×




Madison Avenue: Digital Media Services (A) Negotiation Strategy / MBA Resources

Introduction to Negotiation Strategy

Negotiation Strategy solution for Madison Avenue: Digital Media Services (A) case study


At Oak Spring University, we provide corporate level professional Negotiation Strategy and other business case study solution. Madison Avenue: Digital Media Services (A) case study is a Harvard Business School (HBR) case study written by Steven J. Spear, Jeremy B. Dann. The Madison Avenue: Digital Media Services (A) (referred as “Madison Avenue” from here on) case study provides evaluation & decision scenario in field of Technology & Operations. It also touches upon business topics such as - negotiation strategy , negotiation framework, Growth strategy, Internet, Marketing, Organizational structure, Supply chain.

Negotiation strategy solution for case study Madison Avenue: Digital Media Services (A) ” provides a comprehensive framework to analyse all issues at hand and reach a unambiguous negotiated agreement. At Oak Spring University, we provide comprehensive negotiation strategies that have proven their worth both in the academic sphere and corporate world.


BATNA in Negotiation Strategy


Three questions every negotiator should ask before entering into a negotiation process-

What’s my BATNA (Best Alternative To a Negotiated Agreement) – my walkaway option if the deal fails?

What are my most important interests, in ranked order?

What is the other side’s BATNA, and what are his interests?



12 Hrs

$59.99
per Page
  • 100% Plagiarism Free
  • On Time Delivery | 27x7
  • PayPal Secure
  • 300 Words / Page
  • Buy Now

24 Hrs

$49.99
per Page
  • 100% Plagiarism Free
  • On Time Delivery | 27x7
  • PayPal Secure
  • 300 Words / Page
  • Buy Now

48 Hrs

$39.99
per Page
  • 100% Plagiarism Free
  • On Time Delivery | 27x7
  • PayPal Secure
  • 300 Words / Page
  • Buy Now




Case Description of Madison Avenue: Digital Media Services (A) Case Study


Introduces a "new-economy" company, Madison Avenue, facing challenges of mega-success. In the two years since its founding, the company's revenues have grown from zero to nearly $30 million, head count has swollen from the start-up handful to more than 200, and the client base has gone from one to dozens. In the company's short life, Madison Avenue's managers have already tried four organizational forms to more efficiently and reliably meet the needs of its customers. Despite the intense, ongoing efforts to find an appropriate organizational form, employees struggle to keep pace with ever-increasing demands. Ted Samson, an implementation engineer at Madison Avenue and a reservist in the Marine Corps, expresses a collective frustration in an e-mail to his boss. The case contains a history of Madison Avenue, starting with its serendipitous creation as an outgrowth of a family business's efforts to advertise on the Web and the collateral development of an expertise in Web advertising and the evolution of the company's business model. Gives a detailed explanation of the internal processes by which Madison Avenue creates, implements, and optimizes online advertising campaigns for its clients. The case asks students to analyze how Madison Avenue currently does its work and then to design a "target condition"--based upon analysis of the company's "current condition"--of how Madison Avenue's internal processes might be redesigned in order to produce higher quality ad campaigns, at less cost, with shorter lead-times, and with greater flexibility in responding to customer needs.


Case Authors : Steven J. Spear, Jeremy B. Dann

Topic : Technology & Operations

Related Areas : Growth strategy, Internet, Marketing, Organizational structure, Supply chain




Seven Elemental Tools of Negotiation that can be used in Madison Avenue: Digital Media Services (A) solution


1. Satisfies everyone’s core interests (yours and theirs)


By interests, we do not mean the preconceived demands or positions that you or the other party may have, but rather the underlying needs, aims, fears, and concerns that shape what you want. Negotiation is more than getting what you want. It is not winning at all cost. Number of times Win-Win is better option that outright winning or getting what you want.





2. Is the best of many options

Options are the solutions you generate that could meet your and your counterpart’s interests . Often people come to negotiations with very fixed ideas and things they want to achieve. This strategy leaves unexplored options which might be even better than the one that one party wanted to achieve. So always try to provide as many options as possible during the negotiation process . The best outcome should be out of many options rather than few options.


