×




Testin: Partnering with Multinational Corporations Negotiation Strategy / MBA Resources

Introduction to Negotiation Strategy

Negotiation Strategy solution for Testin: Partnering with Multinational Corporations case study


At Oak Spring University, we provide corporate level professional Negotiation Strategy and other business case study solution. Testin: Partnering with Multinational Corporations case study is a Harvard Business School (HBR) case study written by Shameen Prashantham, Liman Zhao. The Testin: Partnering with Multinational Corporations (referred as “Testin Prashantham” from here on) case study provides evaluation & decision scenario in field of Innovation & Entrepreneurship. It also touches upon business topics such as - negotiation strategy , negotiation framework, Joint ventures.

Negotiation strategy solution for case study Testin: Partnering with Multinational Corporations ” provides a comprehensive framework to analyse all issues at hand and reach a unambiguous negotiated agreement. At Oak Spring University, we provide comprehensive negotiation strategies that have proven their worth both in the academic sphere and corporate world.


BATNA in Negotiation Strategy


Three questions every negotiator should ask before entering into a negotiation process-

What’s my BATNA (Best Alternative To a Negotiated Agreement) – my walkaway option if the deal fails?

What are my most important interests, in ranked order?

What is the other side’s BATNA, and what are his interests?



12 Hrs

$59.99
per Page
  • 100% Plagiarism Free
  • On Time Delivery | 27x7
  • PayPal Secure
  • 300 Words / Page
  • Buy Now

24 Hrs

$49.99
per Page
  • 100% Plagiarism Free
  • On Time Delivery | 27x7
  • PayPal Secure
  • 300 Words / Page
  • Buy Now

48 Hrs

$39.99
per Page
  • 100% Plagiarism Free
  • On Time Delivery | 27x7
  • PayPal Secure
  • 300 Words / Page
  • Buy Now




Case Description of Testin: Partnering with Multinational Corporations Case Study


By 2017, Beijing Testin Information Technology Co., Ltd. (Testin), had forged partnerships with multiple large multinational companies (e.g., Microsoft, IBM, ARM, Intel). Since it was founded in 2011, Testin had served over 800,000 application developers by conducting more than 150 million quality and security tests on over 2.5 million mobile applications. It had received several rounds of financing totaling over $80 million. Many Chinese Internet companies had tried to acquire Testin, and a well-known MNC asked Testin to sign an exclusive service contract. Wang and his partners resisted such offers and were determined that Testin should maintain its neutrality. But as a five-year old enterprise, Testin's big concern was how it could "stay hungry and stay foolish." The authors Shameen Prashantham and Liman Zhao are affiliated with China Europe International Business School.


Case Authors : Shameen Prashantham, Liman Zhao

Topic : Innovation & Entrepreneurship

Related Areas : Joint ventures




Seven Elemental Tools of Negotiation that can be used in Testin: Partnering with Multinational Corporations solution


1. Satisfies everyone’s core interests (yours and theirs)


By interests, we do not mean the preconceived demands or positions that you or the other party may have, but rather the underlying needs, aims, fears, and concerns that shape what you want. Negotiation is more than getting what you want. It is not winning at all cost. Number of times Win-Win is better option that outright winning or getting what you want.





2. Is the best of many options

Options are the solutions you generate that could meet your and your counterpart’s interests . Often people come to negotiations with very fixed ideas and things they want to achieve. This strategy leaves unexplored options which might be even better than the one that one party wanted to achieve. So always try to provide as many options as possible during the negotiation process . The best outcome should be out of many options rather than few options.


3. Meets legitimate, fair standards

When soft bargainers meet hard bargainers there is always the danger of soft bargainers ceding more than what is necessary. To avoid this scenario you should always focus on legitimate standards or expectations, clearly understanding the arbitrage . Standards are often external and objective measures to assess the fairness such as rules and regulations, financial values & resources , market prices etc. If the negotiated agreement is going beyond the industry norms or established standards of fairness then it is prudent to get out of the negotiation.


4. Is better than your alternatives or BATNA

Every negotiators going into the negotiations should always work out the “what if” scenario. The negotiating parties in the “Testin: Partnering with Multinational Corporations” has three to four plausible scenarios. The negotiating protagonist needs to have clear idea of – what will happen if the negotiations fail. To put it in the negotiating literature – BATNA - Best Alternative to a Negotiated Agreement. If the negotiated agreement is not better than BATNA (Negotiations options), then there is no point in accepting the negotiated solution.


5. Is comprised of clear, realistic commitments

One of the biggest problems in implementing the negotiated agreements in corporate world is – the ambiguity in the negotiated agreement. Sometimes the negotiated agreements are not realistic or various parties interpret the outcomes based on their understanding of the situation. It is critical to do negotiations as water tight as possible so that there is less scope for ambiguity.


6. Is the result of effective communication?

Many negotiators make the mistake of focusing only on the substance of the negotiation (interests, options, standards, and so on). How you communicate about that substance, however, can make all the difference. The language you use and the way that you build understanding, jointly solve problems, and together determine the process of the negotiation with your counterpart make your negotiation more efficient, yield clear agreements that each party understands, and help you build better relationships.


7. Managing relationship with counterparty

Another critical factor in the success of your negotiation is how you manage your relationship with your counterpart and other people doing the mediation. According to “Shameen Prashantham, Liman Zhao”, the protagonist may want to establish a new connection or repair a damaged one; in any case, you want to build a strong working relationship built on mutual respect, well-established trust, and a side-by-side problem- solving approach.




Different types of negotiators – what is your style of negotiation

According to Harvard Business Review , there are three types of negotiators – Hard Bargainers, Soft Bargainers, and Principled Bargainers.

Hard Bargainers – These people see negotiations as an activity that they need to win. They are less focused less on the real objectives of the negotiations but more on winning. In the “Testin: Partnering with Multinational Corporations ”, do you think a hard bargaining strategy will deliver desired results? Hard bargainers are easy to negotiate with as they often have a very predictable strategy

Soft Bargainers – These people are focused on relationship rather than hard outcomes of the negotiations. It doesn’t mean they are pushovers. These negotiators often scribe to long term relationship rather than immediate bargain.

Principled Bargainers – As explained in the seven elemental tools of negotiations above, these negotiators are more concern about the standards and norms of fairness. They often have inclusive approach to negotiations and like to work on numerous solutions that can improve the BATNA of both parties.

Open lines of communication between parties in the case study “Testin: Partnering with Multinational Corporations” can make for an effective negotiation strategy and will make it easier to negotiate with this party the next time as well.





NPV Analysis of Testin: Partnering with Multinational Corporations



References & Further Readings

Shameen Prashantham, Liman Zhao (2018), "Testin: Partnering with Multinational Corporations Harvard Business Review Case Study. Published by HBR Publications.


Shanghai La Chapelle Fashion SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer Cyclical , Apparel/Accessories


Shinto Paint Co Ltd SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Basic Materials , Chemical Manufacturing


mPlus Corp SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Capital Goods , Misc. Capital Goods


Crymson SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer Cyclical , Apparel/Accessories


Accor SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Services , Hotels & Motels


ORLEN SA SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Energy , Oil & Gas Operations


Pervasip Corp SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Services , Communications Services


Qianyuan Power A SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Utilities , Electric Utilities


Merlin Properties SA SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Services , Real Estate Operations


Mondi Ltd SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Basic Materials , Containers & Packaging