Biotechnology & Drugs
Capital Goods , Misc. Capital Goods
Financial , Misc. Financial Services
Healthcare , Healthcare Facilities
Basic Materials , Misc. Fabricated Products
Consumer Cyclical , Tires