3. Meets legitimate, fair standards

When soft bargainers meet hard bargainers there is always the danger of soft bargainers ceding more than what is necessary. To avoid this scenario you should always focus on legitimate standards or expectations, clearly understanding the arbitrage . Standards are often external and objective measures to assess the fairness such as rules and regulations, financial values & resources , market prices etc. If the negotiated agreement is going beyond the industry norms or established standards of fairness then it is prudent to get out of the negotiation.


4. Is better than your alternatives or BATNA

Every negotiators going into the negotiations should always work out the “what if” scenario. The negotiating parties in the “Madison Avenue: Digital Media Services (A)” has three to four plausible scenarios. The negotiating protagonist needs to have clear idea of – what will happen if the negotiations fail. To put it in the negotiating literature – BATNA - Best Alternative to a Negotiated Agreement. If the negotiated agreement is not better than BATNA (Negotiations options), then there is no point in accepting the negotiated solution.


5. Is comprised of clear, realistic commitments

One of the biggest problems in implementing the negotiated agreements in corporate world is – the ambiguity in the negotiated agreement. Sometimes the negotiated agreements are not realistic or various parties interpret the outcomes based on their understanding of the situation. It is critical to do negotiations as water tight as possible so that there is less scope for ambiguity.


6. Is the result of effective communication?

Many negotiators make the mistake of focusing only on the substance of the negotiation (interests, options, standards, and so on). How you communicate about that substance, however, can make all the difference. The language you use and the way that you build understanding, jointly solve problems, and together determine the process of the negotiation with your counterpart make your negotiation more efficient, yield clear agreements that each party understands, and help you build better relationships.


7. Managing relationship with counterparty

Another critical factor in the success of your negotiation is how you manage your relationship with your counterpart and other people doing the mediation. According to “Steven J. Spear, Jeremy B. Dann”, the protagonist may want to establish a new connection or repair a damaged one; in any case, you want to build a strong working relationship built on mutual respect, well-established trust, and a side-by-side problem- solving approach.




Different types of negotiators – what is your style of negotiation

According to Harvard Business Review , there are three types of negotiators – Hard Bargainers, Soft Bargainers, and Principled Bargainers.

Hard Bargainers – These people see negotiations as an activity that they need to win. They are less focused less on the real objectives of the negotiations but more on winning. In the “Madison Avenue: Digital Media Services (A) ”, do you think a hard bargaining strategy will deliver desired results? Hard bargainers are easy to negotiate with as they often have a very predictable strategy

Soft Bargainers – These people are focused on relationship rather than hard outcomes of the negotiations. It doesn’t mean they are pushovers. These negotiators often scribe to long term relationship rather than immediate bargain.

Principled Bargainers – As explained in the seven elemental tools of negotiations above, these negotiators are more concern about the standards and norms of fairness. They often have inclusive approach to negotiations and like to work on numerous solutions that can improve the BATNA of both parties.

Open lines of communication between parties in the case study “Madison Avenue: Digital Media Services (A)” can make for an effective negotiation strategy and will make it easier to negotiate with this party the next time as well.





NPV Analysis of Madison Avenue: Digital Media Services (A)



References & Further Readings

Steven J. Spear, Jeremy B. Dann (2018), "Madison Avenue: Digital Media Services (A) Harvard Business Review Case Study. Published by HBR Publications.


Psychemedics SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Healthcare , Healthcare Facilities


HK Land Holdings SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Services , Real Estate Operations


E-Litecom SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Electronic Instr. & Controls


Vealls C SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Services , Recreational Activities


Shanti Overseas SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer/Non-Cyclical , Food Processing


Perusahaan Gas Negara SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Utilities , Natural Gas Utilities


TSI Holdings Co Ltd SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer Cyclical , Apparel/Accessories


MTN Group SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Services , Communications Services


Aberdeen New India SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Financial , Misc. Financial Services


Ariana SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Basic Materials , Gold & Silver


CMC Markets SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Financial , Misc. Financial Services


Quanex Building Products SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Capital Goods , Construction Services